
He wasn't bluffing: Trump's trade war sparks broad backlash
It's dawning on the world — and some Republicans on Capitol Hill — that sometimes President Donald Trump should be taken literally after all.
Trump levied sweeping tariffs on key trading partners Mexico, Canada and China early Tuesday morning, sparking retaliation from Beijing and Ottawa, sending the stock market into a tailspin, and alarming government officials around the globe as they brace for potentially the worst trade war in a century.
Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau blasted the United States for launching 'a trade war against Canada' while 'they're talking about working positively with Russia, appeasing Vladimir Putin — a lying, murderous dictator.' Target CEO Brian Cornell warned that Americans' grocery prices would go up. John Bozzella, CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, said that car prices would spike as much as 25 percent. The Dow industrials, S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite slumped.
And even local businesses are warning of the effects. Anderson Warlick, the CEO of Parkdale Mills, a yarn manufacturer in North Carolina, told a crowd outside the Capitol that it would be only weeks before he has to start furloughing his workers.
Trump's announcement took place hours before he was scheduled to give his first joint address to Congress in his second term, setting the stage for a dramatic spectacle at the Capitol and cementing the fact that the president has swiftly reordered the world in the six short weeks since he took office.
The threat of Trump's tariffs pushing up prices is even causing some Republicans to sound alarms.
In an interview, Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said there is 'a place for tariffs' when used 'selectively and in a targeted way,' but warned that such levies can have unintended effects.
'I'm hoping they're a means to an end and not an end itself. I think they're hopefully temporary, designed to achieve a specific result,' said Thune, who hails from an agricultural-dependent state that was hard hit by retaliatory tariffs during Trump's trade war with China in 2018. 'I'm, you know, coming from an agricultural state. I see the tariff issue through a different lens. Nothing happens in a vacuum. There's always reactions to actions that are taken.'
GOP lawmakers from states with large agricultural industries said they were 'uneasy' and 'concerned' about the 25 percent tariffs Trump slapped on Canada and Mexico.
Rep. Dan Newhouse (R-Wash.), a member of the House's Agriculture Committee, expressed concern about the impact of Trump's levies on companies that do business with America's immediate neighbors to the north and south. He said he has spoken with the White House legislative team about the tariffs.
'It would be very difficult to make farmers completely whole,' he said. 'You got some work to do there in order to make that better.'
Trump's moves come at a politically perilous moment for Republicans. Even before his levies, a backlash has been brewing over his efforts with billionaire adviser Elon Musk to slash the federal government. On Tuesday, Rep. Richard Hudson (R-N.C.), the head of the House Republicans' campaign arm, told GOP lawmakers in a private meeting to stop holding in-person town halls after protesters disrupted meetings with lawmakers around the country.
A recent CBS/YouGov poll found that 54 percent of Americans disapprove of Trump's handling of inflation, which was widely seen among both Democrats and Republicans as a top reason for his victory in last year's presidential election.
Trump's levies, which went into effect just after midnight, put an end to weeks of will-he-or-won't-he speculation in state and world capitals, where many believed that the president was only bluffing in hopes of reaching a deal with other countries. Even some of Trump's allies were taken aback by the announcement.
A former Trump administration official, granted anonymity to speak candidly about the situation, said they were caught off guard, thinking the president would grant Canada and Mexico an extension. The former official read it as part of a broader geopolitical realignment on the heels of the Friday blow-up with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy.
'It's a lot to digest,' the person said. 'Some things that have been fairly known knowns for a long time are now uncertain.'
The former official added that the tariffs taking effect the day of the joint address 'seems fairly predetermined' and it appears that there's nothing Canada or Mexico could have done to stave them off.
But in interviews on Tuesday, most GOP lawmakers stood by Trump's decision to implement tariffs.
As a party, Republicans have largely sought to treat the tariffs as part of a broader financial strategy, one that will reshape the economy with lower energy prices, lower taxes and an influx of domestic investment. They defended Trump's levies as an effort to bring back jobs to America after they have streamed overseas for decades and painted the president as a savvy businessman restoring fairness to the United States after the nation has long been taken advantage of.
'He is the greatest disruptor I've ever seen. He gets people to think in an altogether different vein than they were thinking before,' said Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.). 'Whatever it takes to get what we need to get so that America's on the level playing field, I'm fine. I just hate like hell to watch us give up market share year after year.'
As for the potential pain that tariffs could cause, Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.) said farmers would be willing to weather the fallout.
'They're getting ripped off too on energy costs, they're getting ripped off on their input costs,' he said. 'It remains to be seen what actually is implemented and what is negotiation. But I think when you look at the entire economic agenda together, it will reduce costs.'
Sen. Rick Scott (R-Fla.) said he knew from being on the campaign trail recently that voters are frustrated with inflation. But he wasn't concerned that the tariffs would cause higher prices and instead pinned the blame on the budget deficit and Federal Reserve, adding that balancing the budget would help lower costs.
'Mexico, in particular, is dumping on Florida produce. They've been dumping on our tomato industry. They've been dumping on our blueberry industry,' he said. 'And I think we've got to start holding countries that aren't doing the right thing accountable.'
Meanwhile, Democrats, who have been unsure of how to move forward after a devastating loss in November, sensed an opening. At a press conference in Washington on Tuesday, they sought to capitalize on Trump's trade moves, arguing that his tariffs would hurt the economy.
'You can't get into a trade war with every single country expecting that you're going to come out of that stronger,' said Rep. Linda Sánchez (D-Calif.), the ranking member of the Ways and Means subcommittee on trade. 'If one country has a trade war with the United States, they're dealing with one country. But to try to go to trade war with multiple countries is only going to raise costs for consumers in this country.'
Nick Taylor-Vaisey and Jordan Wolman contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
29 minutes ago
- CBS News
Intel leaders say new intelligence shows Iran's nuclear sites could take "years" to rebuild
The heads of two key American intelligence agencies issued statements Wednesday on what they said was "new" intelligence on the damage resulting from the recent U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, each noting the Iranian program was likely to have been set back by "years." The statements were released after President Trump decried a leaked, preliminary assessment produced by the Defense Intelligence Agency that said Tehran's nuclear program had only been pushed back by a matter of months. Mr. Trump had ordered airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities late Saturday, adding to a more than weeklong Israeli campaign against targets in Iran. CIA Director John Ratcliffe said in a statement Wednesday that "a body of credible intelligence indicates Iran's Nuclear Program has been severely damaged by the recent, targeted strikes." "This includes new intelligence from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years," Ratcliffe's statement said. It added the agency would continue to collect "additional reliably sourced information" to share with policy makers, and, when possible, to provide updates to the public. A CIA spokesperson declined to elaborate on the intelligence referenced by Ratcliffe's statement, including the confidence level associated with it or whether it included Israeli or other foreign intelligence. Earlier on Wednesday, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard also wrote on X that "new intelligence confirms what President Trump has stated numerous times: Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed." "If the Iranians chose to rebuild, they would have to rebuild all three facilities (Natanz, Fordow, Esfahan) entirely, which would likely take years to do," Gabbard's statement read. An intelligence official later confirmed to CBS News that the information shared by Gabbard was based on new American intelligence, but declined to specify its confidence level. Neither of the statements directly addressed some of the questions raised by lawmakers and nonproliferation experts in the aftermath of the strikes about what kinds of residual nuclear capabilities Iran may have retained. There are also conflicting views about whether Iranian officials had managed to transport enriched uranium away from the sites before they were bombed. The DIA assessment indicated at least some of the enriched uranium had been moved, according to one source familiar with it. But when asked whether enriched material was successfully moved during a press availability following the NATO summit in the Netherlands on Wednesday, President Trump said, "We think we hit them so hard and so fast, they didn't get to move." The president also said the U.S. and Iran were expected to hold talks "next week." The format remains unclear, for now, but special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff is expected to lead the talks, if they happen, two U.S. officials told CBS News. Witkoff has spoken with the Iranian foreign minister, and recently, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Vice President JD Vance have also become more involved in the diplomacy, a U.S. and regional diplomat told CBS News. Both Ratcliffe and Gabbard were slated to participate in a classified Senate briefing on Tuesday on the U.S. strikes in Iran, but the session was cancelled and rescheduled for Thursday. The House is expected to be briefed on Friday. It is unclear whether both leaders will still participate in both briefings. Ratcliffe and Gabbard's statements on Wednesday also included criticism of the leak to media outlets of the DIA assessment, which a spokesperson for that agency later said was issued with low confidence and would be refined as additional intelligence becomes available. The initial DIA report said the entrances to two Iranian nuclear sites — including the Fordo facility — were sealed off in the strikes, but that Iran could reconstitute elements of its program once it dug out and made repairs to water and electrical systems, according to sources familiar with it. The assessment also provided a range of possibilities for how long it could take for Iran to regain access to the underground facilities and resume some operations, ranging from a few months to less than a year, one source familiar with the assessment told CBS News. Administration officials have blasted those findings, which are at odds with Mr. Trump's repeated assertions that Saturday night's airstrikes "obliterated" Iran's nuclear facilities. Speaking from the NATO summit, Mr. Trump said the airstrikes set back Iran's program by "basically decades." "They said it could be limited or it could be very severe. They really didn't know," Mr. Trump said of the U.S. intelligence assessments. Appearing alongside the president, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said Wednesday the damage to the sites was extensive. "If you want to make an assessment of what happened at Fordo, you'd better get a big shovel and go really deep, because Iran's nuclear program is obliterated," he told reporters. Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine said in a press availability on Sunday following the strikes that a full battle damage assessment of the strikes "will take some time." He said at the time that the three targets "sustained extremely severe damage and destruction." Hegseth is set to lead a press briefing Thursday morning, which Mr. Trump said "will prove both interesting and irrefutable." , , and contributed to this report.

Wall Street Journal
32 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Trump Criticizes Fed Chair Jerome Powell at NATO Summit
President Trump lashed out at Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, whose term runs for another 11 months, during a press conference at the NATO summit. Photo: Jonas Roosens/ANP/Zuma Press
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mediator In Trump's CBS Lawsuit Proposes $20 Million Settlement
The mediator in President Donald Trump's lawsuit against CBS and 60 Minutes has proposed a settlement worth $20 million, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal, just days after court documents filed by the network called the action 'meritless' and an attack on the First Amendment. The proposal is said to include a $17 million donation to Trump's presidential foundation or museum and $3 million in legal fees and public service announcements on Paramount Global-owned networks to fight antisemitism, the WSJ said, citing people familiar with the situation. The situation is still fluid. Most recently, the Trump team had had asked CBS for a $25 million settlement and an apology. It's not clear if a mea culpa is part of the latest proposal. More from Deadline CNN Says It Stands "100% Behind" Correspondent Natasha Bertrand After Donald Trump Calls For Her Firing 2025 Premiere Dates For New & Returning Series On Broadcast, Cable & Streaming Donald Trump Lashes Out After CNN And Other Outlets Report On Intel That U.S. Bombings Only Set Back Iran's Nuclear Program By A Few Months Trump sued CBS for $20 billion in a Texas court in October claiming deceitful editing of a 60 Minutes interview with Democratic presidential candidate Harris, later revising the suit to claim the newsmagazine violated state and federal laws typically used to pursue false advertising claims. The suit and settlement talks have unfolded with a proposed sale of Paramount Global to Skydance Media under review by the FCC, which is led by Trump appointee and loyalist Brendan Carr. U.S. Senators, California lawmakers and public interest groups have threatened to sue Paramount under anti-bribery statutes if the company agrees to settle and controlling shareholder Shari Redstone is concerned about potential legal liability. Par recently brought in law firm Gibson Dunn to assess whether it could offer more than $15 million without putting its directors and top executives at risk of future litigation or criminal charges. Late last year. Disney's ABC agreed to contribute $15 million to Donald Trump's presidential foundation and museum as part of a settlement reached in Trump defamation case against the network. Last week, Trump praised Skydance CEO David Ellison, telling reporters 'Ellison's great and 'he'll do a great job with it,' referring to the merger. Ellison's father, billionaire Oracle co-founder and CEO Larry Ellison, was a big supporter of Trump in last year's election. A statement to Deadline from a Trump attorney today, however, said the President 'is committed to holding those who traffic in fake news, hoaxes, and lies to account. CBS and Paramount targeted the President in an attempt to harm his reputation while committing the worst kind of election interference and fraud in the closing days of the most important presidential election in history. President Trump will pursue this vital matter to its just and rightful conclusion.' A Paramount spokesperson declined to comment. Best of Deadline Everything We Know About 'My Life With The Walter Boys' Season 2 So Far Everything We Know About The 'Reminders of Him' Movie So Far Everything We Know About The 'Hunger Games: Sunrise On The Reaping' Movie So Far