logo
US, China extend tariff truce, calming tensions

US, China extend tariff truce, calming tensions

The United States and China have announced to extend the suspension of 24 percentage points of reciprocal tariffs on each other's goods for another 90 days, starting August 12, 2025, in a move seen as an effort to stabilise strained economic ties between the world's two largest economies.
The decision, announced in a joint statement on Tuesday, followed talks in Stockholm on July 28-29 led by Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessant, and US Trade Representative Jamison Greer. It builds on commitments made during earlier rounds in Geneva on May 12 and London on June 9-10, under a negotiation framework designed to manage disputes without escalating into a trade war.
Under the arrangement, both sides will retain a 10% tariff on a range of goods while continuing to suspend an additional 24% ad valorem tariff. The US suspension applies to imports from mainland China as well as Hong Kong and Macao. In Washington, the move modifies measures introduced under Executive Order 14257 of April 2, 2025, which had imposed steep tariffs as part of a broader economic pressure strategy. Beijing will amend its counter-tariff measures, first announced under Tax Commission Announcement No 4 of 2025, and pause certain non-tariff actions in line with the Geneva declaration.
While markets and manufacturers welcomed the extension, analysts stressed it is more of a ceasefire than a breakthrough. "This is not a peace treaty; it's a ceasefire," said an international trade analyst in Washington. "Both governments are buying time to keep talks alive, but the fundamental differences are still there."
The extension comes as both economies confront domestic headwinds. The US is grappling with slowing growth, high borrowing costs, and a politically charged election season in which trade with China is a divisive issue. China is contending with a sluggish post-pandemic recovery and a troubled property sector.
"Neither side can afford a new tariff escalation right now," a Beijing-based economist said, framing the move as a pragmatic step driven by necessity rather than a convergence of political visions. For Washington, the truce could help avoid adding price pressures for consumers and businesses. For Beijing, it may shore up investor confidence and secure export markets.
Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng emphasised during the Stockholm talks that a stable, healthy, and sustainable China-US economic relationship serves not only the two countries' respective development goals but also contributes to global economic growth and stability.
Since their imposition in repeated tit-for-tat fashion, tariffs have increased costs for consumers and businesses, disrupted supply chains, and added long-term uncertainty that has dampened innovation and investment. Although some US politicians argue that tariffs bring in revenue, economists argue that the gains are outweighed by reduced economic output and slower growth.
The tariff truce, first agreed earlier this year, rolled back triple-digit rates to more manageable levels, calming tensions in sectors such as electronics, machinery, and agricultural goods. US importers and Chinese exporters alike have used the pause to stabilise contracts, manage inventories, and adjust pricing strategies.
The Sweden talks hold significance far beyond bilateral trade. Both economies remain deeply intertwined despite strategic rivalry, and their decisions ripple through global supply chains and commodity markets. Countries in Asia and Europe linked to the two economies could see short-term stability as a result of the pause in tariff escalation.
"Reducing tariffs and stabilising trade is not a zero-sum game," said a Beijing-based trade researcher. "It's a foundation for sustainable growth benefiting workers, consumers, and producers on both sides."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Foundation of Sino-Pak ties based on mutual respect, trust'
‘Foundation of Sino-Pak ties based on mutual respect, trust'

Business Recorder

time2 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

‘Foundation of Sino-Pak ties based on mutual respect, trust'

LAHORE: Acting Governor of Punjab, Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan, has said that the foundation of Pakistan-China relations is based on mutual respect, trust, and affection. He stated that Pakistan greatly values China's cooperation in the country's development and progress. 'CPEC is not only the key to Pakistan's development but also the prosperity of the entire region,' he added. He expressed these views during a meeting with the Chinese Consul General, Zhao Shiren, at Governor House. The meeting discussed the promotion of Pakistan-China relations, progress on CPEC projects, and expanding cooperation in new sectors. Both sides also agreed on the exchange of parliamentary delegations. Chinese Consul General Zhao Shiren invited the Acting Governor to attend the National Day celebrations of the People's Republic of China as a special guest. Later, Acting Governor Punjab Malik Muhammad Ahmad Khan inaugurated a milk sabeel (refreshment stall) during the 982nd Urs celebrations of Hazrat Data Ali Hajveri (RA). The milk sabeel will continue for three days to serve visitors free milk. Speaking on the occasion, the Acting Governor said that following the teachings of the Sufi saints is the key to harmony in society. 'The teachings of Hazrat Data Ali Hajveri (RA) are a guiding light for us,' he remarked. The Urs celebrations are being observed with great devotion and respect, and a large number of devotees from across the country are visiting the shrine. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Weaker dollar supports copper
Weaker dollar supports copper

Business Recorder

time3 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Weaker dollar supports copper

LONDON: Copper prices held broadly steady on Wednesday as a weaker dollar helped to extend the support gained from this week's 90-day extension of the tariff truce between the United States and top metals consumer China. Benchmark copper on the London Metal Exchange slipped 0.1% to $9,832 a metric ton in official open-outcry trading. It hit $9,865 on Tuesday and Wednesday, the highest since July 25. 'The 90-day extension for the US-China trade discussions has been welcomed and helped all base metals rise yesterday. Copper is holding onto those gains with the aid of a weaker US dollar,' said Nitesh Shah, commodity strategist at WisdomTree. The dollar hit a two-week low on Wednesday, making dollar-priced commodities more attractive for buyers using other currencies, on bolstered expectations of a Federal Reserve rate cut next month. Sets of data from China due this week may provide clearer direction to base metals as any weakness could bolden the case for economic stimulus, Shah said. China's new yuan loans contracted in July for the first time in 20 years, falling well short of analysts' forecasts. However, outstanding total social financing, used by analysts as a gauge of industrial metals demand, rose 9%, hitting the highest since February 2024. Suspension of production at a major lithium mine by Chinese battery giant CATL earlier this week as it applied to renew its mining licence raised hopes of a broader crackdown on overcapacity in other sectors. 'China has demonstrated its determination to stem 'involution' with the halting of CATL's lithium mine. We are watching to see if China will address copper refining overcapacity through similar measures, which could lend support to prices,' Shah said. LME aluminium rose 0.4% to $2,629.5 a ton in official activity, zinc fell 0.1% to $2,845, lead lost 0.4% to $2,008, tin eased 0.3% to $33,800, while nickel was steady at $15,335.

Oil deal in the shadow of political diplomacy
Oil deal in the shadow of political diplomacy

Business Recorder

time3 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

Oil deal in the shadow of political diplomacy

In April 2025, the US tore up the familiar trade framework. Executive orders introduced a 'reciprocal' tariff regime: a baseline 10 percent levy on imports, scaling higher for countries with large trade surpluses unless they struck deals involving investment or purchase commitments. The message was clear, 'Make a deal, or pay a higher price'. Enter into a bilateral agreement with the US on its terms, or be hit with higher tariffs, was well communicated. The formula was blunt: negotiate concessions, investment pledges, or purchase commitments, and receive a capped rate, which is in many cases 15 percent. Those who resist, face steeper tariffs, such as the 25 percent rate imposed on India and 35 percent on Canada. This approach overturned decades of US commitment to multilateral trade norms and the dispute-resolution mechanisms of the World Trade Organization. It also pushed the limits of presidential authority, inviting legal challenges at home and abroad. Critics call it 'forced protectionism,' while the US frames it as 'making trade more reciprocal' correcting trade deficits and rebalancing uneven trade relationships. What emerged was a wave of bilateral agreements blending tariff relief with massive investment and energy commitments as major partners tried to negotiate. The European Union capped most exports to the US at 15 percent tariffs, excluding autos and steel, in exchange for USD 750 billion in US energy purchases and USD 600 billion in American investments. South Korea pledged USD 350 billion in investments and USD 100 billion in US energy buys, winning a similar tariff cap. Japan, Vietnam, Indonesia, the Philippines, and the UK followed suit, offering massive commitments in return for tariff certainty. The US has applied high tariffs ranging 30 percent–41 percent on some countries as part of a wider strategy to address trade imbalances and leverage trade policy for geopolitical influence. These duties are generally fixed, with adjustments possible only if targeted nations make significant concessions or align more closely with US trade. High impact countries are Laos/Myanmar (40 percent), Iraq (40 percent) and Syria (41 percent). While Canada (35 percent), India (25 percent), Taiwan (20 percent) and Switzerland (39 percent) have become victim of not getting engaged in trade and security measures with US. The critics warn that the measures will cause inflation, raise consumer prices, and disrupt global supply chains. For Pakistan, the new landscape is seen as both opportunity and risk. The Pakistan-US oil deal settled and cut tariffs to 19 percent, while it promised joint development of oil reserves. In exchange, Pakistan agreed to jointly develop its oil reserves with US support, with cooperation likely extending to energy infrastructure, IT, and mining. The deal also enables Pakistan's first US crude shipment in October 2025 via companies (Cnergyico and Vitol), with likely regular deliveries. The phase seems like a short-term relief, but may risk long-term energy security and higher export costs. The US also gave Bangladesh 20 percent, but hit India with 25 percent, gesturing trade diversion and geopolitical strategy. Advocates hail this as a strategic shift securing supply chains, locking in foreign investment, and tying trade to geopolitical objectives, but critics call it a power game, with US having a huge consumer market used as a weapon. Unpredictable, president-driven tariffs risk disrupting markets, powering inflation, and discouraging global trade norms. The danger lies in being drawn into asymmetric agreements that address immediate fiscal or trade needs but limit long-term policy sovereignty. Regardless of whether one sees it as diplomacy, strategy, or a compulsion, the reciprocal tariff approach is undeniably altering the world trade order. It's clear that this is not business as usual and returning to protectionism. The US has moved from multilateralism to transactional deal-making, reshaping the world trade order. Regional blocs like CPTPP and RCEP grow more important, while trade deals increasingly collide with non-trade demands like climate rules and human rights. For Pakistan, survival and success mean diversifying exports and markets, leveraging US energy cooperation for broader partnerships, and most importantly entrenching itself in regional value chains with firm rules and policies. The reciprocal tariff regime of 2025 has not only emerged as political diplomacy, strategy, power game, but it's also a cautionary new trade order. Whether it becomes a sustainable norm or a volatile step will depend on how trading partners, especially developing economies like Pakistan, cross its risks and grasp its openings. Whether this is economic defence or political diplomacy, the world is now paying the price. For Pakistan, survival in today's trade deal will depend on turning US pressure into opportunity through strategically well aligned policy. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store