
Thailand's next central bank chief champions rate cuts to revive growth
Growth in Southeast Asia's second-largest economy has stalled, tense negotiations with the United States over trade tariffs continue, industrial sentiment is tepid and critical sectors, including tourism and manufacturing, aren't firing.
"We must accept that the Thai economy is not doing so well," Vitai, who has been approved by the cabinet as the next central bank chief but awaits royal endorsement, told reporters last week.
"And what is worrying is the sluggishness that may be prolonged."
The 54-year-old, who currently serves as president and chief executive of the Government Savings Bank, Thailand's largest state-owned lender, has a prescription: more rate cuts.
The central bank late last month left the key interest rate unchanged, underlining the need to save some policy ammunition, after cuts in October, February and April. Those reductions brought the one-day repurchase rate (THCBIR=ECI), opens new tab to 1.75%, the lowest in more than two years.
"Proactive easing is important," Vitai told Thai financial daily Krungthep Turakij on June 20, when he was locked in the race for the top job with central bank insider Roong Mallikamas.
"It's not just another one or two cuts. We may have to reduce them for a long time and more deeply. So, from 1.75%, if you ask me personally, I think it can go down much further."
Thailand's ruling Pheu Thai party, which took power in 2023, has been at loggerheads with current Bank of Thailand chief Sethaput Suthiwartnarueput for not cutting rates enough to support a sluggish economy.
In May last year, before she became prime minister, Pheu Thai leader Paetongtarn Shinawatra said the central bank's independence was an "obstacle" in resolving economic problems, underlining the scale of the friction.
Vitai's stance will likely tone down some of that conflict, but it has also raised questions about his own ability to lead the central bank without succumbing to pressure from the ruling party - an issue he has publicly addressed.
"I am confident that I can make decisions independently, based on principles and prioritising the nation's interests, free from the influence of any groups," Vitai wrote on his Facebook page on July 8.
Vitai studied economics and law at Thailand's Chulalongkorn and Thammasat universities, and finance at Drexel University in the United States, and entered the Thai private sector, where he worked at Charoen Pokphand Group and budget carrier Nok Air.
A former colleague, who worked alongside Vitai at a private firm, described him as a team player who preferred to work with consensus.
"He is more of a practicalist than a theorist, focusing on getting the job done," he said, asking not to be named because he is not authorised to speak to media.
In 2018, Vitai was appointed the Secretary-General of the Government Pension Fund, which manages assets worth about 1.4 trillion baht ($43 billion), and two years later became the head of the Government Savings Bank.
Thirachai Phuvanatnaranubala, a former Thai finance minister, said Vitai's long experience as a government banker should help him manage relationships with senior finance ministry leadership.
"However, his lack of work experience and zero exposure to high level macro public policy is a cause for concern," Thirachai told Reuters.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
12 minutes ago
- The Independent
Donald Trump's latest Liberation Day means another dark day for America
Precisely what poor, benighted Syria and prosperous, neutral Switzerland have done to deserve US tariffs of 41 per cent and 39 per cent respectively is hard to discern. Neither is the kind of industrial superpower that represents a threat to America's economic hegemony, and both would, in their different ways, prefer to stay on reasonably good terms with the Trump White House. It is, sadly, easier to see why Canada got whacked with a 35 per cent levy on some of its exports – and Donald Trump's tariff tactics do have a hint of the mob about them. Mr Trump suggested that Canada's decision to recognise the state of Palestine as a sovereign nation would make it harder to achieve a trade deal, and he also mentioned the scourge of fentanyl. But then again, Mexico, which has also recognised Palestine and is by far the more important source of the drug, has been granted a 90-day tariff reprieve. Ever since the opening salvo in the Trump tariff war on 2 April – so-called Liberation Day – the shifting schedules and random pauses have lacked both rhyme and reason. Even at the time, their supposed 'reciprocity' was ridiculed. They have generated huge uncertainty, and, for a time, did so much damage to the dollar and US Treasuries on the capital markets that even Mr Trump had to make a tactical retreat. In fact, the US president's observed tendency to cave in whenever a trading 'partner' showed any sign of resistance led to the unwelcome 'Taco' sobriquet – 'Trump Always Chickens Out'. Some countries, such as the UK, Japan and the EU member states, have breathed a sigh of relief that they have escaped the worst, while others – often impoverished ones with no diplomatic leverage, such as Bangladesh and Lesotho – will find it difficult to cope with tariffs that are now considered moderate, but would have seemed shocking even a few years ago. Yet the game, even now, is not over. China – the second-largest economy in the world, and America's most formidable rival – has been left out of this supposedly final list of tariff increases. The trade talks between the two economic giants in Stockholm are dragging on, the prohibitive mutual tariffs having been abandoned, and they may well be extended past the next deadline of 12 August. President Trump met his match in Xi Jinping, and will not be imposing any further punitive trade sanctions on China for fear of another tit-for-tat escalation. Thus far, the markets have received the latest news of tariffs with some equanimity, but a collapse in trade between the world's two greatest economies would generate the kind of turmoil Mr Trump doesn't need right now. Even assuming that the eventual trade truce with China avoids disaster, these US tariffs are, in broad terms, the highest since 1934 and the era of the notorious Smoot-Hawley Act, which helped to strangle world trade and exacerbated the Great Depression. The Trump tariffs are no less damaging to world trade, and thus to economic growth, including that of the United States. But these restrictions on trade are what Mr Trump's Maga 'base' voted for, the folk memory of the previous disastrous experiment with tariffs having faded. The president's winning slogan was 'America First', epitomising a zero-sum, nationalistic view of the world, and unfortunately, he has proved as good as his word on inauguration day: 'Instead of taxing our citizens to enrich other countries, we will tariff and tax foreign countries to enrich our citizens.' Words that were both misguided and economically illiterate, naturally – but a promise kept. Many of the worst fears of America's friends and allies are coming true in these early months of Mr Trump's second term. With far more preparation than took place prior to his first term (which followed an election that, reputedly, he never expected to win), the US president has pressed on with his protectionist, isolationist, natalist agenda with speed and determination, surrounded by mostly underqualified, grotesquely sycophantic cronies. The judiciary is increasingly cowed, and Congress is listless in defending the constitution. The tendency to Caesarism is apparent in everything from the theatrical executive orders to the grandiose golden remodelling of the White House, and the contempt for the chair of the US Federal Reserve, Jerome Powell – a 'moron', apparently. Mr Trump thinks he can, with a stroke of a Sharpie, abolish the birthright to citizenship enshrined in the 14th amendment, passed in 1868. His conception of 'America First' is more America Alone, yet everything he does weakens American power and prosperity. It is an inward-looking, selfish, exclusionary approach. Undoubtedly it enjoys a political constituency, but ultimately it will prove self-defeating.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Malaysian pharmaceuticals, semiconductors exempt from US tariffs, minister says
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 1 (Reuters) - The U.S. imposed a 19% tariff on imports from Malaysia, though Kuala Lumpur said on Friday it had secured exemptions for its pharmaceutical products and semiconductors, and that Washington was open to more cut-outs in ongoing talks. The rate, significantly lower than a 25% levy threatened last month, came as U.S. President Donald Trump hit dozens of trading partners with steep tariffs, pressing ahead with plans to reorder the global economy. Malaysia's Trade Minister, Tengku Zafrul Aziz, told reporters both sides were still negotiating over the details of the deal, and would release a joint statement in the coming days. "At this time, exports of semiconductor and pharmaceutical (products) remain at 0% (tariff rate)," he said at a press briefing. The U.S. was also open to exempting Malaysian cocoa, rubber and palm oil, but an agreement was still being finalised, Tengku Zafrul said. His ministry said in a statement earlier on Friday that the tariff figure had been reached after sustained engagement by both countries and that the agreement did not cross any of Malaysia's "red lines" or compromise its sovereign rights. Tengku Zafrul said there had been no agreement with the United States or other countries on the exclusive supply of rare earths. "In fact, no such request has been made by the U.S.," he said. Gaining access to rare earth metals has been a crucial part of U.S. trade negotiations, with rival China currently in control of 90% of global processing capacity. Critical minerals were also under discussion during U.S. negotiations with Indonesia. The minister said Malaysia had not accepted Washington's requests to relax Malaysian halal product certification, remove excise duties for alcohol, tobacco and automotives, and loosen foreign shareholder limits for certain sectors. "We did not compromise on export duties, blanket exemption from import licensing requirements for U.S. products, and total liberation of equity requirements for strategic sectors," the minister said.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Exclusive: Pakistan to buy first-ever US oil cargo in Cnergyico deal with Vitol
KARACHI/SINGAPORE, Aug 1 (Reuters) - Pakistan's largest refiner Cnergyico ( opens new tab will import 1 million barrels of oil from Vitol in October, Cnergyico's Vice Chairman Usama Qureshi said on Friday, the country's first-ever purchase of U.S. crude following a landmark trade deal. The West Texas Intermediate light crude cargo will be loaded from Houston this month and is expected to arrive in Karachi in the second half of October, he said. "This is a test spot cargo under our umbrella term agreement with Vitol. If it is commercially viable and available, we could import at least one cargo per month," Qureshi told Reuters, adding that Vitol was its long-term trading partner. The deal follows months of negotiations that first began in April, he said, after U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to impose 29% tariffs on imports from Pakistan. Qureshi said Pakistan's finance and petroleum ministries encouraged local refineries to explore U.S. crude imports after the April tariff announcement. Vitol did not immediately respond to a request for comment sent outside of office hours. On Thursday, Pakistan hailed a trade deal struck with the United States, its top export market, and said the agreement would increase investments. The White House said on Thursday the U.S. would charge a 19% tariff on imports from Pakistan. A key China ally, Pakistan has been wooing Trump after he threatened tariffs. It credited U.S. diplomatic intervention for ending recent hostilities with neighbouring India and nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize. Oil is Pakistan's biggest import item and its shipments were valued at $11.3 billion in the year ended June 30, 2025, accounting for nearly a fifth of the country's total import bill. The import deal will help Pakistan diversify its crude sourcing and reduce reliance on Middle Eastern suppliers, which account for nearly all of its oil imports. "Gross refining margin is on par with Gulf grades, and no blending or refinery tweaks are required," Qureshi said. Cnergyico could consider buying at least 1 million barrels of U.S. oil a month after it evaluates the first shipment, given its current monthly demand stands at 4.6 million barrels, he said. "It aligns well with domestic market requirements. Demand typically strengthens in the October–November period," Qureshi said. Cnergyico can process 156,000 barrels of crude per day and operates the country's only single-point mooring terminal near Karachi, enabling it to handle large tankers unlike other refiners in Pakistan. The company plans to install a second offshore terminal to allow larger or more frequent shipments, and to upgrade its refinery over the next five to six years, Qureshi said. The refiner, which has been operating at an average refinery run rate of 30% to 35% due to tepid local demand, is betting on growth in demand for oil products. Trump said on Wednesday the U.S. would also cooperate with Pakistan to develop the South Asian country's "massive oil reserves", without providing further details.