John Swinney: Labour are ruling out all options to reduce energy bills
Octopus Energy has repeatedly said the model – which would have split the UK into price regions based on proximity to energy generation – would have given Scots some of the cheapest energy in Europe because of its abundance of renewables.
But the Scottish Government has appeared reluctant to fight back against the plans being scrapped.
READ MORE: Brian Leishman makes statement after suspension from Labour
Asked why, the First Minister was adamant: 'The question isn't for me, it's for the Labour Government.'
Speaking at a media appearance in Glasgow on Wednesday, he said: 'The Labour government promised to lower people's energy bills by 300 pounds and they're now up by about 150, and they've just turned their back on zonal pricing.
'So the question isn't for me, it's for the Labour government. What are they doing? They've got the power to reduce energy bills. What are they doing about it?'
Pressed on whether this means he would support the UK Government bringing in zonal pricing, Swinney responded: 'What I'm seeing is that the Labour Government has made a promise to reduce energy bills and the question is for them to answer how they're going to do it now they're ruling out all the options.
'It's up to the UK Government to set out how they're going to lower people's fuel prices. When they've turned their back on opportunities to do so, it's for them to answer.'
(Image: Colin Mearns)
Labour energy minister Michael Shanks (above), speaking after the zonal pricing decision last week, admitted there could have been a bill discount for Scots but said it wasn't worth the "trade off".
"If you look purely at one point in time, and look at an analysis of what would have happened to household bills, there would have been a discount in Scotland because we've got a significant amount of renewable energy at the moment,' he told the Daily Record.
"But the other side of that equation is that it would hamper the investment that would be coming in to build that clean power infrastructure in the first place.
"So you've got to have a trade-off here, where there is a theoretical benefit of bill discounts years down the line, but probably an increase in bills in the short term.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
15 minutes ago
- Reuters
Italy to add 15,000 prison places to ease overcrowding
ROME, July 23 (Reuters) - Italy's government has pledged to expand prison capacity by up 15,000 places and facilitate the transfer of inmates with addiction problems to treatment centres to tackle a long-standing overcrowding crisis. The plight of prisoners has attracted more attention in Italy following a record number of suicides last year and complaints about soaring summer temperatures in detention facilities that are not air-conditioned. As of July 15, the country had 62,986 inmates, and an effective capacity in prisons of 47,289, justice ministry data showed. This gives Italy an occupancy rate of around 133%, one of the worst in Europe. According to the World Prison Brief database, only Cyprus and France fare worse. Last year the Italian parliament approved a law to improve jail conditions, but it had little practical effect. "We believe that a just state should adjust the capacity of prisons to the number of people that need to serve their sentences," Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni said in a statement late on Tuesday. Her government presented a 758-million-euro ($890 million) plan to expand prison capacity by almost 10,000 by 2027, and a separate initiative for which it gave no budget to create an additional 5,000 places within five years. It also adopted a draft law - which will need parliamentary approval - to allow a sizeable portion of inmates with alcohol or drug addictions to leave prison and serve their sentences in rehab centres. "These are people who need treatment rather than criminals who need punishment," Justice Minister Carlo Nordio said, noting that inmates with addiction issues make up almost a third of the prison population. Nordio also referred to last week's announcement that up to around 10,000 inmates nearing the end of their sentencing could be eligible for house arrest or probation. His ministry has set up a taskforce to speed up the assessment of these cases. The early release of prisoners is set to be gradual, however, partly due to the political sensitivity of the move for a right-wing government such as Meloni's, known for its tough approach on law and order. ($1 = 0.8513 euros)
The Herald Scotland
28 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Why is there a public funds row over Alexander Dennis leaving Scotland
A government funding row stems from ADL securing tens of millions in [[pub]]lic money after first proposing to cut around one-third of its Scottish workforce, including facilities in Falkirk and Larbert in 2020 and then admitting it is looking to move to England in June. Scottish Enterprise, the agency managing government support, has stated that its most recent review found 'no risks had been identified that would preclude continued funding' to Alexander Dennis. Who is Alexander Dennis and why does it matter to Scotland? Alexander Dennis Limited (ADL) is a major bus and coach manufacturer headquartered with bases in Falkirk and Larbert. Formerly Scottish-owned, it was acquired by Canada's NFI Group in 2019. ADL employs around 1,850 people in the UK, with a significant proportion based in Falkirk and Larbert. The company is a leader in zero-emission bus technology - electric and hydrogen buses - and plays a key role in delivering Scotland's and the UK's green transport ambitions. What are the current challenges facing Alexander Dennis? ADL says it faces an 'uneven playing field' due to policies that favour foreign competitors, including Chinese electric bus manufacturers, whose market share recently rose from 10% to 35% in the UK market ADL's leadership highlighted that government procurement and subsidy schemes tend to prioritise lowest cost rather than domestic manufacturing or local job creation Additionally, UK policies under the Subsidy Control Act 2022 limit the ability to favour domestic suppliers in public funding, while Scottish rules require UK-based firms to meet Fair Work First standards, which it is claimed put ADL at a competitive disadvantage compared to international rivals who are not bound by these conditions. READ MORE from Martin Williams: Bus firm off to England in £90m Scots public funding row may get even more millions Swinney got year-long warning England-bound bus firm was 'reconsidering' Scotland FM in funding row as £90m public cash for Scots jobs given to firm going to England Union says 1600 Scots jobs at risk if government doesn't act in 'national interest' Scottish Zero Emission Bus Challenge Fund (ScotZEB) allocated £100m for green bus procurement. However, according to former SNP minister Michael Matheson with 523 vehicles ordered, only 162 - less than a third - were built by Scottish manufacturers like Alexander Dennis. It was estimated the rest went to overseas firms, including around half from China. Why are jobs in Scotland at risk? In September 2024, ADL launched a consultation on cutting 160 jobs at its Falkirk site due to funding imbalance and policy challenges In June 2025, the company announced plans to end manufacturing altogether in Falkirk and Larbert, consolidating operations at its English site in Scarborough—putting up to 400 jobs at risk in Scotland. (Image: Andrew Milligan/ PA) Unite and other unions warned that up to a multiplier of 1,600 jobs could be affected in the wider supply chain and support services if the closures proceed. Why is this important to Scotland? ADL is one of the largest manufacturing employers in central Scotland with many roles in engineering, apprenticeships, and high-skill technical jobs. The loss of production capacity would affect not only existing jobs but also local supply chains and community livelihoods ADL positions Scotland at the forefront of zero-emission transport technology, aligning with national climate targets and global export opportunities. It is argued that losing manufacturing in Larbert and Falkirk would diminish Scotland's ability to innovate and scale production in green mobility - a strategic disadvantage amid increasing global demand for clean public transport. Why is the public funding of Alexander Dennis an issue? ADL has received some £90m of taxpayer cash over the past ten years and tens of millions since a 2020 plan to axe a third of its Scottish workforce in advance of June's plan to exit to England. The firm had also admitted they had been 'forced' to offshore certain manufacturing functions to China. The public funding is contentious because substantial taxpayer money - allocated to secure jobs and promote clean, local manufacturing in Scotland has coincided with offshore production, reduced domestic orders, and now a possible factory closure and mass redundancies. This raises questions over policy design, procurement strategy, and accountability for economic outcomes. What does the Scottish Government say and how are they responding? Deputy First Minister Kate Forbes described the situation as 'hugely worrying' and says the [[Scottish Government]] is actively exploring all options to preserve jobs and retain manufacturing capacity in Scotland. The government is working with the UK Government, Transport Scotland, Scottish Enterprise, and trade unions to identify mitigation measures and potential support programs. What solutions are being proposed? Fairer procurement frameworks involving publicly funded support, including giving greater weight to local content and job creation. There has been a call for the creation of a strategic industrial partnership involving government, trade unions, industry, and colleges to support retention, reskilling, and redeployment of skilled staff in transitioning industries. Euan Stainbank MP and others have urged city-region mayors in England to place zero emission bus orders with ADL in Scotland. Their letter proposes orders totaling 70 buses in 2025, and 320 buses in 2026, to maintain steady production and job continuity. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer confirmed Labour support, stating they're working with mayors to secure future orders and uphold manufacturing in [[Falkirk]] and Larbert. A joint UK-Scottish Government working group, alongside Scottish Enterprise and trade unions, is meeting weekly to explore viable ways to sustain local operations.
The Herald Scotland
28 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Who does Labour exist to represent in Starmer's Britain?
Contrary to what many people remember the first Thatcher government, elected in 1979, was comparatively benign compared with what was to come – the miners' strike, mass unemployment, the economic vandalism of the 1980s, the Poll Tax – and Kinnock knew that it was simply a warm-up routine. If Thatcher was re-elected, he told the packed hall and a live TV audience on News at Ten, 'I warn you not to be ordinary. I warn you not to be young. I warn you not to fall ill. I warn you not to get old'. Read More: A politician so cruelly misrepresented in the Conservative media, Kinnock was not only the architect of New Labour, and arguably the best Prime Minister his party never had, he was also the greatest platform orator of his generation. Listening to one of his rousing, charismatic and intelligent speeches, was to be reminded of the power of collective ambition and the glorious possibility of change. Above all, he always stressed the importance of not overpromising and of delivering. Neil Kinnock (Image: PA) What is striking about listening to his words today – more than 40 years later – is that under the current leadership, they might equally apply to the Labour government. Labour leaders have always faced a perilous balancing act in appealing simultaneously to the party faithful and the wider electorate. There are those, like Tony Blair and Harold Wilson, who managed the neat trick of speaking effectively to both. Others, like Jeremy Corbyn and Michael Foot didn't even pretend to be interested in engaging with the latter and succumbed, inevitably to the gravitational effects of their own hubris at the polls. The current leadership appears to be the first in the party's history to speak to neither. Sir Keir Starmer's first year as Prime Minister has been marked by a dramatic collapse in public support, with his net approval rating now worse than all post-Thatcher prime ministers, with the exception of Gordon Brown, at the same stage. Key missteps include his controversial decision – alongside Chancellor Rachel Reeves – to cut winter fuel payments for pensioners. This move, justified by a disputed £22billion "black hole", alienated older voters and damaged his reputation, and his inability to deliver on key manifesto pledges accelerated that decline. A recent Public First poll revealed 39% of voters believe he has made no progress on any major promises, including cutting NHS waiting times (24%), restoring order to the asylum system (8%), or improving border security (12%). Tax hikes included in last year's Autumn Statement eroded business confidence, while a prisoner early-release scandal – where a freed inmate thanked Starmer for his "privilege" – deepened the sense of detachment. A disastrous first year was capped with the poor handling of the government's welfare bill, which squeezed through its final Commons stage, only after significant rebellion and concessions. The bill's passage followed weeks of chaos, with ministers forced to scrap PIP cuts for existing claimants and delay changes for new ones. Starmer's low-drama persona, once an asset against Tory turmoil, now appears indecisive, with Reform overtaking Labour in polls and Nigel Farage seen as a stronger leader. The most damaging impact of these failures may well be in the longer term, applied by voters who could be forgiven for wondering who Labour represents and what it stands for. If it is not there to support the 'ordinary, the young, the ill and the old' then what is its purpose? The party is still battling to overcome claims of antisemitism that took root under Corbyn's disastrous, sclerotic leadership. This week Susan Smith, director of the campaign group For Women Scotland claimed the party has an 'ongoing women problem' after Labour MP Tim Roca described gender critical activists as 'swivel-eyed'. While Blair had the benefit of a growing economy when he won a landslide victory in 1997, he also came into office with an identifiable political credo and a sense of purpose. The doctrinal prism through which all policy decisions were refracted, was reform – modernising the party and bringing it more in line with mainstream orthodoxy. While he inevitably alienated parts of Labour's base – not least through his disastrous and, ultimately career-defining, decision to support a US invasion of Iraq – he continued to command popular support. If there's one thing core voters and activists cannot argue against, it's winning elections. The problem for Starmer and his colleagues is that, more than a year into government, voters still have no idea what they stand for. Relying solely on competence for electoral appeal quickly becomes a liability when you make a series of demonstrably incompetent decisions. Before Starmer can begin to address his party's disparity in the opinion polls, he must prioritise reconnecting with its grassroots, to articulate more clearly his values and beliefs, to counter the threat, not only from Farage's snake oil promises, but also from Corbyn's new, and as yet unnamed, party of the far left. He could do worse than start watch another of Kinnock's former speeches, his leader's address to the Labour conference in 1985 when he took on Militant Tendency, the Trotskyist insurgency that threatened to subvert the party from within. His delivery was an object lesson in highlighting the futility of dogmatc obsession and was directed at Militant members who had captured Liverpool City Council, bankrupting it with profligate, illegal spending and then sacking its own employees because it couldn't afford to pay their wages. 'Implausible promises don't win victories,' he told a chastened hall. If Starmer can first convince his party's faithful of that abiding truth, he will be better placed to win over the wider electorate. Carlos Alba is a journalist, author, and PR consultant at Carlos Alba Media. His latest novel, There's a Problem with Dad, explores the issue of undiagnosed autism among older people
