logo
‘Air traffic controllers cannot do their work without us'

‘Air traffic controllers cannot do their work without us'

Yahoo21-02-2025
The first wave of White House-ordered firings at the Federal Aviation Administration included employees who play important roles in the safety of air travel — despite the Trump administration's assurances that no 'critical' staff had been axed.
More than 130 of the eliminated workers held jobs that directly or indirectly support the air traffic controllers, facilities and technologies that the FAA uses to keep planes and their passengers safe, according to the union that represents them, the Professional Aviation Safety Specialists. That alone creates reason for concern about the impact of the cuts, people familiar with the terminations said, even if the initial firings spared the air traffic controllers themselves.
Worries about U.S. air safety have escalated since 67 people died in a crash Jan. 29 between a passenger jet and an Army helicopter in the skies near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.
'I would argue that every job at the FAA right now is safety critical,' said Jeff Guzzetti, an aviation safety consultant who was a longtime official at both the FAA and the National Transportation Safety Board, which investigates accidents. These cuts 'certainly [are] not going to improve safety — it can only increase the risk,' he said.
One of the people let go last week worked as an aeronautical information specialist, a member of a team of 12 just outside of Washington whose job is to create air maps or 'highways in the sky,' the preplanned routes that pilots and controllers use to guide airplanes.
'Air traffic controllers cannot do their work without us,' the former employee said in an interview Wednesday. The employee, granted anonymity to discuss their recent firing candidly, said they believe the administration didn't understand how essential these jobs are for safety but that instead the workers were 'targeted just as a senseless line item on an Excel sheet.'
'To put it frankly, without our team ... pilots would quite literally be flying blind,' the former employee said.
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy has said that fewer than 400 people on probationary status were let go at the FAA, but neither his agency nor the White House has provided details about what jobs they held. Instead, he and White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt have issued statements narrowly focusing on the idea that air traffic controllers and others in 'critical' safety roles did not lose their jobs.
'Here's the truth: the FAA alone has a staggering 45,000 employees. Less than 400 were let go, and they were all probationary, meaning they had been hired less than a year ago,' Duffy wrote in a social media post this week, echoing a similar posting by Leavitt hours before that said: 'No air traffic controllers nor any professionals who perform safety critical functions were terminated.'
Duffy doubled down in a Fox News opinion piece, writing Wednesday that he 'won't be derailed by misleading media coverage,' calling a CNN headline about the firings 'clickbait' and emphasizing again that no controllers were fired.
DOT and the FAA did not return requests for comment. In response to similar questions, DOT has previously referred POLITICO to a statement from a spokesperson saying the FAA continues to hire controllers and has 'retained employees who perform safety critical functions.'
Despite those reassurances, Guzzetti, the former employee, an aviation official and the PASS union predicted that it won't take long for the terminations to ripple through an aviation system already strained by a shortage of controllers, aging equipment and a glut of air traffic.
The fired employees include mechanics who maintain and repair the grounds and buildings where controllers work, aeronautical information specialists, office and data assistants, as well as those who ensure airlines follow certain FAA protocols, according to job categories of fired employees provided by PASS.
The aviation industry official said employees from other parts of the FAA were cut as well, including people from its Air Traffic Organization's safety and technical training division, known as AJI.
The industry official, granted anonymity to discuss their knowledge of the terminations, said this division reviews safety data reports that need additional scrutiny, such as episodes when a plane almost collides with something on a runway. These employees help 'identify risks in the system,' the official said. The same division is also studying controller fatigue.
The official also said they have firsthand knowledge of cuts at the Mike Monroney Aeronautical Center in Oklahoma City, which is instrumental in reviewing aircraft design standards — including issues like the crashworthiness of seats, airframes and other parts of planes.
The industry official noted that some of those let go at the center would probably be involved in offering their expertise to Canadian authorities investigating a Delta Air Lines crash that happened Monday in Toronto, where a regional jet flipped over after landing on a snowy runway. All 80 passengers and crew survived.
Another office where PASS said workers had been fired is a division called Flight Standards — field offices that house the technical experts at the state or local level who monitor whether airlines and other operators are following FAA rules and regulations.
Guzzetti agreed that those firings in particular are cause for concern, saying those in charge of reviewing these certificates already carry a high workload, conducting demanding oversight of passenger planes. By reducing these ranks, these employees 'are going to have less bandwidth to conduct their more safety critical function,' he said.
So far, concern in Congress has split mostly along party lines in reacting to the cuts.
Senate Commerce Chair Ted Cruz (R-Texas), whose committee oversees aviation, echoed the Trump administration's reassurances by saying that those laid off represent less than 1 percent of the FAA's 45,000 employees. Cruz said he's 'confident the agency can continue to perform its job without a handful of junior hires.'
But Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) called Wednesday for the FAA to reverse its cuts, writing in a letter to Duffy that 'now is not the time to frantically discard FAA employees that work tirelessly to ensure the safety of every aircraft that takes to the skies.'
And one Democrat says she cannot effectively judge how significant the dismissals are because the administration hasn't provided details about them.
'I've requested from the FAA a list of who was fired. ... I still don't know who all they were,' Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.), who chaired Commerce's aviation subcommittee in the last Congress, said Tuesday evening. 'They have not provided that to me yet.'
In a subsequent letter to the FAA's acting administrator, Chris Rocheleau, Duckworth sought a slew of details about the firings, writing that, at minimum, 'we need to know why this sudden reduction was necessary' and 'what kind of analysis FAA conducted — if any — to ensure this would not adversely impact safety, increase flight delays or harm FAA operations.'
And Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) and a group of 12 other senators, including Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), on Thursday sent a letter to Duffy saying that the Trump administration risks 'undermining decades of safety improvements' by pushing buyouts across DOT, coupled with the probationary cuts for 'employees who have dedicated their careers to keeping the public safe.'
'Their expertise, experience, and commitment cannot be easily replaced,' the senators said.
Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), Commerce's ranking member, said this is not a good time to cut the FAA workforce and that 'we need to make sure that we're not losing people or equipment that could be critical to the safety of our system.'
Language from one recent termination email said the firing in question was performance-based, according to text reviewed by POLITICO. The letter offered no specifics but said the worker had not demonstrated that further employment would be in the 'public interest.'
The email further added that the 'nature of your appointment does not provide you the right to appeal your termination under a negotiated or administrative grievance procedure, nor to appeal it to the Merit Systems Protection Board ... on its merits.' The notice came from an email domain called 'usfaa.mail.onmicrosoft.com,' which is not a U.S. government address.
A person familiar with the situation, who showed POLITICO the email language and was granted anonymity to discuss a sensitive topic, said the text appeared to be a template that was used for many fired workers at the agency.
The former FAA employee who helped create and update maps said they had been classified as a probationary employee but had previously worked in the same role in the same department for three years as a contractor.
In three weeks, the employee would have no longer been labeled probationary. The workload is now resting in the hands of nine workers out of the original 12, the former employee said.
'We were already understaffed as it was' with retirements from the previous years, the former employee said, adding that the FAA charting office should be operating with roughly 20 people. 'I would hope that Secretary Sean Duffy takes notice that there were critical support to air traffic control employees fired without notice — and that they're able to rectify that mistake.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

It's Trump's economy now. The latest financial numbers offer some warning signs

time18 minutes ago

It's Trump's economy now. The latest financial numbers offer some warning signs

WASHINGTON -- For all of President Donald Trump's promises of an economic 'golden age,' a spate of weak indicators this week told a potentially worrisome story as the impacts of his policies are coming into focus. Job gains are dwindling. Inflation is ticking upward. Growth has slowed compared to last year. More than six months into his term, Trump's blitz of tariff hikes and his new tax and spending bill have remodeled America's trading, manufacturing, energy and tax systems to his own liking. He's eager to take credit for any wins that might occur and is hunting for someone else to blame if the financial situation starts to totter. But as of now, this is not the boom the Republican president promised, and his ability to blame his Democratic predecessor, Joe Biden, for any economic challenges has faded as the world economy hangs on his every word and social media post. When Friday's jobs report turned out to be decidedly bleak, Trump ignored the warnings in the data and fired the head of the agency that produces the monthly jobs figures. 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump said on Truth Social, without offering evidence for his claim. 'The Economy is BOOMING.' It's possible that the disappointing numbers are growing pains from the rapid transformation caused by Trump and that stronger growth will return — or they may be a preview of even more disruption to come. Trump's aggressive use of tariffs, executive actions, spending cuts and tax code changes carries significant political risk if he is unable to deliver middle-class prosperity. The effects of his new tariffs are still several months away from rippling through the economy, right as many Trump allies in Congress will be campaigning in the midterm elections. 'Considering how early we are in his term, Trump's had an unusually big impact on the economy already,' said Alex Conant, a Republican strategist at Firehouse Strategies. 'The full inflationary impact of the tariffs won't be felt until 2026. Unfortunately for Republicans, that's also an election year.' The White House portrayed the blitz of trade frameworks leading up to Thursday's tariff announcement as proof of his negotiating prowess. The European Union, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia and other nations that the White House declined to name agreed that the U.S. could increase its tariffs on their goods without doing the same to American products. Trump simply set rates on other countries that lacked settlements. The costs of those tariffs — taxes paid on imports to the U.S. — will be most felt by many Americans in the form of higher prices, but to what extent remains uncertain. 'For the White House and their allies, a key part of managing the expectations and politics of the Trump economy is maintaining vigilance when it comes to public perceptions,' said Kevin Madden, a Republican strategist. Just 38% of adults approve of Trump's handling of the economy, according to a July poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs. That's down from the end of Trump's first term when half of adults approved of his economic leadership. The White House paints a rosier image, seeing the economy emerging from a period of uncertainty after Trump's restructuring and repeating the economic gains seen in his first term before the pandemic struck. 'President Trump is implementing the very same policy mix of deregulation, fairer trade, and pro-growth tax cuts at an even bigger scale – as these policies take effect, the best is yet to come,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said. The economic numbers over the past week show the difficulties that Trump might face if the numbers continue on their current path: — Friday's jobs report showed that U.S. employers have shed 37,000 manufacturing jobs since Trump's tariff launch in April, undermining prior White House claims of a factory revival. — Net hiring has plummeted over the past three months with job gains of just 73,000 in July, 14,000 in June and 19,000 in May — a combined 258,000 jobs lower than previously indicated. On average last year, the economy added 168,000 jobs a month. — A Thursday inflation report showed that prices have risen 2.6% over the year that ended in June, an increase in the personal consumption expenditures price index from 2.2% in April. Prices of heavily imported items, such as appliances, furniture, and toys and games, jumped from May to June. — On Wednesday, a report on gross domestic product — the broadest measure of the U.S. economy — showed that it grew at an annual rate of less than 1.3% during the first half of the year, down sharply from 2.8% growth last year. 'The economy's just kind of slogging forward,' said Guy Berger, senior fellow at the Burning Glass Institute, which studies employment trends. 'Yes, the unemployment rate's not going up, but we're adding very few jobs. The economy's been growing very slowly. It just looks like a 'meh' economy is continuing.' Trump has sought to pin the blame for any economic troubles on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, saying the Fed should cut its benchmark interest rates even though doing so could generate more inflation. Trump has publicly backed two Fed governors, Christoper Waller and Michelle Bowman, for voting for rate cuts at Wednesday's meeting. But their logic is not what the president wants to hear: They were worried, in part, about a slowing job market. But this is a major economic gamble being undertaken by Trump and those pushing for lower rates under the belief that mortgages will also become more affordable as a result and boost homebuying activity. His tariff policy has changed repeatedly over the last six months, with the latest import tax numbers serving as a substitute for what the president announced in April, which provoked a stock market sell-off. It might not be a simple one-time adjustment as some Fed board members and Trump administration officials argue. Of course, Trump can't say no one warned him about the possible consequences of his economic policies. Biden, then the outgoing president, did just that in a speech last December at the Brookings Institution, saying the cost of the tariffs would eventually hit American workers and businesses. 'He seems determined to impose steep, universal tariffs on all imported goods brought into this country on the mistaken belief that foreign countries will bear the cost of those tariffs rather than the American consumer,' Biden said. 'I believe this approach is a major mistake.'

After a reference to Trump's impeachments is removed from a history museum, complex questions echo
After a reference to Trump's impeachments is removed from a history museum, complex questions echo

San Francisco Chronicle​

time18 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

After a reference to Trump's impeachments is removed from a history museum, complex questions echo

NEW YORK (AP) — It would seem the most straightforward of notions: A thing takes place, and it goes into the history books or is added to museum exhibits. But whether something even gets remembered and how — particularly when it comes to the history of a country and its leader — is often the furthest thing from simple. The latest example of that came Friday, when the Smithsonian Institution said it had removed a reference to the 2019 and 2021 impeachments of President Donald Trump from a panel in an exhibition about the American presidency. Trump has pressed institutions and agencies under federal oversight, often through the pressure of funding, to focus on the country's achievements and progress and away from things he terms 'divisive.' A Smithsonian spokesperson said the removal of the reference, which had been installed as part of a temporary addition in 2021, came after a review of 'legacy content recently' and the exhibit eventually 'will include all impeachments.' There was no time frame given for when; exhibition renovations can be time- and money-consuming endeavors. In a statement that did not directly address the impeachment references, White House spokesperson Davis Ingle said: 'We are fully supportive of updating displays to highlight American greatness.' But is history intended to highlight or to document — to report what happened, or to serve a desired narrative? The answer, as with most things about the past, can be intensely complex. It's part of a larger effort around American stories The Smithsonian's move comes in the wake of Trump administration actions like removing the name of a gay rights activist from a Navy ship, pushing for Republican supporters in Congress to defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and getting rid of the leadership at the Kennedy Center. 'Based on what we have been seeing, this is part of a broader effort by the president to influence and shape how history is depicted at museums, national parks, and schools,' said Julian E. Zelizer, a professor of history and public affairs at Princeton University. 'Not only is he pushing a specific narrative of the United States but, in this case, trying to influence how Americans learn about his own role in history.' It's not a new struggle, in the world generally and the political world particularly. There is power in being able to shape how things are remembered, if they are remembered at all — who was there, who took part, who was responsible, what happened to lead up to that point in history. And the human beings who run things have often extended their authority to the stories told about them. In China, for example, references to the June 1989 crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrators in Beijing's Tiananmen Square are forbidden and meticulously regulated by the ruling Communist Party government. In Soviet-era Russia, officials who ran afoul of leaders like Josef Stalin disappeared not only from the government itself but from photographs and history books where they once appeared. Jason Stanley, an expert on authoritarianism, said controlling what and how people learn of their past has long been used as a vital tool to maintain power. Stanley has made his views about the Trump administration clear; he recently left Yale University to join the University of Toronto, citing concerns over the U.S. political situation. 'If they don't control the historical narrative,' he said, 'then they can't create the kind of fake history that props up their politics.' It shows how the presentation of history matters In the United States, presidents and their families have always used their power to shape history and calibrate their own images. Jackie Kennedy insisted on cuts in William Manchester's book on her husband's 1963 assassination, 'The Death of a President.' Ronald Reagan and his wife got a cable TV channel to release a carefully calibrated documentary about him. Those around Franklin D. Roosevelt, including journalists of the era, took pains to mask the impact that paralysis had on his body and his mobility. Trump, though, has taken it to a more intense level — a sitting president encouraging an atmosphere where institutions can feel compelled to choose between him and the truth — whether he calls for it directly or not. 'We are constantly trying to position ourselves in history as citizens, as citizens of the country, citizens of the world,' said Robin Wagner-Pacifici, professor emerita of sociology at the New School for Social Research. 'So part of these exhibits and monuments are also about situating us in time. And without it, it's very hard for us to situate ourselves in history because it seems like we just kind of burst forth from the Earth.' Timothy Naftali, director of the Richard M. Nixon Presidential Library and Museum from 2007 to 2011, presided over its overhaul to offer a more objective presentation of Watergate — one not beholden to the president's loyalists. In an interview Friday, he said he was 'concerned and disappointed' about the Smithsonian decision. Naftali, now a senior researcher at Columbia University, said museum directors 'should have red lines' and that he considered removing the Trump panel to be one of them. While it might seem inconsequential for someone in power to care about a museum's offerings, Wagner-Pacifici says Trump's outlook on history and his role in it — earlier this year, he said the Smithsonian had 'come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology' — shows how important those matters are to people in authority. 'You might say about that person, whoever that person is, their power is so immense and their legitimacy is so stable and so sort of monumental that why would they bother with things like this ... why would they bother to waste their energy and effort on that?' Wagner-Pacifici said. Her conclusion: 'The legitimacy of those in power has to be reconstituted constantly. They can never rest on their laurels.'

It's Trump's economy now. The latest financial numbers offer some warning signs
It's Trump's economy now. The latest financial numbers offer some warning signs

San Francisco Chronicle​

time18 minutes ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

It's Trump's economy now. The latest financial numbers offer some warning signs

WASHINGTON (AP) — For all of President Donald Trump's promises of an economic 'golden age,' a spate of weak indicators this week told a potentially worrisome story as the impacts of his policies are coming into focus. Job gains are dwindling. Inflation is ticking upward. Growth has slowed compared to last year. More than six months into his term, Trump's blitz of tariff hikes and his new tax and spending bill have remodeled America's trading, manufacturing, energy and tax systems to his own liking. He's eager to take credit for any wins that might occur and is hunting for someone else to blame if the financial situation starts to totter. But as of now, this is not the boom the Republican president promised, and his ability to blame his Democratic predecessor, Joe Biden, for any economic challenges has faded as the world economy hangs on his every word and social media post. When Friday's jobs report turned out to be decidedly bleak, Trump ignored the warnings in the data and fired the head of the agency that produces the monthly jobs figures. 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump said on Truth Social, without offering evidence for his claim. 'The Economy is BOOMING.' It's possible that the disappointing numbers are growing pains from the rapid transformation caused by Trump and that stronger growth will return — or they may be a preview of even more disruption to come. Trump's economic plans are a political gamble Trump's aggressive use of tariffs, executive actions, spending cuts and tax code changes carries significant political risk if he is unable to deliver middle-class prosperity. The effects of his new tariffs are still several months away from rippling through the economy, right as many Trump allies in Congress will be campaigning in the midterm elections. 'Considering how early we are in his term, Trump's had an unusually big impact on the economy already,' said Alex Conant, a Republican strategist at Firehouse Strategies. 'The full inflationary impact of the tariffs won't be felt until 2026. Unfortunately for Republicans, that's also an election year.' The White House portrayed the blitz of trade frameworks leading up to Thursday's tariff announcement as proof of his negotiating prowess. The European Union, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia and other nations that the White House declined to name agreed that the U.S. could increase its tariffs on their goods without doing the same to American products. Trump simply set rates on other countries that lacked settlements. The costs of those tariffs — taxes paid on imports to the U.S. — will be most felt by many Americans in the form of higher prices, but to what extent remains uncertain. 'For the White House and their allies, a key part of managing the expectations and politics of the Trump economy is maintaining vigilance when it comes to public perceptions,' said Kevin Madden, a Republican strategist. Just 38% of adults approve of Trump's handling of the economy, according to a July poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs. That's down from the end of Trump's first term when half of adults approved of his economic leadership. The White House paints a rosier image, seeing the economy emerging from a period of uncertainty after Trump's restructuring and repeating the economic gains seen in his first term before the pandemic struck. 'President Trump is implementing the very same policy mix of deregulation, fairer trade, and pro-growth tax cuts at an even bigger scale – as these policies take effect, the best is yet to come,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said. The economic numbers over the past week show the difficulties that Trump might face if the numbers continue on their current path: — Friday's jobs report showed that U.S. employers have shed 37,000 manufacturing jobs since Trump's tariff launch in April, undermining prior White House claims of a factory revival. — Net hiring has plummeted over the past three months with job gains of just 73,000 in July, 14,000 in June and 19,000 in May — a combined 258,000 jobs lower than previously indicated. On average last year, the economy added 168,000 jobs a month. — A Thursday inflation report showed that prices have risen 2.6% over the year that ended in June, an increase in the personal consumption expenditures price index from 2.2% in April. Prices of heavily imported items, such as appliances, furniture, and toys and games, jumped from May to June. — On Wednesday, a report on gross domestic product — the broadest measure of the U.S. economy — showed that it grew at an annual rate of less than 1.3% during the first half of the year, down sharply from 2.8% growth last year. 'The economy's just kind of slogging forward,' said Guy Berger, senior fellow at the Burning Glass Institute, which studies employment trends. 'Yes, the unemployment rate's not going up, but we're adding very few jobs. The economy's been growing very slowly. It just looks like a 'meh' economy is continuing.' Trump's Fed attacks could unleash more inflation Trump has sought to pin the blame for any economic troubles on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, saying the Fed should cut its benchmark interest rates even though doing so could generate more inflation. Trump has publicly backed two Fed governors, Christoper Waller and Michelle Bowman, for voting for rate cuts at Wednesday's meeting. But their logic is not what the president wants to hear: They were worried, in part, about a slowing job market. But this is a major economic gamble being undertaken by Trump and those pushing for lower rates under the belief that mortgages will also become more affordable as a result and boost homebuying activity. His tariff policy has changed repeatedly over the last six months, with the latest import tax numbers serving as a substitute for what the president announced in April, which provoked a stock market sell-off. It might not be a simple one-time adjustment as some Fed board members and Trump administration officials argue. Trump didn't listen to the warnings on 'universal' tariffs Of course, Trump can't say no one warned him about the possible consequences of his economic policies. Biden, then the outgoing president, did just that in a speech last December at the Brookings Institution, saying the cost of the tariffs would eventually hit American workers and businesses. 'He seems determined to impose steep, universal tariffs on all imported goods brought into this country on the mistaken belief that foreign countries will bear the cost of those tariffs rather than the American consumer,' Biden said. 'I believe this approach is a major mistake.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store