BREAKING NEWS Ex-NFL star Everson Griffen removed from Delta flight as 'unruly behavior' forces plane to make dramatic U-turn
The 37-year-old was onboard a Delta flight departing from Chicago when he was accused of 'unruly behavior.'
The Minneapolis-bound flight was forced to return to O'Hare airport just minutes after taking off to have 'an unruly passenger removed,' according to TMZ.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Joe Rogan blasts Kash Patel and Dan Bongino for Epstein silence
Joe Rogan hit out at the FBI's Kash Patel and Dan Bongino for failing to deliver files on Jeffrey Epstein while speculating about who is really in charge of the sharing information with the public. The podcast host's outburst came after it emerged that the Department of Justice is ending its probe into the case, despite failing to disclose the disgraced financier's 'client list' as previously hinted at. 'Kash came on the podcast and said, "There's nothing that you want to see",' Rogan said during his show Friday. 'Dan Bongino, who's always shouting from the rooftops, "We're going to get to the bottom of this and find out who these people are", now everyone's saying "No, Epstein killed himself. No, nothing to see here", that's why people are cynical.' Patel and Bongino, along with other MAGA personalities, have fueled speculation that Epstein kept a shadowy 'client list' which would be reviewed and disclosed in due course. Bongino stated there was 'extremely credible' evidence of a 'multitude of tapes' existed showing Epstein and associates committing child abuse, a claim which was echoed by Attorney General Pam Bondi. But Rogan claimed the reticence to release the files is indicative of the fact Kash and Bongino are being controlled by external forces. 'People are cynical because you had all this hope for change, and then you realize, "Oh the same people that are pulling the strings are still pulling the strings",' he said. 'I think the cynical perspective is that at the highest levels, it's all being controlled by money and that's not going to change.' The DOJ, led by Bondi, said last week it had concluded that Epstein did not possess a 'client list' and that it had decided against releasing any additional records from the investigation. Conspiracy theorists seized on the decision as the latest in a long line of attempts to cover up and cover for a shadowy list of associates that many believe Epstein kept. The disgraced financier's former lawyer Alan Dershowitz denied the claims and said Epstein did not keep a list of clients. Meanwhile Republicans on the House Rules committee blocked an amendment pushed by Democrats that would have allowed for the release of documents related to the Epstein probe. The DOJ's decision led to a revolt among MAGA loyalists, many of whom had hoped that the files would see prominent Democrats linked to Epstein. The backlash pushed President Trump to request that Bondi release more of the materials. 'Based on the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein, I have asked Attorney General Pam Bondi to produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval,' he wrote on his Truth Social account. Bondi started that process on Friday by filing with the Southern District of New York to unseal the highly-secretive grand jury court documents in the case. Although the filing is submitted it doesn't mean the documents are coming anytime soon. The grand jury information is only a part of the evidence that makes up the so-called Epstein files. Trump's vow to unseal more information came after the Wall Street Journal published a 50th birthday card it said he allegedly sent to Epstein in 2003. It comes as Ghislaine Maxwell's lawyers had appealed to the Supreme Court to overturn her conviction for trafficking. To date, she remains the only person behind bars for crimes associated with the late pedophile, Jeffrey Epstein.
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
JD Vance's intense efforts to secure 2028 Presidential bid
As the blow-up over President Donald Trump and prominent MAGA figures continues to simmer, Vice President JD Vance spent the week calculating his response and limiting his role in the scorched earth debate. Attorney General Pam Bondi shocked Trump's supporters after the Independence Day holiday, releasing a review from the Justice Department claiming that Epstein did not have a 'client list' and there were no more files related to his death in prison or the trafficking investigation against him. The usually thoughtful and provocative vice president was silent on social media as the debate raged online, while Democrats cheered another MAGA 'civil war' at the president's expense. The vice president traveled to West Pittston, Pennsylvania on Wednesday with a pool of reporters, but he did not engage the press who were eager to question him on the fued that threatened to blow up the MAGA coalition. That was all by design, people familiar with Vance's thinking told the Daily Mail. 'Vice President Vance is following President Trump's lead and focusing on celebrating the administration's policy victories like the historic passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill,' a source close to the vice president told the Daily Mail. Trump, the source noted, wanted to focus on their success ending taxes on tips and overtime, the S&P and NASDAQ hitting record highs, unemployment claims dropping, record low border crossings, wages rising more than inflation, and retail sales surging. 'The White House is racking up wins on a daily basis, and there's a lot the Vice President can be talking about and working on that actually affects Americans' day-to-day lives,' the source noted. In other words, ignore the noise that was threatening to rip their coalition apart. After delivering a rousing speech in defence of the administration's 'Big Beautiful Bill' the vice president and Second Lady Usha Vance traveled to the Majestic Lunch diner. As he walked through the diner and spoke to patrons, no one spoke up about the Epstein files on camera. Instead, Vance chatted about food, football, and the military before leaving with a to-go order. Even as Trump angered many of his supporters by dismissing the importance of the Epstein files and even chiding them for being 'duped' by Democrats on the issue, Vance remained focused on his loyalty to the president. It's a familiar struggle for vice presidents who privately harbor future political ambitions even as their boss threatens to undermine their political future. Trump no longer faces voters in a future election, earning him the ability to write off their concerns about the Epstein files. The president calculated that big policy and legislative victories would overcome any disgruntled supporters. For now, Vance appears comfortable siding with the president, who values loyalty over all else. But many perpetually online observers were busy resurfacing old Vance tweets and statements from weeks and years back, reminding him of this own questions about the Epstein files and his own calls to release them. 'If you're a journalist and you're not asking questions about this case you should be ashamed of yourself,' Vance fumed back in 2021. 'What purpose do you even serve?' While Vance was publicly silent after the DOJ's Epstein announcement, he worked quietly behind the scenes to diffuse the civil war within the administration. As FBI Deputy Director Dan Bongino and FBI Director Kash Patel were disappointed with Bondi's handling of the case, he spoke with them personally and urged them to remain in their positions rather than resign in protest, according to a White House insider. Then came the moment to pounce, using the perfect foil. Once the Wall Street Journal published details of a 'letter' purportedly written by the president for Epstein's birthday that included a crude drawing of a woman, Vance eagerly leaped to the defense of his boss. 'Forgive my language but this story is complete and utter bullshit. The WSJ should be ashamed for publishing it,' Vance blasted on social media. He scolded the Journal for failing to show Trump a copy of the letter before publishing details about it in an article. 'Doesn't it violate some rule of journalistic ethics to publish a letter like this without showing it to the victim of this hit piece?' he asked. Vance also applauded the president's announcement that he had asked his attorney general to produce 'any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony' regarding the case, reposting a 'LFG' post hailing the decision by Donald Trump Jr. That measured up to the loyal attack dog role expected by a vice president, but he was careful not to lash out at the president's supporters, even as some of them piled into his replies online. Despite his loyalty, Vance may face political consequences for remaining silent on the issue after cheering on the release of the Epstein files and further investigations into his clients for years. 'Remember when we learned that our wealthiest and most powerful people were connected to a guy who ran a literal child trafficking ring? And then that guy died mysteriously in a jail? And now we just don't talk about it,' he wrote in September 2021, sharing an article published by The Week titled: 'The Jeffrey Epstein case is why people believe in Pizzagate. 'Release the list!' comedian podcaster Theo Von said in an interview with Vance in October 2024, just weeks before the election. Vance agreed at the time. The clip was resurfaced this week by angry supporters, prompting Von himself to respond on social media. 'Yeah what changed?' he asked his 1.6 million followers on X. Vance did not respond, but the unspoken answer to the question is that his boss won the presidency, and for now, the vice president will follow his lead. The question is if that price of loyalty will ultimately cost him. 'I don't know how to do it without infuriating Trump beyond belief but if JD Vance has any hope in 2028 he's going to need to distance himself from the Epstein debacle,' said Clint Russell, a Miami-based conservative YouTuber. 'I mean you need to tell the truth, now, while it's needed.'
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Nantucket tree-cutting neighbor row hit with criminal charges
A fight over a Nantucket neighbor's tree cutting has ramped up as a property owner has been hit with criminal charges after he took drastic measures to improve the view from his property. Jonathan Jacoby, 55, was charged Thursday in Nantucket District Court with felony vandalism, trespassing, and destroying trees on another's land - a set of charges that could land him up to three years in state prison. The charges came after he allegedly removed over 16 trees belonging to longtime homeowners Patricia and Richard Belford, as reported by the Boston Globe. The property feud erupted on the wealthy Massachusetts island after Jacoby allegedly chopped down 50-year-old trees to carve out an 'ocean view' for himself. When the trees were slashed, Matt Erisman, the property manager of Belford's $4.2 million home, notified the Nantucket Police Department (NPD), prompting an investigation. 'It was just a disgusting scene,' Erisman, 40, told the outlet. 'Even outside of my professional work, I've never seen a neighbor act like that and just deceive their neighbor like he did.' Belford herself does not live at the property, located at 1 Tautemo Way, but in an assisted living facility, according to the Nantucket Current. Jacoby's former landscaper, Krasimir Kirilov, voluntarily told investigators Jacoby was responsible. Belford, who is suing on behalf of her family's trust, claimed losing the trees has caused emotional distress In a police statement submitted as lawsuit evidence, Kirilov said Jacoby reached out to him for help cleaning up landscaping work he was going to do on his own. Once he realized the work was not on Jacoby's property, Kirilov refused the offer. 'The NPD concluded that Jacoby entered the property knowingly and willfully and cut the trees for his own personal benefit,' the lawsuit reads about the ongoing investigation. Nantucket Police Lieutenant Angus MacVicar told the Nantucket Current there are pending charges against Jacoby. Belford argued the trees added not only privacy, but value to her home - with a nursey estimating they each could cost thousands of dollars.
