Kiwis not getting a 'raw deal' on butter: Willis
The Finance Minister does not believe New Zealanders are getting a "raw deal" on butter, but has accepted there is no getting away from how expensive it is right now.
Nicola Willis met Fonterra's chief executive Miles Hurrell at Parliament on Tuesday evening.
While the two meet regularly, there was increased interest in the meeting due to the current price of butter. Willis had earlier said it was something she would discuss with Hurrell.
Characterising the meeting as "constructive and engaging," Willis said Hurrell was candid about the way butter was priced in New Zealand.
Her summarisation of her meeting with Fonterra largely zeroed in on her drive to increase supermarket competition.
The large proportion of what people pay for butter is dictated by global demand, which is something the government could not control.
"Were that price to come down, you would expect that to be reflected in the prices that New Zealand shoppers pay," Willis said.
Hurrell had told her that butter had once been the hardest product for Fonterra to sell globally, but the increasing demand was due to reporting on its health benefits.
"It was once viewed as a bogeyman," she said.
The meeting had reinforced Willis' interest in increasing supermarket competition to put downward pressure on the price of butter.
"All roads lead back to supermarket competition. I continue to believe that is the most powerful lever that the government has on this issue. We will never be able to control global dairy prices. What we can influence is the amount of competition in New Zealand's grocery sector and we have a lot of work under way to address that."
Fonterra had also observed the supermarket competition.
"Miles specifically conveyed that Fonterra operates in a number of markets around the world, most of which have a more competitive supermarket sector, and that it does feel different in New Zealand."
She would leave it to supermarkets and Fonterra to argue who was charging what margin.
"The sense that I got from my engagement with Miles is that it's a constant battle between them. Each party are probably going to point fingers at the other."
Hurrell would not answer questions when RNZ approached him outside Parliament on Tuesday night, but a Fonterra spokesperson said the meeting was "constructive".
Willis said she had encouraged Hurrell to front, in particular to explain what proportion of the margins go to Fonterra and what goes to supermarkets.
Acknowledging that Fonterra's job was to get the best possible price for its shareholders, Willis also accepted New Zealanders saw the downsides of that when they were shopping.
"I've been satisfied that I don't think consumers are getting a raw deal. I think that there is good work going on to ensure that there is pressure and competition from Fonterra to try and keep its prices low. But I get it. Butter is expensive right now. There's no getting away from that."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
20 minutes ago
- NZ Herald
Gumboot Friday secures Government funding through 2026 for mental health
'Over the next 12 months, the organisation will be looking at how it can scale up and encourage even more young people to access free counselling.' The Government last year committed $24 million over four years to the Gumboot Friday initiative. The Government last year committed $24 million over four years to the Gumboot Friday initiative, which was founded by mental health advocate Mike King. That was despite pressure from Labour at the time, who called on the Government to pause its funding of I Am Hope/Gumboot Friday following King's controversial comments on alcohol. 'Alcohol is not a problem for people with mental health issues. It's actually the solution to our problem, until you come up with a better solution,' King said at the time. The Drug Foundation rejected that, saying alcohol was 'really unhelpful during times of mental distress'. Mental Health Minister Matt Doocey. Photo / Mike Scott In November last year, Doocey responded, saying while he disagreed King was entitled to have his own opinion on alcohol's association with mental health, and he would not be asking the advocate to rein in his comments. On Thursday, Doocey said in the first 12 months of Government funding, Gumboot Friday had been able to deliver more than 30,000 free counselling sessions. 'They have supported more than 10,000 young New Zealanders who might not otherwise have access to timely support. The counselling service's procurement process had run into difficulties before. Last October, the Auditor-General criticised the Government's 'unusual and inconsistent' process in giving $24 million to King's initiative. The Government had announced the I Am Hope foundation would receive $6m a year for four years to provide counselling services to 5 to 25-year-olds, as part of the coalition agreement. But RNZ revealed health officials had struggled to find a way to make the contract compliant with public procurement rules, and ended up invoking a special 'opt-out' clause. Auditor-General John Ryan wrote to the director-general of health then, saying the process was 'unusual and inconsistent'. – RNZ
The Spinoff
20 minutes ago
- The Spinoff
Echo Chamber: These people are just speaking for the sake of it
Wednesday's question time was a perfect reminder of why people hate politicians. Echo Chamber is The Spinoff's dispatch from the press gallery, recapping sessions in the House. Columns are written by politics reporter Lyric Waiwiri-Smith and Wellington editor Joel MacManus. Sometimes, parliament's question time is an electric battlefield of raw politics. The cut and thrust. The arguments that frame elections, playing out in the moment, and the very centre of power in Aotearoa. Opposition MPs cross-examine ministers with probing questions, poking rhetorical holes in the government's agenda. Ministers parry back, holding the higher ground while they fend off their rivals with dismissive jokes and baying laughter. Other times it, well, isn't. It's a circus of dumb seals clapping for themselves without even the decency to balance a ball on their nose. Wednesday's question time was one of those. A pointless display of largely meaningless words by a group of elected officials who seem to be barely trying. Government MPs debased themselves with patsy questions, the opposition didn't do much better, and crotchety old Winston Peters did crotchety old Winston Peters things. Act MP Todd Stephenson, who famously cannot name a book, also seemed unable to understand his own party's policies, because he had to ask his leader, David Seymour, 'Will New Zealand benefit from the Ministry of Regulations, and if so, why?' Seymour, shockingly, answered that New Zealand would benefit from his new ministry. Stephenson continued along this track, asking gleefully naive questions to Seymour, who happily explained why he was the smartest boy in all the land. Seymour prattled on about the new regulations tip line, which was 'dramatically reducing the amount of annoyance New Zealanders experience'. (But specifically not helping me or anyone else listening to his speech). Labour MPs complained to speaker Gerry Brownlee, 'Make him stop, make him stop'. Peeni Henare tried to prompt Seymour to wrap it up by bellowing 'Haumi e, hui e, tāiki e.' Some nerd in the back (edit: Cameron Brewer, member for the proud electorate of Upper Harbour) wanted to know if finance minister Nicola Willis had seen any recent reports on the economy (incredibly, the answer was yes). He asked which exports were doing well. Willis gave 'a special shoutout to kiwifruit'. Speaking to The Spinoff after question time, a kiwifruit said they were happy and humbled to have their hard work recognised. Brewer followed up with, 'What is behind the increase in export value?' Willis informed the House that 'the value of New Zealand's exports is a function of two things', the first of which was 'export values'. The rest of the sentence would seem to be redundant, but apparently the other thing is 'the prices that exporters receive'. 'What does the future hold for New Zealand's exports?' Brewer asked. (Finally, an interesting question. Laser kiwifruit? Blockchain butter? Androids dreaming of electric sheep?) Willis boringly said that 'international factors are likely to affect global demand'. Wow. The future of exports? Catherine Wedd asked Chris Bishop for updates on the Fast-track Approvals Act, and Bishop reassured the house that 'things are going great'. Vanessa Weenink asked Erica Stanford what feedback she had received on her changes to school property funding. Stanford confirmed that the response to her policies was 'positive', and everyone thought she was cool and funny, and would have totally invited her to their birthday party but the invitation must have got lost in the mail. Usually, asking patsy questions is reserved for the lowliest government MPs, but on this occasion, even the finance minister decided to get in on the action. Willis asked Stanford to point to an example of how she saved money. Stanford happily confirmed that the government was providing classrooms for half the price compared to 2023. Chris Hipkins and Chris Luxon got into a silly argument about whether the cost of living is up or down. 'Why did he claim, one year ago tomorrow, that food prices have been falling under his government?' Hipkins asked. 'Because they are,' Luxon insisted. 'Under the previous government, food prices were up 12.5%; today, they're up 4.6%.' (Fact check: 'up' is the opposite of 'down'.) While the Chrises talked circles around each other, intentionally misunderstanding the difference between deflation and disinflation, the peanut gallery grew louder and louder, until Brownlee got fed up. 'There's an unacceptable level of barrage,' he said. 'People are just speaking for the sake of it.' It was unclear whether the latter part was a complaint or simply an accurate description of question time. Winston Peters did his performative dance where he pretends to be outraged that someone (in this case, Teanau Tuiono) asked a question referring to 'Aotearoa New Zealand'. He refused to answer because 'no such country exists'. Chris Hipkins produced a copy of the government's Budget at a Glance document, which had the phrase 'Te Kāwanatanga o Aotearoa' on the front cover. Brownlee noted that the New Zealand Geographic Board also recognises and uses the term 'Aotearoa New Zealand' and it would be 'utterly ridiculous' for the house not to allow it. But that won't stop Peters from continuing to try. One for the record While attempting to call a point of order for Kieran McAnulty, Brownlee butchered the Wairarapa-based list MP's name with a garble that sounded something like 'Kieran Mogloo' before correcting himself. McAnulty: It's all right, we all know who you mean, it's all good. Thank you, sir. Brownlee: Yeah, well, some people may not. You're not that well known. McAnulty: I am in Eketāhuna, sir, so that's all that matters. Brownlee: Well, I tell you what, it is the centre of the earth.
Otago Daily Times
an hour ago
- Otago Daily Times
Cost of polytech changes revealed
By John Gerritsen of RNZ A Cabinet paper reveals re-establishing independent polytechnics will cost more than 500 courses and about 1000 jobs. The March paper from Vocational Education Minister Penny Simmonds said polytechnics had started to act on financial improvement plans that would ensure they were viable when they were cut free from super-institute Te Pūkenga. "Polytechnics have begun implementing their financial improvement plans, which as of late 2024 indicated reductions of approximately 550 programmes, up to 900 FTE and approximately 30 delivery sites," it said. "The final model for work-based learning will also change the spread of training provision between polytechnics, wānanga and private providers. It would be premature to commit to long-term plans to support important provision when there is potential for delivery to look very different once these processes are completed." The paper said the government would set aside $20 million to ensure the retention of strategically important, but potentially unviable courses. "I intend to review support for strategically important provision in the second half of 2026, including long-term options to support the organisations that provide it and how to incentivise delivery of the provision that regions need, through either polytechnics, Wānanga, or private providers who may be able to fill gaps," the paper said. It also said using $6.5m from a special funding category aimed at supporting Māori and Pacific students to boost government subsidies for polytech courses generally could have a negative effect. "Tertiary education organisations may see the removal of the Māori and Pacific learner criteria from the Learner Component as a signal that programmes tailored to support these learners are no longer needed and can be substituted with more generic student support programmes. This may negatively impact on Māori and Pacific learner outcomes." Tertiary Education Union national secretary Sandra Grey told RNZ's Nine to Noon programme today it was the first time the full scale of the cuts had been revealed. "This is the first time we've seen it in black and white. We've been feeling it every week as each institution tries to right-size so that it can cope with the minister's vision for them. "To see 500 jobs going in black and white is really hard for the sector." Grey said the changes would remove vocational education and training from some communities altogether. The government recently announced nine of the 16 polytechnics that joined Te Pūkenga would emerge as stand-alone institutes next year. Three of the remaining institutes would join a federation, with the fate of four others yet to be decided. Simmonds said in a statement: "The Cabinet paper confirms the scale of change required to re-establish a financially viable and regionally responsive vocational education network. The paper you are referring to is an early piece of advice and there were several updates made." The government had asked the Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) work with Te Pūkenga to assist all polytechnics to review their operations, "an exercise that should have happened five years ago when Te Pūkenga was set up, to ensure the viability of the polytechnic sector", she said. "As the minister, I am not privy to information regarding the operational decisions that polytechnics might contemplate. However, I would suggest that it is important for all polytechnics to be taking appropriate actions to ensure their overall viability and maintain their relationships. "We are absolutely committed to maintaining and improving access to vocational education across the regions. $20m has been secured from TEC to support provision in strategic regions and strategic delivery. "Our goal is to give each polytechnic the autonomy to tailor provision to the needs of their region - something the old centralised model simply didn't allow."
