Assam Cong President blames BJP for illegal mining, drug trafficking in NE region
'Recently, Prime Minister Narendra Modi ji addressed the Rising North-East summit in Delhi, where he talked about various schemes and initiatives. But his words are far away from the ground reality. In the north-east, the actual situation is very critical. Under BJP rule, the region has become a hub for illegal coal mining and narcotics trafficking', said Gogoi, the president of the Congress Assam unit.
Gogoi referred to the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) April 25 press note highlighting the existence of an illegal coal syndicate in Assam and Meghalaya.
'According to the ED, investigations into this syndicate had resulted in the seizure of ₹1.5 crore in cash, alongside various laptops and diaries', Gogoi said.
Also Read: AICC appoints Jorhat MP Gaurav Gogoi as Assam Congress chief
Gogoi said that initially the Congress had welcomed the investigations, since 'this exposed the lies of the Chief Minister of Assam, who has always said that there was no illegal coal mining. But when there was no further investigation, no arrests were made, no Special Investigation Team (SIT) was formed, we became suspicious of the ED also.'
The Congress leader claimed that the actual purpose of the raids might have been to seize the cash on behalf of the BJP, rather than to shut down the syndicate.
Gogoi went on to point out the drug trafficking issue in Mizoram and Meghalaya.
'In Mizoram, the minister of excise and narcotics has said that there has been an increase in drug smuggling into Mizoram… 458 people have been arrested. The government reports an increasing number of arrests as proof of its performance, but if these arrests were to act as a deterrent, the volume of drugs seized would decline. But this is not occurring… In Meghalaya, cabinet minister Paul Lyngdoh stated that there are 300,000 addicts – this is 10% of the population! Amongst the youth, the prevalence rate is 30%', he said.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
11 minutes ago
- Mint
In Rajya Sabha, JP Nadda slams Cong for UPA-era Pakistan 'appeasement' – 'they kept killing us, we served them Biryani
Union Minister JP Nadda on Wednesday tore into the Opposition for its "appeasement" of Pakistan, saying that the Congress-led UPA regime during 2004-14 did not take any action against the neighbouring country despite repeated terror attacks. Nadda said those questioning the government on its response post Pahalgam must introspect on what they did after terror attacks when they were in government. Nadda, who is also Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) President, was speaking in the Rajya Sabha during the 'Special Discussion on India's Strong, Successful and Decisive Operation Sindoor in Response to the Terrorist Attack in Pahalgam' 'The Home Minister of our sensitive government was in Kashmir at 5 pm on the day of the attack while the Prime Minister cut short his Saudi Arabia visit,' Nadda said. He further said the political leadership is extremely important as it gives directions to the armed forces. The Health Minister said political leadership is very important, as it is the leadership that gives instructions to the Army. Nadda said there is a difference between a responsible, sensitive, proactive government and a government which responds according to the needs of the hour, and a lukewarm, non-reactive government. 'There is another type of government, one that is inactive, carries a lukewarm attitude, and is non-reactive and non-responsive. We need to assess this in two phases: the period from 2004 to 2014, and the period from 2014 to 2025,' Nadda said. Speaking during the same debate in Lok Sabha on Tuesday, Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi accused it of lacking the political will to take on Pakistan. He also mentioned Pakistani general Asim Munir, calling him 'the mastermind' behind the Pahalgam attack 'The aircraft were lost because the political leadership had tied the hands of the armed forces by deciding not to attack military and air defence infrastructure in Pakistan,' Gandhi said. Operation Sindoor is being debated during the ongoing Monsoon Session of Parliament. The operation was launched in response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. The debate began in the Rajya Sabha on Tuesday, while the Lok Sabha took up the discussion on Monday. "We will do injustice with this narrative if we look at the Pahalgam terror attack in isolation," the Leader of the House in the Rajya Sabha said. Detailing the response of the Congress-led UPA government during 2004-14 to terror attacks carried out at the time, Nadda said that "no action was taken" after Delhi, Varanasi, Mumbai bomb blasts, where hundreds were killed and injured, which shows the insensitivity of the then government. Trade, tourism and talks with Pakistan continued despite the terrorist attacks, Nadda said. "You kept appeasing and never pressured Pakistan despite terrorism," he said in an apparent reference to the Congress-led governments at the time. They (Pakistan) kept killing us while we served them Biryani. Moreover, India and Pakistan agreed on Kashmir-specific confidence-building measures, Nadda said, asserting that "they (Pakistan) kept killing us while we served them Biryani".
India Today
11 minutes ago
- India Today
Kerala nuns arrested in Chhattisgarh denied bail, NIA Court to hear matter next
The bail pleas of two Kerala nuns, arrested in Chhattisgarh in connection with alleged religious conversion, have been rejected by both the Lower Court and the Sessions Aneesh Dubey (FTSC), presiding over the Sessions Court, ruled that the case falls outside its jurisdiction due to the human trafficking charges, which place it under the purview of the National Investigation Agency (NIA) case will now be heard by the NIA Court in Bilaspur. Until then, the nuns will remain in judicial custody. The complainant's lawyer, Rajkumar Tiwari, is expected to file a fresh petition before the designated court. Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan accused the BJP and its ideological affiliates of targeting the Christian community. He called the arrest a 'deliberate act of harassment' based on a 'false complaint' filed by Bajrang Dal activists.'This incident reveals the true nature of the Sangh Parivar. The same people who walk into Christian homes with cakes and smiles are now hunting down nuns,' said Vijayan. He alleged that the crackdown was part of a broader campaign to curb religious freedom and promote divisive politics, undermining India's secular said he had written to the Prime Minister immediately after the arrests but had received no response. He criticised the Centre for failing to intervene and accused the Chhattisgarh Chief Minister of justifying the arrests. 'Minority rights and the Constitution's guarantees are under threat. We must resist this dangerous trend,' he Chief Minister Vishnu Deo Sai had, on Monday defended the arrests, said it was unfortunate that the issue of safety of women was being politicised."Three daughters of Narayanpur were promised nursing training, followed by jobs. A person from Narayanpur handed them over to two nuns at Durg station, who were taking them to Agra. An attempt was being made to convert them," Sai had BJP President Rajeev Chandrasekhar said the party had taken swift action to support the nuns. He said State General Secretary Anoop Antony is already in Chhattisgarh to provide legal and logistical assistance to them.'I have 100 per cent belief that it's a misunderstanding and a case of miscommunication,' Chandrasekhar said. He added that while the case was initially treated as human trafficking, the situation appears to be a lapse in registration under the Private Placement Agencies Regulation Act.'What I understand is that they have not registered on the required portal. But it is certainly not a case of trafficking or religious conversion,' he clarified.- Ends IN THIS STORY#Kerala
India Today
11 minutes ago
- India Today
Jat conundrum: Jagdeep Dhankar's exit bares BJP's struggle with community
When the BJP elevated Jagdeep Dhankhar to vice-presidency in 2022, it was pitched as a masterstroke. A farmer's son from Kithana village in Rajasthan, Dhankhar symbolised the party's breakthrough moment with the Jat heartland spanning Haryana, Rajasthan, western Uttar Pradesh and Punjab. His appointment was meant to signal respect, representation and long-term stake. He was, after all, the first Jat to occupy this top constitutional three years later, Dhankhar's abrupt removal and stories of his friction with the Narendra Modi government have flipped that narrative. The leaders are not going by the merit of the case, but the emotions running with it. In Jat chaupals and khap meetings, it is not being read as a dry institutional tussle in Delhi but as a familiar story: that the BJP allegedly hands out chairs but not power, titles but not trust. In many quarters, it has only deepened the community's longstanding a regime thought by many to wield the axe unsentimentally—nudging out Reserve Bank of India (RBI) governors Raghuram Rajan and Urjit Patel, seeing off election commissioner Ashok Lavasa, abruptly shunting out finance secretary Subhash Chandra Garg, swapping cabinet ministers without explanation, even replacing chief ministers before or after hard-fought poll victories—the Dhankhar episode still lands elevation as vice-president was sold internally as a symbolic gesture to the Jat community, an anointment of a face with weight across Rajasthan, Haryana and western UP. Dhankhar leaned into that identity, consciously projecting his Jat tag. That the BJP chose to cut him down so openly has sharpened the perception that the party's embrace is transactional. Jagdeep Dhankhar may not have been able to prove himself as a Jat leader. His biggest claim to fame is that because of his understanding of the Constitution, the BJP picked him to tackle Mamata Banerjee in West Bengal, as the state's governor, and later entrusted him the responsibility of running Rajya Sabha, as its some are trying to generate sympathy, emotions and further anger against the BJP. Dhankhar's resignation sparked sharp reactions from across the Jat spectrum. Indian National Lok Dal (INLD) chief Abhay Singh Chautala called it a 'conspiracy'; Dushyant Chautala and his Jannayak Janta Party (JJP) termed it a 'national loss'.Jat khaps joined in: Yudhbir Singh Dhankhar warned of Jat alienation; Tek Ram Kandela dismissed Jagdeep Dhankhar's health claim for the resignation as an 'excuse'. Even Ranjit Chautala, who stood with the BJP until the last Haryana polls, said the community must introspect: 'The BJP gave our people key posts. First Satyapal Malik embarrassed the party, and Dhankhar did no less.'Farmer leader Rakesh Tikait added a sardonic warning to young Jat politicians: 'Those under 50 aligning with this party will end up like Dushyant Chautala; those above 50 will be sidelined like Satyapal Malik or Jagdeep Dhankhar.'For the BJP, the blow cuts deeper because it sits atop a decade of calculated outreach. The Modi years have seen a sustained attempt to stitch a Jat strategy, knowing the community can swing nearly 30 Lok Sabha seats and dominates assembly politics across north India. The effort has been systematic: Subhash Barala and O.P. Dhankar as Haryana BJP chiefs to counter the 'non-Jat' charge; Satish Poonia in Rajasthan; Chaudhary Bhupendra Singh in UP; Sunil Jakhar in Dhankhar's rise was accompanied by gubernatorial placements: Satyapal Malik in Bihar, Jammu and Kashmir and Meghalaya; Acharya Devvrat in Gujarat; Gurmit Singh in Uttarakhand. The optics were clear—the BJP was investing in Jat leadership at every BJP also went leader-hunting. From the Congress came Birender Singh, a towering Jat figure, rewarded with a Union ministry and a Rajya Sabha seat. His wife Premlata was fielded in the Haryana assembly election and son Brijendra Singh launched as a Lok Sabha MP—a textbook case of Jat cultivation. Then, just before the next Lok Sabha polls, father and son both went back to the Congress. Brijendra contested assembly elections and lost, leaving the BJP with nothing to show for years of careful offered the same lesson. The BJP tried to breach Jat Sikh agrarian politics by importing Balbir Sidhu and Gurpreet Kangar and anointing Sunil Jakhar as state chief. But without rural organisational depth or cultural bridge into peasant networks, the party remained an Rajasthan, the alliance with Hanuman Beniwal's Rashtriya Loktantrik Party (RLP) offered a flash of Jat consolidation that dissolved almost instantly. Rahul Kaswan's defection to the Congress before the 2024 general elections underlined the lack of a self-sustaining second-rung Jat leadership in the UP tells the same story in a different accent. The 2024 alliance with Jayant Chaudhary's Rashtriya Lok Dal (RLD) was electorally expedient but underscored the BJP's dependence on external anchors. The memory of the 2020-21 farm laws protests still hangs over Muzaffarnagar and Shamli. Satyapal Malik, once the BJP's own Jat face, became its fiercest internal critic during the agitation. Welfare schemes and OBC consolidation have helped the BJP claw back some ground, but its Jat cadre remains wafer is the most instructive case. The BJP has run the state for a decade, yet its core base comprises urban Punjabi clusters, the Bania community and non-dominant OBCs. The 2019 alliance with Dushyant Chautala's JJP was supposed to blend that with Jat rural strength and create a durable coalition. The farm laws protests blew it apart. Dushyant's tightrope act between khap anger and coalition loyalty symbolised the BJP's structural problem: in the absence of an organic Jat base, it is forced to lean on alliances that crumble the moment community trust is all the BJP's attempts at Jat inclusion, the numbers reveal the pattern: the party leans overwhelmingly on turncoats and alliance imports rather than cultivating an indigenous leadership. Of the three Jat ministers in the current Modi cabinet, two—Jayant Chaudhary and Ravneet Singh Bittu—crossed over from rival camps just before the 2024 Lok Sabha Haryana, one of the Nayab Singh Saini cabinet's two Jat faces, Shruti Choudhry, is a recent Congress defector. Rajasthan's Bhajan Lal Sharma government counts four Jat ministers, half with Congress lineage. Even in UP, the Yogi Adityanath cabinet's three Jat ministers are organisational loyalists without mass resonance. The tally across Union and state cabinets underlines the structural gap: a party ruling the Hindi heartland for a decade still has to rent rather than raise its Jat has the BJP failed to crack the Jat puzzle? The answer lies as much in culture as in arithmetic. Jat politics is agrarian, rooted in land, khap panchayats and a collective sense of izzat. The BJP's sociological DNA in these states is urban, trader and non-dominant OBC. The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) shakha network—the bridge elsewhere—never built deep roots in Jat villages. Without that ideological embedding or grassroots cadre, the party's strategy defaults to parachuting leaders and stitching alliances. That creates visibility, not loyalty. In Jat politics, respect isn't conferred in Delhi; it is earned in the is why symbolic elevation often boomerangs. Dhankhar's vice-presidency was meant as the ultimate gesture of respect. His very public jousts with the government are being read as proof of a larger pattern: the BJP offers titles without autonomy, seats without voice. Birender Singh and Brijendra Singh's exit carried the same moral. In Punjab, the Sidhu-Kangar-Jakhar experiment failed not for lack of faces but lack of onto this is the political economy gap. The BJP's north Indian narrative is built on welfare delivery, urban expansion and non-farm growth. Jat politics is tethered to land value, credit and the moral economy of agriculture. The farm laws protests were not just a policy backlash; they were an identity revolt. Even now, as the BJP offers MSP guarantees and rural sops, the memory of that rupture the BJP, this isn't a marginal problem. Sustaining north Indian dominance depends on turning gestures into genuine roots. The current model—symbolic posts, imported leaders, transactional pacts—has delivered intermittent wins but no structural consolidation. Breaking that cycle requires a shift: building a real cadre in Jat belts, embedding in khap networks, crafting an agrarian economic pitch beyond welfare doles and, above all, understanding that in Jat politics, izzat is cultivated, not Dhankhar episode has crystallised that lesson more sharply than any electoral defeat. What was meant as inclusion has become a parable on the limits of symbolic politics. In the khaps of Rajasthan, the sugarcane fields of western UP and the chaupals of Haryana, the story is already being retold in a way no Delhi spin can recast. The BJP has spent a decade trying to engineer a Jat breakthrough. What it has built instead is a fragile edifice of borrowed faces and paper alliances, always one defection or protest away from collapse. Until it learns that posts don't buy allegiance and power without izzat is no power at all, the Jat conundrum will remain the party's most persistent to India Today Magazine- Ends
