‘You're Cordially Invited' Review: Comedy Pros Reese Witherspoon and Will Ferrell Vow to Ruin One Another's Weddings
It's a sign of the times that a good, old-fashioned date movie featuring two of the most bankable movie stars of the early aughts, Reese Witherspoon and Will Ferrell, is bypassing theaters altogether in early 2025. When it comes to writer-director Nicholas Stoller's latest rom-com — if that's the word for a film where two adults set out to sabotage one another's wedding plans — you're cordially invited to watch 'You're Cordially Invited' at home. The Prime release should play great at any scale while its stars are crossed at one another, but miscalculates their chemistry in a gratuitous and slightly icky epilogue.
As Jim, Ferrell is the first to be introduced, fussing over his Gen Z daughter Jenni (Geraldine Viswanathan), who disturbs the balance with her widower dad when she announces she's engaged to Stony Blyden's one-dimensional Oliver (the grooms-to-be can't be too memorable, or they'd pull focus from the adults). Ever since Jenni's mom died, Jim has pinned all his happiness on her feelings, and when it comes time for his only girl to get married, he wants everything to be perfect — so he calls the Palmetto House, the island resort where he and his late wife tied the knot, and books the venue.
More from Variety
Reese Witherspoon Was on Jury Duty After 'Legally Blonde' and Got Shocked When Jurors Thought She Was a Real Lawyer: 'This Is Really Upsetting'
Will Ferrell Finally Explains Bringing Buddy the Elf Back as a Smoker and Beer Drinker, Calls the Reaction 'Insane': 'I Just Like to Do Weird Things'
Will Ferrell Dresses Up as Buddy the Elf With a Cigarette, Tells Reporter 'It Was a Tough Holiday Season'
For her part, Witherspoon is back in 'Sweet Home Alabama' mode, assuming that character had never gotten hitched in the first place: She plays Margot, a high-strung Los Angeles TV producer who's cut off nearly all contact with her judgmental Georgia family, apart from her younger sister, Nev (Meredith Hagner), who's madly in love with a devoted but dense Chippendales dancer (Jimmy Tatro). Nev's situation, plus the news that she's pregnant, brings out Margot's protective instinct, and she immediately switches into wedding planning mode, promising her sister the perfect ceremony.
There's just one problem: The idyllic island resort where both Jim and Margot made reservations accidentally double-booked, and the place isn't big enough for both parties. The control-freak organizers could go nuclear on the poor Leslie (Jack McBrayer), the exasperated Palmetto House manager, or insist that they have the venue all to themselves. Instead, they tentatively agree to share the space … which is a recipe for conflict with two such control freaks involved.
On Margot's side, there's the rest of her family to worry about, as her hyper-critical mother (Celia Weston) can't let anything go without complaining, even though everyone but Margot thinks she's a sweetheart. Her siblings bother her even more, whether it's caveman Colton (Rory Scovel), who refers to his wife as 'the wife,' or heavy-drinking and highly inappropriate Gwyneth (scene-stealer Leanne Morgan), who turns laconic one-liners — like 'I got a spray tan, if you're wondering what that smell is' or 'If I wasn't married, I'd climb him like a redwood' — into quotable insta-classics.
A Tennessee stand-up with a hilariously husky drawl, Morgan might as well be this movie's answer to Melissa McCarthy. Though nothing can touch the 'Bridesmaids' breakout's hall-of-fame performance, Stoller follows director Paul Feig's lead in recognizing that a wedding comedy's only as entertaining as its guests. Meeting Margot's clan, it's easy to understand why she sought refuge as far away as possible, and yet, Jim instantly gets along with her family, which only makes matters worse.
Meanwhile, there's something suspicious about Jim and Jenni's codependent dynamic — the way he does his daughter's hair and insists on baking the wedding cake himself — that could be coded as there being skeletons (or more) in his closet. In lieu of giving a speech, he invites Jenni up to do a duet, but their song, 'Islands in the Stream,' is wildly inappropriate for a parent to be singing to his child. Its lyrics were clearly intended from one lover to another, ah-ha.
Whether they're playing naughty or nice, Witherspoon and Ferrell are two of the rare stars who can be charming even when trying to sabotage someone else's most important moment, and 'You're Cordially Invited' is most fun when they're on the warpath. The trailer has tipped most of the big gags, from the disaster at the dock to Jim wrestling an alligator, but Stoller's script is strong enough that the movie's pleasures are far from spoiled. Jenni's generation is an easy target — like her hyper-sensitive bestie Heather (Keyla Monterroso Mejia), who's to blame for not confirming the reservation — though the film strikes just the right tone in tripping their triggers.
Stoller, who wrote 'The Five-Year Engagement' and directed 'Forgetting Sarah Marshall,' is notable among contemporary comic filmmakers in that he always keeps his characters grounded. And yet, not even he can solve the problem of where this story's headed: Late in the film, once the festivities have played out and Jim and Margot have gone their separate ways, Stoller introduces the idea that Witherspoon's character doesn't want to spend the rest of her days alone. Unfortuantely, there's not so much as a spark between her and Jim.
Witherspoon presents Margot's not as some unhappy spinster, but as a modern self-reliant woman. If anyone other than Ferrell had played Jenni's teddy-bear father, the movie wouldn't be half as funny, but he's an actor whose emotionally stunted shtick has never lent itself to romance. The mere thought of Jim being a sexual entity revolts his daughter, and unless the cues weren't meant to suggest as much, it's been a running joke for much of the film that he could be gay — or else what is the unspoken 'secret' that everyone's speculating about?
But that dimension doesn't impact the film until the final stretch, by which point, 'You're Cordially Invited' has been so much fun, wherever it's headed 'ever after' hardly matters. The film pulls in cameos from Peyton Manning (boy, does he look uncomfortable doing comedy) and Nick Jonas (funny enough you wish the part were bigger). To tie up the ending nobody asked for, Stoller orchestrates one of those tricks, à la 'Anyone but You,' where the whole cast sings the same song over the course of the shoot — which is to say, they rely on each other, ah-ha.
Best of Variety
The Best Albums of the Decade
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why romance fans are rooting for the rich guy in 'Materialists' — and what it says about dating in 2025
Materialists, the upcoming A24 romance from Past Lives director Celine Song, doesn't hit theaters until June 13, but the love triangle at its core is already sparking heated debate online — with one guy, perhaps surprisingly, coming out as the clear winner. Dakota Johnson stars as Lucy, a New York City matchmaker caught between two suitors: John (Chris Evans), a waiter with a past connection to Lucy, and Harry (Pedro Pascal), a charming finance mogul eager to get to know her. Both Evans and Pascal have worn the crown of 'internet boyfriend,' but social media seems to be heavily favoring one: People want Lucy to end up with the rich guy. 'If she doesn't choose him, it's the greatest misreading of the room in cinema history,' one person wrote in the comments section of a clip of Johnson and Pascal in the film. 'Nobody is choosing the poor waiter in 2025. We're choosing the millionaire who looks like Pedro Pascal.' 'If she chooses brokie, it's literally poor man propaganda,' another added, urging women to 'know your worth.' Meanwhile, a third person accused the film of 'pushing the agenda' of loving a 'poor, messed up man' over the 'handsome, wealthy, polite, loving man.' There's no doubt that both Evans and Pascal are conventionally attractive, not to mention capable of charming Johnson's character in the few clips we've seen from the film. So, why is social media begging Lucy to bag Harry? Here's what romance experts have to say about the preference for Pascal's character — and how it points to a shift in dating overall. What's striking about the discourse around the Materialists love triangle is how sharply it contrasts with the way we talked about previous romantic triangles. Think back to 2004's The Notebook: The film framed Allie (Rachel McAdams) choosing passionate, if impulsive, Noah (Ryan Gosling) over the wealthy and reliable Lon (James Marsden) as the right call, with the two living a long, happy life together. The same dynamic plays out in 2002's Sweet Home Alabama, in which Reese Witherspoon picks her rugged first love over her polished, well-off fiancé (Patrick Dempsey), and again in 1994's Reality Bites, in which Winona Ryder's character gravitates toward Ethan Hawke's brooding slacker Troy — with whom she shares sizzling chemistry — over the more stable and successful Michael (Ben Stiller). In each case, emotional history and romantic spark won out over financial security and predictability … and audiences loved it. Of course, money has always been part of the dating conversation — it's why a wealthy, successful man can be a powerful rival in a romantic love triangle in the first place. We get why it's appealing to be with someone who can jet you off to Paris on a whim — or, you know, foot the bill for dinner. But even as more women are now going to college than men and young women are outearning men in several cities, the desire for financial security in a partner hasn't disappeared — in fact, it may be growing. 'There's always a battle between scarcity and abundance, or security versus passion,' matchmaker Sandra Hatton, CEO of the dating app When We First, tells Yahoo Entertainment. 'People are more leaning into security right now.' But why? One reason: Growing concerns about the economy mean people are more in tune with the importance of stability. (It's worth noting that The Notebook came out four years before the 2008 stock market crash, for example.) But at the same time, women are working hard and earning more — and many 'want someone who matches their ambition,' Hatton says. Wendy Walsh, a relationship expert, psychology professor and adviser for tells Yahoo Entertainment that this desire for security is rooted in evolutionary research. Heterosexual women, she said, tend to look for men who can provide resources — or in the case of Pascal's character, economic stability. 'Having that backup plan — that buffer of having resource potential from a male — is paramount to survival, and survival of one's kids,' she explained. 'So, therefore, I understand all the comments saying, 'Go for the rich dude.'' Successful, financially secure women might be looking for someone even more well-off than they are, even as the pool of such men continues to shrink. And it's worth noting that this conversation is coming around at the same time as talks around the so-called 'tradwife life,' in which women rely on wealthier partners to take care of them so they can focus on domestic duties instead. But even the people the internet has coined 'tradwives' — the influencers who are popularizing a more domestically focused lifestyle — have their own successful, thriving careers online. When we think back on romantic movies of the '90s and early '00s, many of the men whom our heroines chose were still figuring themselves out — not quite as polished as, say, the Lons of the world. In a way, that made things seem more romantic, Julie Nguyen, a Los Angeles-based dating coach working with the app Hily, tells Yahoo Entertainment. 'We used to root for the underdog. We really believed that love conquers all — that it's all we need, that it can overcome every test, every trial, every difficulty, as long as we have each other,' she says. 'But in 2025, the fairy tale has updated. We're not as interested in dating someone for their potential instead of their reality.' And even though the Materialists trailer shows sweet moments with Evans's character — he knows her 'Coke and beer' drink order before she even asks, for example — Nguyen noted that 'his life isn't together.' 'He's still figuring things out,' she said. 'And I think now, a lot of people would see that as immature…maybe even a little toxic, or just not aligned with what we're looking for anymore. He seems sincere but also like someone you have to wait for or really support to get to where you need to be. And energetically, I think a lot of people want to heal and move into relationships where they're met where they are, rather than having to carry or build someone up.'
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sarah Jessica Parker Shares Reaction to Learning Fans Didn't Like ‘And Just Like That' Character Che
Sarah Jessica Parker admitted she was surprised to learn that fans didn't like And Just Like That… character Che Diaz, played by Sara Ramirez. While speaking to The Guardian on June 6, Sarah, 60, said she had no idea that so many fans didn't like the controversial nonbinary character until a friend brought it up to her. 'A friend of mine brought it up to me, and it's like: 'What are you talking about?'' she recalled. 'And he said: 'Yeah, there's all this conversation.' I've been an actor for 50 years, and I've almost never paid attention to peripheral chatter.' Sarah added that she 'loved working with' Sara, 49, who is also nonbinary and uses they/them pronouns. It was revealed in February 2024 that Sara would not return as standup comic Che after appearing on And Just Like That… for the first two seasons. Shortly after the show's debut in 2021, Che quickly became a meme and the butt of the joke among many viewers. The Grey's Anatomy alum reflected on the backlash while speaking to Variety in June 2022. 'Other people's opinions of a character — that's not something I can allow into my process,' they said. 'I choose what I receive, right? That's the beauty of being grown — I don't have to receive everything!' Che was romantically involved with original Sex and the City character Miranda Hobbs (Cynthia Nixon), while they also worked on a podcast with Carrie Bradshaw (Sarah Jessica Parker). In addition to discussing the backlash surrounding Che, Sarah also reflected on Sex and the City's popularity among Gen Z. 'It's curious, because their lives are so different – the language they use around dating is different,' she told The Guardian about the younger generation. 'They're less patient. They're more punitive. They're not as forgiving of people's shortcomings. I'm not condemning it, it's just what I've heard. So it's really interesting that they feel so spirited about it.' One topic that the younger viewers have strong opinions on is Carrie's relationship with Mr. Big (Chris Noth). The couple dated on and off throughout the original series, and they faced several obstacles before they wed during the first Sex and the City movie in 2008. Big eventually died during the season premiere of And Just Like That… The relationship has faced backlash, with many viewers believing that they didn't have a healthy dynamic. 'It doesn't mean they aren't objecting to Big and Carrie's relationship, or the way he treated her, or choices Carrie made,' Sarah continued about the younger fans' views of the show. 'But people had those strong feelings back then, too.' When asked if she was disappointed by any of the original show's plot lines, Sarah admitted that viewers could sometimes be "disheartened" by seeing what the characters went through. 'But the show is also about finding home and contentment, whatever home means to you,' she continued. 'I feel that 20- and 30-year-olds should be searching. There should be something in the distance that's important and exciting, and worth the wait. Part of it is rather dreary that great women of all ages are still incredibly frustrated by the dating scene, but I also see a lot of happy endings.'
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
M&M's promotes cross-generational unity with new creative platform
This story was originally published on Marketing Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Marketing Dive newsletter. M&M's revealed a new creative platform, 'It's More Fun Together,' that promotes a message of togetherness through humor and cross-generational bonding, according to a press release. New spots depict occasions, including a family movie night and a couple settling into a romantic evening that's disrupted by a visiting relative, where M&M's unite people. The brand's signature spokescandies crack jokes and add an element of surprise in the spots. The effort was developed for a global audience spanning over 100 markets, with an emphasis on the ampersand in M&M's name to hammer home the theme of unity. The marketer joins others in the industry in focusing on connection in divisive times. At a time when many CPG brands are reinventing themselves to better cater to Gen Z, M&M's is taking a cross-generational approach with 'It's More Fun Together.' The concept for the platform is rooted in survey data from YouGov and Statista that show a majority of Gen Z, millennials and boomers in the U.S. cite M&M's as their favorite candy, underpinning the Mars-owned confectionery brand's broad appeal. 'We know that to maintain this iconicity, we must — and we will — continue to keep fans at the heart of how the M&M's brand comes to life,' said Rankin Carroll, global chief creative officer of Mars Snacking, in a statement. 'Co-creation is the future of brand building, and 'It's More Fun Together' lays the foundation for us to do just that.' A fresh crop of ads accordingly depict people of varied ages and backgrounds bonding over M&M's. In one spot promoting M&M's Minis, a millennial couple eagerly waits to see if their toddler has gotten the hang of going to the bathroom alone, only to be surprised when the red M&M spokescandy walks out of the john and asks for a reward. Another ad, 'Jump Scare,' shows parents settling in to watch a horror movie with their twins, when the dad suddenly emits a high-pitched scream. The blue M&M warns the scares are only just getting started. Each video closes with M&M's products as the '&' in the logo flashes different colors. Other spots running as part of 'It's More Fun Together' are more product-oriented, highlighting the taste of offerings such as peanut- and milk chocolate-flavored M&M's. The campaign will run across digital, social, TV, out-of-home and other traditional ad channels and includes partnership and activations at the brand's experiential retail stores, per details shared with Marketing Dive. 'It's More Fun Together' was created by Team OMC and BBDO with paid media by EssenceMediacom and PR by Weber Shandwick. 'It's More Fun Together' arrives several years after M&M's was caught in a swirl of controversy after updating its spokescandies to be more inclusive, which drew criticism from right-wing commentators. Changes included introducing a purple spokescandy mascot themed around acceptance, who factors into 'It's More Fun Together.' M&M's leaning into messaging around unity could resonate at a moment when many consumers are divided. Other confectionery brands have taken a similar tack of late. Twix, another product under the Mars portfolio, ditched a long-standing focus on the left-right divide of its twinned chocolate bars earlier this year, pivoting to marketing that has people working together. The multimillion dollar campaign, 'Two is more than one,' is intended to address how sick young consumers are of polarization and capitalize on their interest in living life to the fullest. Mars ramping up its creative initiatives comes as it is potentially mulling other changes around its marketing. The company is planning to move its media account from WPP Media, formerly GroupM, to Publicis, Digiday reported, citing sources familiar with the matter. Recommended Reading Twix ditches left-right divide for new brand position around unity