Ramaphosa doubles political donation limits to R30 million
According to a proclamation published in the Government Gazette, the annual donation ceiling has been raised from R15 million to R30 million.
The proclamation also increased the disclosure threshold, allowing donations under R200 000 to go unreported, up from the previous R100 000 limit.
Ramaphosa made the changes under powers granted by the Political Party Funding Act, which allows the president to set financial thresholds.
The revisions follow a National Assembly resolution in May, based on recommendations from Parliament's Portfolio Committee on Home Affairs.
Civil society organisation My Vote Counts (MVC) condemned the move, warning it could erode transparency and public trust.
'Raising the ceiling means political parties can now accept R200 000 without disclosure. A donor can funnel R30 million annually to each party of their choice,' MVC said in a statement.
MVC is already pursuing legal action in the Western Cape High Court, challenging both the limits and the constitutionality of giving the president final authority over them.
The Electoral Commission's George Mahlangu emphasised last week that all parties remain bound by the law.
He said parties must still reflect donations below the new threshold in their annual financial statements.
According to IOL , supporters argue the revised limits account for inflation and rising campaign costs.
But critics warned the higher thresholds risk undermining South Africa's fragile efforts to regulate political financing, especially in the run-up to future elections.
Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1.
Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
35 minutes ago
- The Star
Skewed editorial on Marikana Massacre
I refer to your leading article on the thirteenth anniversary of the Marikana Massacre ('Ramaphosa must face Marikana widows', The Star, August 19). No sane person would deny that the police reaction on that day was disproportionately lethal, and that some form of compensation should have been made by the platinum mining industry. What has to be disputed is how the editorial in question has been framed. In recent years, there has been a tendency among journalists to whitewash the events that led to the massacre. Those of us who read about this tragedy thirteen years ago, reported by some respected journalists and editors, will recall that the police were provoked, and that the miners were not innocent protesters. Visuals that were published then showed the miners carrying crude weapons that could inflict death. There were several people, including a police officer or two, killed in the days preceding the massacre. There were rituals performed on the koppie, probably some form of witchcraft to make the miners invulnerable in the event of a confrontation. None of this is even hinted at in the editorial, which portrays the miners as hapless victims. Even the Farlam Commission was wary of finding anyone guilty. Those not familiar with the events of August 16, 2012, would not have been served well by the skewed version in The Star's editorial. They would be better served by Wikipedia, even though academia may thumb its nose at this online 'encyclopedia'. Harry Sewlall Parkmore
IOL News
35 minutes ago
- IOL News
Saturday Star
The new annual donation limit will be R30m, up from R15m, and the new disclosure threshold will be R200 000, up from R100 000. This will deepen secrecy in political funding and make it easier for private interests to influence our politics and for corruption to occur.
IOL News
3 hours ago
- IOL News
Skewed editorial on Marikana Massacre
In recent years, there has been a tendency among journalists to whitewash the events that led to the massacre, according to the writer. I refer to your leading article on the thirteenth anniversary of the Marikana Massacre ('Ramaphosa must face Marikana widows', The Star, August 19). No sane person would deny that the police reaction on that day was disproportionately lethal, and that some form of compensation should have been made by the platinum mining industry. What has to be disputed is how the editorial in question has been framed. In recent years, there has been a tendency among journalists to whitewash the events that led to the massacre. Those of us who read about this tragedy thirteen years ago, reported by some respected journalists and editors, will recall that the police were provoked, and that the miners were not innocent protesters. Visuals that were published then showed the miners carrying crude weapons that could inflict death. There were several people, including a police officer or two, killed in the days preceding the massacre. There were rituals performed on the koppie, probably some form of witchcraft to make the miners invulnerable in the event of a confrontation. None of this is even hinted at in the editorial, which portrays the miners as hapless victims. Even the Farlam Commission was wary of finding anyone guilty. Those not familiar with the events of August 16, 2012, would not have been served well by the skewed version in The Star's editorial. They would be better served by Wikipedia, even though academia may thumb its nose at this online 'encyclopedia'. Harry Sewlall Parkmore
