Singapore military helps battle cyberattack: minister
Defence Minister Chan Chun Sing said these select units will work with the Cyber Security Agency (CSA) in a united government response to the threat, local media reported.
Chan described the cyberattack as "one example of the emerging threats" that the military has to handle, the reports said.
There have been no reported breaches so far.
Coordinating Minister for National Security K. Shanmugam first disclosed the attack late Friday, describing it as a type of Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) that poses a serious danger to the city-state.
An APT refers to a cyberattack in which an intruder establishes and maintains unauthorised access to a target, remaining undetected for a sustained period of time.
"I can say that it is serious and it is ongoing. And it has been identified to be UNC3886," Shanmugam said, referring to the alleged attackers.
Shanmugam, who is also home affairs minister, did not elaborate in his speech on the group's sponsors or the origin of the attack.
But Google-owned cybersecurity firm Mandiant described UNC3886 as a "highly adept China-nexus cyber espionage group".
APT actors typically steal sensitive information and disrupt essential services, such as healthcare, telecoms, water, transport and power, Shanmugam said.
"If it succeeds, it can conduct espionage and it can cause major disruption to Singapore and Singaporeans," he added.
- 'Stealthy opponents' -
A successful breach of Singapore's power system, for example, could wreak havoc with the electricity supply, with knock-on effects on essential services, such as healthcare and transport.
"There are also economic implications. Our banks, airports and industries would not be able to operate. Our economy can be substantially affected," Shanmugam said.
Between 2021 and 2024, suspected APTs against Singapore increased more than fourfold.
A cyber breach of a public healthcare cluster in 2018 accessed the medication records of about 160,000 patients, including then prime minister Lee Hsien Loong.
Beijing's embassy in Singapore on Saturday expressed "strong dissatisfaction" with media reports linking UNC3886 to China.
In a statement, the embassy said it "firmly opposes any unwarranted smearing of China" and that "in fact, China is one of the main victims of cyberattacks".
The statement added: "China firmly opposes and cracks down on all forms of cyberattacks in accordance with the law. China does not encourage, support, or condone hacking activities."
Asked by reporters Saturday about the link between UNC3886 and China, The Straits Times newspaper quoted Shanmugam as saying: "As far as the Singapore government is concerned, we can say we are confident that it is this particular organisation. Who they are linked to, and how they operate, is not something I want to go into."
Information Minister Josephine Teo said in a Facebook post Saturday that the alleged attacker was publicly named because it was "important for Singaporeans to know where the attack is coming from and what the potential consequences will be".
The attack on Singapore's critical infrastructure "highlights the extraordinary challenges posed by APT actors," said Satnam Narang, senior staff research engineer at US-based cybersecurity firm Tenable.
"Combating such stealthy opponents is becoming increasingly demanding as the scale and complexity of IT infrastructure that organisations and nations must defend continues to grow," he said.
mba/sst
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
18 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
What's Next as Trump Tests India's Ties With Russia
By , Naomi Ng, and K Oanh Ha Save Never miss an episode. Follow The Big Take Asia podcast today. President Trump has been cranking up the pressure on India, a country the US has courted as a strategic counterweight against China. Last week, Trump announced a 25% tariff on the country, a higher rate than many other major economies in Asia. But he didn't stop there. This week, he's threatened to raise the levy even higher. His message to India is clear: Stop buying Russian oil.
Android Authority
an hour ago
- Android Authority
Teardown confirms Galaxy Z Fold 7 is a repair nightmare, but maybe that's the point
TL;DR iFixit gives the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 a pitiful repair score in its latest teardown. Fragile inner components, glued batteries, and a hard-to-replace screen make DIY fixes tough. It could be that the same design choices may help the phone survive extreme durability tests. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7 impressed last week in JerryRigEverything's notorious bend test, which is just as well. According to iFixit, if anything does go wrong, actually repairing the device is a different kind of endurance test. In a new teardown video, iFixit gives the Fold 7 a repairability score of just three out of ten, calling it fragile and a 'repair nightmare.' The team does praise Samsung's hardware engineering in some places — like the easily replaceable USB-C port — but says frustrating adhesives, ultra-thin batteries, and a highly delicate inner screen make most common repairs both difficult and prohibitively expensive. This whole process is everything that's wrong with battery replacement in modern electronics. iFixit The disassembly process reveals two glued-in lithium-ion batteries, both of which use older-style pull-tab adhesives that frequently tear and require force to remove. Given how thin the batteries are, iFixit warns that applying too much pressure could bend them enough to cause combustion. The inner display is even more of a headache. Despite being rated for 500,000 folds, the 8-inch AMOLED panel is extremely sensitive to pressure and torsion. Even tweezers used to lift the glued-in bezel can cause damage. iFixit estimates a screen repair will cost nearly $600, and replacing just the panel isn't realistic in most cases, as the screen and chassis replacements are typically bundled. In Samsung's defense, some of the same things that make the Fold 7 hard to repair may be helping it survive in one piece. JerryRigEverything's onslaught highlighted the device's impressive structural strength, with Samsung's redesigned hinge and outer display holding up under serious abuse. It's possible that the strong adhesives and tightly packed components that frustrate repair efforts also contribute to that surprising durability. Still, iFixit criticizes Samsung's broader repairability record, pointing out that spare parts and repair manuals are still missing for last year's Z Fold 6, let alone the new model. They say they'll consider updating the Z Fold 7 repair score if Samsung improves its support for self-repair. Follow
Washington Post
an hour ago
- Washington Post
How India can win Trump's trade game
India desperately needs a trade deal with President Donald Trump — for both economic and strategic reasons. When rival Pakistan, with its far smaller economy, finalized an agreement first, it underscored just how badly India has misplayed its hand. India was among the first countries to enter trade negotiations with the Trump administration. Yet despite nearing an interim deal several times, there has been no breakthrough. And prospects for one have dimmed in recent weeks, with the president first slapping a 25 percent tariff on the country, then threatening further unspecified measures and 'substantially' higher tariffs if India does not stop buying Russian oil. The key to breaking out of this spiral? Recognizing that the holdup is political and personal, not economic. With those higher tariffs set to take effect as soon as Wednesday, some of India's most export-dependent industries — including gems, textiles, apparel and crude oil refining — are braced for pain. The pharmaceutical sector, a pillar of India's export economy, is also at risk. The tariffs could shave as much as 0.3 percentage points off India's GDP growth. Worse, they will make India less attractive as a manufacturing hub in a region where competitors such as Bangladesh, Pakistan and Vietnam have already secured more favorable trade terms with Trump. The mercurial Trump has made no secret of his frustration with the government of Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The original sin stems from the end of fighting between India and Pakistan in May, a welcome development that Trump claimed full credit for. Modi has repeatedly said that India's ceasefire decision was made without foreign influence — without mentioning Trump. That omission, along with India's refusal to halt Russian oil purchases despite U.S. pressure, has hardened Trump's stance. Contrast that with Pakistan's brazen diplomatic flattery, which included nominating Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize. 'The fact that India has been unwilling to publicly acknowledge … the president's role in bringing the India-Pakistan ceasefire to pass has really stuck in Trump's head,' Milan Vaishnav of the Carnegie Endowment told me. If it hopes to close the deal, India will have to provide Trump with some kind of symbolic 'win.' But Modi needs to tread carefully at home. He could probably close India's refineries to Russian oil without putting India's economy at risk, but acknowledging Trump's role in the ceasefire would be politically disastrous. Modi's carefully cultivated strongman image leaves little room for displays of deference. Opposition leader Rahul Gandhi jibed that Trump said 'Narendra surrender,' and Modi rolled over. A gifted politician, Modi will have to find a way to square that circle. There are other sweeteners India could offer Trump. Both countries have agreed in principle to increase bilateral trade to $500 billion annually, from the current $190 billion, by 2030. India had promised to slash duties on most U.S. imports, in exchange for a 15 percent tariff on its exports into the United States — a competitive rate compared with Vietnam's 20 percent and Pakistan's 19 percent. India also agreed to increase imports of American natural gas to close its $45.7 billion trade surplus with the U.S. But Trump is said to have pushed hardest for opening India's agriculture sector, and that's where the domestic politics become truly daunting. Nearly 44 percent of India's workforce depends on agriculture, and Modi is haunted by a year-long farmers' protest in 2020 and 2021 that forced his government to repeal key farm reforms. The Hudson Institute's Aparna Pande told me that Modi may be hoping to push any agriculture concessions past the October elections in the state of Bihar. Expect him to try to hold the line on agriculture while offering concessions elsewhere. Some possibilities: India could sweeten the deal on pharmaceutical imports, the backbone of the U.S.-India trade relationship, by offering to lower or even eliminate its 10 percent tariff on American pharmaceutical products. It could also pledge to increase purchases of American energy and defense equipment. On energy, India might eliminate the existing 2.5 percent import duty on American liquefied natural gas — just as it has already done in deals with the United Arab Emirates and Australia. Such a move would not only boost U.S. energy exports but also provide a stark contrast with China, which continues to impose a 15 percent tariff on U.S. gas imports. Opportunities abound on defense as well. Despite long-standing security cooperation with the United States, India has not yet made procurement pledges in this round of negotiations. But during Modi's U.S. visit in February, he announced plans to buy Javelin anti-tank missiles and Stryker combat vehicles, as well as finalize the purchase of P-8I maritime patrol aircraft. Advancing these plans and committing to new defense acquisitions would undoubtedly help to placate Trump. Navigating Trump's shifting trade demands has proven challenging for Modi. It will be difficult, but not impossible, for him to concede enough without alienating his domestic base. Modi has long made the case to voters that only he could successfully manage India's relationships with great powers. Time for him to prove it.
