Watch: Bengal Politician's Nephew Assaults Referee After Interrupting Football Game
Raja Khan, nephew of Midnapore Municipality chairman, was arrested for kicking referee Lakshman Mandi during a football match, sparking political tensions between BJP and TMC.
A video has gone viral, capturing the nephew of the Midnapore civic body chairman interrupting a football match and kicking the referee in the stomach.
The youth involved has been identified as Raja Khan, nephew of Soumen Khan, chairman of Midnapore Municipality in West Midnapore district, West Bengal.
Raja Khan was arrested by the police shortly after the incident.
The sequence of events unfolded as follows: A junior football match was in progress at a local playground in Midnapore town, and one of the teams had the patronage of Raja Khan.
Conflict arose when the referee, Lakshman Mandi, a school teacher and member of the Kharagpur Subdivision Referee Association, disallowed a goal for the team supported by Raja Khan. This led to Raja Khan entering the field, disrupting the match, engaging in a heated argument with the referee, and ultimately kicking him in the stomach.
Medinipur ref Lakhan Mandi (ST) kicked by TMC leader's nephew during match!TMC = goondaism, cut-money, syndicate raj. #Medinipur #TMCTerror #AdivasiAtrocity #BanglaWillFightBack pic.twitter.com/wnrFkrml0y — Agnimitra Paul BJP (@paulagnimitra1) August 16, 2025
At the time of the incident, his uncle Soumen Khan was present as a guest.
A political confrontation between the BJP and Congress has erupted over the incident.
The opposition leader in the West Bengal assembly issued a statement, asserting that this reflects the true culture of Trinamool Congress.
'In reality, the culture of Trinamool is to launch vile attacks on referees, whether it is Mamata Banerjee attacking the Election Commission of India, which acts as a referee in the electoral arena, or this petty, insignificant Trinamool member Raja Khan on the field of a local football tournament," his statement read.
Trinamool Congress, however, condemned the incident.
'The matter is very unfortunate. But why should Trinamool Congress be held responsible for the wrongdoing of a local leader's nephew? We will not listen to tall talks by BJP leaders on the matter," said Trinamool Congress spokesman in the state, Arup Chakraborty.
(With agency Inputs)
view comments
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
3 minutes ago
- The Print
CEC Gyanesh Kumar isn't interested in convincing the people of India
What this means is that India's democracy is now facing one of the worst crises in its history. So here's the problem: this current avatar of the Election Commission is wiping out that sterling record. I know fewer and fewer people who admire our present election commissioners. Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, in particular, has lost the respect of much of the nation with his farcical press conference a few days ago. First things first. I believe the Election Commission, along with the Supreme Court, is the most important constitutional body in India. It deserves our respect and admiration for the role it has played over the last seven decades in allowing us to proudly describe ourselves as the world's largest democracy. Lest you think that sounds overdramatic, let me explain. Election Commission's key role in Indian democracy Electoral franchise is one part — the major part, certainly, but not the only one — of modern democracy. Not only should people be governed by those they have elected, but they should also be guaranteed certain basic rights — liberty, free speech, dissent, and more — for democracy to function effectively. The tragedy of India is that many of these rights are often disrespected or overturned entirely. It's always easy to point fingers at the government of the day, but let's accept that the decline began decades ago, long before the BJP was even founded. Indira Gandhi first subverted many of our democratic institutions and later went the whole distance: censoring the press, arresting journalists, locking up the opposition, and more. The whole promise of India as a nation was about to be betrayed. The Supreme Court, which was supposed to protect citizens, failed. Only elections saved democracy. Convinced that she would win and legitimise her dictatorial regime, Indira Gandhi called a general election in 1977. She lost that election so badly that all future would-be dictators learned two lessons: never actually declare an Emergency, just impose it quietly. And don't call an election unless you are certain of winning it. That's why the Election Commission is so important. If elections are fair, and the people of India are allowed to register their protest and vote out tyrants or scamsters, only then can democracy survive. All the other features we associate with modern democracies (mostly in the West) — liberty, dissent, justice, etc — are already in trouble in India. It is difficult, if not impossible, for a poor person to find or afford justice or to speak out against powerful officials or politicians. Also read: Why Modi, BJP should worry about bad blood between CEC Gyanesh Kumar and Rahul Gandhi How Election Commission lost people's trust The only time every citizen of India feels empowered is when they vote. That's when the roles are reversed: when politicians must come to the people to ask for something. And the ordinary citizen knows that at least on that one day every few years, they have the right to send a tyrant or a crook packing. Take away electoral franchise and you take away our right to be called a democracy. That's why it is so important that elections remain fair and beyond controversy. It's not easy to do this in a country the size of India. And yet the Election Commission has often shown more courage than the judiciary. It turned Indira Gandhi out of office when she was all-powerful. In the 1990s, when TN Seshan was Chief Election Commissioner, he showed politicians their place and reminded them that the Constitution was more important than any individual. It is to the credit of those who conduct our elections that, until recently, even the losers did not claim the process was unfair. Yes, there were complaints about booth capturing, but the Commission usually ordered repolls in those booths. All that has changed. A few years ago, doubts were raised about the functioning of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs). Those doubts never gained much traction with the general public because nobody could convincingly explain how the EVMs had been tampered with, and former Election Commissioners made it clear that rigging them was impossible. But over the last couple of years, especially after the Maharashtra Assembly elections, there have been concerns about how electoral rolls are compiled. The allegation is that the Commission is complicit in adding a significant number of bogus voters in various constituencies. This is not done everywhere, so there is no question of the BJP winning a Soviet-style majority. But it is done shrewdly and selectively in enough constituencies to affect the outcome. It only works when the mood is not overwhelmingly anti-BJP and the votes of other parties do not swamp the bogus ones. Because this sounds like a sophisticated way of influencing elections, it is a hard allegation to substantiate. About the only thing critics can do is point to mysterious spikes in voting numbers and to suspicious or duplicate names in the rolls. Which is exactly what the Opposition — and Rahul Gandhi, most recently — has done. Also read: Dismiss debate on EC functioning as 'hoo-haa', then hail India as 'robust democracy' CEC shows no interest in convincing Indians Any sensible Election Commissioner knows that for the process to have credibility, both the government of the day (which appointed these commissioners and changed the selection process to exclude the Chief Justice) and the Opposition must have faith in the Commission. Most important of all: so must the electorate. The reason the EVM allegations receded was because the public was not convinced. To retain the faith of the Opposition and the public, the Chief Election Commissioner must go out of his way to demonstrate that once he occupies this constitutional office, he forgets his loyalties to those who appointed him and functions only in the interests of the Constitution. One of the problems today is that the Election Commission sees no reason to take the Opposition's complaints seriously. When someone points out anomalies in the rolls in detail, a sincere and honest guardian of the Constitution would say: 'I need to examine your claims and give you an equally detailed response.' He does not say: 'How dare you? File an affidavit or we won't listen to you! Apologise!' Do these sound like the words of a man determined to get to the truth? A man with nothing to hide? Worse still: there is no interest in convincing the people of India. Asked several important questions at his now notorious press conference, CEC Gyanesh Kumar simply did not answer them. Later, supporters of the government tried to muddy the waters by focussing on a numerical error in a tweet sent out by a pollster, arguing that because he made a mistake, the well-documented allegations levelled by the Opposition must also be false. None of this augurs well. The only thing that powers Indian democracy is the belief every Indian has: that they will get a fair opportunity to choose their leaders and throw out those who have not performed. Take away that assurance and you puncture the heart of Indian democracy. And you rob elected governments of their very legitimacy. Vir Sanghvi is a print and television journalist, and talk show host. He tweets @virsanghvi. Views are personal. (Edited by Prashant)
Deccan Herald
17 minutes ago
- Deccan Herald
BJP MP attacks Congress in LS for 'sabotaging' India's space mission
Initiating a special discussion on Group Captain Shubhanshu Shukla, the first Indian astronaut to be part of the International Space Station, Nishikant Dubey (BJP) accused the Congress of getting a top ISRO scientist arrested under influence of foreign countries, including the US, China and Pakistan, and damage India's space programme.
Hans India
33 minutes ago
- Hans India
Problems of farmers have only intensified: BJD
Bargarh: Calling the ruling BJP 'anti-farmer,' the Opposition Biju Janata Dal (BJD) on Monday held a farmers' rally in Bargarh, Odisha's rice bowl, demanding a minimum support price (MSP) of Rs 3,100 per quintal for paddy, simplification of Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana (PMFBY) norms and an end to farmer exploitation during procurement. The rally, attended by thousands of farmers from all the districts of the State's western region, criticised the BJP government's agriculture policy in Odisha. Speaking at the event, BJD MLA and farmers' wing leader Prasanna Acharya alleged that in the last 14 months under the 'double-engine government,' the problems of Odisha's farmers have only intensified. 'The BJP promised a lot, but farmers have only faced increasing exploitation and systemic failures,' Acharya claimed. The party submitted a memorandum to the Bargarh District Collector, to be conveyed to the President of India, highlighting urgent farmer issues. 'The State government had imposed a complicated registration process for farmers, which clearly reflected its anti-farmer stance. This complex process was intended to exclude farmers from selling their paddy. The BJD had opposed this decision, and due to the collective voice of the farmers under the party's leadership, the State government hastily withdrew the decision on Sunday,' the memorandum said. It also alleged that farmers were not getting the benefits of Pradhan Mantri Fasal Bima Yojana introduced by the BJP government. The insurance companies get benefit while farmers suffer, the BJD claimed, adding that there is huge deduction on weight of paddy at the government mandis. 'The BJP's election promises, such as procurement without deductions, middlemen-free mandis and payments within 48 hours have become a joke,' it said, alleging that the BJP government has denied benefits to sharecroppers and marginal farmers in the CM Kisan scheme. The Swaminathan Commission had recommended providing Minimum Support Price at 1.5 times the cost of production, the party said, adding that the BJP government did not implement it. 'During an election rally in Bargarh, the Prime Minister had promised an MSP of Rs 3,100 per quintal for paddy. That promise, however, has vanished into thin air. Hence, the BJD demands that MSP be fixed in line with the Swaminathan Committee's recommendations and be made a legal right,' the memorandum added.
