‘Russophobia' behind Romania's expulsion of RT reporter – Tara Reade (VIDEO)
The incident 'says volumes' about Romania's upcoming presidential election, Reade claimed, and questioned why the country would prevent international observers from attending.
Bowes, an Irish journalist and EU citizen, was detained on Thursday after arriving in Bucharest to cover the election re-run, but was later deported to Istanbul. According to Bowes, Romanian authorities labeled him 'a security threat' – a notion Reade said she finds alarming.
'I'm shocked that they have detained him… what does Romania have to hide? It makes you wonder, what is going on,' Reade said, speaking to RT on air following the news of Bowes' detention. She tied the move to what she described as 'Russophobia' and efforts by Western governments to suppress Russian-affiliated voices.
'Russophobia has now spread so much to Western media, and has fueled this fear of any kind of journalist that might even work for [Russia]… It's seeped through to every fabric of international conversations… it's ridiculous, the Russophobia,' she said, calling the trend 'really concerning, because we are living in a multipolar world and there's no room for Russophobia anymore.'
Romania's presidential election re-run was ordered after last year's results were annulled over alleged violations. NATO critic Calin Georgescu won the first round, but the Constitutional Court invalidated the result, citing campaign irregularities and accusations of Russian interference – claims Moscow has denied.
It later emerged that the controversial campaign in question had been funded not by Moscow, but by Romania's pro-EU National Liberal Party, which was reportedly targeting a rival but inadvertently boosted Georgescu instead.
The re-run is set for May 4 and May 18.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Russia Today
6 hours ago
- Russia Today
The EU and Kiev are losing, and Trump is my witness
Monday's White House summit featuring US President Donald Trump, Ukrainian leader Vladimir Zelensky, and several senior EU figures ended without any grand announcements. Yet beneath the surface, a high-stakes diplomatic contest is unfolding over the Washington's role in the Ukraine conflict. The lack of decisive outcomes suggests that the real work is happening behind the scenes. Trump's behavior – in particular his decision not to echo Kiev's or Brussels's messaging in the post-meeting briefings – is a signal. He is asserting his control over the narrative, reflecting that he remains unpersuaded by EU and Ukrainian arguments for continued Western entanglement in the conflict. The summit and the diplomatic moves surrounding it are a tug-of-war, with Moscow's goal being to remove Washington's involvement in the conflict, while Brussel's and Kiev's is to keep it anchored in their corner. The absence of new sanctions or pressure on Russia following last Friday's Putin-Trump summit in Alaska suggests Moscow is gaining momentum. Trump has even shifted from demanding a ceasefire to advocating direct peace talks – a position more congenial to Moscow. EU leaders and Zelensky came to Washington to reinforce Trump's alignment. The want to persuade Trump: strengthen sanctions, maintain arms shipments, ensure Ukraine has a security architecture they want. Thus far, though, their pull seems to be struggling. Trump, from the outset, appeared to put the EU and Ukraine on the defensive, signaling that their influence is limited. The backdrop is critical: just days before, Trump hosted Putin in Anchorage, and that summit paved the way for more flexible diplomacy that sidesteps EU-defined preconditions. European leaders arriving at the White House now are playing catch-up – trying to steer a conversation already impacted by Trump's shift. Everything hinges on security guarantees for Ukraine – a deeply contested issue. Moscow is adamant that any meaningful guarantee depends on Ukrainian neutrality and demilitarization. In contrast, Kiev and the EU are pushing for a reinforced Ukrainian military, possible NATO deployment on Ukrainian soil or even eventual NATO accession. These efforts by the Europeans appear desperate, even naïve – given that Russia isslowly but steadily winning the war on the ground. And as Russia makes military gains, Kiev's and Brussels' wiggle room in the negotiations shrinks. That said, their attempts shouldn't be dismissed outright. The shape of the peace deal slow-cooked in Washington will determine Ukraine's fate – and by extension, much of Europe's future security structure. Moscow, meanwhile, remains unperturbed. After the meeting with Zelensky and the Europeans, Trump held a 40-minute phone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Judging by the information released about the substance of the call, Trump made no demands and Putin offered no concessions. They talked about continuing direct Russia-Ukraine talks. They also discussed 'elevating' the level of the talks, and according to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who was present at Monday's meeting, direct talks between Putin and Zelensky could take place within two weeks. It is clear that the Kremlin remains steadfast and poised to consider setting the terms while it holds all the military cards. In the end, the Washington summit may have lacked ceremony and a spectacular outcome, but it was loaded with geopolitical subtext: a contest over whether the US remains a supporter to Ukraine or begins to shift back toward a more transactional, realist posture. The EU, recognizing its diminishing leverage, is trying to reclaim the narrative as the battleground, at least for now, is clearly tilting against it.
Russia Today
10 hours ago
- Russia Today
Zelensky admits territory exchanges on talks agenda
Ukraine's Vladimir Zelensky has acknowledged that territorial exchanges are on the talks agenda at the White House with US President Donald Trump and Kiev's key Western European backers. Zelensky had previously refused outright to discuss any loss of land. In the aftermath of last week's Putin-Trump summit in Alaska, Zelensky reacted to any type of territorial concession stating that 'The Constitution of Ukraine does not allow the surrender of territories or the trading of land.' During his opening remarks at the White House, before meeting with Zelensky, the leaders of the UK, France, Italy, Germany and Finland, as well as the heads of NATO and the European Commission, Trump said the talks would address possible territorial exchanges. He described the current front lines as 'the war zone, war lines that are pretty obvious – very sad to look at,' and added that any decision on the matter 'can only be made by Zelensky and the people of Ukraine working together, and by President Putin.' Zelensky followed up by thanking the American President for a map Trump had apparently used in discussions with the Ukrainian leader.
Russia Today
11 hours ago
- Russia Today
EU state hints at cutting off power supply to Ukraine
Hungary could cut off power supply to Ukraine in response to a recent attack on a pipeline carrying Russian oil to the EU state, Foreign Minister Peter Szijjarto has suggested. Unlike most EU countries, Budapest has refused to provide military aid to Kiev, and has been a vocal critic of the bloc's sanctions against Russia. Hungary's relations with Ukraine have been steadily deteriorating in recent years, with Budapest accusing Kiev of discriminating against the Hungarian ethnic minority in Western Ukraine. In a post on X on Monday, Szijjarto stated that while 'Russia has supplied oil to Hungary for decades via the Druzhba pipeline,' Ukraine 'attacks this pipeline, and because of these Ukrainian strikes, oil supplies to Hungary are repeatedly cut off.' The diplomat stressed that Kiev's actions go directly against his country's national interests. Szijjarto went on to warn Kiev that a 'significant part of Ukraine's electricity comes from Hungary…' The remark came in response to a statement by Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrey Sibiga. In an X post earlier on Monday, Sibiga wrote that 'Hungary has made every effort to maintain its reliance on Russia,' even after the Ukraine conflict escalated in February 2022, and despite being 'told for years that Moscow is an unreliable partner.' 'You can now send your complaints – and threats – to your friends in Moscow,' Sibiga told Szijjarto. In an earlier message, the Hungarian official claimed that the 'outrageous and unacceptable' Ukrainian attack on the conduit was part of concerted efforts by Kiev and Brussels to 'drag Hungary into the war in Ukraine.' The previous attack on Druzhba happened as recently as last week. Druzhba is one of the world's longest networks, transporting crude some 4,000km (2,485 miles) from Russia and Kazakhstan to the Czech Republic, Germany, Hungary, Poland, and Slovakia. Commenting on the latest attack on the pipeline, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova suggested that the current Ukrainian leadership poses a threat to all neighboring nations, with Moscow having repeatedly warned about that since the 2014 Western-backed Maidan coup.
