Royal Caribbean has bad port news for passengers
Frustrating cruise itinerary changes continue to plague Royal Caribbean passengers hoping to sail to one sought-after cruise port.
For months, passengers booked on one Royal Caribbean ship have been receiving the bad news that their cruise's call to the destination had to be canceled due to construction work at the pier. Now, the ongoing problem with the cruise port is impacting another hugely popular Royal Caribbean ship, too.Although the situation is out of Royal Caribbean's control, it's still very disappointing for the passengers who may have selected a particular sailing specifically for the destinations the ship will visit on the itinerary.
Recent rumors suggested the pier repair work could wrap up in early 2025, but new updates indicate that the port will remain unavailable until at least late July. Royal Caribbean has already made itinerary changes for several more sailings as a result.
This week, passengers booked on multiple cruises on Royal Caribbean's Icon of the Seas received the same disappointing news that passengers booked on Symphony of the Seas have been receiving for months.
Their cruise vacation will no longer include a visit to San Juan, Puerto Rico.The only pier at the San Juan Cruise Port that can accommodate Royal Caribbean's biggest ships has been closed to these cruise ships for months. The closure stems from an incident with an MSC Cruises ship in April 2024 that resulted in the loss of a dolphin mooring structure just off the main pier.
After the incident, the U.S. Coast Guard established an operational control disallowing cruise ship operations at San Juan Port's Pier-3 West until it can be determined that the structure remains sound for cruise ship operations.The port's other piers continue to welcome cruise ships, but only Pier-3 West can accommodate Royal Caribbean's massive Icon- and Oasis-class ships.
Recently, the San Juan Cruise Port filed a negligence lawsuit against MSC Cruises and its insurers to attempt to recover the costs of the damages to the pier structure. This new development likely slowed the process of reopening the cruise port, contributing to the continued cancellations of planned cruise ship calls.Royal Caribbean recently notified passengers booked on four Icon of the Seas sailings that the San Juan Cruise Port won't be able to welcome them and their cruise itinerary has changed, according to RoyalCaribbeanBlog.com. The impacted cruises include May 3, June 7, June 21, and July 19 sailings on Icon of the Seas.
"Before your vacation begins, we wanted to inform you about some changes to our itinerary. Due to ongoing improvements to the pier infrastructure in San Juan, the port operators have advised us that the port will not be ready in time for our visit," the cruise line states in the emails sent to passengers booked on the four sailings.
The May 3, June 7 and June 21 cruises will now visit Ponce, Puerto Rico in place of San Juan while the July 19 sailing will instead call to Phillipsburg, St. Maarten.Royal Caribbean Blog reports that the cruise line also made big changes to the itinerary for Symphony of the Seas' April 6 sailing to replace its planned call to San Juan with other ports. Instead of visiting San Juan, St. Maarten, and Perfect Day at CocoCay, the cruise will now sail to Labadee, Haiti, Puerto Plata, Dominican Republic, and Nassau, Bahamas, in addition to Perfect Day at CocoCay.
The ongoing pier closure in San Juan also impacted Disney Cruise Line's newest ship, the Disney Treasure, in early February. The cruise line was forced to revise the itinerary for its Feb. 1 sailing on the Treasure to skip San Juan due to the unavailable berth. Instead, the cruise visited the cruise line's private destination in The Bahamas, Disney Lookout Cay at Lighthouse Point.
(The Arena Group will earn a commission if you book a cruise.)
, or email Amy Post at or call or text her at 386-383-2472.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Top House Democrat grills Hegseth on submarine spending plans: 'Give us the details'
Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., confronted Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth during a heated House Appropriations Committee hearing Tuesday over years-long lags in the nation's shipbuilding capacity. The top Appropriations Democrat accused the Defense Department (DOD) of failing to present a clear, transparent plan to ramp up production at a time when China's shipbuilding capabilities are estimated to be 230 times greater than the U.S.'s. She said the Biden administration had been similarly opaque. DeLauro zeroed in on what she characterized as a troubling shortfall between the Navy's current production capacity and future strategic needs. "Do you know where our submarine production currently stands and whether current production is sufficient to bridge the gap between current fleet size and projected need?" she asked. Hegseth Defends National Guard La Deployments, Says Ice Agents Must Be Protected "There is a gap," Hegseth admitted, "but we believe we are closing it." Read On The Fox News App But DeLauro wasn't satisfied, demanding detailed data to back up that claim. "We do not have any information or data that can substantiate what you're saying," she shot back. "Give us the details." "We've had difficulty with the prior administration, and I don't mind calling them out. What is your plan for the future?" Asked what the status is of the department's investment in submarine programs, Hegseth boasted of a 14% increase in funding in the fiscal year 2026 budget request for the Columbia-class nuclear-powered ballistic missile submarines and a "substantial increase" in the Virginia-class fast-attack submarines as well. But the congresswoman raised concerns about reports that the Pentagon plans to shift $3.1 billion in funding for the Columbia-class submarine program from FY2026 to FY2027 and FY2028. "This creates a serious problem for industry in the short term and hampers shipbuilders' ability to reach an adequate production rate," DeLauro warned. "Have you been in contact with Electric Boat or Huntington Ingalls about your plans?" Hegseth pushed back, saying top Pentagon officials were in regular communication with shipyards. "Almost every day," he said. "We're actively engaged… to make sure their needs are being met and their shortfalls are being addressed so we can close that gap in real time." DeLauro pointed to a missed deadline for placing key submarine contracts authorized under the December continuing resolution. Congress had approved $5.7 billion for two Block IV and one Block V Virginia-class submarines, with the understanding that contracts would be in place by February 2025. The Defense Department did not finalize the contracts until April 30. "We have made a serious investment," DeLauro said. "Now we want to know where that is going and what your plan is." Move Over, Black Hawk: Army Unveils The Mv-75, Tiltrotor Aircraft To Replace Iconic Assault Chopper When pressed for specifics, Hegseth thanked the committee for its flexibility and acknowledged prior mismanagement under previous administrations. But DeLauro cut him off. "I want your plan," she said. "Can we get that in writing and on paper? Because we don't have anything today. We have zip, nada." Hegseth promised to provide the committee with written details of the department's submarine production plan. "We have the details, and we will provide them," he said. DeLauro insisted she wanted the information before the committee's markup later the same day. The U.S. Navy's shipbuilding capacity has been on the decline since the Cold War. In the 1980s, the U.S. aimed for a 600-ship fleet; today, it struggles to maintain 300 operational vessels. The Navy currently operates under 50 attack submarines, well below the long-term requirement of 66 boats, as outlined by recent Navy force structure assessments. Shipyards like Electric Boat (General Dynamics) in Connecticut and Huntington Ingalls Industries in Virginia and Mississippi are the primary builders of nuclear submarines—but both are operating near maximum capacity and face major workforce and supply chain challenges. Shipbuilders report significant difficulties in hiring, training and retaining welders, pipefitters, engineers and designers. Shipbuilding's highly specialized supply chain was hit especially hard by the Covid-19 pandemic and has been slow to article source: Top House Democrat grills Hegseth on submarine spending plans: 'Give us the details'
Travel Weekly
an hour ago
- Travel Weekly
Royal Caribbean and the latest on cruising's exclusive destinations
Clockwise from top: Teri West, Travel Weekly's cruise editor; Jay Schneider of Royal Caribbean Group; and Folo host Rebecca Tobin talk about the latest in private and exclusive cruise destinations. We're returning to a subject that we've talked about before on the Folo, but that just keeps continuing to grow and evolve, that's cruise companies' private islands and destinations. On the podcast this week is Jay Schneider, the chief product innovation officer of Royal Caribbean Group. Royal Caribbean has been at the forefront of these discussions with its Perfect Day projects and now is moving forward with a destination in the South Pacific and a hotel in Chile for Antarctica guests on its Silversea brand. In this episode, cruise editor Teri West and Schneider talk about the inspiration for Royal's thrill-and-chill vibes, competition and the evolution of land-and-sea vacations in the Caribbean. This was recorded May 29 and has been edited for length and clarity. Episode sponsor This episode was sponsored by the Globus Family of Brands Related links Perfect Day Mexico: Royal Caribbean previews its next frontier of fun The Grand Lucayan overhaul is an $827M bet on cruise tourism Royal Caribbean expects to open its South Pacific destination in early 2027 Holland America Line reveals plans for an upgraded Half Moon Cay MSC Cruises will develop a private island adjacent to Ocean Cay Carnival Corp.'s private-destination plan: Update, build and promote NCLH starts construction of a pier on Great Stirrup Cay The evolution of cruising's private islands
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
GHM Q1 Earnings Call: Operational Investments, Defense Growth, and Leadership Transition Highlight Outlook
Industrial fluid and energy systems manufacturer Graham Corporation (NYSE: GHM) reported Q1 CY2025 results topping the market's revenue expectations , with sales up 20.9% year on year to $59.35 million. The company's full-year revenue guidance of $230 million at the midpoint came in 1.7% above analysts' estimates. Its GAAP profit of $0.40 per share was significantly above analysts' consensus estimates. Is now the time to buy GHM? Find out in our full research report (it's free). Revenue: $59.35 million vs analyst estimates of $55.67 million (20.9% year-on-year growth, 6.6% beat) EPS (GAAP): $0.40 vs analyst estimates of $0.18 (significant beat) Adjusted EBITDA: $7.65 million vs analyst estimates of $4.77 million (12.9% margin, 60.5% beat) EBITDA guidance for the upcoming financial year 2026 is $25 million at the midpoint, above analyst estimates of $23.77 million Operating Margin: 9.3%, up from -3% in the same quarter last year Backlog: $412.3 million at quarter end Market Capitalization: $489 million Graham Corporation's first quarter results reflected the impact of multi-year investments and a diversified market focus, with management attributing revenue growth to increased defense sales and stronger execution across all segments. CEO Daniel Thoren highlighted the recently secured $136.5 million contract for the U.S. Navy's Virginia-class submarine program and noted that the Barber-Nichols division's performance supported both ongoing revenue stability and future visibility. The company completed several high-return capital projects, expanded its Batavia manufacturing facility, and grew its welder workforce by 10%, steps that were identified as critical to supporting long lead-time defense contracts and enabling continued backlog growth. Management emphasized that productivity initiatives, operational improvements, and a focus on higher-margin work in defense and energy contributed to the year-over-year margin expansion. Looking forward, Graham Corporation's outlook is driven by expectations for continued defense demand, capacity expansion projects coming online, and ongoing efficiency improvements. President and incoming CEO Matthew Malone outlined the transition into the 'improve' and 'growth' phases of the company's long-term strategy, emphasizing upcoming benefits from technology investments and scalable product offerings. Management expects capital expenditures to remain elevated to support growth, with a target to increase R&D spending and further automate manufacturing. Malone stated, 'We are aligning both organic and inorganic investments to capture tailwinds in our core markets,' and highlighted digital transformation and global reach as future priorities. Management also cautioned that tariffs and the absence of certain grants could affect margins, but expressed confidence in offsetting these pressures with process improvements and pricing initiatives. Management attributed the quarter's performance to defense contract wins, expanded manufacturing capabilities, and successful execution of their stabilization and improvement strategy. Defense contract momentum: The company secured a major contract for the Virginia-class submarine program, bolstering its recurring revenue base and enhancing long-term visibility, with Barber-Nichols maintaining a key supplier role. Manufacturing capacity expansion: Ongoing investments in facilities—such as the 30,000 square foot Navy-focused Batavia site and automation upgrades—are expected to improve throughput and support increased defense and energy market demand. Operational process improvements: Management reported that initiatives like automated welding and enhanced radiographic testing are reducing project cycle times and improving quality, with broader benefits anticipated from applying these technologies across markets. Workforce development: The company's welder training program expanded the skilled labor pool by 10% year-over-year, helping address past bottlenecks and enabling the execution of complex defense contracts. Portfolio diversification and integration: The integration of P3 into Barber-Nichols has provided rapid design capabilities and cross-pollination of advanced technology, positioning the business to serve new energy and process opportunities beyond its legacy operations. Graham Corporation's management expects that ongoing defense demand, facility investments, and operational efficiencies will be the leading factors for revenue and margin performance in the coming quarters. Defense and naval demand: Management expects continued high volumes from U.S. Navy programs, supported by contract structures that now include protections against commodity price volatility, providing greater stability over multi-year cycles. Capacity and technology upgrades: Several capital projects—including automation, new testing facilities, and digital systems—are set to come online by year-end, with benefits to productivity and margin expansion expected to begin in the following year. Margin and cost headwinds: While tariffs and the expiration of certain training grants are forecast to create temporary margin pressure, management believes that improved pricing models, process efficiencies, and the ability to order high-risk materials early will partially offset these risks. In upcoming quarters, the StockStory team will be watching (1) the ramp-up and customer adoption of new manufacturing and testing facilities, (2) progress on integrating advanced automation and digital systems into operations, and (3) continued success in converting backlog into revenue, particularly in defense and energy markets. The effectiveness of cross-market technology applications and the ability to offset margin headwinds will also be key signposts. Graham Corporation currently trades at a forward P/E ratio of 38×. At this valuation, is it a buy or sell post earnings? The answer lies in our full research report (it's free). Market indices reached historic highs following Donald Trump's presidential victory in November 2024, but the outlook for 2025 is clouded by new trade policies that could impact business confidence and growth. While this has caused many investors to adopt a "fearful" wait-and-see approach, we're leaning into our best ideas that can grow regardless of the political or macroeconomic climate. Take advantage of Mr. Market by checking out our Top 5 Growth Stocks for this month. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-micro-cap company Kadant (+351% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
