logo
Singapore's core inflation rises to 0.7% in April; headline inflation is unchanged at 0.9%

Singapore's core inflation rises to 0.7% in April; headline inflation is unchanged at 0.9%

Business Times23-05-2025

[SINGAPORE] Singapore's core inflation came in higher than expected in April, driven by higher food and services prices, while headline inflation stood pat, data from the Department of Statistics showed on Friday (May 23).
April's core inflation, which excludes accommodation and private transport, rose to 0.7 per cent. This was marginally higher than March's 0.5 per cent and the median forecast of 0.5 per cent by private-sector economists polled by Bloomberg.
Headline inflation was unchanged at 0.9 per cent – higher than economists' median forecast of 0.8 per cent.
On a month-on-month basis, the overall consumer price index (CPI) edged down 0.3 per cent in April, while core CPI increased 0.5 per cent.
In a joint statement on Friday that was nearly identical to the one issued last month, the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and the Ministry of Trade and Industry (MTI) reiterated that Singapore's imported inflation is expected to remain moderate.
They noted that though trade conflicts could be inflationary for some economies, the impact on Singapore's import prices is likely to be more than offset by the disinflationary drags from weaker global demand.
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
On the domestic front, unit labour costs are projected to rise gradually, while enhanced government subsidies for essential services will continue to dampen services inflation.
Taking these factors into account, MAS and MTI maintained the full-year forecast range for core and headline inflation at 0.5 to 1.5 per cent, adding that risks to inflation are 'tilted towards the downside, given heightened uncertainties in the external environment'.
MAS lowered the inflation forecast range on Apr 14, when it eased monetary policy settings for the second time in a row.
Less urgency to ease
Several economists are not ruling out a loosening of monetary policy in July, though they see less urgency for MAS to act.
OCBC chief economist Selena Ling pointed out that MAS' inflation outlook is largely the same as the previous month, with no change to the official forecast range. 'As such, there is no urgency per se to ease monetary policy immediately after the January and April moves,' she noted.
But she added that the window 'may still be open' should core inflation drop further and if global trade tensions re-escalate, resulting in a deterioration of global and domestic economic conditions.
Similarly, Barclays analysts Brian Tan and Liu Hongying believe that there is 'less urgency' for MAS to ease monetary policy. But they maintained their base case for the slope of the Singapore dollar nominal effective exchange rate policy band to be lowered to neutral in July, 'with a risk of delay to October'.
'We believe... MAS will look through the impact of the administered price adjustments and view underlying demand-pull conditions as still soft. Coupled with its assessment that the output gap is entering negative territory, this should still justify a zero slope.'
That said, they expect that 'an optically more stable core inflation path, even if supported by administered price adjustments' could still reduce pressure on MAS to ease policy, raising the risk of a delay in easing.
Citing MAS' position that risks to inflation are tilted to the downside, Standard Chartered's chief economist for Asean and South Asia Edward Lee expects MAS' next move, if any, to be an easing. But he added that April's inflation data supports the bank's on-hold call for July.
In contrast, Maybank economists Chua Hak Bin and Brian Lee expect MAS to maintain its policy stance come July and October. They said: The April inflation data does not change the picture of a benign inflation outlook, while near-term recession risks are abating on the US-China trade truce and export front-loading.'
Economists also maintained their 2025 core inflation forecasts, which ranged between 0.5 per cent and 1.2 per cent.
At the lower end of the range was Maybank's Chua and Lee, whose full-year core inflation forecast stood at 0.5 per cent and headline inflation forecast at 0.8 per cent.
They expect inflation to remain low, noting that import prices are likely to fall 'amid soft global demand and displacement of China's excess capacity'; lower imported costs from a stronger Singdollar; as well as cautious local consumer demand that will limit price hikes.
Barclays' Tan and Liu kept their core inflation forecast at 0.7 per cent for 2025 and 1.1 per cent for 2026, but lowered headline inflation to 0.8 per cent for both 2025 and 2026.
Likewise, UOB associate economist Jester Koh kept his full-year core inflation forecast at 0.7 per cent, noting 'risks tilted towards the downside on weaker external demand, in addition to possible rerouting of excess supply from China into Asean'.
Should weakness in core inflation momentum persist, there is also a likelihood of full-year core inflation undershooting MAS' forecast range of 0.5 per cent to 1.5 per cent, he added.
Meanwhile, OCBC's Ling maintained her full-year core inflation forecast of 1.2 per cent. This is on the assumption that core inflation may inch higher over the course of this year and that the first quarter's low levels were due to earlier 2024 Goods and Services Tax hike effects, she explained.
Though March's core inflation reading came in at a 'very dovish' 0.5 per cent, Ling said, April's bump-up to 0.7 per cent 'should not be too alarming' on account of current heightened tariff uncertainties in the external environment. 'Given the lack of clarity on tariffs, even with the ongoing trade negotiations, especially pertaining to the eventual outcome of the 90-day trade truce with China, the disinflation path is likely still bumpy.'
Key CPI categories
In April, higher inflation in services and food was offset by lower inflation in the categories of accommodation, retail and other goods, and private transport.
Services inflation rose to 1.1 per cent, from 0.6 per cent in March, due to a larger increase in the cost of health insurance and a smaller decline in airfares.
Food inflation edged up to 1.4 per cent, from 1.3 per cent the previous month, as the prices of non-cooked food rose at a quicker pace.
Electricity and gas inflation was unchanged, as electricity and gas tariffs declined at a similar pace in April and March.
Accommodation inflation moderated to 1.1 per cent, from 1.4 per cent in March, as a result of smaller increases in housing rents and maintenance and repair costs.
Private transport inflation eased to 1.3 per cent, from 2.1 per cent the month prior, due to a smaller increase in car prices and a larger decline in petrol prices.
On the other hand, retail and other goods prices fell at a faster pace to minus 1.2 per cent in April, compared to minus 0.5 per cent in March.
This was despite the increase in water prices and was attributed to a decline in clothing and footwear prices, as well as a sharper drop in the cost of medicines and health products.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Gold Gains on Weaker Dollar Before U.S.-China Trade Talks, Platinum Hits Four-Year High
Gold Gains on Weaker Dollar Before U.S.-China Trade Talks, Platinum Hits Four-Year High

International Business Times

time3 hours ago

  • International Business Times

Gold Gains on Weaker Dollar Before U.S.-China Trade Talks, Platinum Hits Four-Year High

As the prelude to a possible major storm, investors are taking a cautious yet hopeful stance as gold prices edged higher Monday. Bullion surged on the back of a softer U.S. dollar, with hopes that trade talks between the United States and China might tamp down tensions supporting precious-metal buyers. For many, gold remained a source of comfort during times of global turmoil, a safe haven when economic and geopolitical storm clouds were threatening. Spot gold was up 0.3% at 3,317.97 per ounce by 1124 GMT, after touching its lowest since early June at 3,293.29 earlier in the session. U.S. gold futures, meanwhile, fell 0.2 percent to $3,338.70. The dollar fell 0.2 percent relative to a basket of other currencies, which makes gold cheaper and more attractive for international buyers. This week, attention will be centered on the U.S.-China talks that are scheduled to take place in London and through which officials are hoping to draw up common ground and avert a further escalation of trade tensions between the top two economies in the world. "Trade tensions, geopolitical risks, elevated debt levels, and slow economic growth are still the main drivers supporting gold prices," said UBS analyst Giovanni Staunovo. These factors should continue to be supportive of gold in the months to come. Gold price movements were mixed over the past week, but the precious metal retained its ground as market sentiment fluctuated. The yellow metal managed to remain steady even after stronger-than-expected U.S. employment data dampened some expectations around Federal Reserve interest rate cuts. Investors have recalibrated their expectations, shifting from anticipating two rate cuts to just one, likely in October. Traders will be closely watching the upcoming U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI) data due Wednesday, which could offer fresh clues about the Fed's next move. Meanwhile, platinum continued its stunning rally, adding 2.7% ($31) to reach $1,200.95, a price not seen since May 2021. Alexander Zumpfe at Heraeus Metals Germany attributed the strong showing by platinum to short supply, better industrial demand, and a tailwind from across the broader precious metals market. Silver also rallied and gained 0.9% to $36.27 an ounce, and palladium advanced 2.5 % to $1,072.96.

MAS: digital token services for overseas customers must be licensed by 30 June or cease operations
MAS: digital token services for overseas customers must be licensed by 30 June or cease operations

Online Citizen​

time17 hours ago

  • Online Citizen​

MAS: digital token services for overseas customers must be licensed by 30 June or cease operations

SINGAPORE: The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) will mandate that digital token service providers (DTSPs) serving only overseas clients must be licensed from 30 June 2025. This includes providers dealing in digital payment tokens or capital market product tokens. MAS issued a clarification on 6 June 2025, reiterating that the licensing bar will be set 'high' and that such licences will 'generally' not be issued. The central bank cited elevated money laundering risks and supervisory limitations as key reasons. 'If their substantive regulated activity is outside of Singapore, MAS is unable to effectively supervise such persons,' it stated. DTSPs that continue to offer services to only foreign clients without a licence after 30 June will be required to cease those activities. MAS has communicated this position consistently since 14 February 2022, reaffirming it in statements dated 4 October 2024 and 30 May 2025. On 30 May 2025, MAS released its response to feedback on the Consultation Paper on Proposed Regulatory Approach, Regulations, Notices and Guidelines for DTSPs. The proposed framework falls under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2022. According to the regulator, the internet-based and cross-border nature of these services increases the likelihood of misuse for money laundering and terrorism financing, posing risks to Singapore's financial integrity. MAS also clarified that DTSPs already licensed to serve Singapore customers are unaffected. These entities may also serve overseas clients as part of their operations. Providers dealing with tokens other than payment or capital market types – such as utility or governance tokens – are not subject to the new licensing requirement. MAS emphasised that the upcoming framework targets only a small segment of DTSPs. 'Based on available information, we are aware of a very small number of such providers,' the authority stated. The regulator has reached out to those likely to be affected to clarify its policy and discuss an orderly wind-down of operations. Affected parties are advised to contact MAS at AMLCFT@ This move aligns with MAS' broader efforts to fortify Singapore's financial ecosystem against illicit financial activities, without disrupting regulated providers already operating within the city-state. Singapore rejects crypto for SWFs investments over speculation, volatility During Parliamentary sitting on 5 March, then-Minister of State for Trade and Industry and MAS Board Member Alvin Tan reaffirmed that cryptocurrencies are unsuitable for Singapore's sovereign wealth funds due to their speculative and volatile nature. He emphasised that both the Government and MAS view cryptocurrencies as lacking the underlying economic fundamentals required for long-term institutional investments. This stance was reiterated in response to WP MP Jamus Lim's queries on whether cryptocurrencies could play a role for institutional investors, to which Tan questioned the Workers' Party's position and reaffirmed the Government's cautious approach. Tan also responded to concerns from MP Yip Hon Weng about the tightening of regulations on crypto-related services, especially the prohibition of using credit or leverage for crypto purchases. He warned of the risks of compounded debt and financial loss due to the high volatility of cryptocurrencies. Addressing whether a total ban was considered, Tan explained that MAS prefers regulation and education over prohibition, aiming to avoid driving crypto trading underground while fostering a responsible digital asset ecosystem. Temasek's FTX investment: Losses, internal review, and accountability measures Temasek invested US$275 million in FTX across two funding rounds in 2021, believing in the exchange's potential and its role in the digital asset ecosystem. However, in November 2022, FTX collapsed due to liquidity issues and allegations of fraud, leading to its bankruptcy. Following the collapse, Temasek wrote off its entire investment in FTX, acknowledging the loss. In May 2023, Temasek announced that it had conducted an internal review of its due diligence process. As a result, it cut the compensation of its senior management and investment team responsible for the failed investment.

MAS clarifies position on regulation of digital token service providers
MAS clarifies position on regulation of digital token service providers

Singapore Law Watch

time18 hours ago

  • Singapore Law Watch

MAS clarifies position on regulation of digital token service providers

MAS clarifies position on regulation of digital token service providers Source: Straits Times Article Date: 09 Jun 2025 Author: Timothy Goh The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) said it has set the bar 'high' for licensing, and will 'generally' not issue a licence. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has clarified that digital token service providers offering services solely to customers outside Singapore – whether involving digital payment tokens or capital market products – will need to be licensed from June 30. The central bank added in its clarification on June 6 that it has set the bar 'high' for licensing, and will 'generally' not issue a licence. 'The money laundering risks are higher in such business models and if their substantive regulated activity is outside of Singapore, MAS is unable to effectively supervise such persons,' it said. Without a licence, existing digital token service providers serving only overseas customers will be required to cease these activities when the regime comes into effect on June 30, said MAS. In its response on May 30 to feedback on a consultation paper regarding its proposed regulatory framework for digital token service providers, MAS noted that such providers may be more vulnerable to money laundering and terrorism financing risks due to the internet-based and cross-border nature of their services. This increases the likelihood that they could be misused for illicit purposes, to the detriment of Singapore's reputation. The proposed regulatory framework will come under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2022. MAS also clarified that service providers for digital payment tokens or tokens of capital market products that serve customers in Singapore are already regulated, and there will be no change to what these licensed providers can do. Providers serving customers in Singapore may also offer services to overseas clients, while those dealing with other types of tokens – such as utility or governance tokens – are not subject to licensing or regulation under the new regime and are therefore unaffected. MAS said that it has reached out to persons who, based on information available to them, may be affected by the new regime to clarify its policy position and to discuss their plans for an 'orderly wind-down' of the activity. It added that 'based on available information, we are aware of a very small number of such providers'. Parties who may be affected by the digital token service regime may contact MAS at [email protected]. Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Print

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store