logo
Murder suspect arrested in connection to Las Cruces shooting on Picacho Ave.

Murder suspect arrested in connection to Las Cruces shooting on Picacho Ave.

Yahoo11-06-2025
LAS CRUCES, N.M. (KRQE) — The Las Cruces Police Department has taken a murder suspect into custody following a deadly shooting on Tuesday. Police say Pancho Garcia, 35, has been booked into the Doña Ana County Detention Center where he is being charged with an open count of murder.
Story continues below
New Mexico Crime Files: Grocery store worker hands out semen-tainted yogurt
Film: These productions were filmed at White Sands. Have you seen them?
New Mexico News Insiders: Who Will Fix New Mexico's Mental Health Problems?
News: Governor's Office: Operation Zia Shield is different than situation in California
Slightly after 8:30 a.m., police and fire were dispatched to the intersection of Picacho and 17th Street in response to shots fired. First responders found Juan Javier Lujan Garces, 29, in his vehicle with at least one gunshot wound. Garces was pronounced dead on the scene.
Police say Garcia barricaded himself in a first-floor room of a motel in the 1700 block of west Picacho Avenue following the shooting. A perimeter was set up. Las Cruces police activated its SWAT and hostage negotiation teams. Nearby residents were asked to evacuate and residents who lived further away were asked to shelter in place.
Multiple attempts were made to contact Garcia, according to police. SWAT team members breached a window at about 11:30 a.m. Garcia left the room shortly after and was taken into custody. Police say no shots were fired by police and no other injuries were reported. West Picacho Avenue is now clear and open to traffic.
Garcia is currently being held without bond.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Abrego Garcia's lawyers want smuggling charges dismissed on grounds of vindictive prosecution
Abrego Garcia's lawyers want smuggling charges dismissed on grounds of vindictive prosecution

Yahoo

time11 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Abrego Garcia's lawyers want smuggling charges dismissed on grounds of vindictive prosecution

Lawyers for Kilmar Abrego Garcia asked a federal judge on Tuesday to dismiss a human smuggling case against him, saying the government was prosecuting the Maryland construction worker to punish him for challenging his removal to El Salvador. Their motion filed in court said attempts to dismiss indictments on the grounds of 'selective or vindictive prosecution' are infrequent and rarely succeed, 'but if there has ever been a case for dismissal on those grounds, this is that case.' The attorneys said senior cabinet members, Justice Department leaders and President Donald Trump mounted unprecedented public attacks on Abrego Garcia and that 'vindictiveness is clear from the record.' Acting U.S. Attorney Robert E. McGuire in Tennessee, where Abrego Garcia is in jail, said in an email prosecutors would have no other comment beyond what they file in response to the motion. No prosecutor motion was filed as of late Tuesday. Abrego Garcia became a prominent face in the debate over Trump's immigration policies following his wrongful expulsion to El Salvador in March. Trump's administration violated a U.S. immigration judge's order in 2019 that shields Abrego Garcia from deportation to El Salvador because he likely faces threats of gang violence there. The administration claimed Abrego Garcia was in the MS-13 gang, although he wasn't charged and has repeatedly denied the allegation. Facing mounting pressure and a U.S. Supreme Court order, the Trump administration returned Abrego Garcia to the U.S. in June to face the smuggling charges, which his attorneys have called 'preposterous.' Tuesday's motion alleged the government was trying to paint Abrego Garcia as a criminal to punish him for challenging his removal to El Salvador and to avoid 'the embarrassment of accepting responsibility for its unlawful conduct." The motion said the government also aimed to change public opinion about Abrego Garcia's deportation. Abrego Garcia's attorneys asked the court at least to order a hearing on the government's motives. The smuggling case stems from a 2022 traffic stop for speeding, during which Abrego Garcia was driving a vehicle with nine passengers. Police in Tennessee suspected human smuggling, but he was allowed to drive on. A federal judge in Maryland last month prohibited the Trump administration from taking Abrego Garcia into immediate immigration custody if he's released from jail. The judge ordered the government to provide three business days notice if Immigration and Customs Enforcement intends to initiate deportation proceedings against him.

Abrego Garcia's lawyers want smuggling charges dismissed on grounds of vindictive prosecution
Abrego Garcia's lawyers want smuggling charges dismissed on grounds of vindictive prosecution

Associated Press

time12 hours ago

  • Associated Press

Abrego Garcia's lawyers want smuggling charges dismissed on grounds of vindictive prosecution

Lawyers for Kilmar Abrego Garcia asked a federal judge on Tuesday to dismiss a human smuggling case against him, saying the government was prosecuting the Maryland construction worker to punish him for challenging his removal to El Salvador. Their motion filed in court said attempts to dismiss indictments on the grounds of 'selective or vindictive prosecution' are infrequent and rarely succeed, 'but if there has ever been a case for dismissal on those grounds, this is that case.' The attorneys said senior cabinet members, Justice Department leaders and President Donald Trump mounted unprecedented public attacks on Abrego Garcia and that 'vindictiveness is clear from the record.' Acting U.S. Attorney Robert E. McGuire in Tennessee, where Abrego Garcia is in jail, said in an email prosecutors would have no other comment beyond what they file in response to the motion. No prosecutor motion was filed as of late Tuesday. Abrego Garcia became a prominent face in the debate over Trump's immigration policies following his wrongful expulsion to El Salvador in March. Trump's administration violated a U.S. immigration judge's order in 2019 that shields Abrego Garcia from deportation to El Salvador because he likely faces threats of gang violence there. The administration claimed Abrego Garcia was in the MS-13 gang, although he wasn't charged and has repeatedly denied the allegation. Facing mounting pressure and a U.S. Supreme Court order, the Trump administration returned Abrego Garcia to the U.S. in June to face the smuggling charges, which his attorneys have called 'preposterous.' Tuesday's motion alleged the government was trying to paint Abrego Garcia as a criminal to punish him for challenging his removal to El Salvador and to avoid 'the embarrassment of accepting responsibility for its unlawful conduct.' The motion said the government also aimed to change public opinion about Abrego Garcia's deportation. Abrego Garcia's attorneys asked the court at least to order a hearing on the government's motives. The smuggling case stems from a 2022 traffic stop for speeding, during which Abrego Garcia was driving a vehicle with nine passengers. Police in Tennessee suspected human smuggling, but he was allowed to drive on. A federal judge in Maryland last month prohibited the Trump administration from taking Abrego Garcia into immediate immigration custody if he's released from jail. The judge ordered the government to provide three business days notice if Immigration and Customs Enforcement intends to initiate deportation proceedings against him.

Kilmar Abrego Garcia's attorneys move to dismiss criminal case
Kilmar Abrego Garcia's attorneys move to dismiss criminal case

Yahoo

time13 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Kilmar Abrego Garcia's attorneys move to dismiss criminal case

Kilmar Abrego Garcia's attorneys accused federal prosecutors on Tuesday of "vindictive and selective prosecution" in a motion seeking to dismiss the criminal charges against him. Abrego Garcia could be released from Tennessee criminal custody on Friday, when U.S. Magistrate Judge Barbara Holmes's temporary stay is set to expire. This comes after a separate judge ruled last month that Abrego Garcia must be returned to Maryland if he is released. In the 25-page filing, Abrego Garcia's attorneys argued that the government charged him "because he refused to acquiesce in the government's violation of his due process rights." MORE: Justice Department investigating 2022 Abrego Garcia traffic stop: Sources "Kilmar Abrego Garcia has been singled out by the United States government," his attorneys said. The Salvadoran native was deported in March to El Salvador's CECOT mega-prison -- despite a 2019 court order barring his deportation due to fear of persecution -- after the Trump administration claimed he was a member of the criminal gang MS-13, which he denies. He was brought back to the U.S. in May to face charges in Tennessee of allegedly transporting undocumented migrants. In the filing on Tuesday, the attorneys said that Abrego Garcia was "sent on his way without so much as a traffic ticket" after the Tennessee Highway Patrol stopped their client in 2022. "Yet three years later, unrelatedly, the government picked Mr. Abrego up off the street—along with others with similar immigration status—as part of a shock-and-awe immigration enforcement push," they said. MORE: Timeline: Wrongful deportation of Kilmar Abrego Garcia to El Salvador After Abrego Garcia's wrongful removal, the attorneys said the government "responded not with contrition, or with any effort to fix its mistake, but with defiance." "A group of the most senior officials in the United States sought vengeance: they began a public campaign to punish Mr. Abrego for daring to fight back, culminating in the criminal investigation that led to the charges in this case," they said. Abrego Garcia's attorneys said in their filing the government is using the criminal case to punish their client for "successfully fighting his unlawful removal." "That is a constitutional violation of the most basic sort," they said. "The indictment must be dismissed."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store