
Opinion: Modi's Red Fort Arch – From Basics Of Past To Blocks Of Future
From toilets to chips, from appeals to delivery, today's Red Fort vow by Modi declares a simple creed - India will build what it dreams, and defend what it builds
'By the end of this very year, a Made-in-India chip, built in India by the people of India, will arrive in the market." That single line from Prime Minister Narendra Modi's 12th Independence Day address today captures the audacity of India's new horizon.
Eleven years ago, his first Red Fort speech dwelled on toilets, sanitation and the shame of open defecation; he pleaded with MPs and companies to help build school toilets so daughters wouldn't drop out. That was what India of 2014 needed – fixing basics and restoring dignity.
A task which should have been completed in the first few decades of Independence itself but needed a Narendra Modi 70 years later to mainstream the topics, build a mass movement and then deliver.
Fast forward just 11 years and today's India is gearing up to build its own semiconductors, homegrown AI platforms, indigenous jet engines and an Iron Dome-like Sudarshan Chakra — because all the necessary basics have not just been painstakingly built but also delivered.
Consider the new aspirational promises that punctuated Modi's 103-minute address.
First, semiconductors, mission mode, time-bound. Modi didn't speak of a distant aspiration; he set a deadline: a Made-in-India chip this year. After 'losing 50–60 years" to missed chances, India under Modi has 'freed ourselves from this burden" and moved into execution gear. This is not techno-jingoism; it's strategic sovereignty. Chips are the arteries of the modern economy – phones, cars, power grids, missiles. If India can design and ship credible nodes at scale, it will de-risk supply chains, lift manufacturing GVA, and anchor deep R&D jobs at home. The choice of Red Fort for this pledge wasn't mere symbolism; it was a sovereign statement.
Second, a 'double Diwali" through next-generation GST reforms. 'We are bringing next-generation GST reforms. This will reduce the tax burden across the country," the PM said, explicitly signalling that daily-use items will get cheaper and relief will flow to MSMEs. An under-appreciated aspect of GST is the equitable economic development it brings since it incentivises tax at consumption site and not at manufacturing site. Further simplifying GST and reducing taxes will benefit the Eastern states, the least economically developed, the most.
Third, a jobs push with the Pradhan Mantri Viksit Bharat Rozgar Yojana, a Rs 1 lakh-crore programme launched with immediate effect that offers Rs 15,000 to youth who secure their first private-sector job, and incentives for employers. The target: 3.5 crore job opportunities. Apart from job creation, the scheme will further incentivise formalisation of the job market and create a whole new generation of consumers and economy drivers.
Fourth, the new security doctrine and technology depth. Modi drew a line in the sand to end strategic ambiguity: 'India will no longer tolerate nuclear blackmail." He coupled that with a warning that terrorists and their enablers are one and the same, and with a reiteration that India will not resume the old Indus Water status quo that disadvantaged India's own farmers. The language deployed by Modi was one of unambiguous clarity: a public doctrine of deterrence, retaliation, and the primacy of national interest.
Clarity, though, is not enough; capability must follow. Enter Mission Sudarshan Chakra — an indigenous, Iron Dome-like, multi-layered national shield to protect strategic and civilian sites and, crucially, to punish aggressors. Having spectacularly demonstrated its air defence systems in a live shooting match during Operation Sindoor, at a geographical scale at which no other country has done before, India already carries the heft to make good on this aspirational target.
Fifth, an economically reformed state. Alongside GST 2.0, the PM announced a Task Force for next-generation reforms to slash red tape, align laws to twenty-first-century needs, and push India toward Viksit Bharat by 2047. Instead of relying on the usual internal government machinery, the creation of a task force is a clear demonstration of political will and determination to get the reforms done in a specific time frame.
Sixth, a Prime Ministerial declaration to build India's own jet engine. Operation Sindoor distilled a lesson across the board: self-reliance in munitions and platforms is no longer optional. Modi thus explicitly urged young scientists and engineers to build indigenous jet engines for Indian fighters. Given the declaratory impact of a Red Fort Speech, that too from a person with proven track record of Modi, in time this could be like the Moon Mission target, which will not just spur achievement of the main target but many spin-offs as well.
Seventh, in energy, PM Modi spoke of a ten-fold expansion of nuclear capacity by 2047, the only scalable, low-carbon baseload that can partner with renewables for a 10-trillion-dollar economy. And in space, he saluted Group Captain Shubhanshu Shukla's ISS mission and affirmed India's march toward a home-grown space station – lighthouse programme that knits together materials science, robotics, life-support tech and private launch ecosystems.
Eighth, and indeed equally important is the announcement of Demography Mission. Gone is the squeamishness of addressing head on, a sustained 'invasion' (as the Supreme Court once described it), to irreversibly change India's civilisation. The impact of PM Modi promising it from Red Fort will percolate down the entire enforcement machinery and will come with the necessary political will as well as with the stamp of a national mission rather than isolated local level efforts.
However, none of this in 2025 would land with such force if India hadn't journeyed so far since 2014. Re-read that first Red Fort speech of PM Modi: 'Has it ever pained us that our mothers and sisters have to defecate in the open? … I call upon [everyone] to provide toilets in schools… so our daughters are not compelled to leave."
That appeal, and the intent behind it to get the basics first, informed by decades of experiential learning of a ground level activist, seeded Swachh Bharat, Ujjwala, Jan Dhan, Aadhaar-enabled DBT, rural electrification and basic housing—a decade of inclusionary plumbing without which the high-tech frontier talk today would have been performative. The last decade spent in fixing the basics gives Modi the credibility to deliver on the promises made today – for both delivery mechanism knows Modi means business and the people at large trust Modi's sequencing and timing.
There is also a politics of confidence at work. Today's Modi blended welfare (a direct transfer for first jobs), tax relief (GST 2.0), strategic autonomy (semiconductors, jet engines, nuclear and space), and hard-nosed security (Sudarshan Chakra, doctrine against blackmail). In other words: growth with guardrails. The narrative is no longer defensive–'we will catch up"-but declarative: India will set its own terms, build within its borders what it must, and compete on the frontier. That stance is amplified, not diminished, by global turbulence.
In 2014, Modi called himself the 'first servant", promising to work longer hours than the people he led. In 2025, he sounded like the chief product manager of a state-scale startup, shipping features on a tight release cycle: chip this year, GST 2.0 by Diwali, jobs scheme today, reform task force now, an air-defence platform on the roadmap, and a doctrine that tells adversaries where the red lines are. That's not bluster; it's a theory of change shaped by a decade of building foundations, and the confidence that India can finally argue on the frontier, not at the margins.
top videos
View all
From toilets to chips, from appeals to delivery, today's Red Fort vow by Modi declares a simple creed – India will build what it dreams, and defend what it builds.
The writer is the founding CEO of BlueKraft Digital Foundation. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely that of the author. They do not necessarily reflect News18's views.
Click here to add News18 as your preferred news source on Google.
view comments
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
August 15, 2025, 14:32 IST
News opinion Opinion: Modi's Red Fort Arch – From Basics Of Past To Blocks Of Future
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
22 minutes ago
- Mint
Jan Vishwas 2.0: Centre set to table decriminalisation bill in Lok Sabha. Here are five things to look out for
The central government is set to table the Jan Vishwas 2.0 bill in front of the Lok Sabha on Monday, 18 August 2025, as the nation is looking to amend several laws and bring in the new concept of decriminalisation by introducing an 'improvement notice' instead of a penalty for an offence, reported the news portal Indian Express on Saturday, 16 August 2025. Earlier this week, the Union Cabinet of India cleared the Jan Vishwas 2.0 bill which is aiming to decriminalise and rationalise the punishment of offences based on a trust basis governance for the ease of doing business. 'In our country, there are such laws that can put people in jail for very small things — you would be shocked. No one has really paid attention to them. I have been pursuing this, because these unnecessary laws that put our country's citizens behind bars should be abolished. We had introduced a Bill in Parliament earlier, and we have brought it again this time,' said Prime Minister Narendra Modi in his 79th Independence Day speech. 1. Improvement notice — In the Jan Vishwas 2.0 bill, the centre has proposed to introduce a concept of an 'improvement notice' instead of a penalty for a first time offender. In the Budget 2025 announcement, Union Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman announced that the government will bring the Jan Vishwas 2.0 this year, though which the Centre aims to decriminalise more than 180 legal provisions. "In the Jan Vishwas Act 2023, more than 180 legal provisions were decriminalised. Our government will now bring up the Jan Vishwas Bill 2.0 to decriminalise more than 100 provisions in various laws," said Sitharaman in the Budget speech. 2. Shift of approach — The proposed bill bring forth a shift of approach of the central government moving from a 'penalise on first detection' approach of the Jan Vishwas 1.0 which was imposed as a law in 2023, into a 'inform–correct–penalise' approach soon to be mandated as the law. Through this move, the government aims to promote the ease of doing business and trust-based regulation while maintaining deterrence for repeated violations, a person aware of the development told the news portal. 3. No penalty on first offence — According to the proposed bill, the first time offenders will not be charged any penalty for their offence and will be served an opportunity to rectify their non-compliance withing a pre-set period. 4. Increasing subsequent fines — In case an entity becomes a repeat offender, the penalties will start to be applicable from the second offence onwards. According to the news portal's report, the penalty which will be applicable will be the same as it was for the first offence in Jan Vishwas 1.0. The proposal also mandates that the fines charged will increase for the subsequent offences subject to a maximum cap depending on the sections. 5. Changes via Jan Vishwas 1.0 — According to the Jan Vishwas Act of 2023, in efforts to decriminalise several offences under various laws, the Indian government removed the Section 41 of the Food Corporations Act, 1964 which punished imprisonment for a term which may extend to six months, or a fine of ₹ 1,000, or both in case of a using FCI's name in any prospectus or advertisement without its consent in writing. Another case was when the Jan Vishwas Act removed the 6-month imprisonment penalty for tree felling or damage caused by cattle in protected forests; they have however, kept ₹ 500 as a fine for the same in efforts to decriminalise.

The Hindu
24 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Political Line newsletter: Cow Economy, and Diplomacy
Culture influences market and diplomacy. But how much is too much on this count? A slice of the stalemate in trade talks between India and the U.S. is related to the U.S. demand for opening up India's farm sector. The U.S. wants to export more of its dairy and poultry products to India. India resists this demand. Prime Minister Narendra Modi has said he would make personal sacrifices, if required, to ensure that farmers are protected. The proportion of population dependent on agriculture reveals one of the most striking differences between India and the United States, highlighting their vastly different economic structures and development stages. India has nearly half of its workforce engaged in agriculture, while the United States has only less than two percent directly employed in farming — representing a 32-fold difference in agricultural employment dependency. In India's case, agriculture contributes roughly 18 percent of GDP but nearly half of the population is dependent on it. Farmers are a powerful political constituency in both India and the United States. Food is also a question of national security. Post-Covid fears related to self-sufficiency in critical areas have further strengthened the case for national food markets insulated from global disruptions. India's resistance to allowing American farm produce in its market rests on three reasons. The first, as mentioned above, is that too many people are dependent on agriculture, and opening up the sector to American products could render them vulnerable. The second is national security. The third concerns apparently cultural reasons — American cows may be fed meat products such as chicken waste, and this is unacceptable to India. Milk and other products from a cow whose food chain is not clearly plant-based do not meet Indian standards. Whether such determination is consistently applied across all milk produced within India is beside the point. Cultural reasons are relevant to market decisions in all societies. For instance, some Muslim countries or shops may not sell pork; among the GCC countries, pork is available in the UAE and Bahrain, while in others it is not. In large parts of India now, beef is legally banned; in many parts, such as southern India, West Bengal, and the northeastern states, it is widely consumed by all social groups including Hindus. Cultural barriers to global trade are not new in India. Crossing the seas was once taboo — Gandhi had to do penance to be readmitted to his Modh Vaniya caste, which had ostracised him for doing so. Of the three issues at play in trade in agriculture, perhaps the easiest to change is the competency of the sector. But the cultural politics around the cow and the requirements of the agriculture sector often come into conflict. At least 20 out of 28 states have some form of laws to protect cows, which effectively translates into restrictions on the trade and transportation of cattle, including buffaloes. In the last decade or so, many states have enforced these laws aggressively, and vigilantes targeting even legal cattle trade often go scot-free. Simultaneously, a whole network of rent-seeking has emerged in the guise of cow protection, as the state spends massive amounts to shelter unproductive cows that farmers do not want to keep. It is not the case that meat production has ended; India's export of buffalo meat has been growing in the last three years at around four percent annually. What has happened is that cattle and leather trade have been pushed into a grey zone of legality, inflicting costs and losses for all involved and creating new rent-seeking opportunities. You can read about a sample of such restrictions here. Farmers are paying a huge price for this — on the one hand, the difficulty in disposing unproductive cattle, and on the other, the problem of free-roaming cattle destroying their crops. Cow protection in India was linked historically to farming practices of an earlier era. Those factors have changed due to technology and other developments. Yet, productivity in India's agriculture sector remains entangled in the religious association many people have with cows. The cow has long functioned as a symbol in Hindu-Muslim rivalry in the subcontinent. Hindu leaders such as Dayananda Saraswati made cow protection a tool for popular consolidation antagonistic to Muslims in the 19th century. Some Muslim leaders, such as Pir Abu Bakr in Bengal in the early 20th century, argued that cow sacrifice was an essential practice of Islam. Whether cow sacrifice is indeed an essential practice of Islam has been the subject of several litigations in independent India as well. While India grapples with global uncertainties created by political and technological upheavals, it might also make sense to review its priorities at home. The Fear of the Future People Prime Minister Narendra Modi has now raised the spectre of a demographic threat to India in his Independence Day speech. He said there was a conspiracy to change the demographic profile of India. You can read The Hindu editorial on this speech here. Does demographic composition determine the character of a nation? Leaving that question for a future discussion, here are some quick adjacent thoughts. Variations in population growth across communities and geographies pose challenges for governance and national identity. It is one thing to say that everyone is an individual citizen regardless of social location, faith, or ethnicity. But India's governance structure acknowledges the principle of group identities while providing special protections for religious and linguistic minorities, Dalits, backward classes, tribes, etc. Collective identities are not anathema to India's constitutional scheme; in fact, they are central to it. Political contestations have historically been framed in India around the numerical strength of communities. That history warrants discussion separately, but to cite a well known example, the 15% and 7.5% reservations for Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe communities, respectively, were based on their proportion in the population. As the proportion of their population changes, so will their representation. This will be among the issues in the next delimitation of parliamentary constituencies in India. Currently, there are two distinct divergences in population growth in India. First, the north-central regions have higher birth rates than peninsular and western India. Second, Muslims have a higher birth rate than Hindus. Among Hindus, upper castes have lower birth rates compared to other groups. While the BJP and its supporters try to highlight the Hindu-Muslim divergence in population growth, many others, particularly parties in the South, are more worried about the regional divergence in population growth. It is this regional divergence that makes the next delimitation an unsettling prospect for many regions. Population management has to be a secular task, and all communities should participate in it. While the BJP constantly talks up an Islamic demographic threat, there are Muslim actors who acknowledge and even amplify it. Last year, a Muslim Minister in West Bengal said Muslim population was growing fast and would soon become a majority. The ruling Trinamool Congress distanced itself from the statement. Federalism Tract: Notes on Diversity This article by Tamil Nadu Chief Minister M. K. Stalin discusses how India is home to many nationalities and emphasizes the importance of linguistic diversity as a defining feature of India. It argues that in a true federal system, states should not have to protest, litigate, or plead for their rightful share of revenues. Governors are taking their role as chancellors of State universities too seriously, which is roiling the higher education sector. Read our editorial on the ongoing conflicts between Governors and State governments over university governance here. The drive against unauthorised immigrants from Bangladesh is creating rifts within India, as any Bengali-speaking individual can end up as a target of police action.
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
24 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Dixon Tech, China's HKC form ₹370 cr JV for display module manufacturing
Domestic electronics contract manufacturer Dixon Technologies has formed a Rs 370 crore joint venture for display modules manufacturing with Chinese company HKC Overseas. The Dixon Technologies-HKC Overseas joint venture is for manufacturing and selling of LCD and TFT-LCD modules that are used in electronic devices like TV, mobile phones etc for display, a regulatory filing said on Saturday. "Dixon Technologies (India) Ltd has entered into a Term Sheet with HKC Corporation Ltd to form a joint venture for manufacturing of Liquid Crystal Modules, thin film transistor liquid crystal display modules, assembly of end products such as smartphones, TVs, monitors and auto displays and selling HKC branded end products in India," the filing said. HKC Overseas Ltd will acquire 26 per cent stake in Dixon Display Technologies Pvt Ltd (DDTPL) for USD 10.998 million, about Rs 95.5 crore and Dixon will acquire 74 per cent stake in the JV for USD 31.3 million, about Rs 274 crore in two tranches. "The company, HKC and DDTPL have executed the SSHA (share subscription and shareholders' agreement) on August 16, 2025," the filing said. Dixon has been on a spree of forming joint ventures with Chinese technology companies. Last month, the company had announced a JV with Chinese electronic component firms -- Chongqing Yuhai Precision Manufacturing Co Ltd and the Indian arm of Kunshan Q Technology -- for manufacturing and sales of electronic components used in electronic devices like mobile phones and laptops, among others. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)