logo
Trump slaps 30 pc tariffs on EU, Mexico starting August 1

Trump slaps 30 pc tariffs on EU, Mexico starting August 1

India.com6 days ago
New Delhi: US President Donald Trump on Saturday issued 30 per cent tariffs on imports from Mexico and the European Union (EU), to renegotiate trade terms before the August 1 deadline. The European Union will allow complete, open Market Access to the United States, Trump said in its letter posted on Truth Social, or 'whatever the number you choose to raise them by, will be added on the 30 per cent that we charge.'
The 27-country EU bloc is under pressures as Germany urged a quick deal to safeguard its industry.
In his letter to Mexico, Trump said the country has been 'helping me secure the border,' but added that it wasn't enough. 'Mexico still has not stopped the Cartels who are trying to turn all of North America into a Narco-Trafficking Playground. Obviously I cannot let that happen!' Trump said in the letter to Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum.
Earlier, the US President advised countries in ongoing trade talks with his administration to 'just keep working hard' ahead of the August 1 negotiation deadline, repeating his claim that America has been taken advantage of by 'both friend and foe' for many years.
Trump made the remarks before departing for a flood-ravaged area in Texas, as South Korea, Japan and other countries strive to reach deals with the United States to avoid or minimize the impact of steep 'reciprocal' tariffs that are set to take effect on August 1.
'I think just keep working hard. You know, we've been taken advantage of for many, many years by countries, both friend and foe. And frankly, the friends have been worse than the foes in many cases,' he said during a press availability at the White House.
On Monday, Trump sent a letter addressed to South Korean President Lee Jae Myung, saying that the U.S. will start imposing 25 per cent tariffs on South Korean products on August 1 — rather than Wednesday, when the reciprocal tariffs were initially set to take effect following a 90-day pause.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump administration allows ICE to gain access to medicaid data to find illegal immigrants: Report
Trump administration allows ICE to gain access to medicaid data to find illegal immigrants: Report

First Post

time12 minutes ago

  • First Post

Trump administration allows ICE to gain access to medicaid data to find illegal immigrants: Report

Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials will be given access to the personal data of the nation's 79 million Medicaid enrollees, including home addresses and ethnicities, to track down immigrants who may not be living legally in the United States read more US President Donald Trump's administration is empowering the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) even more after it was revealed that the body will be given access to the personal data of the nation's 79 million Medicaid enrollees. The data would include home addresses and ethnicities, and is intended to track down immigrants who may not be living in the United States legally, The Associated Press reported. The information will give ICE officials the ability to find 'the location of aliens' across the country, says the agreement obtained by The Associated Press on Monday. The agreement was signed between the Centres for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Department of Homeland Security and has not been publicly announced as of now. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The extraordinary disclosure of millions of such personal health data to deportation officials is the latest escalation in the Trump administration's immigration crackdown, which has repeatedly tested legal boundaries in its effort to arrest 3,000 people daily. The backlash that followed Lamakers and some CMS officials are challenging the legality of the ICE officials getting access to some states' Medicaid enrollee data. 'ICE will use the CMS data to allow ICE to receive identity and location information on aliens identified by ICE,' the agreement says. The US Health and Human Services (HHS) came out in defence of the agreement. 'HHS and CMS take the integrity of the Medicaid program and the protection of American taxpayer dollars extremely seriously,' HHS spokesperson Emily Hilliard told The Guardian. 'With respect to the recent data sharing between CMS and DHS, HHS acted entirely within its legal authority – and in full compliance with all applicable laws – to ensure that Medicaid benefits are reserved for individuals who are lawfully entitled to receive them,' Hillard added. It is important to note that the agreement does not allow ICE officials to download the data. Instead, they will be allowed to access it for a limited period from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, until September 9. 'They are trying to turn us into immigration agents,' a CMS official who asked to remain anonymous told AP. The move came two months after the Trump administration defended the data-sharing agreement as part of an effort to ensure undocumented migrants who are not eligible for the program did not receive benefits. 'President Trump consistently promised to protect Medicaid for eligible beneficiaries,' said the DHS assistant secretary Tricia McLaughlin at that time. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'To keep that promise after Joe Biden flooded our country with tens of millions of illegal aliens, CMS and DHS are exploring an initiative to ensure that illegal aliens are not receiving Medicaid benefits that are meant for law-abiding Americans," McLaughlin furthered. It is pertinent to note that undocumented migrants are generally not eligible for Medicaid, and only some lawfully present migrants may obtain coverage under the program. According to the healthcare research non-profit Kaiser Family Foundation, eligible noncitizen immigrants represent only about 6 per cent of people currently enrolled in Medicaid. 'This is a privacy violation of unprecedented proportions and betrayal of trust, as the government has explicitly said, for decades, that this information will never be used for immigration enforcement,' said Ben D'Avanzo, a healthcare strategist at the National Immigration Law Centre on X. With inputs from The Associated Press.

Germany deports 81 Afghan nationals, 2nd flight since Taliban's return
Germany deports 81 Afghan nationals, 2nd flight since Taliban's return

Business Standard

time12 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Germany deports 81 Afghan nationals, 2nd flight since Taliban's return

Germany deported dozens of Afghan nationals to their homeland on Friday, the second time it has done so since the Taliban returned to power and the first since a new government pledging a tougher line on migration took office in Berlin. The Interior Ministry said a flight took off Friday morning carrying 81 Afghans, all of them men who had previously come to judicial authorities' attention. It said in a statement that the deportation was carried out with the help of Qatar, and said the government aims to deport more people to Afghanistan in the future. More than 10 months ago, Germany's previous government deported Afghan nationals to their homeland for the first time since the Taliban returned to power in 2021. Then-Chancellor Olaf Scholz vowed to step up deportations of asylum-seekers. New Chancellor Friedrich Merz made tougher migration policy a central plank of his campaign for Germany's election in February. Just after he took office in early May, the government stationed more police at the border and said some asylum-seekers trying to enter Europe's biggest economy would be turned away. It also has suspended family reunions for many migrants. The flight took off hours before German Interior Minister Alexander Dobrindt plans to meet his counterparts from five neighboring countries France, Poland, Austria, Denmark and the Czech Republic as well as the European Union's commissioner responsible for migration, Magnus Brunner. Dobrindt is hosting the meeting to discuss migration on the Zugspitze, Germany's highest peak, on the Austrian border.

Trump's sugar economics for Coke amid the company's multi-billion tax case
Trump's sugar economics for Coke amid the company's multi-billion tax case

Time of India

time12 minutes ago

  • Time of India

Trump's sugar economics for Coke amid the company's multi-billion tax case

Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Trump, Coke and populist optics HFCS vs. sugar Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Where Coca-Cola stands Coke's billion-dollar tax mess Impact on sugar producers and costs Nutritional nuance Ninety-four percent of the world's population recognises the red-and-white Coca-Cola logo, according to a ResearchGate study citing multiple reports. That's not a brand — it's a global reflex. And now, Donald Trump wants President Donald Trump is gettinghimself involded into the recipe of the planet's most iconic soft drink. Coca-Cola, Trump claimed this week, has agreed to replace high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) with real cane sugar in its US-made sodas, a move he framed as a win for his "Make America Healthy Again" announcement came via Trump's Truth Social platform, where he posted a mock-up of a Coke bottle reading 'Share a Coke with Trump' and declared, 'I have been speaking to Coca-Cola about using REAL Cane Sugar in Coke in the United States, and they have agreed to do so… This will be a very good move by them — You'll see. It's just better!'Coca-Cola hasn't confirmed the a vague statement hinted at something brewing: 'More details on new innovative offerings within our Coca-Cola product range will be shared soon,' the company said, while thanking the President for his 'enthusiasm.'Coca-Cola is deeply embedded in American culture. By nudging its formula, Trump taps into nostalgia, anti-corporate sentiment, and populism. Cane sugar recalls a time when things supposedly tasted 'better,' like the Mexican Coke many Americans swear message is simple: real over artificial, sugar over syrup, 'America First', even in your also a nod to Trump's Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who's crusading against ultra-processed foods. Kennedy has blamed HFCS for fuelling obesity and diabetes, calling it 'just a formula for making you obese and diabetic.'HFCS, derived from corn starch, dominates US soda recipes because it's cheaper, partly due to corn subsidies and tariffs on imported became Coke's sweetener of choice in the 1980s. But many consumers prefer the cane sugar version sold abroad, which they say tastes cleaner. Trump's move channels that feeling, but swapping out HFCS isn't just accounts for about 3% of total US corn usage, 410 million bushels a year, according to the US Department of Agriculture. Removing that would ripple through corn prices and farm Corn Refiners Association (CRA) estimates such a shift could cut farm receipts by $2.2 to $5.1 billion, with worst-case losses reaching $7.5 billion. Iowa, Illinois and Nebraska alone could lose nearly $2.35 billion in the short term.'Replacing high-fructose corn syrup with cane sugar would cost thousands of American food manufacturing jobs, depress farm income, and boost imports of foreign sugar — all with no nutritional benefit,' warned CRA President and CEO John Bode, as per remains a of July 17, 2025, it had a market cap of $298.16 billion. It reported $47.06 billion in revenue for 2024, with Q1 2025 revenues at $11.13 billion (down 2% YoY due to currency swings and bottling changes), while organic revenue rose 6%.Net income in 2024 hit $10.63 billion; Q1 2025 net income rose 4.8% to $3.33 sells 500+ brands in over 200 countries, reaching 1.9 billion people daily. It led the global non-alcoholic beverage market with over 40% share in 2024, according to $478.14 billion carbonated beverage market is projected to hit $707.76 billion by 2034, as per Precedence Research. The cola segment alone could more than double, from $144.6 billion to $317.5 billion, by then, as per Prophecy Market the US, Coke held a 44.9% share of the 2024 carbonated soft drink market, which was valued at $303.11 billion and is forecast to grow to $467.18 billion by 2030, according to Grand View brands like Coke (19.2%), Sprite (8.1%), and Diet Coke (7.8%) remain also worth noting is that nearly 40% of Coca-Cola's global revenue comes from the US market alone. In 2024, North America contributed 39% to total revenue, followed by Europe, the Middle East and Africa at 23%, Latin America and Bottling Investments at 13% each, and Asia Pacific at 12%, as per the Trump touts Coca-Cola's supposed health kick, the company is fighting a far more consequential battle, with the IRS. And the outcome could reset global norms on how multinationals are goes back to 1996, when Coke and the IRS agreed on a royalty formula for profits from foreign subsidiaries: the so-called 10-50-50 rule. Under it, subsidiaries kept 10% of sales and half the residual profit; the US parent got the return, the IRS said it wouldn't impose accuracy-related penalties, so long as Coke stuck to the truce held, until 2011. As reported the Forbes, without warning, the IRS scrapped the agreement for tax years 2007 to 2009 and imposed a new method: the Comparable Profits Method (CPM), which bases income allocations on profits earned by similar independent switch inflated Coca-Cola's taxable income by $9 billion and hit it with $3.4 billion in tax deficiencies for those three years challenged the IRS in court, but in 2020, the US Tax Court largely sided with the government. While the court allowed Coke some credit for dividends paid, it upheld the IRS's overall company now owes $2.7 billion in back taxes, $6 billion with September 2024, Coca-Cola wired the full $6 billion to the IRS, labelling it a 'tax litigation deposit.' The company is still appealing, but the money's already argues that the IRS pulled a bait and switch. After encouraging use of the 10-50-50 formula for years, the agency retroactively changed the rules and punished the company for following its its own words, the IRS 'handed Coca-Cola a $3 billion jaywalking ticket' after leading it into the the IRS accuses Coca-Cola of shifting billions in profits to low-tax countries like Ireland, Brazil, and Eswatini. In court, Judge Albert Lauber called the company's global tax structure 'astronomical.'The fallout is already in May 2024 raised $4 billion in debt, partly to deal with the Express reported that the case could curb acquisitions and buybacks. Al Jazeera pegged the company's total exposure at up to '$16 billion, almost two years' worth of profits.A shift to cane sugar would likely boost demand for domestic producers, particularly in Florida and Louisiana, where most of the US cane sugar industry is based. In 2024, the US sugar market stood at 48.1 million tons, as per IMARC, and the cane segment accounted for roughly 40–45% of total supply, USDA ERS, shift would be welcomed by powerful industry groups like the American Sugar Alliance, which have long advocated for reduced reliance on being shielded by the US Sugar Program, which keeps domestic prices high through tariffs and quotas, cane sugar producers have struggled. They face rising input costs, margin pressures, and stiff competition from cheaper HFCS, widely adopted since the sector has also seen significant consolidation, with sugarcane farms declining by 31% between 1997 and 2022, as reported Southern Ag Today. For many growers, a move back to real sugar in sodas would be a rare opportunity to reclaim lost the cost implications are sugar costs between $0.40 and $0.50 per pound in the US, compared to $0.20–$0.30 for HFCS. That could mean $800–$900 million in added annual costs for Coca-Cola alone, Hindustan Times reported, based on its estimated use of 2.7 billion pounds of could see price hikes of 10–15% on sweetened drinks, as per would also force 'massive supply chain overhauls,' from storage to equipment labour impact is mixed. Corn processors and HFCS refiners may face job cuts, thousands, according to the CRA. Meanwhile, sugar refining jobs could grow slightly, but direct employment in that sector is modest — 14,000 to 15,000 people, as per IBISWorld, switching to cane sugar may not mean much. The FDA has stated there's no evidence of a meaningful safety difference between HFCS and cane sugar. Harvard nutritionist Frank Hu summed it up: 'Sugar in general' is the problem, not which the war on ultra-processed food is as much cultural as medical, and Trump is using that is more than a formula change, it's a potential $6 billion shake-up in the domestic sugar economy, which accounts for 30% of US sugar announcement may be political theatre, but for Coca-Cola, it could be smart brand positioning. With tax agents closing in and consumers rethinking processed foods, appearing to respond to health concerns could be a reputational buffer.'Real sugar Coke' fits 2025's consumer trends: nostalgia, authenticity and clean-label marketing. But overhauling sugar sourcing, supply chains and formulas won't be easy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store