logo
Why vitamin C DOESN'T cure colds - but here are two others that WILL boost your immunity

Why vitamin C DOESN'T cure colds - but here are two others that WILL boost your immunity

Daily Mail​27-05-2025
No doubt your mother used to tell you that vitamin C-packed orange juice would help ward off colds.
You might pop probiotic-packed yoghurts into your shopping trolley to 'boost' your natural defences against illness. Or perhaps you've gone for a run to try to 'sweat out' a fever.
There's so much of this kind of received wisdom about how to support our immune systems. But do any of these tactics actually work?
I've been immersed in questions about immunity for 25 years. I have studied up close how certain immune cells latch on to cancers and then send toxic molecules to kill them, as well as watching others engulf dangerous bacteria to destroy them.
I'm also regularly asked about the best way to improve our natural immunity. Even as an expert I admit it's highly confusing, and there's also a lot of hype around improving immunity.
It's all become big business – one UK High Street chain has 276 products listed under 'immune support supplements' alone. Yet not a single one of these products is required to have scientific proof for their claims.
And, most importantly, none of us is the same as the next person: the fact is, your immune system is probably the single most unique thing about you. It's not a simple part of our anatomy, it's a multi-layered, dynamic lattice of interlocking genes, proteins and cells.
It means we all vary in how susceptible we are to illnesses – and in the symptoms we experience with infections.
Which means what might work for one person might not work for another. But from what we do know, some simple truths emerge about how we can really help our natural immunity – and what are simply myths.
VITAMIN C WON'T STOP YOU CATCHING A COLD
Vitamin C is important to health. A strong antioxidant, neutralising potentially dangerous substances known as 'free radicals' in our body, it also helps us absorb iron, and is involved in things such as collagen production, essential for tissue healing and more.
But there's no solid proof vitamin C can cure colds.
For more than 60 years, this idea has had a stranglehold on our imaginations – which is largely down to Linus Pauling, a double Nobel Prize-winning scientist who was based in the US.
He first championed this theory in the 1960s, after he and his wife took a megadose of vitamin C – some 3,000mg, though our current advised daily dose is just 40mg. They reported that it gave them extra energy and prevented further colds.
Pauling then scoured scientific journals, cherry-picking results to fit his idea. In 1970, his best-selling book Vitamin C And The Common Cold was published, claiming everyone's health could be improved by higher levels of the vitamin. And a huge myth was born.
However, a 2013 systematic review – which collects data from previous studies – concluded that, for the general population, vitamin C does not reduce the chance of catching a cold.
Yet for unknown reasons, people taking regular vitamin C supplements did experience cold symptoms for slightly less time.
To be precise, daily vitamin C reduced the duration of a cold by 8 per cent in adults and 14 per cent in children. In other words, for a cold lasting a few days, someone taking regular vitamin C supplements might feel better a few hours sooner.
. . . BUT HERE ARE TWO VITAMINS THAT DO HELP
Happily, there are two vitamins which can improve immune health: vitamins A and D.
We generate vitamin D in our skin with exposure to sunshine, and some from eating foods such as eggs and oily fish.
Once in the body, it's processed by immune cells. One of its roles is to dampen the activity of specific immune cells.
This might sound like something you don't want to happen, but it's extremely important for an immune response to quieten down when a threat has been removed.
If the immune system stayed in a heightened state after a threat was neutralised, there's more chance of collateral damage to the body, potentially increasing the risk of developing autoimmune diseases (such as type 1 diabetes).
Low levels of vitamin D are also linked with an increased susceptibility to infections.
In 2021, an analysis of 43 trials involving nearly 50,000 people found vitamin D supplements helped protect against respiratory infection – most likely relating to vitamin D being important in the body's response to germs, including the process by which immune cells destroy bacteria.
It's probably sensible to take it in the wintertime, as per government advice.
As for vitamin A – found in carrots, meat and eggs – it's vital for the development and functioning of many immune cells, and is crucial to our defences, playing a role in the body's production of mucus, which obviously helps us eject germs from our body in respiratory infections, for example in a runny nose.
As it happens, most people get the vitamin A they need from their normal diet.
TRUTH ABOUT KEFIR AND YOGHURT DRINKS
I've been asked many times to promote everything from health stores to a dating agency (as my first book included a section on whether the immune system affects who we find attractive – the jury's still out).
Most recently, I was asked to consider promoting yoghurts containing live bacteria.
I've never said yes to any such offers because I've spent nearly three decades studying immunology and still don't know the half of its complexities, so it seems unlikely I could ever get behind a simple advertising slogan.
Still simple slogans are rife – and probiotic yoghurts or kefir commonly feature scientific-sounding phrases such as 'supports immunity', 'protects against colds' and so on. One reason for this being they contain 'good bacteria' that are apparently beneficial for our gut health.
But do probiotic yoghurts really turbocharge immunity?
There are two ways live bacteria in probiotics could feasibly support immune health: by acting directly on our immune system, or by affecting the gut microbiome, the community of microbes in the gut that play a role in immunity.
There are signs both can happen. In a 2012 study published in the journal Gut, when volunteers were fed a particular strain of bacteria called Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 (a billion of them once per day for eight weeks), it increased levels of 'Tregs' in their blood.
Tregs are regulatory T cells: immune cells that specialise in turning off other immune cells.
They ensure an immune response doesn't happen against something which doesn't warrant it or that an ongoing immune reaction doesn't run out of control. In other words, they help keep our immune system balanced. It's also clear that ingesting bacteria affects the gut microbiome.
In one study, probiotic yoghurt consumed by patients who had inflammatory bowel disease changed the make-up of their microbiome.
In another study, the negative effect of antibiotics on the diversity of a person's gut microbiome could be avoided if they took probiotics at the same time.
However, it's notable that your environment – where you live – may be more important than your diet in terms of gut health.
Interestingly, when a hospital in Calgary, Canada, used a probiotic for infants, bacteria from it were often detected in the faeces of nearby babies who had not yet been given it themselves. In other words, cross-contamination can happen in a shared environment.
Indeed, some people living in the same place share features of their microbiome.
BEING OVERWEIGHT AND THE RISK OF INFECTION
Carrying a few extra pounds can affect the immune system because fat cells do much more than just store fat.
Perhaps surprisingly, there is a vast array of immune cells that live within body fat. If we have an excess of fat, the immune cells residing within it can become more active. These immune cells can then trigger unwanted inflammation, which in turn increases our risk of disease such as cardiovascular problems or rheumatoid arthritis.
As well as this, fat cells produce various molecules, including those called cytokines, which also trigger a background inflammation in the body, which in turn reduces your immunity's sensitivity to a real threat such as an actual viral infection.
To make matters worse, people living with obesity produce other kinds of cytokines in an attempt to counteract this unwanted background inflammation caused by excess fat, by dialling down the immune system.
Yet the very presence of these other cytokines then works against us if an immune response is needed to fight an actual infection.
However, being underweight can be just as perilous for our immune systems for a very simple reason: not getting enough food makes us deficient in all sorts of important nutrients, such as minerals, vitamins, amino acids, cholesterol and fatty acids.
HOW FASTING CAN IMPACT IMMUNE CELLS
Restricting food entirely for a period to lose weight is hugely popular – but can impact your immune cells.
During a period of fasting, we know the human body limits its energy use, which has knock-on consequences for immune health.
Indeed, fasting for just one day reduces the numbers of a type of immune cell called a monocyte in the blood. Experiments on mice show these cells moving into bone marrow, where they effectively hibernate to conserve energy. Eating again sees these immune cells immediately mobilise back into the blood.
We don't yet know what effect this has on immune health or the symptoms of immune-related diseases, but it's clear the immune system is very much affected by fasting.
ALWAYS AIM TO GET A GOOD NIGHT'S SLEEP
Sleep affects the symptoms of illnesses, and most often this comes down to fluctuating levels of hormones or cytokines.
This may explain why problems from asthma, for example, are more common at night, and deaths due to asthma are more likely around 4am.
Indeed, unwanted immune responses tend generally to worsen at night, at least in part because cortisol – the stress hormone – is kept low while we sleep, which means immune responses are not suppressed by it.
This is important for rheumatoid arthritis, where the immune system attacks the tissue lining of joints, causing unwanted inflammation and pain.
Again, because cortisol is kept low, inflammation can build up while we sleep, leading to stiff joints in the morning.
There's a paradox here, though. If sleep makes symptoms from unwanted immune responses worse, having less sleep should help. But it doesn't. Disrupted sleep is especially problematic and can lead to worse symptoms from autoimmune diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis and psoriasis.
AVOID HEAVY EXERCISE WHEN YOU'RE FEELING UNWELL
The evidence that hitting the gym helps the immune system is strong, including a year-long study of almost 19,000 people living in Denmark, which established that any level of physical activity correlated with a person being less likely to need antibiotics.
And a UK study of nearly 100,000 people correlated exercise with halving the risk of dying from an infection over a nine-year period.
Crucially, however, there is a flip side: stress hormones such as cortisol can be produced during exercise, which tend to dampen immune responses. Immune cells also need lots of energy to secrete toxins to attack diseased cells, and multiply in number by dividing.
During exercise, energy is used for muscle activity, which limits that available to immune cells.
Most doctors, then, advise not to exercise heavily during a bout of flu or in the grip of fever.
Adapted from Self Defence by Daniel M. Davis (Bodley Head, £22), published on June 5. © Daniel M Davis 2025. To order a copy for £19.80 (offer valid to 10/06/25; UK P&P free on orders over £25) go to mailshop.co.uk/books or call 020 3176 2937.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mum says severe pregnancy sickness leading to abortions in women
Mum says severe pregnancy sickness leading to abortions in women

BBC News

timean hour ago

  • BBC News

Mum says severe pregnancy sickness leading to abortions in women

A mum whose severe pregnancy sickness was so bad she said she had to have a termination has called for better care for women like Spooner from Monmouthshire recalled "begging" medical professionals for Xonvea, an anti-sickness medication that's available in England for women with Hyperemesis gravidarum (HG) but not routinely available in is defined by the NHS as prolonged severe nausea and vomiting that might not stop until the baby is Welsh government said Xonvea could be prescribed in exceptional cases where other treatments have failed, with more than 750 prescriptions dispensed since January. According to NHS Wales, it is thought about one to three of every 100 pregnant women get HG, although some cases go symptoms are severe nausea, vomiting, dehydration and weight loss and it often requires hospital treatment. Sarah, 32, said her concerns about excessive vomiting in her first pregnancy were dismissed and it was only after giving birth and losing 3kg (6lbs) that she realised she probably had mum-of-one thought her knowledge of the condition would help her second pregnancy earlier this year "but then it was just a car crash".She recalled routinely waking up at 4 or 5am to be sick, being unable to eat or drink and unable to work."You can't keep water down and then you're tired because you don't eat for days and your head hurts and you're losing weight."The optometrist and part-time photographer said, when the sickness got worse, she wanted to try Xonvea, the only anti-emetic licensed for use in pregnancy to treat nausea and vomiting in the is recommended as an effective first line treatment by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, alongside alternatives such as cyclizine, prochlorperazine and ondansetron which are regularly prescribed by box of 20 tablets costs £28.50 - considerably higher than other is not routinely available in Wales or Scotland - it is available in parts of England, although last month Prime Minister Keir Starmer promised to address the postcode lottery some patients there was prescribed the drug at an appointment in Wales and found it to be more effective than other medications, but it was only for a fortnight at a time and was difficult to get hold of."My husband had to drive a 100-mile round-trip, and I'd be being sick, so he'd have to take time off work to get me there," she said. One time, her husband had to call an ambulance after coming home to find her on the floor vomiting, unable to move because of the nine weeks pregnant and ill with a serious eye infection, a hospital doctor told her her body was not coping."She said worst-case scenario, you've only got seven months left of this and I thought 'I'm going to die, I can't do this for seven more months'," she couple decided to end their much-wanted pregnancy and now Sarah has submitted a petition to the Senedd calling for wider access to Xonvea in described her experience as "unbelievably frustrating" as she lives on the Wales-England border."To think that, if I lived half a mile down the road, the outcome of pregnancy could have been different, it's just unacceptable." Pregnancy Sickness Support chief executive Charlotte Howden said the situation was "beyond belief".The charity, which provides counselling, training and advocacy, said there needed to be fairness."With Wales it's effectively a widespread 'computer says no, you are not able to access this medication'," she said."Yes, you might find a doctor willing to prescribe it, but that shouldn't be the journey here."She added it was important to note that different combinations of drugs had different results for individuals, but women should have all options available to them, regardless of the cost of Xonvea."What's the cost of an ambulance to go into hospital because you've not been given all the treatment options available to you and once you do that it's a very quick assessment to be able to see that's a false economy".The All-Wales Medicine Strategy group (AWMSG) advises the Welsh government about the use, management and prescribing of is made up of NHS consultants, GPs, nurses, pharmacists, health economists, pharmaceutical industry representatives and considers both clinical evidence and cost effectiveness.A spokesperson said the data on the latter was "insufficient" from the company when it appraised Xonvea in 2019, although it had recently met the manufacturer again and understood it was "actively exploring what options are available". It added that it hoped the company would could re-engage later this Exeltis UK said it has been in contact with the AWMSG and was working with health boards across Wales "to support access to treatment".The Welsh government said GPs in every health board area regularly prescribed Xonvea when other treatments have failed and AWMSG's 2019 appraisal remained the most current formal evaluation of the drug in Wales."This did not recommend routine use due to insufficient cost-effectiveness data" it you have been affected by any of the issues raised in this story you can find details of organisations that can help via BBC Action Line.

Aspiring doctors with only BCC grades can still enter medicine due to diversity and inclusion scheme
Aspiring doctors with only BCC grades can still enter medicine due to diversity and inclusion scheme

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Aspiring doctors with only BCC grades can still enter medicine due to diversity and inclusion scheme

Aspiring doctors who only get BCC grades can still find a route to medical school in Clearing this year thanks to a scheme to make the profession more diverse. Bradford University runs a foundation year for those with lower grades to catch up – transferring 20 of these students per year directly to a full medical degree at nearby Sheffield University. The course, 'foundation in clinical sciences and medicine', still has places available and is being advertised on the official Clearing website. It means students who miss their grades to attend regular medical school – which typically asks for AAA – could find another route in to train as an NHS doctor. This Thursday, hundreds of thousands of sixth formers will receive their A-level grades, and discover whether they secured their first choice university place. Those rejected can enter Clearing, which matches unplaced students with unfilled places. Bradford's course, which has entry criteria of BCC but 'no specific subject requirements', teaches a range of relevant content including chemistry and biology. The course page says its focus is 'to encourage progression into medicine and healthcare education from under-represented groups.' Historically, 20 have transferred per year thanks to the 'established partnership' between the two universities. Those transferring must achieve at least 70 per cent in a chemistry module, meet the medical school's UCAT test criteria, and go through an interview process. They must also be able to demonstrate they are from a disadvantaged or 'underrepresented' background. It comes following political pressure to make the profession more diverse, with the Medical Schools Council committed to 'widening participation'. However, Chris McGovern, of the Campaign for Real Education, said: 'The quality of medical care is being sacrificed to promote EDI (equality, diversity and inclusion). 'This is totally unacceptable. It is putting the well-being of vulnerable patients at risk. 'We do need to train more doctors but not by diluting entry requirements. 'It is a national disgrace for any university to surrender to the woke tyranny that is currently plaguing our country.' Previous graduates of the foundation year have also successfully entered Leeds, Hull, York, Brighton and Sussex and Norwich medical schools, according to the course page. Anyone not transferring to medical school can continue onto Bradford's 'clinical sciences' three-year degree. A Bradford spokesman said the course is 'designed to support students from under-represented backgrounds in accessing careers in medicine and healthcare.' They added: 'While the entry requirements reflect our commitment to widening participation, progression to medical school is not automatic. 'Students must meet rigorous academic and admissions criteria, including performance in key modules and competitive selection processes. 'The programme is academically demanding. 'Widening participation is a national priority and programmes like ours play a vital role in ensuring that talented individuals from all backgrounds have the opportunity to contribute to the future of healthcare. A Sheffield spokesman said: 'Our partnership with the University of Bradford is a dedicated access pathway, specifically for students from under-represented and educationally disadvantaged backgrounds, which allows them to apply to our medical school after successfully completing a rigorous foundation year and demonstrating performance equivalent to our existing A-level requirements. 'This ensures we maintain our high academic standards while promoting a more diverse medical profession. 'Students who successfully progress from this pathway are highly capable and have demonstrated the academic rigour, commitment and personal qualities required to become outstanding doctors.' The Bradford course is the only route into medicine available in Clearing this year. However, recent research has shown 16 other medical schools not entering Clearing also run similar schemes. For example, Bristol University's medical school has its own foundation year specifically for disadvantaged students, with grade requirements of just BBC. A report by the Sutton Trust in February found only 5 per cent of medical school entrants were from disadvantaged backgrounds in 2021, compared with 75 per cent from advantaged backgrounds. At the time, Clare Owen, director of education at the Medical Schools Council (MSC), said: 'By 2032, medical schools aim to have 33 per cent of students from disadvantaged backgrounds. 'Achieving this goal will require a sector-wide effort.'

Prince Harry considering starting new charity after Sentebale row
Prince Harry considering starting new charity after Sentebale row

Sky News

timean hour ago

  • Sky News

Prince Harry considering starting new charity after Sentebale row

Prince Harry is considering starting a new charity after a highly-publicised dispute saw him exit his Sentebale charity, a spokesperson has said. The Duke of Sussex stepped down as a Sentebale patron in March in support of trustees who resigned in opposition to the board chairwoman, Dr Sophie Chandauka, who previously accused Harry of bullying and harassment - claims a source close to the former trustees described as"completely baseless". Sentebale works to support the health and wellbeing of young people, especially those with HIV and AIDS, in Botswana and Lesotho. It was co-founded by Harry and Prince Seeiso of Lesotho in 2006. Seeiso also stepped down as patron in March. In a report published on Tuesday, the Charity Commission criticised all sides for making the fallout public with interviews and statements, but the war of words has continued. 1:33 On Sunday, a spokesperson for Harry said: "The duke remains absolutely committed to continuing the work he started, supporting the children and young people of Lesotho and Botswana, nearly 20 years ago. "In what form that support takes - no decisions have been made. "All options remain on the table; whether that be starting a new charity or working to support pre-existing charities operating in the same sector in the region." The charity regulator, which cannot investigate individual allegations of bullying, said it found no evidence of systemic bullying or harassment at Sentebale, including misogyny or misogynoir. The trustees who resigned said in a statement they were "gravely concerned for the future of the charity" as they felt the commission had "chosen to ignore key concerns and irrefutable evidence raised with them regarding the leadership and oversight of Sentebale's chair". In response to the findings, Sentebale said in a statement: "The Charity Commission is explicitly clear, including in its public guidance, that it is not the commission's responsibility to adjudicate or mediate internal disputes. This would include individual allegations of bullying, harassment, misogyny, misogynoir etc. "As a result, the commission has not investigated any individual allegations and therefore has not made any findings in relation to individuals, including Prince Harry. "The issues not investigated by the commission can and may be dealt with through avenues more appropriate than the commission."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store