Young people always worry about Social Security. Older people are joining them.
In an AARP survey released July 22, only 36% of Americans voiced confidence in the future of the retirement trust fund, down from 43% in 2020.
Another July survey, from the nonprofit Alliance for Lifetime Income, found that 58% of older Americans fear Social Security cuts because of recent news about potential changes to the program.
'These fears are not new. But I do think they are growing,' said Jean Chatzky, an education fellow with the Alliance's Retirement Income Institute and CEO of HerMoney.
How soon will Social Security run out of money?
Fears of a Social Security shortfall have loomed for decades. Lately, though, the agency's fiscal plight seems to be getting worse.
New federal projections, released in June, show the combined Social Security trust funds will run short in 2034. That date is one year earlier than the Social Security Administration reported a year ago.
The Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund, which pays benefits to retirees and their families, is fully funded only until 2033.
'And I think that's close enough in the viewfinder for even older people to think, 'Holy moly, what's going to happen to me?'' Chatzky said.
Americans young and old worry about Social Security
Younger Americans tend to worry more about Social Security than older Americans. In the new AARP survey, 25% of people ages 18-49 voiced confidence in the program's future, compared with 48% of those 50 and older.
The new report from the Alliance for Lifetime Income is striking, because it shows heightened Social Security fears among older Americans.
The industry group enlisted IPSOS to conduct a nationally representative survey of 3,502 adults ages 45-75. Among the findings:
Trump, DOGE cuts have disrupted Social Security
Social Security has been in the headlines all year, and not just because of the coming shortfall.
The Trump administration has thrown the agency into upheaval, with a cascade of staff cuts, rule changes, website outages and leadership shuffles, a routine that played out across the federal bureaucracy under the cost-cutting eye of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. (Musk himself eventually bowed out.)
Both Trump and Musk sowed doubt in the integrity of the venerable benefits program. In a March speech before Congress, Trump spoke of 'shocking levels of incompetence and probable fraud' in Social Security. Around the same time, Musk told podcaster Joe Rogan that Social Security was 'the biggest Ponzi scheme of all time.'
Taken together, the events seemed to shake public confidence. New benefit claims were up by more than 15% in March, compared with the same month a year ago.
'Fearmongering has driven people to claim benefits earlier, 'cause they're afraid they're not going to claim benefits at all,' said Leland Dudek, acting Social Security commissioner at the time, in a March public meeting.
Is Trump undermining public faith in Social Security?
Some Social Security watchdogs say the Trump administration has eroded public faith in the program.
'I think there's really been a sea change since January 20,' said Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works, a nonprofit dedicated to protecting and expanding Social Security. 'I've been working on this for half a century, and I've never seen this kind of chaos and undoing of the administration of the program.'
The notion that Social Security faces a shortfall suffuses the national conversation about retirement. Older Americans wonder if their monthly checks will go down, rather than up, during their golden years. Many younger Americans have doubled down on retirement savings, partly for fear that Social Security won't fully support them.
'What we find is, whenever Social Security is in the headlines, it strikes fear and anxiety into the hearts of so many, especially those who rely so heavily on Social Security,' said Ramsey Alwin, CEO of the nonprofit National Council on Aging.
Faith in the future of Social Security hinges partly on political party. The new AARP survey found that Republicans were more likely than Democrats to express confidence in the program's future, by a margin of 44% to 32%. During the Obama administration, by contrast, AARP found that Democrats voiced more faith in Social Security than Republicans.
Social Security administrators, for their part, have sometimes blamed the news media for stirring up public doubt about the agency's stability. In March, they took the unusual step of posting a press release to contradict media reports about the closure of Social Security field offices.
AARP issued a rare rebuke of Social Security administrators
But not all reports of Social Security instability have come from the news media. In February, AARP, the powerful interest group for older Americans, issued a rare public rebuke of the agency.
'AARP is hearing from thousands of older Americans confused and concerned about their Social Security payments, the status of Social Security field offices, and inexcusably long wait times on the phone to get their questions answered,' said Nancy LeaMond, AARP executive vice president.
In March, AARP members peppered Congress with 2 million messages and calls about their Social Security concerns.
AARP leaders touched on that nerve in a July 22 press conference about the new survey, released to coincide with Social Security's 90th anniversary.
'We can't afford for politicians to play games with the future of Social Security,' said Myechia Minter-Jordan, CEO of AARP. 'And we'll fight as hard and as long as we need to, to ensure that Social Security remains the economic bedrock of retirement for generations to come.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Chicago Tribune
14 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
President Donald Trump wants to play global peacemaker. Derailed Gaza ceasefire shows how daunting that ambition is
WASHINGTON — The United States cutting short Gaza ceasefire talks this week plunges one of President Donald Trump's pushes to solve global conflicts into new uncertainty. The derailing of talks to solve the 21-month Israel-Hamas war is the latest blow to Trump as several of his efforts to broker agreements for fraught conflicts and complex global threats have stalled. Though the Republican president has only been back in office for six months, he has sought to be known as a peacemaker. In some cases, he has set ambitious goals that have fallen short, like a promise to end the still-ongoing war in Ukraine before he took office. Trump has said he's seeking the deals to stop destruction and loss of life. But he has also been open about his ambition to be awarded a Nobel Peace Prize, prompting some of those seeking to cultivate favor with Trump to nominate him for the prestigious recognition. Here's a look at where some of Trump's efforts to strike peace and security deals stand. STATUS: No major breakthroughs in recent talks. THE BACKSTORY: Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff said Thursday that the U.S. was bringing home its negotiating team from Qatar, where talks were ongoing, to assess its next steps. Witkoff said the move was made because Hamas was not showing 'good faith' toward reaching a ceasefire, but U.S. officials did not offer specifics. No major breakthroughs have occurred despite weeks of talks in Qatar, along with a visit early this month to the White House by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Witkoff said the U.S. would 'consider alternative options to bring the hostages home,' but U.S. officials did not answer questions about what those options could include. When asked about next steps on Friday, Trump told reporters that Hamas didn't want to make a deal and said, 'I think what's going to happen is they're going to be hunted down.' STATUS: War still going on. THE BACKSTORY: Before he returned to office, Trump repeatedly said he would solve the Russia-Ukraine war in 24 hours — and even before he was sworn in as president. That didn't happen, and both sides remain far apart on reaching an agreement. Trump has become increasingly critical of President Vladimir Putin in recent months and is losing patience with his continued offensive in Ukraine. But Trump has resisted backing a bipartisan U.S. bill to impose steep sanctions on Russia, instead giving Russia 50 days to accept a peace deal or face sanctions on its energy exports. The delay has given Russia a window to continue a stepped-up offensive in Ukraine. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy this week reiterated his willingness to meet face-to-face with Putin to end the conflict. Russia has rejected the offer, saying the countries are too far apart. Lower-level Ukrainian and Russian officials met Wednesday for talks in Istanbul, but no breakthroughs were announced. Putin has said any peace deal should include Ukraine withdrawing from the four regions that Russia illegally annexed in September 2022 but did not fully capture. He also wants Ukraine to renounce its bid to join NATO and accept limits on its military. Ukraine and its Western allies have rejected those terms. STATUS: Open conflict ended for the moment. Many unanswered questions remain. THE BACKSTORY: Trump was able to broker a fragile ceasefire between Israel and Iran after the U.S. joined Israel in launching strikes on Iran's nuclear program. But the status of Iran's nuclear program is another unanswered question for the Trump administration. While the recent U.S. and Israeli strikes dealt a blow to Iran's nuclear capacities, the United States has still not struck an agreement with Iran over its nuclear program. An Iranian diplomat said Wednesday that his country was ready to engage in talks on its nuclear program with the United States, but only after Washington takes meaningful steps to rebuild trust. Meanwhile, Iran has opened the door to a separate yet related negotiation track with Britain, France and Germany, three of the remaining members of a 2015 nuclear deal, which Trump withdrew the United States from in his first term. Foreign ministers from the four countries met in Istanbul on Friday to discuss European threats to reimpose sanctions on Iran if there is no progress on a deal to limit its nuclear program by August. While deals in some of the most pressing conflicts have remained elusive to Trump, he has helped to broker agreements in the months he's been back in office. RWANDA-DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO: In June, he invited leaders from Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo to the White House to sign an agreement seen as a major step toward peace after decades of conflict. The U.S.-brokered deal emphasizes the two neighboring countries' sovereignty and territorial integrity and includes a commitment to end hostilities and backing of armed groups. The deal also helps the U.S. government and American companies gain access to critical minerals in the region. INDIA-PAKISTAN: In May, when a series of military strikes brought longtime nuclear adversaries India and Pakistan closer to war, Trump's administration intervened. The nations agreed to stop fighting after the U.S.-led talks, and Trump said he would work to provide a 'solution' to the long-running dispute over the Indian-controlled Kashmir region. The ceasefire has held, but it's not clear what progress has been made on any long-term agreement. Last month, Trump had lunch at the White House with Asim Munir, Pakistan's army chief. SYRIA-ISRAEL: Earlier this month, after Israel intervened in fighting between Syrian government forces and rival armed groups, Trump's special envoy to Syria, Tom Barrack, announced a limited ceasefire agreement between Israel and Syria. Barrack, who's also the U.S. ambassador to Turkey, said he met in Paris on Thursday with representatives from both countries to discuss de-escalation. Barrack said on social media that 'we accomplished precisely that' and that both sides committed to continuing the effort. Israel's intervention, however, caught Trump off guard and stymied his administration's push to get both countries to reach a full normalization of diplomatic relations.


Axios
14 minutes ago
- Axios
Scoop: Inside Thune's effort to keep N.C. in GOP's column
Senate Majority Leader John Thune is planning a fall visit to North Carolina to fundraise for Michael Whatley's upcoming Senate campaign, Axios has learned. Why it matters: Senior Republican officials think the North Carolina contest will be among the most expensive Senate races of 2026 — and that every dollar will matter. "It's always the most expensive race in U.S. history. It will be again," retiring North Carolina Sen. Thom Tillis said at an Axios Live event on Wednesday. Tillis, a Republican, announced he won't seek reelection after clashing with President Trump over the president's " big, beautiful bill." Behind closed doors: GOP leaders had given Lara Trump, Trump's daughter-in-law and a North Carolina native who had considered running, the right of first refusal. But during a phone call Thune had with Lara Trump and her husband, Eric Trump, this month, Lara Trump indicated she was leaning against entering the race. When it became clear Lara Trump would not run, Thune turned his attention to wooing Whatley, who was North Carolina GOP chair before Trump handpicked him to be the Republican National Committee chair last year. Thune called Whatley last week and encouraged him to run. Then, on July 16, Whatley attended a reception hosted by the Thune-aligned Senate Leadership Fund super PAC. During the gathering, which was attended by about 75 top donors and senators, the Republican leader introduced Whatley as the party's nominee for North Carolina Senate. The intrigue: Trump and Thune called Whatley on Monday and encouraged him to jump into the race quickly. During the call, Thune pledged the party machinery would consolidate around Whatley. The big picture: Whatley is expected to soon step down from his RNC role to enter the race and will have the full backing of Trump and Thune. It is anticipated he will face off against former Gov. Roy Cooper, who is preparing to launch his campaign next week. Between the lines: By lining up behind Whatley, Trump and Republican leaders are hoping to avoid a divisive primary.


The Hill
14 minutes ago
- The Hill
Hulk Hogan wife reflects after wrestler's death: ‘I wasn't ready for this'
Hulk Hogan's wife, Sky, posted a Friday homage to the professional wrestler, reflecting on his life and legacy. 'I wasn't ready for this…and my heart is in pieces. He had been dealing with some health issues, but I truly believed we would overcome them. I had so much faith in his strength. I thought we still had more time,' she wrote in the post on Instagram. 'This loss is sudden and impossible to process. To the world, he was a legend… but to me, he was my Terry. The man I loved. My partner. My heart,' she added. Hogan died on Thursday at the age of 71 in Florida. The longtime WWE challenger recently claimed his stake in politics with a memorable appearance during last year's Republican National Convention backing President Trump's reelection campaign. 'Hulk loved his fans so much and despite his growing physical discomfort, he did everything he could to show up, sign autographs, take photos, and connect with the people who supported him through it all. You meant everything to him,' Sky said on Friday. 'He was a believer in Christ, and I take comfort knowing his soul is at peace and he's been welcomed home,' she added. Multiple politicians mourned his Thursday death and shared their condolences for the family. Trump specifically lauded the celebrity for his 'cultural impact' through various show appearances and engagements throughout his years of stardom. 'We lost a great friend today, the 'Hulkster,'' Trump said in a Thursday post on Truth Social shortly after news of Hogan's death was confirmed. 'Hulk Hogan was MAGA all the way — Strong, tough, smart, but with the biggest heart,' the president said.