logo
Commentary: How the US weaponised Pakistan against India

Commentary: How the US weaponised Pakistan against India

CNA3 days ago
NEW DELHI: Many in New Delhi welcomed President Donald Trump's return to power, expecting him to take the Indo-US relationship to new heights.
They must wonder where it all went wrong, given that Trump launched an unprecedented broadside against India this week – threatening tariffs of 25 per cent and warning that a surcharge would be added unless India stops buying Russian oil and weapons. He even expressed dissatisfaction with the nation's participation in the 'anti-US' BRICS grouping.
Normally, Prime Minister Narendra Modi might just overlook a few social media posts. It may be humiliating to wind up with higher tariff rates than India's peers after wooing Trump, but that can be shrugged off as well.
Yet the president didn't stop at trade. He twisted the knife by announcing a tariff deal with Pakistan on the very same day – and added that US companies would help India's troubled neighbour extract oil from recently discovered reserves, and that 'maybe they'll be selling oil to India one day.'
I'm not sure Trump knows what he's playing with. Yes, the government was looking forward to a more transactional era: For New Delhi, almost everything is negotiable. But not its relationship with Pakistan.
Citizens already resented Trump claiming credit for a ceasefire between the nuclear-armed nations earlier this year. Nothing is more likely to cause any Indian leader to dig in his heels and stop talking about economic ties than a mention of Pakistan.
INDIA HAS LITTLE LEVERAGE
Policymakers are grimly absorbing some unpalatable truths. Has New Delhi overestimated its geopolitical importance? The tariff threat was bad enough: 25 per cent is higher than the 19 per cent agreed with the Philippines and Indonesia, and much higher than the 15 per cent offered to US allies like the European Union, Korea and Japan.
For some reason, India expected it was so indispensable to the US that it would receive a better deal than long-term allies – even one that preserved the barriers it has erected around industry and agriculture. Instead, unless it gives away far more than planned, it might wind up as one of the few countries that emerged from Trump's tariff 'pause' with a higher, not lower rate than was originally threatened.
New Delhi has learned, too late, that it has very little actual leverage in Washington. The Chinese may be granted another extension because they have things that they can threaten the US economy with. The Europeans and East Asians can promise to buy American-made weaponry or invest in the US. India can neither threaten nor bribe.
For years, it has nevertheless managed to punch above its actual economic weight by tacitly promising to be part of Washington-led attempts to contain a rising China. Tacitly, not openly, mind – India doesn't believe that closeness to the US precludes it from participating in China-dominated groupings or supporting Beijing's clients in Moscow.
But Trump's ire demonstrates that this balancing act has may finally have run its course. Russia might not be his top priority, but its second-largest client's refusal to fall in line will still irritate him. He received fulsome praise from Pakistan's leaders after he announced a ceasefire; the Indians pointedly ignored him.
This White House wants homage, not defiance. There was certainly a cantankerous edge to his remark that, for all he cared, India and Russia could 'take their dead economies down together'.
INDIA'S US POLICY IS IN SHAMBLES
Had he merely demanded more distance between Delhi and Moscow – and done so, if possible, without insulting India's economic prospects – leaders might well have quietly given in. The discount on Russian oil is only between US$6 and US$10 a barrel, and according to research from Standard Chartered, the impact on inflation of switching to US sources would be negligible.
Sure, the government would have to somehow convince its nationalist base that the switch would be in the country's interest after spending two years claiming the opposite. But trust in the prime minister is high enough for him to pull that off.
What voters won't accept, however, is any dilution of the government's hard line on Pakistan. Capitulation to Trump after he has signalled he prefers their neighbours would be a tough sell, even for Modi.
In less than 24 hours, New Delhi's policy for the Trump era, and its carefully cultivated strategic ambiguity amid US-China tension, were both left in shambles. I expect Modi will still be able to push through some sort of deal, if with more concessions and domestic political damage than he would like. But Trump is clearly asking himself exactly what India brings to the table as a partner.
Equally, citizens will wonder if the US is once again making the mistake – as it has so often before – of trusting Pakistan's establishment while ignoring India. New Delhi's confidence that it could navigate the Trump era has been well and truly shattered; it will take a long time for the relationship to recover from this tumultuous week.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Netherlands uses new NATO channel to pay for US arms for Ukraine
Netherlands uses new NATO channel to pay for US arms for Ukraine

Straits Times

time42 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Netherlands uses new NATO channel to pay for US arms for Ukraine

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Military equipment are pictured as the Dutch government presents plans to increase spending on defence to 2% of GDP in the wake of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, in Amersfoort, Netherlands, September 5, 2024. REUTERS/Piroschka van de Wouw/File Photo AMSTERDAM/BRUSSELS - The Netherlands said on Monday it will contribute 500 million euros ($578 million) to purchase U.S. military equipment for Ukraine, becoming the first NATO country to contribute to a new mechanism to supply Kyiv with American weapons. President Donald Trump said last month the U.S. would provide weapons to Ukraine, paid for by European allies, but he did not provide details on how this would work. "As the first NATO ally, the Netherlands will deliver a €500 million package of US weapon systems (including Patriot parts and missiles)," Dutch Defence Minister Ruben Brekelmans said in a post on X. NATO chief Mark Rutte, a former Dutch prime minister, welcomed the announcement and said he has encouraged other alliance members to participate in the new mechanism, called the NATO Prioritised Ukraine Requirements List (PURL) initiative. 'This is about getting Ukraine the equipment it urgently needs now to defend itself against Russian aggression,' Rutte said in a statement. 'I have written to all NATO Allies, urging them to contribute towards this burden sharing initiative, and I expect further significant announcements from other Allies soon,' he added. The U.S. ambassador to NATO, Matthew Whitaker, told Reuters on Monday that he expected many more countries to announce over the coming weeks that they will participate. 'We're moving as fast as possible,' Whitaker said in an interview at NATO headquarters in Brussels. Asked about a timeline for getting U.S. deliveries to Ukraine under the new mechanism, he said, 'I think we'll see it moving very quickly, certainly in the coming weeks, but some even sooner than that. 'The Dutch are just the first of many. You're going to see a series of announcements in the coming weeks,' he added. NATO said it would coordinate the new initiative, which is funded by European members of the alliance and Canada and will be divided into packages worth approximately $500 million. In a statement, the alliance said, "Working closely with Ukraine and the United States, the Supreme Allied Commander Europe Alexus Grynkewich will validate packages that correspond to Ukraine's needs, such as air defence, ammunition and other critical equipment for rapid delivery from U.S. stockpiles". Kyiv welcomed the Dutch decision. "Ukraine, and thus the whole of Europe, will be better protected from Russian terror," Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy wrote on X. "I am sincerely grateful to the Netherlands for their substantial contribution to strengthening Ukraine's air shield," he added. REUTERS

US to Require Bonds of Up to $15,000 for Some Tourist Visas Under Pilot Programme
US to Require Bonds of Up to $15,000 for Some Tourist Visas Under Pilot Programme

CNA

timean hour ago

  • CNA

US to Require Bonds of Up to $15,000 for Some Tourist Visas Under Pilot Programme

WASHINGTON: The United States could require tourist and business visa applicants to pay bonds of up to US$15,000 under a pilot programme launching in two weeks, as part of efforts to deter overstays, according to a government notice released on Monday (Aug 4). Under the one-year initiative, US consular officers will have discretion to impose the bonds on travellers from countries with high rates of visa overstays or where screening and vetting information is considered insufficient. The scheme, set to begin on Aug 20, is part of President Donald Trump's broader crackdown on illegal immigration, which has included ramped-up border enforcement and tighter entry restrictions. Trump's administration issued a travel ban in June affecting citizens from 19 nations, and his immigration agenda has led to a decline in inbound tourism. According to industry data, transatlantic airfares fell to pre-pandemic levels in May, and travel from Canada and Mexico to the US dropped 20 per cent year-on-year. Consular officers will choose from three bond amounts, US$5,000, US$10,000 or US$15,000, though they are generally expected to require at least US$10,000. The funds will be returned if travellers leave the country in line with their visa terms. The pilot mirrors a similar initiative launched in November 2020 during Trump's first term, which was not fully implemented due to the collapse in global travel caused by COVID-19. It remains unclear how many travellers will be affected. However, many countries named in Trump's current travel ban, including Chad, Eritrea, Haiti, Myanmar and Yemen, have among the highest overstay rates. Several African nations, such as Burundi, Djibouti and Togo, were also identified for excessive visa overstays in US Customs and Border Protection data for fiscal year 2023.

Hitachi mulling over sale of Japanese white goods business, Nikkei reports
Hitachi mulling over sale of Japanese white goods business, Nikkei reports

CNA

time3 hours ago

  • CNA

Hitachi mulling over sale of Japanese white goods business, Nikkei reports

Japanese conglomerate Hitachi is considering selling its domestic home appliance business as part of a continued effort to prioritize the group's social infrastructure and digital sectors, the Nikkei newspaper has reported. The deal could be worth around 100 billion yen ($679.49 million) or more, the report said. Hitachi has reached out to multiple companies to buy its white goods business, with South Korea's Samsung Electronics being one of its potential suitors, Nikkei said. However, the report added that Hitachi is keeping the option of retaining the business open as well due to its potential of contributing to the company's brand recognition among consumers. Hitachi and Samsung Electronics did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for a comment. ($1 = 147.1700 yen)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store