Wall Street poised for higher open as US-Japan trade deal lifts sentiment
The pact will slash tariffs on the Japanese auto sector to 15% from 27.5%, with duties on other goods also dropping to 15% from 25%.
At 8:24 a.m. ET, S&P 500 E-minis were up 22.5 points, or 0.35%, Nasdaq 100 E-minis were up 17.75 points, or 0.08%, and Dow E-minis were up 233 points, or 0.52%.
Futures tracking the domestically focused Russell 2000 small-cap index rose 0.9%.
Representatives from Washington and the European Union were headed into negotiations, hoping to secure a breakthrough deal. At the same time, the European Commission declared plans to submit counter-tariffs on 93 billion euros ($109 billion) of U.S. goods for approval to EU members.
"The United States has been working very hard on trying to get a lot of trade deals in time before the August 1st deadline, and it seems like they're starting to get some momentum. So I do think this is a very positive sign," said Chris Zaccarelli, chief investment officer at Northlight Asset Management.
Meanwhile, the S&P 500 notched its eighth record close in a month on Tuesday, buoyed by easing trade tensions, a resilient U.S. economy, and upbeat second-quarter earnings.
The Dow climbed 0.4%, now within striking distance of its all-time high, while the Nasdaq slipped as declines in Meta and Microsoft weighed on the tech-heavy index.
Investors are now laser-focused on earnings from the "Magnificent Seven" - the market's star performers who have powered stocks to record highs.
Tesla and Alphabet are set to report after the bell on Wednesday. With AI optimism running high and valuations stretched, expectations for these tech giants are sky-high, leaving little margin for disappointment. Both the stocks eased about 0.3% premarket.
In earnings-focused moves, Texas Instruments tumbled 9.9% after its quarterly profit forecast failed to impress investors, as it pointed to weaker-than-expected demand for its analog chips from some customers and underscored tariff-related uncertainty.
The earnings also weighed on its peer analog chipmakers, with NXP Semiconductors, Analog Devices and ON Semiconductor falling between 3.1% and 5.4%.
Automaker General Motors also became a casualty of the trade war on Tuesday when it said Trump's tariffs took a $1.1 billion hit on its quarterly earnings, sending its shares down more than 8%.
Toymaker Hasbro rose 0.5% after raising its annual revenue forecast, while AT&T slipped 3.4% despite beating quarterly profit estimates.
In economic data, existing home sales numbers for June are due on the day. Thursday's weekly jobless claims numbers and S&P Global's flash PMI data will be closely assessed to gauge economic health in the wake of tariff uncertainties.
Following a mixed set of economic data last week, traders have ruled out an interest rate cut by the Federal Reserve next week. Odds for a September reduction stand at 56%, according to the CME FedWatch tool.
The Fed's July meeting will follow on the heels of mounting concerns about its independence amid political interference and President Trump's persistent attacks on Chair Jerome Powell for his reluctance to cut rates. - Reuters
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
6 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Stanford University axes 363 jobs amid Trump's education funding cuts
LOS ANGELES, United States: Stanford University plans to axe hundreds of staff due to funding cuts for higher education under President Donald Trump, the latest mass layoff at an elite US college. The plan announced in late July, which AFP confirmed Wednesday by consulting official documents, follows similar firings at Harvard, Columbia and Johns Hopkins – all of which have been targeted in the White House's crackdown on top universities. Trump has wielded federal funds as a negotiating tool for universities that he says are too liberal, insisting that they submit to curriculum, enrollment and other changes. The Republican's administration has also decreased or placed holds on spending for university research as part of wider budget cuts since taking office in January. Stanford, located just south of San Francisco with some 18,000 staff, said it was making a US$140 million reduction in the general funds budget for the upcoming year. "This is the product of a challenging fiscal environment shaped in large part by federal policy changes affecting higher education," Stanford president Jon Levin and provost Jenny Martinez said in a joint statement. They added that the job cuts were "difficult actions that affect valued colleagues and friends who have made important contributions to Stanford." A filing by Stanford with the California state government said 363 employees would be impacted by the layoffs.--AFP
New Straits Times
7 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Trump slaps additional 25pct tariff on India over Russian oil trade
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump on Wednesday ordered an additional 25 per cent tariff on Indian goods over New Delhi's continued purchase of Russian oil, a key revenue source for Moscow's war in Ukraine. The tariff, set to take effect in three weeks, comes on top of a separate 25 per cent duty entering into force on Thursday, according to the text of the executive order released by the White House. The order also threatens potential penalties on other countries deemed to be "directly or indirectly importing Russian Federation oil." Exemptions remain for items targeted by separate sector-specific duties such as steel and aluminium, and categories that could be hit like pharmaceuticals. Trump has been ramping up pressure on India after signaling fresh sanctions on Moscow if it did not make progress by Friday towards a peace deal with Kyiv, as Russia's devastating invasion of its pro-western neighbour drags on. India's national security adviser was in Moscow on Wednesday, media in New Delhi reported, coinciding with a visit by US envoy Steve Witkoff. India's foreign ministry earlier said US pressure to stop it buying Russian oil was "unjustified and unreasonable" and that it would protect its interests.--AFP
The Star
8 hours ago
- The Star
EU may have just deepened its reliance on the US, former Chinese envoy says
The latest trade deal between Brussels and Washington may deepen the European Union's economic and security dependence on the US and increase the risks to the bloc's pursuit of strategic autonomy, according to a senior Chinese diplomat. Shi Mingde, who served as China's ambassador to Germany from 2012 to 2019, gave his assessment of Sunday's transatlantic agreement to academics and reporters at an event in Beijing on Tuesday to mark 50 years of China-EU relations. The deal came hard on the heels of last Thursday's one-day EU-China summit in the Chinese capital, which also marked the 50th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic ties between China and the 27-member bloc. While Beijing has supported Europe's push for strategic autonomy, it has firmly rejected its de-risking policy – to reduce the EU's reliance on China – as a veiled attempt to contain Chinese growth, particularly in technology and the economy. 'The Europeans have proposed to reduce reliance to mitigate risk, but this reasoning is flawed,' Shi said. 'They claim that greater reliance leads to greater risk, yet their dependence on the United States remains even stronger – both in terms of security and economics – and the recent deal ... further reinforces the EU's dependence on the US in terms of security and the economy. 'So, will this agreement ultimately lead to greater strategic autonomy for Europe? Not yet.' Touted by US President Donald Trump as 'the biggest deal ever made', the agreement puts a 15 per cent tariff on most European imports to the United States, while the average rate on goods in the other direction will drop below one per cent, according to the White House. The EU has also agreed to buy US$750 billion in American energy and make US$600 billion in new investment in the United States – all by 2028. There have been concerns that a transatlantic agreement may increase Trump's leverage in the continuing trade talks with Beijing while allowing the US and the EU to refocus on their alignment in the competition with China. On Monday, EU trade chief Maros Sefcovic said that as part of the deal, Washington and Brussels would develop a metals alliance to mitigate the impact of subsidised Chinese products – notably 'steel, aluminium, copper and the derivatives' – on global markets. Without going into the agreement's details, Shi said that while Beijing's policy with the bloc had been 'consistent' and 'cooperative', it was the EU's own job to shape its future with major powers like the US, China and Russia. How Sino-EU relations develop would depend on how the bloc definef China, 'but the premise is how the EU defines itself in a turbulent world', he said. '[Would Brussels really] want a full-scale confrontation with Russia, comprehensive suppression by the US ... and an increasingly fractious relationship with China?' Despite the frictions in the relationship, China has positioned itself as a partner to Europe and has been encouraging the European Union to do more to assert its strategic autonomy. At last week's summit, expected to set the tone for China-EU relations, President Xi Jinping urged his visitors – European Commission chief Ursula von der Leyen and the president of the European Council Antonio Costa – to make 'the right strategic choice'. Speaking before Shi at the same event, Di Dongsheng, professor and associate dean of the Renmin University of China's school of international studies, observed that the EU's policy on China had been largely influenced by Washington rather than Beijing. The results of a 2023 study by his team at Renmin University suggested there was a risk that the EU might use China as leverage if Brussels was pressed hard by the US, he said. The researchers analysed more than 200 million recorded events – including diplomatic engagement and conflicts – related to relations between China, the US and Washington's allies since 2009, when former president Barack Obama took office. 'Our research shows Europe's China policy isn't shaped by Beijing's actions at all – whether we're positive or negative makes no difference in the EU's attitude on China,' Di said. 'The real decider is America's stance towards China and, to a lesser extent, the United States' attitude towards the EU. 'In this sense, when the Europeans talk about cutting dependence on China, in the economy and supply chains, I think they should also be pursuing real political and strategic autonomy.' - South China Morning Post
