Netherlands to start NATO's new Ukraine weapons finance scheme with $578 mln payment
'Ukraine needs more air defence and ammunition now. As the first NATO ally, the Netherlands will deliver a €500 million package of US weapon systems (including Patriot parts and missiles),' Dutch Defense Minister Ruben Brekelmans said in a statement on X.
'This helps Ukraine to defend itself and the rest of Europe against Russian aggression,' he added.
In a statement posted on the Dutch defence ministry website, the ministry said that other countries have also pledged financing under the new mechanism.
The defence ministry said that under the new scheme, Ukraine can draw on US military equipment stocks if these are funded by NATO allies. The United States is releasing military aid in packages worth approximately $500 million, it said, adding that the packages consist of air defence equipment, ammunition and other essential supplies tailored to Ukraine's needs.
US President Donald Trump said last month the US would supply weapons to Ukraine, paid for by European allies, but did not provide details on how this would work.
Reuters reported on Friday that NATO countries, Ukraine, and the US were developing a new Ukraine weapons financing mechanism.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
7 minutes ago
- Mint
Swiss Gold Trading Takes Spotlight in Trade Talks With Trump
The trade imbalances that prompted President Donald Trump to slap hefty levies on Swiss imports have been driven by a small industry at the center of the world's gold market. The country is the world's biggest gold-refining hub, thanks to a longstanding reputation for quality and discretion. Billions of dollars worth of gold is constantly flowing into and out of the nation, from mines in South America and Africa to banks in London and New York. Flows of the precious metal cause big swings in the country's trade balances, even if the Swiss refiners capture only a small portion of the value of the commerce. Bullion is by far the country's largest export good, according to Simon J. Evenett of IMD Business School. 'Gold is special,' Evenett said. 'It isn't really manufactured in Switzerland. Processed is a better word.' The impact of the industry is more important than ever as the Trump administration focuses on leveling trade deficits. Record bullion exports of more than $36 billion made up more than two-thirds of Switzerland's trade surplus with the US in the first quarter, according to Swiss customs data. The US president's decision to slap tariffs of 39% on all Swiss imports has caused a shock in the country, with the government having previously been confident it would avoid heavy duties. US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said the tariffs reflect the balance of commerce with America and the country's willingness to address its trade deficit. The recent flood of gold imports into the US was largely in response to a potentially lucrative trans-Atlantic arbitrage opportunity opened up by concerns the precious metal could get caught up in sweeping US import duties. Traders in Europe wanted to deliver bullion to New York to capture premium prices, but first they needed their metal recast from the 400-ounce bars standard in London — the largest gold trading venue — into the 1 kilo or 100oz bars required by the US-based Comex exchange. That made Switzerland's gold refiners a crucial node in the arbitrage. In the second quarter, that flow reversed after bullion was exempted from Trump's tariffs, leading US prices to fall back into line with the benchmark spot price in London. Switzerland saw a net inflow of well over $1 billion of gold over the period. The exemption means that Switzerland's future gold exports probably wouldn't be hit by the new 39% levy. Despite the vast sums involved in the bullion trade, refining is a relatively small business. Switzerland only has five companies producing investment-grade gold, most of whom only employ a couple of hundred people. While the price of the gold that passes through the refineries has surged to nearly $3,500 an ounce this year, the refiners will usually only capture a couple of dollars of that price when they recast a bar. The Swiss National Bank had addressed the issue earlier this year in a paper, arguing that outsized gold exports to the US shouldn't be included when analyzing the trade relationship between the two economies. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
Economic Times
7 minutes ago
- Economic Times
India's tax department investigating Jane Street over possible tax treaty misuse, sources say
Synopsis Indian tax authorities are investigating Jane Street for potential tax violations related to derivative trades. The probe centers on whether the firm used its Singapore entities to evade taxes, leveraging the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement. This follows a SEBI ban alleging market manipulation. TIL Creatives India's tax authorities are investigating whether Jane Street violated tax laws by booking profits via its Singapore entities on its derivative trades in the Indian market, three sources briefed on the matter said. Searches at the U.S. trading firm's India offices by the income tax department have been underway since last week, sources have said. A government source who was briefed on the matter later said that Jane Street staff were not cooperating. The tax authorities' enquiries follow a temporary ban by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), the market regulator, which publicly alleged that the firm manipulated stock indexes through its derivatives positions. Jane Street has denied the SEBI allegations, but has not made any public comments so far on the tax investigation. The firm did not respond to a Reuters request sent to its U.S. headquarters for comment on Monday on the latest developments. India's income tax department did not respond to Reuters request for comment. Tax authorities are investigating whether Jane Street violated the General Anti-Avoidance Rules (GAAR) by using the Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA) between India and Singapore to evade taxes on large profits it made on Indian derivative trades, all three sources said. The sources declined to be named because they were not authorised to speak to the media. The DTAA is designed to prevent residents from being taxed twice, while the GAAR gives a country the power to deny a particular tax benefit if it is being used solely for tax avoidance. The Indian tax authorities are looking into whether Jane Street booked larger profits on its derivatives positions in the Indian market via its Singapore entities as a way to reduce the tax burden, all three sources briefed on the matter added. SEBI's July 4 ban order showed that Jane Street made more than $4 billion trading in India from January 2023 to May 2025. Jane Street's two India entities - JSI Investments and JSI2 Investments - made a profit of 39.35 billion Indian rupees ($448.23 million), Jane Street Singapore made a profit of 256 billion rupees ($2.92 billion) and its Hong Kong entity, Jane Street Asia Trading, made a profit of 69.30 billion Indian rupees ($789.39 million), the order showed. If the tax department's probe shows the tax rules have been breached, Jane Street could be issued with a tax demand, the third source said. Tax authorities are trying to access Jane Street's accounts, which are maintained overseas, they added. The second source said SEBI had provided the tax department with the profit and loss details of four Jane Street group entities the regulator had named in its orders. SEBI did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comment.
Hindustan Times
11 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Iceland has no armed forces, but that could change
Zipping over lava fields and fjords, the Icelandic coastguard were putting a chopper crew through its paces. The coastguard, which Iceland relies on instead of an army, does everything from rescuing wayward tourists to protecting undersea cables from sabotage. But they are starting to feel a bit overstretched. 'Three helicopters, two ships and one aeroplane is not enough,' sulks one officer after dropping off a colleague next to a steaming volcano. A founding NATO member, Iceland has relied mainly on America for its defence. But as Europe rearms and the Americans call out laggards, it is feeling the heat. 'They are putting pressure on us,' admits Thorgerdur Katrin Gunnarsdottir, the foreign minister. Iceland has spent just 0.2% of its GDP on defence in recent years. Home to some 400,000 people, the island matters. Americans use it as a base to watch for Russian submarines sneaking into the Atlantic. This geographical importance has allowed Iceland to outsource its own defences. 'We need to do more,' says Thorgerdur. There are plans to boost spending, perhaps to 1.5% of GDP. That will help keep watch over the Atlantic and build infrastructure that American and European ships, submarines and planes could use as wartime staging posts. But neglect leaves Iceland vulnerable elsewhere. It could be cut off if its cables were severed. It has no intelligence service to hunt saboteurs and spies. Thorgerdur says she supports setting one up. The coastguard would struggle if multiple ships sank simultaneously; Iceland has only recently begun spending on unmanned submarines and anti-drone technology. A cross-party task force is discussing what else to consider. Some want to take the next step. Arnor Sigurjonsson, until recently the Icelanders' top defence official, says the government in Reykjavik should bite the bullet and create an army. It is infantilising to outsource defence, he argues. He wants a thousand-strong force to defend airports and harbours in emergencies and says Icelandic infrastructure could be targeted by Russian strikes. 'They say that we are too few and too poor,' he says. 'This is simply not true.' Such views were once laughed at, but no longer. Though most remain sceptical about Arnor's proposal, Icelanders generally agree they should spend more. Thorgerdur takes no position on the need for an army, but notes that Luxembourg has a small force. Malta too has a proper fleet. 'I am not afraid of this debate,' she says. 'The main question is: how do we defend Iceland?' The issue has become more pressing because of Donald Trump's threats against (relatively) nearby Greenland, which Icelanders have followed with alarm. It is Mr Trump who would decide whether America will defend Iceland. He must surely be displeased that Americans have been footing the island's defence bill. It is a geological fact that Iceland is being torn apart as Europe and America drift away from each other. Volcanoes testify to this. Now Icelanders worry it could become a political reality too. That is rekindling debate over whether to join the European Union. A referendum is planned on resuming accession negotiations. Polls indicate it will pass. Icelanders, says Pawel Bartoszek, a pro-European MP, are looking towards Europe more than ever. The two people doing most to convince them to join the EU, he says, are 'Vladimir Putin and, in many ways, Donald Trump'. To stay on top of the biggest European stories, sign up to Café Europa, our weekly subscriber-only newsletter.
