Houston Ship Channel Expansion – Project 11 Funded to Completion
HOUSTON--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Port Houston is pleased the President's fiscal year (FY) 2026 budget has allocated $161 million for the Houston Ship Channel Expansion – Project 11. In addition, the President's FY26 Operation & Maintenance (O&M) budget allocated $53.6 million to the Houston Ship Channel, the nation's No. 1 ranked waterway. These funds are in addition to the $33 million for Project 11 construction and $98 million for O&M in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Workplan for FY25 that was released a few weeks ago.
Port Houston is pleased that the President's fiscal year (FY) 2026 budget has allocated $161 million for the Houston Ship Channel Expansion – Project 11.
Share
Port Houston Chairman Ric Campo extended congratulations and appreciation to all industry partners, stakeholders, Congressman Wesley Hunt, and the bipartisan delegation involved in this tremendous effort undertaken over the past several years.
"This is a momentous achievement," said Chairman Campo. "We appreciate the Trump Administration for recognizing the criticality of this expansion and applaud Congressman Wesley Hunt and Congressman Brian Babin for their tremendous advocacy and unwavering leadership to bring home the millions of federal dollars needed to complete Project 11. This project will keep our economy moving forward and enable our port to continue delivering for not just Houstonians but the entire nation."
"Since my swearing-in nearly three years ago, one of my biggest priorities has been to ensure that Project 11 in the Houston Ship Channel is fully funded and its construction completed. As the largest energy port in the entire world, Project 11's success is essential to maintaining Texas's and the United States' energy dominance," said Congressman Hunt. 'I would also like to express my sincerest gratitude to President Trump for recognizing the importance of this project and his goal of ensuring America is once again a net exporter of energy."
Project 11 Construction Progress
Several portions of the channel expansion project are complete and already providing benefits. Daylight restrictions have been reduced by up to two hours in each direction, increasing time for two-way vessel traffic along the waterway and improving efficiency.
Later this summer Port Houston will complete the remaining Port-led portion of Project 11 dredging, between Bayport Ship Channel and Barbours Cut Ship Channel, with USACE leading the remaining portions of Project 11 in Barbours Cut and the upper Turning Basin. Project 11 is scheduled to be complete by 2029.
Project 11 is a testament to Port Houston's advocacy for the Houston Ship Channel and the region. It will provide a safer waterway for larger ships and vessels, further supporting economic development and jobs for the region and the state of Texas.
See more details and updates about Houston Ship Channel Expansion – Project 11 here: https://www.expandthehoustonshipchannel.com.
For more than 100 years, Port Houston has owned and operated the public wharves and terminals along the Houston Ship Channel, including the area's largest breakbulk facility and two of the most efficient container terminals in the country. Port Houston is the advocate and a strategic leader for the Channel. The Houston Ship Channel complex and its more than 200 private and eight public terminals is the nation's largest port for waterborne tonnage and an essential economic engine for the Houston region, the state of Texas and the U.S. The Port of Houston supports the creation of nearly 1.5 million jobs in Texas and 3.37 million jobs nationwide, and economic activity totaling $439 billion in Texas and $906 billion in economic impact across the nation. For more information, visit the website at PortHouston.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
29 minutes ago
- New York Times
The MAGA Fight Over the Iran Fight
A decade ago, President Trump electrified conservatives with his promises to get the United States out of foreign entanglements and to always put — say it with me — 'America first.' As he weighs involving American planes and weaponry in Israel's attacks on Iran, a brawl has broken out in the Republican Party over what 'America first' really means. I wrote today about how a swath of Trump's base is in an uproar over the president's increasing openness to deploying U.S. warplanes — and perhaps even 30,000-pound bunker-busting bombs — against Iran in an effort to help Israel finish off its nuclear program. 'Everyone is finding out who are real America First/MAGA and who were fake and just said it bc it was popular,' Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia posted on X over the weekend. She added, 'Anyone slobbering for the U.S. to become fully involved in the Israel/Iran war is not America First/MAGA.' The anger extends well beyond Greene's social-media account, to cable television and the podcast feeds of the likes of Tucker Carlson, Steve Bannon and Candace Owens. They are passionately arguing that intervening in Iran would contravene Trump's long-held promise to steer the nation out of, not into, foreign entanglements, and threaten to fracture his whole coalition. It's a remarkable fight, and one that raises a bigger question about who is really the keeper of Trump's political flame. Is it the non-interventionists who have been there from the start, or the Republican hawks — the Senator Lindsey Grahams of the world — who are now sticking by the president? Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Washington Post
37 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Tracking Trump: Iran gets the ‘ultimate ultimatum'; Fed maintains interest rates; Hegseth defends Confederate base names; and more
Trump remained noncommittal about the U.S. striking Iran. The Supreme Court upheld a ban on gender transition treatments for minors. A report found Social Security will run out of money in under 10 years. The Federal Reserve said it will not drop interest rates. The defense secretary defended Confederate names for bases.
Boston Globe
38 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Iranian Americans anxiously watch war unfold from afar
Valipour, a US citizen, has resigned himself to the possibility that the United States could join Israel's war against Iran. It wouldn't be a question of allegiances for Valipour. 'If there is fighting between parents, mom and dad, do I choose a side or say, 'OK, I'm going to talk to them to find a resolution?'' he said. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up On Tuesday, in one of the most vibrant Iranian American communities in the United States, uncertainty and anxiety lingered among residents, as Iran and Israel continued another day of fierce fighting. Westwood, a neighborhood on the west side of Los Angeles near the UCLA campus, is home to the largest Iranian community outside of Iran. It has taken on many names, including Persian Square, Little Persia, Little Tehran, and Tehrangeles, a combination of Iran's capital Tehran and Los Angeles. Advertisement After President Trump signaled that the United States could enter the conflict against Iran, reaction among the Iranian-Americans in Westwood was a mix of dismay, concern, and hope for the possible end of the Islamic regime. Advertisement Some in the neighborhood worried the conflict could divide the community. There were those, including many Jewish-Iranians, who supported Israel's bombing campaign as a legitimate way to end the rule of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. And there were those who said they believe regime change should not come at the expense of innocent lives. Israeli strikes have killed at least 224 people in Iran, according to the country's Health Ministry, and injured more than 1,400 people. Retaliatory strikes by Iran have killed at least 24 people in Israel, identified as civilians, with about 600 injured. On Tuesday night, a man was on the phone with his father-in-law as he pulled up to Pink Orchid, a Middle Eastern bakery in Westwood. The man asked that his full name not be used, out of fear of retribution by the Iranian government if he returns to Iran. As evacuations have intensified in Tehran, the man's father-in-law was among those stranded there. Gasoline stations had run out of fuel. 'We're worried about families, our people,' the man said, adding, 'Some people couldn't coordinate, or they're too old, or they couldn't leave early enough and then they ran into gas problems.' Although he harbored no sympathy for the government and the military leaders who were killed in Israeli airstrikes, his main concern was with the safety of civilians. 'I just hope that when they consider airstrikes on western Tehran and other residential cities that they consider the fact that a lot of people don't have cars anymore, after 40 years of sanctions,' the man said. 'A lot of people don't have cars or the means to leave. So it's not as easy as just telling people to get up and go.' Advertisement Of an estimated 400,000 Iranian-born immigrants living in the United States, more than a third live in the Los Angeles region. Many live in the Westwood area, but others live across west Los Angeles, including in Beverly Hills, where Iranian-Americans have not just settled roots but have established political power. Sharona Nazarian, the mayor of Beverly Hills, fled Iran with her family in 1979, seeking refuge from religious persecution as Iranian Jews, and has lived in Beverly Hills for more than 30 years. Nazarian is the first Iranian-American woman to serve as the city's mayor. In a statement, Nazarian said she felt compelled to speak out about the tensions between Israel and Iran, and expressed sympathy for innocent civilians. 'It's important to remember: Israel's conflict is not with the people of Iran,' Nazarian said. 'In fact, the people of Israel and Iran share a long and rich history of friendship dating back to the time of Cyrus the Great. The Iranian people have suffered deeply under a regime that has isolated them from the world and placed them in harm's way.'
