For 100 years, we have marveled at planetariums. Here's a brief history of how humans brought the stars indoors
This article was originally published at The Conversation. The publication contributed the article to Space.com's Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights.
Picture this: a small audience is quietly ushered into a darkened room. They gasp in awe, as a brilliant night sky shines above. They wonder – as many after them will do – what trickery has made the roof above their heads disappear?
But this is a performance; the stars above an ingenious projection. For the first time a public audience has experienced the spectacle of the opto-mechanical planetarium. The location is the newly opened Deutsches Museum in Munich, built to celebrate science and technology. The date is May 7 1925.
Throughout time, cultures around the world have used the stars to help make sense of the world, to understand where we come from and determine our place in the cosmos.
People have tried to recreate the movements of the stars and planets since antiquity. In the 1700s, the orrery, a clockwork model of the Solar System, was developed. The word 'planetarium' was invented to describe orreries that featured the planets.
One room-sized orrery example was built by the self-taught Frisian astronomer Eise Eisinga. It's still operational today in Franeker, Netherlands.
No human has ever been to the edge of the Solar System to see this view. Orreries, and other mechanical models of the universe like celestial globes, present views from impossible, external perspectives.
The desire for a realistic view of the stars and planets, created from a perspective we actually see, gathered pace in the early 20th century as light pollution from growing cities diminished the view of the night sky.
People like Oskar von Miller, first director of the Deutsches Museum in Munich, Germany, wanted to return this vision of the stars and planets to everyone. (Ironically, von Miller's earlier career was as an electrical engineer, rolling out the city lighting that contributed to light pollution.)
One early attempt to create this view of the night sky was the Atwood Sphere, installed in Chicago in 1913.
Approximately five metres across, it was made of sheet metal perforated with a star map. When viewed from the inside, the light shining through 692 pinholes replicated the Chicago night sky. The whole structure could even be rotated to simulate the motion of the stars.
A realistic display of the stars is one thing. Representing the planets, whose positions in the sky change from night to night, is a different one. Von Miller and others at the Deutsches Museum knew that fixed holes could not represent the complexity of a moving planet.
What if the planets were displayed by projection? If so, couldn't the stars be projected, as well? With this realization, a new kind of planetarium was born, borrowing the name from earlier orreries but working in a completely different way.
The task of building such a device was given to the German optical company Carl Zeiss AG. After many setbacks, their first planetarium projector was completed in 1923, with the first performance at the Deutsches Museum a century ago today.
Planetariums were a hit with the public. Within decades, they had spread around the world – the first planetarium in the United States opened in Chicago in 1930, while the first one in Asia opened in Osaka, Japan in 1937. The popularity of planetariums particularly accelerated in the US during the space race of the 1960s.
Australia's oldest operating planetarium is the Melbourne Planetarium, managed by Museums Victoria since 1965. In Aotearoa New Zealand, Auckland's Stardome Observatory has been in operation since 1997. The current longest-running planetarium in the southern hemisphere is in Montevideo, Uruguay, operational since 1955.
The opto-mechanical planetarium projector remains a technological wonder of the modern world. Individual plates, perforated with pinholes, are illuminated by a bright central light. Separate lenses focus each projection from one of these star maps to fill the entire dome with about 5,000 stars.
The Sun, Moon and planets have separate projectors driven by gears and rods that mechanically calculate the object's position in the sky for any time or place.
The opto-mechanical planetarium projector remains a technological wonder of the modern world. Individual plates, perforated with pinholes, are illuminated by a bright central light. Separate lenses focus each projection from one of these star maps to fill the entire dome with about 5,000 stars.
The Sun, Moon and planets have separate projectors driven by gears and rods that mechanically calculate the object's position in the sky for any time or place.
By the 1990s, a digital revolution had begun. With the advent of computers, the positions of the planets could now be calculated digitally. The Melbourne Planetarium became the first digital planetarium in the southern hemisphere when it installed the Digistar II in 1999.
This system, developed by computer graphics company Evans and Sutherland, replaced the multiple lenses of earlier projectors with a fisheye lens. A single beam of light swept across the whole dome so rapidly that it seemed to create a single image – albeit in a bizarre green color, rendering a starfield of fuzzy green blobs.
The trade-off for a less crisp starfield was a 3D database with more than 9,000 stars. For the first time, planetarium audiences could fly through space, far beyond the edge of the Solar System.
Planetarium technology continues to develop. Today, most planetariums operate through video projection. Known as fulldome, the output from multiple projectors is blended together to create a seamless video, transforming the planetarium into a sophisticated 360-degree theatre.
Astronomy has also changed over the last century. Just as Zeiss was completing its first projector, astronomer Edwin Hubble discovered that other galaxies exist beyond our Milky Way galaxy.
The stars shown on the dome in Munich in 1925 turned out to be just a tiny part of the universe that we know today.
Planetariums' digital systems now incorporate data from telescopes and space agencies around the world. Audiences can fly off Earth, orbit the planets and moons of the Solar System, and explore the billions of known galaxies.
Yet some things have not changed. From orreries and lantern slides to opto-mechanical and digital planetariums, the communication of astronomy has always been about more than just the latest results of science.
The power of the planetarium over the last 100 years has been its ability to evoke wonder and awe. It taps into our enduring fascination with the vast mystery of the night sky.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
8 hours ago
- Forbes
Ph.D. Candidates Are Not Overqualified, They Are Underrated
'You're overqualified for this role.' It's a phrase far too familiar to Ph.D. holders navigating the job market. Despite their deep expertise, many find that corporate America often misunderstands, underestimates, or overlooks the value they can bring to businesses, especially when the preference leans toward more traditional credentials, such as the M.B.A. In an era of accelerated technological disruption and knowledge-based industries, companies can no longer afford to ignore the untapped potential of Ph.D. talent. Ph.D. is short for Doctor of Philosophy. Its roots trace back to 18th-century Germany, where the Prussian model of education was designed to train individuals to produce new knowledge, not just practice or regurgitate current knowledge. The U.S. adopted this model in the 19th and 20th centuries, and today the Ph.D. is a common offering at many universities, focused on pushing the boundaries of what we know. What separates a Ph.D. from other graduate degrees isn't just subject matter expertise, it's the process of their studies, which entails a long and rigorous journey. On average, earning a Ph.D. takes about five years, and can extend up to eleven. Candidates conduct original research, publish findings, and defend their dissertations in front of experts in their fields. The result is a scholar trained to solve problems no one has solved before. These are exactly the kinds of thinkers businesses need when thinking about new innovations and approaches to challenges. Historically, Ph.D.s were seen as a pipeline to the professoriate. But that narrative is changing. Nearly half (48%) of all Ph.D. recipients now pursue careers in industry, while just 33% remain in academia. In STEM fields, that number is even higher. Over half of Ph.D.s in science and engineering fields enter industry, and for engineers, it's closer to 79%. These shifts aren't just preferences—they reflect evolving professional ambitions. And there's a new variable reshaping the Ph.D. talent pool: government layoffs. Recent cuts in federal agencies have displaced over 51,000 federal workers. The result is a wave of highly trained Ph.D. researchers with policy insight, scientific rigor, and real-world experience entering the private job market. However, future supply of researchers may be a risk. Research universities (where most are trained) rely on government grants and have had to scale back due to federal cuts, meaning less funds for Ph.D. students. For employers, this is a talent acquisition opportunity hiding in plain sight. These professionals bring expertise in data analysis, project management, and scientific reasoning while working within tight budgets (i.e. government). These are skills that are increasingly vital as companies across industries seek to become more innovative and tech-forward. Whether in product design, Research & Development (R&D), sustainability, or strategy, Ph.D. holders can help companies not just compete, but innovate. Yet too often, Ph.D. applicants are dismissed as 'too academic' or 'overqualified.' This stems from outdated assumptions and an incomplete understanding of what Ph.D. training entails. Yes, Ph.D.s are highly educated—but many also bring real-world experience: managing budgets, writing grants, collaborating across institutions, and mentoring diverse teams. These are not your thought-of ivory tower theorists; they are applied thinkers ready to drive change. There's another aspect worth noting. Ph.D. pathways are difficult to access, especially for students without generational wealth or academic lineage. While federal numbers on graduate completion are limited, some research purports that only 56% of Ph.D. students actually complete their 3% of first-generation undergraduate students ever enroll in a Ph.D. program. That's a missed opportunity for both social mobility and corporate innovation. To tap into this hidden talent, employers must take action. That means building or supporting recruitment pipelines—like the McNair Scholars Program, Científico Latino, The Ph.D. Project, and Leadership Brainery. These initiatives are working to ensure that students from even the most challenging backgrounds can become the next generation of knowledge creators and innovators. If innovation is the lifeblood of 21st-century business, then Ph.D. talent is part of the circulatory system. These individuals know how to ask the right questions and pursue rigorous answers, skills that go far beyond academic settings. Companies that recognize and embrace this kind of thinking will be better positioned to lead in an increasingly complex and competitive world. So the next time a résumé crosses your desk bearing the letters 'Ph.D.,' don't ask whether the candidate is overqualified. Ask whether your company is ready to think bigger. Help us widen the pipeline. Support Leadership Brainery in creating equitable pathways to graduate education. Donate today! Interested in engaging with us or have an idea for a future topic? Submit this brief form.
Gizmodo
10 hours ago
- Gizmodo
Scientists Recreated the Universe's First Molecule
Seconds after the Big Bang, the newborn universe gave rise to the first elements—ionized forms of hydrogen and helium. These particles combined, forging helium hydride—the first ever molecule. It would take another several hundred million years for the first stars to be born, and scientists have long puzzled over the exact nature of the chemical processes that led to their formation. To try and tease apart the stellar origin story, scientists at the Max Planck Institute for Nuclear Physics in Heidelberg, Germany recreated helium hydride in the lab. They found that it likely played a much larger role in star birth than they had previously thought, helping primordial gas clouds shed enough heat to collapse into stars. In the study, the researchers recreated collisions between helium hydride and deuterium in what they believe to be a first-of-its-kind experiment, according to a press release. Their findings, published in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics on July 24, indicate that the rate of the reaction remains constant as the temperature drops, contradicting earlier work. 'Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,' Holger Kreckel, who is a researcher at Max Planck and the lead author on the study, said in a statement. 'The reactions of [helium hydride] with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,' he added. Two helium hydride reactions produce molecular hydrogen, and likely aided star formation in the early universe. In the first—replicated in the study—deuterium, an isotope of hydrogen that contains a neutron in addition to a proton, collides with helium hydride to yield hydrogen deuteride, a form of molecular hydrogen composed of a hydrogen atom and a deuterium atom. The other reaction occurs when helium hydride collides with a neutral hydrogen atom, producing neutral molecular hydrogen. Both forms of molecular hydrogen act as coolants, helping nebulae lose heat, condense, and ultimately collapse into stars. The researchers used Max Planck's Cryogenic Storage Ring to carry out their experiment. This low-temperature reaction chamber allows scientists to study molecular and atomic reactions in space-like conditions. The team stored helium hydride ions inside the chamber for up to a minute at roughly -450 degrees Fahrenheit (-267 degrees Celsius), then superimposed them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. To observe how the collision rate varies with collision energy—directly related to temperature—they adjusted the relative speeds of the two particle beams. Scientists previously believed rate of reactions would slow down as temperature dropped, but the results of this experiment suggest otherwise. The researchers found that the rate remained almost constant despite decreasing temperatures. This surprising result suggests that helium hydride remains chemically active even in cold conditions, a finding that the scientists argue in their paper should prompt a reevaluation of helium chemistry in the early universe.
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Scientists recreate universe's first molecule to crack 13-billion-year-old mystery
Scientists have recreated the first molecule ever to form and found that it likely played a much bigger role in the birth of early stars than previously thought. The universe was unimaginably hot and dense immediately after it formed about 13.8 billion years ago, and cooled down seconds later to form the first elements, hydrogen and helium, albeit in a completely ionised form. It then took another 380,000 years for the temperature in the early universe to drop enough for neutral atoms to form by combining with free electrons to pave the way for the first chemical reactions. The first molecule created this way is thought to be helium hydride ion (HeH+), formed from a neutral helium atom and ionised hydrogen. Helium hydride's origin also marked the beginning of a chain reaction that led to the formation of molecular hydrogen (H2), which is by far the most common molecule in the universe, scientists say. Although the infant universe at this point was transparent due to the binding of free electrons, there were still no light-emitting objects, such as stars. Researchers found that this ancient helium hydride molecule helped cool the universe over a process lasting several hundred million years before the first stars ignited. Stars are powered by nuclear fusion in which light atomic nuclei combine to form a heavier nucleus, releasing a tremendous amount of energy. However, for any early contracting gas cloud of a protostar to collapse to the point where nuclear fusion can begin, heat must be dissipated via collisions between atoms and molecules, which then emit this energy in the form of photons. But below 10,000C, this process becomes ineffective for the dominant hydrogen atoms. So researchers have long considered helium hydride ions as a potentially important candidate for cooling in the formation of the first stars. These ancient molecules could facilitate further cooling by emitting additional energy through rotation and vibration, particularly at low temperatures. The concentration of helium hydride ions in the universe was likely key to the effectiveness of early star formation, the study found. New research, published in the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics, used a special ultra-cold lab setup to mimic conditions from over 13 billion years ago that led to the formation of these molecules. The study recreated conditions similar to those in the early universe for the first time at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) instrument at the Max-Planck-Institut fur Kernphysik – a globally unique lab set up for investigating molecular and atomic reactions under space-like conditions. In the research, scientists superimposed HeH⁺ ions stored in a 35-metre-diameter storage ring for up to just a minute at a few kelvins (-267C) with a beam of neutral hydrogen atoms. They studied how the collision rate varied with temperature and found that, contrary to earlier predictions, the rate at which this reaction proceeds does not slow down with decreasing temperature. 'Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,' said study co-author Holger Kreckel from the MPIK. The findings suggest the reactions of HeH⁺ with hydrogen were far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously thought.
