No change to Apple's India iPhone plan for now amid Trump's strictures
NEW DELHI
:
Apple Inc. is not mulling any immediate change to its strategy of manufacturing more devices in India, said a person aware of developments at the Cupertino technology giant on Thursday. As a result, plans to use India as a hub for making more iPhones to supply the US market are on track, as per the company's current strategy—wherein it seeks to more than double the number of iPhones it makes in India at the moment.
The comments come in light of US President Donald Trump's statement at an event in Doha, where he claimed to have conveyed to Tim Cook, Apple's chief executive, the message not to ramp up manufacturing in India.
Also Read: New ₹3,700-crore HCL-Foxconn JV to help India localise display manufacturing
'I said to him, my friend, I am treating you very good [sic]. You are coming up with $500 billion, but now I hear you are building all over India. I don't want you building in India. You can build in India, if you want to take care of India because India is one of the highest tariff nations in the world, so it is very hard to sell in India," Trump said at the event.
India key to Apple's production growth
For Apple, India is already a key manufacturing destination, accounting for more than 10% of all iPhones sold every year. Last month, Mint reported that the company is set to more than double its iPhone manufacturing in India within the next three years, with net production crossing 50 million units.
Cook, to be sure, has already confirmed that the company is ramping up production in India. On 1 May, at the company's March quarter earnings call with analysts, the executive said that he expected 'the majority of iPhones sold in the US will have India as their country of origin."
Also Read: Home-made chips: India's GPUs set for year-end trials
Therefore, the plan appears to be in place for now. An email sent to Apple for a comment on the matter did not immediately receive a response.
Trump, meanwhile, also claimed that India has offered the US 'a deal" to charge 'literally no tariffs."
'I said Tim, we are treating you really good, we put up with all the plants you built in China for years. We are not interested in you building in India. India can take care of themselves," he added.
Industry stakeholders have said that the instability of the US trade tariffs, enforced by Trump on 2 April, could continue to hurt US companies. Navkendar Singh, associate vice-president at IDC India, said that the uncertainty 'does not mean much for India's manufacturing plans, since the regulatory regime does not have a stable narrative that it is currently operating on."
Also Read: Murugappa's chip testing plant to begin supplies next year, says JV partner
'This also leaves the India market as exposed as before, showing that India remains dependent on the US for the goals that it has set for itself," Singh added.
Apple's share price on the US stock exchange Nasdaq was down 0.5% at the time of publishing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
19 minutes ago
- Mint
US Court Rules Trump Can Exclude Journalists From Oval Office
A federal appeals court has ruled that President Donald Trump can exclude journalists from the Oval Office, Air Force One and other 'restricted' spaces based on their editorial decisions, handing the administration a win in its fight with the Associated Press over access. In a 2-1 order on Friday, the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit halted a lower-court judge's order that had restored the wire service's ability to participate in a rotating pool of reporters who cover the president's daily movements. The news agency sued the Trump administration in February when the White House press office started limiting the access of reporters and photographers after the wire service refused to update its style guide to rename the 'Gulf of Mexico' the 'Gulf of America' following a Trump executive order. A Washington federal judge's order forcing the White House to reinstate the 's access took effect April 14 after the appeals court didn't immediately intervene. The next could ask the full bench of active judges of the DC Circuit to reconsider the panel's order or ask the US Supreme Court to immediately intervene. A lawyer for the and a White House spokesperson did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Judge Neomi Rao wrote in the majority opinion that the lower court's decision 'impinges on the president's independence and control over his private workspaces.' The panel did leave in place part of the original order that required the to still have access to the East Room in the White House, which was usually open to a broader group of reporters. 'Throughout our nation's history, presidents have held crucial meetings and made historic decisions in the Oval Office and on Air Force One,' wrote Rao, joined by Judge Greg Katsas. 'On occasion, they have welcomed the press to observe. But these restricted presidential spaces are not First Amendment fora, and the President retains discretion over who has access.' Rao and Katsas were nominated by Trump in his first term. Judge Nina Pillard, appointed under former president Barack Obama, dissented. Historically, the has been part of a small, rotating pool of media outlets that cover the president's day-to-day activities as well as events open to larger groups of credentialed media outlets. In an April 8 order, US District Judge Trevor McFadden ruled that the was likely to succeed in arguing that the Trump administration violated the First Amendment of the US Constitution by singling out one media outlet based on its editorial choices. He said that officials remained free to exclude journalists from one-on-one access to Trump, but that they couldn't kick out the if it allowed in its peers. The case is Associated Press v. Budowich, 25-5109, DC Circuit Court of Appeals This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.
&w=3840&q=100)
India.com
20 minutes ago
- India.com
Amid White House Peace Push, Trump Calls Musk Mentally Gone; But Is Elon Even Listening?
New Delhi: Just a day after X (formerly Twitter) lit up with signs of a possible ceasefire between the two alpha billionaires of American influence, US President Donald Trump has poured cold water over any reconciliation talk. Asked by ABC News if he would speak to Musk after their very public clash, he scoffed, 'You mean the man who has lost his mind? I am not particularly interested in talking to him.' Classic Trump, doubling down even when the temperature seems to be cooling. There is an odd symmetry here. Musk, who had just hinted at making peace – replying 'You are not wrong' to billionaire investor Bill Ackman's call for the two to settle their feud for the sake of the nation – now finds himself ghosted by the very man he might have tried to reach out to. 'I am not even thinking about Elon. He has got a problem, the poor guy has got a problem,' Trump told CNN with dismissive finality during a June 6 interview. And while the White House reportedly flirted with the idea of brokering a peace call, as per Politico, other sources quickly knocked that down – saying no such call had been scheduled. So now, America's two most powerful disruptors remain locked in a bizarre standoff that is half-reality TV and half-national policy debate. This feud is not only personal, it is political and economic. It started when Trump lashed out during a White House appearance, accusing Musk of betrayal over criticism of his tax and spending bill. Musk hit back hard. He accused Trump's trade policies of potentially triggering a recession and even dragged the former president's links to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein into the public arena. Then came the bizarre twist – Trump, clearly furious, threatened to cancel U.S. government contracts with Tesla CEO Elon Musk's companies. In retaliation, Musk posted that he would 'retire' the Dragon spacecraft – a vehicle crucial to NASA. The internet melted down. But a few hours and likely a few backchannel calls later, Musk reversed course: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' In this verbal space race, it is hard to tell who is steering the ship and who is punching holes in the hull. Whether this ends in detente or total decoupling remains unclear, but what is certain is this – the Trump-Musk saga has become a defining narrative of America's political tech complex where egos, economics and electoral stakes collide like celestial bodies on a crash course.
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
‘No idea what he was thinking': Errol Musk on son Elon's Epstein-Trump association claims; urges to let feud 'fizzle out'
Errol Musk weighs in on Elon-Trump feud Elon Musk 's father, Errol Musk, weighed on his son's feud with Donald Trump which included reference to Jeffrey Epstein in an attack on US President, calling it 'just a silly mistake' and "not knowing what he (Elon) was thinking". He also urged his son to let the feud 'fizzle out.' In an interview with Al Arabiya English from a lounge in Delhi Airport, Errol Musk downplayed the widely publicised social media clash between the two high-profile figures, characterising it as a momentary flare-up between strong personalities under pressure. 'I have no idea what he was thinking… I can only imagine that's just a silly mistake,' Errol said of Elon's now-viral post alleging Trump's name was in the Epstein files. Musk had, in a post on X, said, 'Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT!'. Errol, attributed his son's actions to stress rather than intent. Referencing scripture, he added, 'Let the innocent person cast the first stone,' suggesting no one is without fault. The elder Musk said he had personally messaged his son to help ease tensions. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Here's The Price for a 1-Day Walk-in Shower In 2025 Homebuddy Learn More Undo 'I did send him a message… telling him, make sure this fizzles out,' he said, confidently predicting that the spat would be short-lived. 'Yes, of course,' he added when asked whether Trump and Elon would reconcile. 'When people have been through a great deal of stress… eventually people reach a point where they lash out,' Errol said. 'Even at the highest levels, people struggle to find common ground.' He suggested Elon's criticisms stemmed from concerns over Democrats' use of financial incentives to push legislation—a dispute that eventually escalated into a social media confrontation. Describing the online standoff as 'elephant bulls or alphas having a go at each other,' Errol Musk brushed off the seriousness of the episode. Reflecting on his recent visit to the US, Errol also claimed overwhelming public support for the former president. 'I would like to say 80 percent, but actually 100 percent [are] behind Trump,' he said. What is the Musk-Trump feud ? The public spat between US President Donald Trump and former adviser Elon Musk has intensified, following Musk's opposition to a significant domestic policy initiative by Trump. Following his 129-day tenure at the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge), Musk utilised his platform X to denounce the bill as a "disgusting abomination", adding: "Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong." He expressed concerns about the legislation's impact on national debt levels and urged his followers to contact their representatives in opposition to the spending proposal. The conflict between the two wealthy individuals heightened on Thursday as they traded harsh words on their respective social media platforms, indicating the end of their previous collaboration. Trump initiated the exchange by expressing disappointment over Musk's criticism of his administration's primary tax and spending legislation, suggesting this could terminate their formerly positive association. In response, Musk claimed credit for Trump's electoral success, stating: "Without me, Trump would have lost the election". The deterioration in their relationship occurred after Musk's sustained opposition to Trump's spending legislation, which received approval from the US House and awaits Senate consideration.
