What hope is there for today's unlucky graduates?
I used to urge everyone to go abroad in their twenties before family responsibilities overtake. But where to now? Hong Kong and mainland China are out; it's the wrong time to go to America or the Middle East; they'll need work permits for the EU. Maybe Mark Carney's resurgent Canada – a destination out of fashion for Brits since the 1950s – will become the hot new place to go.
Closer to home, what of careers in journalism? At a recent seminar in Oxford, a panel of veterans agreed it's more fun than having a real job but demands relentless self-promotion to achieve bare subsistence earnings. And oldsters like me can't even use a lifetime's contacts to help youngsters who have the gumption to ask, because these days that's seen as elitist and unfair.
What else can I say? You're on your own, kids. But when I was your age in the 1970s, prospects felt a lot darker than today. It took a decade and a radical change of government, but horizons eventually brightened beyond anything we imagined at the nadir. So wait for the wheel of fate to turn, and meanwhile keep busy in the most stimulating ways you can find.
You might become a day trader, dabbling in any market – crypto if you must – that moves. And there I might be able to help with occasional tips, noting smugly that shares in the gold miner Fresnillo are up 44 per cent since mentioned in April.
More sensibly, you might start your own business. I laughed at a picture of Chancellor Rachel Reeves, who has done so much harm to enterprise, 'saluting start-ups at No. 11'. But she's right that high-growth companies are the only things that will create better jobs to replace so many that have gone missing. And I can help there too, by pointing you towards The Spectator's Economic Innovator Awards. One way or another, my young friends, the motto must be never lose hope.
Lotus crash?
'Lotus to end carmaking in the UK after 70 years' was Saturday's headline, followed by 'Reprieve for Lotus factory in Norfolk' on Sunday. What happened in between? The Lotus sports car marque has long stood for engineering brilliance combined with financial turmoil. Since 2017 it has been controlled by Geely, the Chinese giant which also owns Volvo. In response to Donald Trump's tariffs, it halted production in Norfolk where it employs 1,300 workers and was reported to be planning a new plant in the US.
But after an intervention by the Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds, Lotus's (presumably AI-driven) PR machine changed its tune to 'exploring strategic options to enhance efficiency and ensure global competitiveness in an evolving market'. Whatever that means, expect Lotus to depart these shores by next year.
Lost tribe
At a 90th birthday lunch for a friend from my banking career back in the mists of time, I'm moved to an impromptu speech quoting my long-forgotten book Falling Eagle: the Decline of Barclays Bank, in which I wrote that great companies have never been 'machines for making money' but are 'accumulations of human skill, hope and weakness' with the distinctive character and folklore of historic regiments or primitive tribes. For those present, it felt as though our Barclays regiment had been disbanded – our tribe dispersed, if you prefer – a generation ago: none felt pride or affection for the bank of today beyond, let's be honest, its defined-benefit pension scheme. And as if to confirm that sense of severance, up popped news of Jes Staley, the pugnacious American boss of Barclays from 2015 to 2021 who stood down after a Financial Conduct Authority investigation into his friendship with the sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, but challenged the FCA's decision to ban him from senior jobs in financial services. The Upper Tribunal upheld that judgment last week and the FCA repeated its finding that Staley had acted recklessly and 'with a lack of integrity'. 'Every time a sentence is written about him,' one City source observed, 'Epstein will get a mention.' Indeed so – and every time Barclays is named alongside, our lost tribe will utter a collective sigh of regret.
Rail against
I warned a month or so ago that ministers and union leaders who are ideologically set on renationalising the railways were also conspiring to scrap the passenger-friendly 'open access' system that allows licenced operators such as Lumo and Grand Central to compete against mainline franchisees. Following a select committee hearing in which Mick Lynch of the RMT union damned as 'parasites' these freelance services which many regular travellers regard as the best thing on the network, the Secretary of State Heidi Alexander has ordered a 'review' of open access, on the basis of a claim that it extracts 'supernormal profits' of more than £200 million a year at taxpayers' cost.
Several new open-access bids, including one from Sir Richard Branson to bring Virgin trains back into competition against Avanti on the West Coast mainline, are under threat – and despite Alexander's assurances to the contrary, I'd bet on open access being abolished entirely by the time Labour limps out of power.
And now the King has been persuaded to decommission the royal train. Why am I suddenly seeing a vision from Doctor Zhivago of the Bolshevik commander Strelnikov lurking behind his armoured locomotive?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
28 minutes ago
- The Independent
Labour minister hints at tax hikes for middle class – but rules out rises for people on ‘modest incomes'
Labour has left the door open to higher taxes on the middle classes in Rachel Reeves ' crunch budget later this year. Transport secretary Heidi Alexander would not rule out tax rises in a series of interviews on Sunday morning, but said the government had pledged not to hike them for 'people on modest incomes'. Asked if the public should expect taxes to go up in the autumn, she said ministers would be guided by "fairness". She also told Sky News's Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips programme that Cabinet ministers did not 'directly' talk about the idea of a wealth tax – being pushed by unions and former Labour leader Lord Neil Kinnock – during an away day at the Prime Minister's Chequers country estate this week. The shadow home secretary Chris Philp said her comments 'sound to me like a barely disguised reference to tax rises coming in the autumn'. The chancellor has refused to rule out tax rises at the budget since Labour MPs forced ministers to make a U-turn on welfare reforms, losing the government an estimated £5 billion a year in savings. She is under intense pressure to find more money after the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) this week warned that the UK's finances are on an 'unsustainable' path the government 'cannot afford' in the longer term. On Wednesday, Keir Starmer failed to rule out extending so-called 'stealth taxes' – as well as the introduction of a wealth tax – as his government struggles to balance the books. The prime minister reiterated that Labour would stick to its manifesto pledge and ruled out increases to income tax, VAT and national insurance, but he did not confirm whether the government was planning to lift the freeze on income tax thresholds in 2028. The freezes mean more and more people are dragged into paying higher rates of income tax every year as the thresholds fail to keep up with inflation. Lord Kinnock last week suggested a wealth tax would bolster the public finances without breaking Labour's pledges. Union leaders, including Sharon Graham of Unite, are also pressuring ministers to consider the move. Asked by Sky News if such a tax had been discussed at the Cabinet away day on Friday, Ms Alexander said: 'Not directly at the away day.' Pressed on what she meant by not directly, the senior minister replied: 'I think your viewers would be surprised if we didn't recognise that, at the budget, the chancellor will need to look at the OBR forecast that is given to her, and will make decisions in line with the fiscal rules that she has set out. 'We made a commitment in our manifesto not to be putting up taxes on people on modest incomes, working people. We have stuck to that.' Asked again if this meant there will be tax rises in the budget, Ms Alexander replied: 'So, the Chancellor will set her budget. I'm not going to sit in a TV studio today and speculate on what the contents of that budget might be. 'When it comes to taxation, fairness is going to be our guiding principle.'
Reuters
36 minutes ago
- Reuters
EU must be ready for decisive action over US tariff hike: Germany finance minister
July 13 (Reuters) - German Finance Minister Lars Klingbeil said on Sunday the European Union must take "decisive" measures against the United States if tariff negotiations fail to cool an escalating global trade war. President Donald Trump on Saturday threatened to impose a 30% tariff on imports from Mexico and the EU starting on August 1, after weeks of negotiations with the major U.S. trading partners failed to reach a comprehensive trade deal. The threat has prompted a robust response from German politicians and business leaders. "If a fair negotiated solution does not succeed, then we must take decisive countermeasures to protect jobs and companies in Europe," Klingbeil, who is also vice chancellor in Germany's ruling coalition, told German newspaper Sueddeutsche Zeitung. "Our hand remains outstretched, but we will not go along with everything," he added. Germany, Europe's biggest economy, is a big exporter to the United States, where it sells vehicles and automotive components, machinery and pharmaceuticals. In 2024 it sold goods worth 161 billion euros ($188 billion) to the United States, running a trade surplus of nearly 70 billion euros, according to German government data. Klingbeil said Trump's tariffs policy would only result in losers, and called for de-escalation in the row, which he said threatened the American economy at least as much as European companies. "Nobody needs new threats or provocations now," Klingbeil said. "Instead, we need the EU to continue serious and targeted negotiations with the USA. Europe remains united and determined: We want a fair deal." Earlier on Sunday, Juergen Harder, deputy leader of Chancellor Friedrich Merz's conservative CDU/CSU parliamentary group in the Bundestag, said he was hopeful of further negotiations between the EU and Washington, with the higher tariffs postponed. "I'm betting that at least a partial agreement and a further postponement will be reached before August 1," Hardt told Reuters. "After all, high tariffs have to be paid by American citizens and companies and lead to higher prices and inflation in the U.S.," he said. ($1 = 0.8555 euros)
The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
Brexit: Most people in France, Germany, Italy and Spain want UK to rejoin EU, poll finds – but on new terms
Most people in the four largest countries in the European Union would welcome the UK back into the bloc, a new poll has found – but not on the same terms it had before. At the same time most Britons are in favour of rejoining the EU, the YouGov survey of six western European nations found, but only if they can keep the opt-outs the UK previously had, such as remaining outside the Schengen zone and keeping its own currency. The results come just days after Keir Starmer welcomed French President Emmanuel Macron to the UK for the first state visit from an EU leader since Brexit. The Labour leader has said he wants to fix Britain's damaged relationship with the European Union for the benefit of 'generations to come'. Now, 10 years after MPs voted to hold the referendum that led to Britain leaving the EU, the poll found that at least half of people asked in France, Germany Italy and Spain, supported the UK being allowed to rejoin, a range that spanned from 51per cent support in Italy to 63 per cent in Germany. But the pollster said the results revealed a 'public opinion impasse'. Asked if Britain should be allowed to return on the same conditions as when it left, support fell. Just one in five across the four countries, from 19 per cent in Italy and France to 21 per cent in Spain and 22 per cent in Germany agreed, but more than half, 58 to 62 per cent, saying the UK must be part of all of the EU's main policy areas. In the UK, 54 per cent supported rejoining the EU, but that number fell to 36 per cent if it meant giving up previous opt-outs. If that was the case, 45 per cent said they opposed returning to the EU. The final European country polled, Denmark, one of three member states to hold significant opt-outs itself, was more enthusiastic about allowing UK to keep its previous opt-outs, a stance 43 per cent of people said they backed. The official Office for Budget Responsibility estimates that the size of the UK economy will be four per cent smaller over the long term than it would have been without Brexit. The Independent also revealed earlier this year that Brexit has created a 'mind blowing' nearly two billion extra pieces of paperwork for businesses - enough to wrap around the world 15 times.
