logo
Forgotten veterans of MLB: Why pre-1980 retirees earn a fraction of modern pensions

Forgotten veterans of MLB: Why pre-1980 retirees earn a fraction of modern pensions

USA Today19-07-2025
Former right-handed pitcher Jerry Hinsley is one of just over 500 retirees who are not receiving adequate benefits from either MLB or the MLB Players Association.
In 1980, to avoid a strike, an agreement between MLB and the MLBPA changed the eligibility for players' health coverage to just one game day and 43 game days for monthly benefits. Players originally needed four years of service to be eligible for a pension.
However, this agreement didn't grandfather in pre-1980 players like Hinsley, who earned two trials with the New York Mets in 1964 and 1967 and worked in road construction to make ends meet during the offseason. Hinsley pitched 20.1 innings in 11 career games and has more than 43 game days in MLB, but less than four years of service.
Hinsley didn't respond to multiple interview requests from the Sun-News, part of the USA TODAY Network. He is not a vested retiree. Per an awards program that began in 2011, Hinsley can receive $718.75 for every 43 game days, up to a maximum of $11,500. A vested retiree can earn up to $275K, according to the IRS, but Hinsley only earns a gross check of $2,100 for his three months of MLB service before taxes are taken out. Since these payments aren't inherited by relatives or beneficiaries, they will cease when the 80-year-old Hinsley dies.
Those who have fought for changes to help those like Hinsley don't hold back in their opinions.
In case you missed it: Americans love pensions. Where did they go? Will they ever return?
"It's absolutely pathetic, and a blight on the game that men such as Jerry are being treated like this," said Douglas Gladstone, author of the 2010 book "A Bitter Cup of Coffee," which details the plight of pre-1980s MLB players in receiving better pensions.
"They have been consigned to the sports' garbage heap, and all the union can do is agree to throw them the BS stipend these men are thrown every February."
The MLBPA, which declined to comment, has stalled on a solution. MLBPA Executive Director Tony Clark, the first former player to hold the position, has never spoken publicly about Hinsley and others. Meanwhile, MLB Retired Players Association Director Kurt Bevacqua bemoans the MLBPA's lack of communication.
Bevacqua says he's gathered a group of attorneys to find out why the MLBPA has been so silent. While he's not ready to release the documents and information they've acquired, he says it'll eventually bring them to the negotiating table.
"In my mind, I've got a bullet in my gun for the non-vested guys to be able to fight for them, and I also have a bullet in the gun for the widow's benefits," Bevacqua said. "Hopefully, we have the Players Association come and say, 'What can we do to fix this?' So that's where we are."
Mike Port, a former San Diego Padres general manager and MLB's vice president for umpiring from 2005 to 2011, says a potential solution could be giving Hinsley and others around $25,000 to $30,000 a year, which amounts to roughly $12.5 million to $15 million every year for everyone. MLB announced $12.1 billion in revenue last season, while the value of the MLBPA's benefit plan was reported at $2.7 billion in assets in 2018.
Port calls on both organizations to come together and pay retired players like Hinsley more.
"I have to think, given the people who are at MLB, given the people who are at the Players Association and their degree of intelligence, the things that they've accomplished... they should be able to get together and fathom something that would take care of this group of players," Port said.
Gladstone and Bevacqua put the onus on the MLBPA to approach MLB about giving pre-1980 players more benefits. They both believe that if the MLBPA fought for it during negotiations for its collective bargaining agreement with MLB (which expires after the 2026 season), men like Hinsley would have a greater chance of receiving more money.
'It is a disgrace that today's players' union won't go to bat for these old-timers, many of whom walked picket lines and went without paychecks all so that today's players could enjoy free agency," Gladstone said.
Those fighting for pre-1980 players are in a race against time. Port and Bevacqua both believe the MLB and MLBPA are waiting for the group to die out, as a collective that was once over 1,250, according to Bevacqua, has now decreased by more than half. The longer both organizations stall, the older the retirees get.
Bevacqua says the fight will continue for those still living, like Hinsley, but hopes he and others receive what they're owed before it's too late.
"It wouldn't take very much to put the money aside and to make a fund up where these guys could be vested. I mean, there are only 500 of them left," Bevacqua said. "We're not getting any younger. These guys are going to continue to die off. They're dying every day."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cameras captured José Buttó's live bullpen reaction to being traded to Giants
Cameras captured José Buttó's live bullpen reaction to being traded to Giants

USA Today

timea few seconds ago

  • USA Today

Cameras captured José Buttó's live bullpen reaction to being traded to Giants

With the MLB trade deadline fast approaching, players know that they could easily be playing their final game with their current teams. But still, that doesn't make the news of a trade any easier. We saw those emotions play out in real time on Wednesday. As the Mets were taking on the Padres in a getaway game at Petco Park, reports broke that New York had dealt José Buttó, Blade Tidwell and Drew Gilbert to the Giants in exchange for reliever Tyler Rogers. Buttó — who had spent his entire professional career with the Mets organization — was in the bullpen as the news went public. The SNY broadcast captured his reaction, and the pitcher was visibly emotional to be leaving the Mets. That had to be tough news for Buttó — even if Mets players expected deadline moves to hold off the Phillies in the NL East. To make matters even more awkward for Buttó, the Mets will head home to open their series Friday against the Giants. He won't have to wait long at all to face his former team at Citi Field.

Why the Washington Commanders' owners are thinking hard about Trump's demand they restore the ‘Redskins' moniker
Why the Washington Commanders' owners are thinking hard about Trump's demand they restore the ‘Redskins' moniker

New York Post

timea few seconds ago

  • New York Post

Why the Washington Commanders' owners are thinking hard about Trump's demand they restore the ‘Redskins' moniker

The owners of the NFL's Washington Commanders fear they will have to snub the woke mob and restore the original Redskins name – or risk President Trump throttling their deal for a new stadium, On The Money has learned. That, at least, is the word from insiders close to private equity titans Josh Harris and David Blitzer, who in addition to the Commanders own the NBA's Philadelphia 76ers and the NHL's New Jersey Devils through their holding company, Harris Blitzer Sports and Entertainment. The buyout billionaires are facing heat to bring back the Redskins name – and its famed, feathered logo, too – after the commander-in-chief has repeatedly ripped the new nomenclature, recently referring to the franchise as the 'Washington Whatevers.' Advertisement 3 The billionaire owners of the Washington Commanders are facing pressure from President Trump to restore the original Redskins name Getty Images 'I may put a restriction on them that if they don't change the name back to the original 'Washington Redskins,' and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, 'Washington Commanders,' I won't make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington,' Trump posted last week. Since then, Harris and Blitzer have been privately warning business associates that the White House does indeed have some leverage over their plans to build a new, $3.7 billion stadium for the team, a source said. Advertisement 'They're really getting nervous about Trump's attacks and how they might impact the stadium deal,' said one person with direct knowledge of the matter. Publicly, Harris and Blitzer have said the Commanders will remain the Commanders. Much of the stadium deal involves working with the decidedly woke DC government run by left-wing mayor Muriel Bowser. The deal has no direct federal funding, with DC agreeing to cover about $1 billion of the cost. Behind the scenes, they say they are parsing all the ways Trump could screw things up for them. The stadium is on federal land leased to the DC government for the next 99 years. 3 'They're really getting nervous about Trump's attacks and how they might impact the stadium deal,' said one person with direct knowledge of the matter. AP Advertisement That means it will need certain approvals from US agencies like the National Capital Planning Commission and the US Commission of Fine Arts – the boards of both are occupied by some Trump appointees. It also needs a nod or two from the Trump administration's environmental team. The fear is that Trump could, as he's done with left-leaning law firms, colleges and major media outfits, use his control of the administrative state to extract concessions, the people at Harris-Blitzer concede. Would Trump ever use his sway over such entities to meddle in a private business deal? Well, we know the answer to that since fighting wokeness appeals to the MAGA base, and quite frankly, most Americans. Note that Trump is a master troller. He can generate unfavorable news cycles and skewer Harris and Blitzer as woke Wall Streeters, potentially hurting team attendance since most football fans are right of center, people close to them fear. Advertisement 3 David Blitzer, left with part-owner Magic Johnson in 2023. Getty Images Recall that former owner Dan Snyder renamed the team in 2020 at the height of the social-justice movement, bowing to the woke NFL and its commissioner Roger Goodell, as well as some advertisers and activists who argued the name was an affront to Native Americans. Snyder had been fighting the switch for years, arguing that the Redskins moniker was hardly a slur, but instead a term of pride in Native American culture. Charlie Gasparino has his finger on the pulse of where business, politics and finance meet Sign up to receive On The Money by Charlie Gasparino in your inbox every Thursday. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters A lot has happened since 2020, including Snyder selling the team to Harris and Blitzer in 2023 for $6.05 billion. There also has been a public backlash against all things woke: See what happened to Bud Light after it used a trans activist in a beer commercial. One sports executive, who asked not to be quoted by name and knows Trump well, said the duo will at the very least have to do what other big companies are doing when confronted by The Donald – bow and kiss the ring. 'He may not ultimately try to kill the stadium deal if they don't change the name but Harris and Blitzer are going to have to grovel before Trump relents,' this person said. A press rep for Harris-Blitzer didn't return a request for comment.

Former Cy Young Winner Suddenly Available at MLB Trade Deadline: Report
Former Cy Young Winner Suddenly Available at MLB Trade Deadline: Report

Newsweek

timea minute ago

  • Newsweek

Former Cy Young Winner Suddenly Available at MLB Trade Deadline: Report

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The San Francisco Giants, who already traded one of their high-leverage relievers Wednesday, are open to trading a future Hall of Famer after losing five straight games. More news: Mets Make Trade, Acquire Veteran Pitcher From Giants: Reports According to Jon Morosi of MLB Network on Twitter/X, Justin Verlander is being made available to other teams in advance of the MLB trade deadline, which falls at 6 p.m. Eastern Time on Thursday. Justin Verlander is available on the trade market. Verlander is on an expiring contract; out of respect to the future Hall of Famer, the Giants are open to working out a deal if it makes sense for Verlander and the organization. His last 2 starts: 10 IP, 1 ER.@MLBNetwork — Jon Morosi (@jonmorosi) July 30, 2025 Verlander has struggled for most of the season since signing a one-year, $15.5 million contract with the Giants in January. He's 1-8 with a 4.53 ERA (85 ERA+) in 18 starts in 2025, after going 5-6 with a 5.48 ERA in 17 starts in 2024 with the Houston Astros. Justin Verlander #35 of the San Francisco Giants stands on the mound in a break in play with Patrick Bailey #14, Matt Chapman #26, Willy Adames #2, and Casey Schmitt #10 in a break in... Justin Verlander #35 of the San Francisco Giants stands on the mound in a break in play with Patrick Bailey #14, Matt Chapman #26, Willy Adames #2, and Casey Schmitt #10 in a break in play against the Toronto Blue Jays during the second inning in their MLB game at Rogers Centre on July 18. MoreBut between his postseason experience, and the wisdom of a veteran who's won 263 career games — the most among active pitchers — contending teams might be willing to look past Verlander's surface stats as well as his age (42). For what it's worth, Verlander's last two starts have been his best of the season. More news: MLB News: Former Mets GM Slams Angels For Deadline Trade Tuesday against the Pittsburgh Pirates, Verlander allowed one run, six hits, one walk, and struck out seven batters in five innings. He reportedly left the clubhouse without speaking to media after the Giants' 3-1 loss, their fifth straight. Justin Verlander left before the media could enter the clubhouse to ask any questions — Ben Ross (@BenRossTweets) July 30, 2025 Verlander threw five shutout innings on July 23 in Atlanta, picking up his first win of the season. The future Hall of Famer is a veteran of 10 different postseason runs with the Detroit Tigers (2006, 2011-14) and Houston Astros (2017-19, 2022-23). He's won three Cy Young Awards over a 20-year major league career, and was the last full-time pitcher to win an MVP award in the American League (2006). More news: Former GM Calls MLB Trade Deadline 'The Most Bizarre I Can Remember' None of that accumulated experience will be of any use this year to the Giants, who are 54-54, third place in the NL West, after losing again Tuesday to the rebuilding Pittsburgh Pirates. Since June 15 — the day they acquired star Rafael Devers from the Boston Red Sox in a rare blockbuster trade — the Giants had baseball's worst record at 13-24 entering Wednesday's series finale. More news: Former Mets Pitcher Traded for Hall of Fame Manager Passes Away Earlier Wednesday the Giants traded reliever Taylor Rogers, 34, who has led the National League in games pitched in four of his six full big league seasons. Rogers is 4-3 with a 1.80 ERA this season. Verlander would be a fit on almost any team in playoff position. Other than perhaps the Milwaukee Brewers, whose surplus of starting pitching makes them a trade-deadline outlier, the best teams in the American and National League will likely evaluate whether Verlander could fit their post-deadline roster plans. For more MLB News, visit Newsweek Sports.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store