Selwyn, Ashburton buck the building trend
Nationally the building sector has had a slowdown, with recent Stats NZ figures showing the number of new builds was down 3.8% in the year to May 2025.
But Selwyn and Ashburton have both experienced booms in recent times and now, after a plateau, the numbers are trending back up in both districts.
In the last 10 years Selwyn - which includes Rolleston and Lincoln - has had 14,647 new homes consented, an average of 1627 per year.
In the 2024-25 year, it issued 1378 consents, a 7.2% increase on the previous year.
Council director of development and growth Robert Love said that looking ahead to the current financial year, he is expecting growth to be 'higher than we have seen in the previous two financial years', but not near the peak years of 2020/2021 (1949) and 2021/2022 (2175).
In Ashburton, new home builds were up 25.9% in 2024/25, with 204 consents issued - higher than the 10-year average of 190.
New Zealand Certified Builders Mid-South Canterbury regional president Johnny Rive, owner of Ashburton-based J Rive Construction, said things are just steady.
'Ashburton seems to be ticking along regardless of what the rest of the country is doing.'
He said it wasn't a boom - which are not great for anyone.
'That's when prices go up, everyone is busy, and the work quality goes down,' Rive said.
'The spot we are in now, everyone has a bit of time to do the job the way it should be done, while contractors and suppliers aren't increasing prices.
'It's a happy medium as no one is undercutting each other, so everyone is still making the profit they need to without taking the piss.'
The price of land in Ashburton is a key difference, even compared to the nearby growth areas of Lincoln, Rolleston, and Christchurch, he said.
'People can't believe for $250,000 you can get 800 square metres sections in a new subdivision [in Ashburton] when they are spending at least $350,000 or more on something like that elsewhere.'
There are a number of multi-section subdivisions popping up, keeping the local builders in business as the town grows, he said.
And its not just Ashburton, with a large number of the new homes popping up in Methven and new subdivisions in Rakaia.
Rive also said he knows there has been an influx of people moving to the district from big cities for the more affordable housing options.
While Selwyn and Ashburton new builds increased, it was a different story for their neighbours.
Down in Timaru, there were 139 new homes consents in 2024/25, one lower than the previous 12 months, with a 10-year average of 187.3.
Timaru District Council building control manager Jayson Ellis said he believed that Timaru 'will not see any significant increase in new houses over the next 12 months when comparing to the last 2 years'.
Waimakariri District Council building unit manager Aaron Haymes said the district had 659 new builds in 2024/25, down from 770 the previous year, with a 10-year average of 692.5.
'Consent numbers have been steady and all signals from the sector appear to support a continuation of construction activity in the Waimakariri District at similar levels,' Haymes said.
Christchurch City Council head of planning and consents Mark Stevenson also reported a 4% drop, with the 2998 new build consents in 2024/25, down from 3124 the previous year, but both above the 10-year average of 2500.
'Annual consent numbers have varied [over the past decade], ranging from around 1,700 to 3,900 new homes.
'Assuming no significant changes in market conditions or demand for new housing in Christchurch, it is reasonable to expect that future consent levels will remain broadly in line with historical trends for additional housing,' Stevenson said.
By Jonathan Leask, Local Democracy Reporter
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
30 minutes ago
- Otago Daily Times
Kmart accused of links to slave labour factories
Retail giant Kmart is facing accusations it misled customers on its ethical credentials by sourcing clothing supplies from factories in China with links to slave labour. An Australian-based Uyghur group has filed a lawsuit against the outlet in the Federal Court, seeking to gain documents so they can see whether it knowingly sourced stock from suppliers who used forced labour from those in the ethnic group. In its ethical sourcing statement, Kmart said it aimed to provide products that respected human rights according to its ethical sourcing code which committed to abiding by international standards, including guidelines set out in the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The lawsuit filed by the Australian Uyghur Tangritagh Women's Association claims Kmart included on its 2024 and 2025 factory lists two suppliers with links to the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region. It said this region in China's west has been well-documented for "systemic state-sponsored forced labour and other atrocities against Uyghur and other Turkic Muslim people". The group wants proof from Kmart that it has abided by its ethical sourcing promises regarding these suppliers and whether its public statements have been misleading or deceptive. Kmart must ensure it is not profiting off forced labour in China, association president Ramila Chanisheff said. "We're demanding answers from Kmart so we know whether its actions live up to its words about addressing forced labour risks in its supply chain," she said. The retailer risks a legal claim that it breached Australian Consumer Law by misleading and deceptive conduct if documents show it had failed to monitor the risk of it using forced labour in its supply chain. Maurice Blackburn principal lawyer Jennifer Kanis said the firm was using this first-of-its-kind case to bring real accountability to Australian retailers. "Kmart tells customers that it supports ethical sourcing and the protection of human rights – but we know there are credible links between two of its factories and suppliers and the use of Uyghur forced labour in Xinjiang," Ms Kanis said. Human Rights Law Centre associate legal director Freya Dinshaw said the case highlighted the weaknesses in Australia's laws when members of the public are left to take companies to court on suspicions of modern slavery. Unlike the United States, Australia has not banned imports of products made in the Xinjiang region, instead opting for a transparency approach which requires businesses to report annually on their actions to identify and address slavery risks. Wesfarmers, the parent company of Kmart, has been contacted for comment.
1News
6 hours ago
- 1News
Rocky road predicted due to Trump's tariff expansions, not least for US
The global rollercoaster ride of US trade tariffs has entered a new phase with sobering ramifications for many countries including the US. Auckland-based Economics professor Niven Winchester explains. The global rollercoaster ride of United States trade tariffs has now entered its latest phase. President Donald Trump's April 2 'Liberation Day' announcement placed reciprocal tariffs on all countries. A week later, amid financial market turmoil, these tariffs were paused and replaced by a 10% baseline tariff on most goods. On July 31, however, the Trump Administration reinstated and expanded the reciprocal tariff policy. Most of these updated tariffs are scheduled to take effect on August 7. To evaluate the impact of these latest tariffs, we also need to take into account recently negotiated free trade agreements (such as the US-European Union deal), the 50% tariffs imposed on steel and aluminium imports, and tariff exemptions for imports of smartphones, computers and other electronics. ADVERTISEMENT For selected countries, the reciprocal tariffs announced on April 2 and the revised values of these tariffs are shown in the table below. The revised additional tariffs are highest for Brazil (50%) and Switzerland (39%), and lowest for Australia and the United Kingdom (10%). Table: The Conversation; Source: Niven Winchester (Source: Supplied) For most countries, the revised tariffs are lower than the original ones. But Brazil, Switzerland and New Zealand are subject to higher tariffs than those announced in April. In addition to the tariffs displayed above, Canadian and Mexican goods not registered as compliant with the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement are subject to tariffs of 35% and 25% respectively. Economic impacts The economic impacts of the revised tariffs are examined using a global model of goods and services markets, covering production, trade and consumption. A similar model was used to assess the impacts of the original reciprocal tariffs and the outcome of a US-China trade war. ADVERTISEMENT GDP impacts of the tariffs are displayed in the table below. The impacts of the additional tariffs are evaluated relative to trade measures in place before Trump's second term. Retaliatory tariffs are not considered in the analysis. Table: The Conversation; Source: Niven Winchester (Source: Supplied) An economic own goal The tariffs reduce US annual GDP by 0.36%. This equates to US$108.2 billion or $861 per household per year (all amounts in this article are in US dollars). The change in US GDP is an aggregate of impacts involving several factors. The tariffs will compel foreign producers to lower their prices. But these price decreases only partially offset the cost of the tariffs, so US consumers pay higher prices. Businesses also pay more for parts and materials. Ultimately, these higher prices hurt the US economy. ADVERTISEMENT The tariffs decrease US merchandise imports by $486.7 billion. But as they drive up the cost of US supply chains and shift more workers and resources into industries that compete with imports, away from other parts of the economy, they also decrease US merchandise exports by $451.1 billion. The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including the West Auckland builder sentenced over massive meth haul, fire on a commuter train, and how Bluey could teach kids about resilience. (Source: 1News) Global impacts For most other countries, the additional tariffs reduce GDP. Switzerland's GDP decreases by 0.47%, equivalent to $1,215 per household per year. Proportional GDP decreases are also relatively large for Thailand (0.44%) and Taiwan (0.38%). In dollar terms, GDP decreases are relatively large for China ($66.9 billion) and the European Union ($26.6 billion). Australia and the United Kingdom gain from the tariffs ($0.1 billion and $0.07 billion respectively), primarily due to the relatively low tariffs levied on these countries. Despite facing relatively low additional tariffs, New Zealand's GDP decreases by 0.15% ($204 per household) as many of its agricultural exports compete with Australian commodities, which are subject to an even lower tariff. ADVERTISEMENT Although the revised reciprocal tariffs are, on average, lower than those announced on April 2, they are still a substantial shock to the global trading system. Financial markets have been buoyant since Trump paused reciprocal tariffs on April 9, partly on the hope that the tariffs would never be imposed. US tariffs of at least 10% to 15% now appear to be the new norm. As US warehouses run down inventories and stockpiles, there could be a rocky road ahead. Niven Winchester is a Professor of Economics, Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand. This article was republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons Licence.
Otago Daily Times
10 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Cryptopia customer tried to bribe court registrar for information
A man claiming to be an affected party in the collapse of a multimillion-dollar cryptocurrency company has tried to bribe a court registrar to release information related to the case for $2 million in Bitcoin. New Zealand-based company Cryptopia was allegedly hacked in January 2019, leading to the loss of about $30m in cryptocurrency held by it in an exchange. The business tried to reopen, but customer trust was low following the hack, and it went into liquidation. Liquidators are still trying to disentangle its finances and return funds to customers where possible. In December last year, public accountancy firm Grant Thornton announced that $400 million in cryptocurrency had been returned to about 10,000 customers. Then, in June this year, the firm announced a further 2624 customers had received $50m in Bitcoin and Dogecoin. It was also preparing to launch distributions to affected customers to qualifying account holders in Cardano, Tether, Tron and Litecoin currencies. Cryptopia, founded by Adam Clark and Rob Dawson, owed IRD more than $19m and a further $22m to unsecured creditors. The accountancy firm has said it was unclear whether there would be money remaining to pay those creditors. 'I need assets returned to me' Now, a man claiming to be a creditor has applied to the High Court at Christchurch to access court documents related to the liquidation of Cryptopia. The case has been before the court since liquidators applied for a court order to sell some of Cryptopia's bitcoin to pay their own fees in liquidating the company. The documents the man requested were related to an affidavit filed in 2019 by one of the liquidators, David Ruscoe, in which he annexed two spreadsheets containing databases of commercially sensitive and confidential information relating to 960,000 of Cryptopia's account holders and their cryptocurrency holdings. The court had received the information on a USB drive. According to court documents, a court registrar inadvertently sent it to Thomas Cattermole, who runs an unincorporated enterprise called 'Cryptopia Rescue' that purports to offer help to former customers of Cryptopia. Grant Thornton then took Cattermole to court, claiming he was in contempt of court for passing the information held on that USB to third parties, and secured an injunction to stop him sharing the information further. 'Abuse of process' Any member of the public can request documents held by a court, but it's at the judge's discretion to release them. In this case, the man, emailed the Christchurch High Court registry requesting access to the confidential spreadsheet. 'I would like to seek out answers as to why the TRUSTEE / Liquidator are hiding the blockchain wallet addresses for my assets. They have breached trust law, and I would like to seek out the return of my funds. I need assets returned to me,' his email read. Grant Thornton opposed those documents being released, noting that a person by the same name was currently going through the account registration process to receive funds released by liquidators. In addition to filing a request for access to Ruscoe's affidavit, the man emailed a court registrar and said he had faced 'significant barriers' in accessing the information he was seeking. A registrar responded, identifying themselves as the case manager, and the man then replied with allegations about the conduct of the liquidators. He told the registrar that if they saw 'anything dodgy happen', to email a private email address, which he provided. 'They can't pay you, but I think they will donate 10 bitcoin to any wallet of the whistleblower's choice,' his email said. Ten Bitcoin is roughly equivalent to $2 million at the time the ruling was issued. The man also accused High Court judge, Justice Andru Isac, of holding a private teleconference with the liquidators. In a recent ruling by Justice Isac declining the man's application for the requested documents, he pointed out that the man had attempted to arrange an unlawful Bitcoin payment to a member of the court registry in exchange for information, before providing an email address to facilitate a private response. 'Given the applicant's improper attempt to solicit information from a Court officer I am satisfied the request for access to Court documents is an abuse of process,' Justice Isac said. 'The party lodging the request has not provided proof of their identity. They claim to be residing overseas. 'And as the premise of the application is the applicant's desire to be repatriated with an account held by Cryptopia, given the liquidators have an identification process available to the applicant, it is unclear why he should need access to Court documents to establish his interest in the relevant account. 'That information should already be available to him.'
