logo
Network Rail under fire as it snubs British steelmakers in contract

Network Rail under fire as it snubs British steelmakers in contract

Daily Mail​2 days ago

State-owned Network Rail has snubbed UK steelmakers for a major contract, despite promises by the Chancellor to support the struggling industry.
In last week's Spending Review, Rachel Reeves mentioned the UK steel sector no less than 13 times and pledged that huge amounts of Government investment would give it a 'proud future'.
She boasted that UK steel would be used in nuclear power, submarines and a third Heathrow runway.
But the message may not have reached some areas of the public sector.
The Mail on Sunday can reveal that Network Rail put out a £140 million order for steel on the open market without favouring UK suppliers.
The Government-owned company, which looks after Britain's 10,000 miles of railway track and infrastructure, last month launched a 'preliminary market engagement' for the contract.
It is seeking contractors for an order of steel piling, masts and girders for overhead electric equipment over six years from October 2026.
A formal tender for the contract, worth £23 million a year, is due to be issued in August. However, the preliminary notice is open to suppliers anywhere in the world.
Master Cutler Philip Rodrigo called on the Government to use UK steel for the contract.
He leads the Company of Cutlers in Hallamshire – a trade guild representing 255 companies with a combined revenue of £2 billion and tens of thousands of employees in South Yorkshire.
'I urge Network Rail to consider its support for the UK's economic prosperity by using suppliers from within the British Isles,' he said. 'This contract with National Rail should also consider the long-term growth of our nation.'
Clive Betts, Labour MP for Sheffield South East who sits on the Public Accounts Committee, asked for an 'across the board review' of public sector procurement to maximise support for British firms. The Government, which is preparing a steel strategy, has pledged to spend £2.5 billion of public money on supporting the industry over the next five years. This includes funds for Britain's last two blast furnaces at Scunthorpe, Lincolnshire. A further £500 million has already been pledged to help Tata Steel build an electric arc furnace at Port Talbot in South Wales.
Nigel Farage pledged last week that his Reform UK party would re-open blast furnaces at Port Talbot and resume mining for coking coal in Wales.
Betts, whose constituency includes several steelmakers, said it was 'entirely right and proper' that firms spending public money 'should first of all look at how they should source from British suppliers and support British jobs'.
Network Rail said the notice had been issued in line with standard procedures under the Procurement Act 2023. The legislation aimed to make public sector procurement 'more flexible and transparent' post-Brexit, but does not prioritise British suppliers over those from other countries.
The Departments for Transport and Business and Trade were approached for comment.
Sources said a major announcement on top of Reeves' Spending Review is set to be made in the coming weeks involving major rail projects and UK steel – but would provide no further details.
Steel magnate Sir Andrew Cook said: 'UK taxpayer cash should be spent exclusively on UK-produced goods. To risk importing dumped foreign steel is crazy.'
A Government spokesman said: 'Network Rail's procurement process remains at an early stage, and we welcome and encourage bids from British steel suppliers.
'We're determined to support the bright future steelmaking has in the UK, which is why we've committed up to £2.5 billion of investment to rebuild the industry.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The lazy and entitled are killing WFH
The lazy and entitled are killing WFH

Telegraph

time27 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

The lazy and entitled are killing WFH

It can be hugely helpful for people with young children to look after. It can be great for people who are struggling to relocate from the countryside. And there have always been a core group of industries that lend themselves to it naturally. Working from home has always been part of a flexible economy. And yet, as more and more companies order their staff back to office, one point has also become clear. A determined group of lazy, over-entitled staff have exploited this rise. And the tragedy is that they are killing a way of working that should have been great for both sides. With every week that passes, more and more companies are ordering their staff back to their desks. The stockbroker Panmure Liberum has just barred staff from working from home on consecutive Mondays and Fridays, and so has Deutsche Bank. UBS has told its bankers they must be at the desks on either a Monday or a Friday as part of their designated three office days. Peel Hunt has insisted that its people show up four days a week, while the hedge fund Man Group has gone full retro and is now demanding five from its London-based analysts. The list goes on and on. The 'right' to hybrid working, which became normalised after the pandemic, is now starting to be underpinned by lots of rules and regulations. There should be no great surprise about that. The UK has embraced WFH more enthusiastically than virtually any other major developed economy. British employees work for 1.8 days a week from home, according to research by the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and King's College, compared to an average of 1.3 days across the world. It is taken as a right. It has even developed its own complex slang. The 't***s' only show up on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursdays, devoting the rest of the time to a long weekend (which explains why a Monday or a Friday is now often mandatory as part of your three office days). The 'polyworkers' are the people juggling two or three jobs at the same time, along with a couple of side hustles, taking advantage of the fact that home workers can often get away with earning several salaries. The 'quiet quitters' are those still technically working, but who barely make any discernible contribution. The 'mouse jigglers' use smart software to make it seem like they are clicking away at their screens while taking the dog for a walk, and the 'pyjama professionals' need no explanation. Here's the problem, however. The terminology sticks because it describes something we all know is very real. There are plenty of people who exploit the right to work from home to take long weekends, or hold down multiple jobs even if it's a form of fraud, or put in the minimum efforts required to scrape by without getting fired, or simply slack off and lose any sense of professionalism. The only rational response by employers is to put ever more heavy handed rules in place, to install monitoring software, or to make showing up at the office mandatory. If they don't, productivity, innovation and customer service will all collapse (as it is doing in the public sector, where employment rights often reign supreme). The trouble is, working from home was always great for some people, and employers always understood that. For parents, when someone had to get to the ballet class, it provided a degree of flexibility, and if an email or two was missed they could usually deal with it after the kids had gone to bed. It meant you could still accept a promotion even if the office was in a different city. And it suited a handful of professions, such as designers, for example, or musicians, or scriptwriters, or skilled craft workers or, indeed, freelance opinion writers. Working from home was a flexible arrangement that worked for both sides: the worker controlled their own hours; and in return they typically put in more effort, and worked more diligently, than the desk jockeys. But over the last four years since the pandemic, the lazy and entitled WFH home fanatics have killed that culture. By exploiting the opportunities for slacking off it provides, they are forcing employers to close down the option for everyone.

Hostile foreign powers could dim the SUN and weaponise weather to attack the West, UK fears
Hostile foreign powers could dim the SUN and weaponise weather to attack the West, UK fears

Daily Mail​

time28 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Hostile foreign powers could dim the SUN and weaponise weather to attack the West, UK fears

British minister are preparing for a dire scenario in which foreign actors could weaponise sun dimming technology. According to a ministerial letter, whose details were reported by the Telegraph, the Government is looking to understand the risks and implications of an 'independent or third party actor' using advanced technology to reflect light away from specific parts of the planet. While this technology is being developed with the aim of drastically reducing global warming in a last ditch effort, experts fear hostile nations like Russia could use solar engineering to put their enemies into an environmental disaster. Kerry McCarthy, the UK's climate minister, wrote in the letter: 'The UK is a longstanding leader on climate action and an active international collaborator in scientific research. 'The Government recognises the need to understand the risks and impacts of [solar radiation modification] approaches that could be deployed by an independent or third-party actor. 'Robust scientific evidence is essential for informing responsible and inclusive governance.' Most, though not all, methods of solar radiation modification involve shooting reflective aerosols into the atmosphere. Reflective particles then bounce the sun's light out of the atmosphere, before it has a chance to get trapped and heat it up. Though these technologies are being developed for climate adjusting purposes, Matt Ince, the associate director at Dragonfly Intelligence, told the Telegraph that rogue nations could use them to create 'novel' problems for their enemies. He said: 'In a context where we've had, for example, Russia increasingly expanding its use of hybrid warfare activities, it's possible – not immediately, but down the line – that they may look to broaden and diversify the types of activities that they're conducting, to include more novel types of activity of which solar geoengineering may be one. 'Not least because of its relative affordability and the feasibility of conducting it, but also because it would allow a relative degree of plausible deniability. 'We've seen migration patterns being intentionally influenced by the Russian state as a way of trying to push more pressure on to European countries.' But other experts were less certain that states would use the technology for nefarious purposes. Lt Gen Richard Nugee, an MoD expert on climate change and sustainability, said: 'No country has yet tried to weaponise the technology, quite possibly for a couple of reasons. 'It is seen to be very expensive for no defined and guaranteed output, and also it is not possible to predict the outcome – there are too many variables.'

Overturning miscarriages of justice and boosting local businesses – the power of real-world university learning
Overturning miscarriages of justice and boosting local businesses – the power of real-world university learning

The Guardian

time38 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Overturning miscarriages of justice and boosting local businesses – the power of real-world university learning

When lawyers at Northumbria University's Student Law Office (SLO) were approached by a man who appeared to have been wrongfully imprisoned for eight years for armed robbery, they believed their students could help. At the SLO, students research, interview, and sometimes represent clients on a pro bono basis, all supervised by experienced lawyers. They were right – students successfully worked to get Alex Allan's conviction overturned back in the early 2000s and, after taking his case to the court of appeal, he was paid £170,000 in compensation for the miscarriage of justice. Since then, real-world learning at Northumbria University has been driving change, helping the local community and powering the economy in the north-east. While most cases at the SLO, set up in the 1980s to give students real-world law experience, are less high profile than Allan's, they are no less impactful for the clients at the centre of them. 'We get a lot of demand,' says Dr Jonny Hall, a solicitor who worked on part of Allan's case and is now the university's academic lead for all aspects of experiential learning. Students typically work in pairs, spending some 10-15 hours a week on real-life cases across areas of law including family, crime and human rights as part of their third-year studies. 'They gain skills and experience but also knowledge and attributes,' Hall says. 'The SLO introduces students to the reality of how lawyers might be able to help people.' The SLO is just one example of how the university is integrating real-world learning within its courses, helping both students and those living, working and trading in the local area. The Business Clinic is a similar initiative. Final-year business students consult and advise national and international companies, local SMEs, social enterprises and charities on business problems, from helping a home fragrance business with its latest marketing campaign to supporting the RNLI with a series of events and fundraising ideas to help sustain the future of its base in the nearby seaside town of Cullercoats. 'It's embedded into the curriculum – we've made it an integral part of their degree – and that's important because students then have the time to devote to it,' Hall says. 'It's not just about learning by doing, it's about students applying the knowledge they are gaining in the real world to further their understanding, skills and future careers. Alongside this, they are contributing to the local economy and community – the benefits really are widespread.' The majority of the university's undergraduate degree programmes already include real-world learning, and Northumbria's goal for the future is for every UK-based undergraduate student to take part in this transformative learning as part of their studies. Many courses, such as nursing, education and social work, already require students to spend a significant percentage of their time on placement, developing the skills they need in a real-life environment. The university has enhanced the way these students train by investing in VR technologies which provide simulation scenarios to help them prepare and rehearse in a safe environment on campus, before they face similar scenarios in the real world. This ethos carries through to other courses. Physiotherapy students help patients with real issues in the Physiotherapy clinic, supervised by a chartered physiotherapist. Law and history students have collaborated to dig into legal archives, while fashion students work with major-label brands on live projects including design, marketing and social media campaigns, many of which have led to employment after graduation. 'It's a really important part of what we're trying to do across the university,' Hall says. 'We're trying to make these kinds of connections to the outside world, and to real experience,' he says. 'Each student goes on an individual journey, and for most I would say it enhances both their learning experience and their career prospects.' This approach has helped Northumbria University drive social mobility and power an inclusive economy in the north-east, an integral part of the university's mission. 'Northumbria places more graduates in highly skilled north-east positions than any other university,' says Prof Graham Wynn, the university's pro-vice-chancellor (education). 'We do this by constantly evolving our education offer to be ever-more responsive to the educational needs of our students and our region.' This creates a pipeline of talent for the area's economy and beyond – the university supplies policing, nursing and social work apprentices in the region, as well as healthcare professionals, entrepreneurs and skilled graduates for established and emerging sectors. 'I think Northumbria is a great example of a university that really is very focused on its economic mission and that means making sure students get good jobs on graduating, or create jobs for themselves and other people,' says Vivienne Stern, chief executive of Universities UK, which has recently published reports on the skills needed by employers over the next decade and the economic impact of start-up and spin-out businesses originating from universities. 'The university works hard to make sure students can show prospective employers what they have done that has real-world applicability and will make them really attractive.' One of the university's great success stories is iamproperty, a business founded by two Northumbria graduates in 2009, with support from the university. It has since grown to become a business with annual revenues of £76m, making it one of the UK's largest residential auctioneer companies, employing more than 700 people. However, back in 2008, founders Ben Ridgway and Jamie Cooke were just two 24-year-olds with an idea. '[The university] was able to give us a small two-man office in the business centre that covered our phone bills, print bills and post bills for that first year,' Cooke says. 'They put us in contact with advisers, helped with our accounting process and legals and that was really, really helpful.' Without the university's backing, he says, it would have been difficult for the fledgling company to get off the ground. 'I'd like to think we would have got there, but I know for a fact that our growth would have been stunted without the support that we had,' Cooke says. 'They knew we were wet behind the ears and they put their arms around us and helped us.' Now, iamproperty recruits graduates from Northumbria University because the founders value the real-world learning students get there. 'We were really looking back to the university as a talent pool to recruit from because we knew the kind of education and the knowledge people were coming out with, and we knew they were hands-on, that they'd had the level of experiences that we had had,' Cooke says. 'We attend all its graduate fairs … to make sure we're bringing in a really high calibre of people with a real base knowledge that we can push on from.' Overall, Northumbria University's emphasis on experiential learning is supporting local communities and businesses, and beyond. The SLO, Business Clinic and success stories like iamproperty are examples of how 'economic powerhouses' such as Northumbria University are powering an inclusive economy that benefits everyone, says Stern. 'There are seeds of tangible, meaningful growth that will mean people in the north-east have access to better jobs, and money and investment coming into the region,' she says. 'And that matters – that really matters. People can feel it in their everyday lives.' Find out more about how Northumbria University is shaping futures and driving change

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store