Ram temple construction to be overby year-end, says Nripendra Misra
He said devotees would be allowed to visit all parts of the temple complex within the next two months.
Misra said all the idols to be installed in the temple have arrived and now the Temple Trust will begin the work of Pran Pratishtha.
He said the idol of Lord Shiv will be installed on May 31 and mark the start of rituals leading up to the main consecration events.
The consecration of the Ram Darbar, featuring idols of Lord Ram, Sita and Hanuman, is scheduled from June 3-5.
The ceremony will be led by 101 Vedic scholars, primarily from Kashi and Ayodhya. According to reports, the temple trust has decided to invite mainly spiritual leaders instead of VIPs from the central or state govts for the June 5 ceremony.
Misra said 'Sapt Mandir' (seven temples) work had been completed. It houses temples dedicated to sages and devotees associated with Lord Ram. These include temples of Maharishi Valmiki, Vashistha, Vishwamitra, Ahalya, Shabari, Nishadraj and Agastya Muni.
Likewise, 90% of the 'Parkota' work is expected to be completed by June-July and it will be fully ready by Sept, Misra said.
The construction of the exhibition and auditorium has started and would be completed by March next year, he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Deccan Herald
5 hours ago
- Deccan Herald
Why historians misunderstand myths — and why it matters
Most historians do not understand myths. They confuse it with fiction. Myths need to be distinguished from other kind of stories that shapes human culture:· Parables and fables that are prescriptive.· Ballads, sagas, and legends that seek to evoke tribal pride.· Propaganda that seeks to mobilise people.· Fiction that communicates an author's imagination to entertain, enlighten, inspire, or reflect.· News that narrates stories of the present, based on verifiable facts.· History (itihasa in Hindi) that narrates stories of the past, based on verifiable facts.· Myth (itihasa-purana in Sanskrit) that uses metaphors to provide a community with a map to cope with life, the world, and the afterlife. Myth justifies borders and hierarchies to establish identity. Hence, it makes sense to insiders, not are often a function of geography. West Asia has deserts and mountains. By contrast, South Asia is full of river valleys, and is shaped by the Monsoon. This resulted in different migration patterns, different economic activities, and different forms of political organisation. This gave rise to different stories that created communities and tribes. The myths of West Asia are, therefore, different from the myths of South are never static. They change over time. West Asia did not always have Christianity, Islam, or Judaism. Likewise, the mythology of India has never been static. Vedic Hindus were different from Sanatani Hindus, who attack anyone who does not eat vegetarian food. Vedic Hindus sacrificed all kinds of animals, including horses, for their ancestors and myths did not emerge fully formed like the adult Draupadi emerging from the fire-pit in the Mahabharata. It changed over time. When we map myth to history, something fabulous emerges:· The 3,000-year-old Vedic poetry and prose did not glamorise hermits, but the 2,500-year-old Vedic philosophy did.· In 2,000-year-old Hindu epics, we find householders being presented as superior to hermits.· In 1,000-year-old temples, multi-armed gods and goddesses are evoked in occult rituals to empower kings and establish 'mandala' kingdoms in India and Southeast Asia.· In 500-year-old poetry, the gods become more mystical, analytical, and aesthetic, the object of the devotee's deep Hindu myths were evolving in response to Indian history, monotheistic myths were evolving in response to West Asian history.· The Old Testament of the Bible was being composed around 600 BC, when the first temple of Jerusalem was destroyed by the Babylonians. This is when Vedic ritualism was slowly being challenged by monastic ideals in India.· The New Testament of the Bible was being compiled around 100 AD, after the second temple in Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans. This is when the Ramayana and the Mahabharata had reached their final form in India. Ideas from North India were spreading to West, East, and South India.· The Quran had reached its final form around 700 AD, following the rise of the Arab empire that overshadowed both the Holy Roman and the Persian empires. By this time, the Maha-Puranas narrating tales of Brahma, Vishnu, Shiva, and Durga had reached their final form in India, and were being displayed on temple walls, and in theatrical Old Testament (Jewish Bible), the New Testament (Christian Bible), and the Quran (Islamic lore) constitute the body of West Asian myths. They create a belief system that is very different from Hindu myths. They speak of one true god who does not permit the worship of false gods. Here, everyone lives one life, followed by the Judgement Day. They are expected to live as per the commandments transmitted through messengers. Jews, Christians, and Muslims are unable to agree on what that message contrast, there is no Judgement Day in Hindu myths. Hindu myths speak of rebirth and a balance sheet of debit and credit. Here, one seeks liberation from the trap of endless debts. Belief in one true god explains much of the conflicts in West Asia. Belief in rebirth explains the diversity, dynamism, and complexity in India. The two myths engaged with each other: Peacefully, through the Monsoon maritime trade across the Indian Ocean; and violently, through military campaigns of horse-breeding and horse-trading tribes of Central the Old Testament, the New Testament, and the Quran are textual and resist change, Hindu myths remain primarily oral, aesthetic, and ritual; so very fluid, changing dramatically with history and geography. The dynamism and diversity make Hindu myths very difficult to fix or date. But broad shifts are evident. Along with the flexibility and the adaptability, there is an undeniable resilience. Many things change, yet many things remain the same. There is discontinuity and continuity. (Devdutt Pattanaik is the author of more than 50 books on mythology. X: @devduttmyth.)Disclaimer: The views expressed above are the author's own. They do not necessarily reflect the views of DH.
Time of India
a day ago
- Time of India
What Role Does Manglik Dosha Play in Aishwarya Rai's Marriage to Abhishek Bachchan?
A Brahmin priest explains the natal chart, highlighting Mars and Manglik Dosha, to a concerned bridal couple during a twilight wedding ceremony. Vedic astrology continues to play a significant role in guiding life's most important decisions, with marriage being at the forefront. One of the most discussed and often feared astrological configurations in this context is the Manglik Dosha. This planetary placement is believed to predict potential challenges in marital life, and its influence was brought to the forefront of public discourse during the highly anticipated wedding of Bollywood stars Aishwarya Rai and Abhishek Bachchan. The events surrounding their marriage serve as a powerful example of how tradition and modern life intersect in India. What is the Manglik Dosha? The Manglik Dosha is a specific condition in a person's birth chart (kundli) that is formed when the planet Mars (Mangal) is positioned in certain houses. In Vedic astrology, Mars is a fiery, aggressive planet, and its placement in the 1st, 4th, 7th, 8th, or 12th house is said to create this dosha. The 7th house governs marriage, the 1st house governs the self and temperament, the 4th house represents domestic happiness, the 8th house deals with longevity and marital knots, and the 12th house influences marital pleasures and secrets. Astrological belief dictates that a person with this dosha, a "Manglik," may have a fiery temperament and face discord, conflict, or even a premature end to their spouse's life if they marry a non-Manglik. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 11 Harry Potter Actors Who Grew Up Stunningly. The Noodle Box Read More Undo To mitigate these perceived negative effects, a marriage between two Manglik individuals is often recommended, as it is believed that the doshas cancel each other out. However, if a Manglik wishes to marry a non-Manglik, traditional remedies are often sought. The Aishwarya Rai Bachchan Case When Aishwarya Rai, a global icon and one of India's most beloved actresses, was set to marry Abhishek Bachchan, the media was captivated by every detail. However, a significant part of the public narrative revolved around whispers that her birth chart indicated she was a Manglik. This created a stir, as her partner, Abhishek Bachchan, was not. According to astrological tradition, this pairing could be problematic. This situation brought to light a fascinating collision of old and new. Here was a highly successful, independent woman at the peak of her career, yet her personal life was still being analyzed through the prism of a centuries-old astrological belief. For many, this event demonstrated the deep-seated cultural importance placed on astrological compatibility in Indian marriages, transcending fame and modernity. The Kumbh Vivah Ritual To address the perceived astrological imbalance, it was widely reported that Aishwarya Rai underwent a Kumbh Vivah ceremony. A kumbh is a pot, and a vivah is a wedding. In this ritual, a person symbolically "marries" an object—often a peepal tree or a clay pot—to negate the dosha. The belief is that this symbolic first marriage absorbs the malefic effects of the dosha, freeing the individual to marry a person without the same affliction. After the ceremony, the symbolic "spouse" (the pot or tree) is typically destroyed or immersed. By performing this ritual, it was believed that Aishwarya could proceed with her marriage to Abhishek without the negative consequences traditionally associated with the Manglik Dosha. The incident was widely reported and sparked a national conversation about tradition, belief, and the role of astrology in modern Indian life. It underscored the fact that for many, even in the face of scientific skepticism, astrological beliefs hold powerful sway and are a fundamental part of the cultural landscape. The story of Aishwarya Rai's marriage and the associated Manglik Dosha is a compelling illustration of the enduring power of Vedic astrology in Indian culture. It shows that even for a prominent celebrity couple, adherence to traditional practices is a significant part of their journey. While the efficacy of such a ritual remains a subject of debate, its performance highlights a cultural deference to ancient astrological wisdom and a desire to ensure a long and prosperous marital life by all means. Discover everything about astrology at Times of India , including daily horoscopes for Aries , Taurus , Gemini , Cancer , Leo , Virgo , Libra , Scorpio , Sagittarius , Capricorn , Aquarius , and Pisces . Read your detailed Horoscope Today and Horoscope Tomorrow here.
Scroll.in
a day ago
- Scroll.in
How to be Indian in India: In his new book, Manu Joseph tries to make sense of the ‘amateur Indian'
What happens when we stop thinking in our mother tongue? Meander a little with me before we come to 'the point'. This is, after all, about language. I used to think in Malayalam and Tamil, though I always hoped only in English. I was born in Kerala and raised in Chennai, a cuckoo among the crows. Like many people, I could speak only one dominant tongue at a time. As a boy I spoke fluent Tamil, and a type of Malayalam that Malayalis said was not Malayalam, and a heavily accented English. However, I read English the best, and as I began reading books, which were almost entirely works from the West, I changed. By the age of 17, I was moving away from Tamil and Malayalam, and I was beginning to think entirely in English. There were hundreds of thousands like me across India, going through the same phase. It was obvious to us then that a bright future was a time and place that thought in English. Are there serious consequences when this happens, or is the specialness of language overrated? When I was around ten, during a monthly test in school, I was asked to write 'the opposite gender of ram'. I was baffled when I realised that most of the class had got the alleged answer 'ewe'. My answer was Sita. I still maintain that I was right. No one in Chennai had ever seen a ram, while Ram, or Rama as we used to call him, was everywhere. Everything else about English was like this – it was venerable at a distance but all wrong when it passed through me. It was a medium of study and intellect but to use it in a casual conversation seemed comically arrogant. The act of speaking in English, in fact, was defamed as 'Putting Peter' in my circle. I was among the boys who carried out the defamation. My teachers were not fluent in English. When my parents spoke English, they, like all Malayalis, spoke English in Malayalam. The effect of not being fluent in English was that I was an insider in my home town. I belonged to my city and the place belonged to me. Not for a moment was I an amateur Indian. I could talk to thugs and policemen and slum dwellers and eunuchs. Also, come to think of it, even stray dogs didn't faze me. I never even noticed them, even though as a kid I began to run at dawn. Being Tamil, or being Malayali, is a distinct behavioural system and only those who thought in either of those languages could play a part in it. Maybe it had nothing to do with Tamil or Malayalam but with the absence of a world framed in English. For instance, when a Tamil Brahmin wanted to convey an insult, he would hedge the risk by putting it across as an ambiguous joke. Also, Tamils of my childhood had the propensity to use glee to show contempt. They would laugh hard, in an exaggerated way, at the jokes of the people they despised, especially their teachers or bosses. This is nothing remarkable or even unique. But it's not an entirely insignificant thing either. All this I did not observe as a boy, when I used to think in Tamil. Observation is not the act of seeing; it is the act of remembering what has already been seen. Only when I stopped thinking in Tamil did I begin to actually see Chennai. The Argentine writer Jorge Luis Borges once wrote that the one word we will not find in the Quran is 'camel'. His implication was that ancient Arabs had no reason to mention what was very common in almost every frame of their existence, but an outsider sees what is too ordinary for the insider. (Borges was wrong; the Quran does mention 'camel'. But I accept what he implies.) As a child, I made no special effort to learn to read and write in Tamil or Malayalam. I used them only to think and speak. I could write only in English and Hindi, both foreign to me, Hindi more than English. Then, in 1987, a film called Nayakan by Mani Ratnam was released. I was thirteen and I thought it was the greatest film on Earth. I still believe it is one of the greatest. I decided that apart from being a journalist, I would also become a Tamil filmmaker. I began to write scripts for many Tamil films that I hoped would find takers, but all of them in English. When I was 16, I thought the best way to enter the movie business was as a low-level actor. So when I heard that a film audition was underway for some extras, I went. The queue was long and the men looked impoverished and depressing, and the line had not moved after two hours, so I left, abandoning the idea of acting. I wrote more stories. I co-wrote one with the milkman. Nothing ever came out of them. The Tamil sphere of creativity offered me no prospects. So I let myself be colonised by the English language, by which I also mean a strange condition. Compared to Indian languages, English has names for so many abstract things, labels, even lies, that they can be misunderstood as truths, like hypnosis, secularism, sexism, liberty, human rights, and plain nonsense like 'quality time' and 'multitasking'. All these ideas might seem innocuous, even sensible. Some people might think these words capture innate human nature. They don't. They are a way of thinking. And not long ago in India, people who thought like this were not merely artists and writers. They were the people who ran the country – they were prime ministers, ministers, judges, bureaucrats, editors, all of them shaping the nation at a time when a few influential people could run the country. Yes, most of them liked their samosas and some of them sang in their mother tongue, but the West was inside their heads. The West gave them their aesthetic, intellectual, and moral direction. They had this perception that the West was the pinnacle of the human race. This class and this way of thinking has been properly killed in India. I think the West is being killed even in the West. The death of this class has resulted in the unification of classes. The richest Indian, Mukesh Ambani, in how he perceives wealth, marriage, and family values, his religious piety, his surrender to the mystical, is very similar to a poor or lower-middle-class Indian in the way a Tata was not. The poor can pretty much identify with all their major public figures. The depth of this belonging is best understood from the orphanhood of the other Indian, the amateur Indian. To ruin the chances of sleeping with them, rasp, 'Is the science of climate change beyond dispute?' They say things like 'asparagus' and 'edamame' and eat them, too. They used to love Aung San Suu Kyi, but not any more. They read very long articles in English that are called longform. They despise the word 'infrastructure' when uttered by a provincial man. But anything they hate they will consider forgiving if it is 'sustainable'. They know what an 'open' relationship means. Many of them, especially in Mumbai, have 'friends' among street urchins. They hated giving their biometrics to their government but routinely do that for an American or European visa. They wish for diversity in plants and animals even though they themselves are a monoculture of identical ethical organisms spread across the informed world whose president was Barack Obama. At times, they hold candles and go somewhere. They were, for long, awkward in India, but they had their islands where they could escape the nation. Now there is nowhere to hide, not even in literature festivals. This is a government that is everywhere. So they feel uncertain in universities, think tanks, cultural bodies, journalism, theatre, art and mainstream cinema, activism, and in charitable works. They have lost beef too. The worst truth of this new order is that they, who received the finest education and other opportunities, and who consider themselves the most intelligent and informed among Indians, have been shown as inaccurate, unreliable, and incompetent political analysts of their own nation. It appears that there is only one way left to use them as political forecasters. Listen carefully to what they have to say, for the outcome will be the very opposite. They are the amateur Indians. They always were, since birth. The times when they strayed outside their safe houses, they did not know how to negotiate their own nation. What should they do when a government official asks for a bribe, what should they do when their car hits the bumper of another vehicle, how should they speak to a cop, what are the meanings of many words in their own mother tongues? But never before have state and society encroached into their islands so forcefully and decisively. They are not alone anywhere any more. Nowhere in the malls, theatres, and restaurants can they be guaranteed a degree of refinement. In the theatres they must rise for the national anthem. And what should they do if a man is on the phone throughout the movie? They have heard stories of friends being punched just for objecting to the use of the phone in movie halls. Never before has the uncouth Indian been so empowered, and so affluent. There is no place he cannot afford, or be refused admittance to any more. In any case, some of the richest residential real estate in the country has for long been taken over by fanatic vegetarians. Now there are affluent residential colonies in all major cities where residents demand the construction of temples. What should the lofty people do? Where should the amateur Indian go? They do consider themselves 'global', and everyone knows 'global' does not include Sudan or Mongolia. They will be able to obtain visas of the most advanced economies. But despite everything, all things considered, it is in India that life is the easiest; it is here that they are assured of good spots on the social mountain. What must they do? How can they become as confident as the son of the soil, who has friends in the police commissioner's office and in other government places, who knows when to stand firm during a traffic dispute and when to flee, and how to game the system. How to be Indian in India? Excerpted with permission from Why the Poor Don't Kill Us: The Psychology of Indians, Manu Joseph, Aleph Book Company.
