logo
'Sirens' Shows We Just Can't Get Enough Of Toxic Sisterhood

'Sirens' Shows We Just Can't Get Enough Of Toxic Sisterhood

Elle09-06-2025
Lately, it feels like every time I turn on the TV, a sister is doing something unthinkable. Gaslighting her sibling. Stealing her boyfriend. Faking her own death to ruin her life. Sisterhood, that age-old shorthand for unconditional love, has gone dark – and we can't stop watching.
From the calculating twin gynaecologists in Dead Ringers and the scheming siblings of Bad Sisters to the most recent Netflix and Prime thrillers: The Better Sister and Sirens, mainstream culture is fascinated with the kind of bond that cuts both ways – deep love and deeper resentment in one fraught, inseparable package. Because nothing hurts like family, and sisters have an unmatched capability to twist the knife.
FIND OUT MORE ON ELLE COLLECTIVE
And it's not just on our screens, our bookshelves are also amuck: Esther Freud's My Sister and Other Lovers, lays bare the complex mesh of fear and mistrust between sisters whilst Favourite Daughter by Morgan Dick has two women working together as therapist and patient – with no idea that they're in fact sisters.
I should admit upfront: I'm part of the hysteria. In my new novel Selfish Girls, I write the about an uninhibited, dysfunctional family. It's a pressure-cooker narrative about the pain we inflict on those we love most: our sisters. Writing it, I kept asking myself: what happens when a sibling becomes both your witness and your rival?
It's true that toxic sisterhood has always been in the narrative fold. From Whatever Happened to Baby Jane? where sibling rivalry curdles into psychological horror, to Atonement and the O'Haras in Gone with the Wind, fiction loves to recognise the emotional volatility built into sisterhood.
Even soap operas from Dynasty to EastEnders have mined the vein of sisterly sabotage for decades. We have ancient archetypes of this uneasy alliance with the Graeae: three sisters who shared a single eye and a single tooth, passing them back and forth in a choreography of dependency and distrust. There's something eerily familiar in this arrangement. It mirrors the way sisters – in fiction and real life – must negotiate shared identity, resources, even attention. The myth captures the essence of what today's tales are digging into: how love and resentment often share the same body.
If we're in a golden age of complicated women and problematic sisters are the star, where has the sudden surge in interest come from? What links all these stories is a shared fascination with how female closeness can curdle. We're no longer in the land of heart-warming sisterly support (no offence, Little Women). Instead, we're watching women who grew up in each other's shadows, trying to forge identities outside the sibling dynamic, and often failing spectacularly. This duality is exactly what gives these relationships their cataclysmic charge. Sisters know your history; they know your secrets. They share your DNA and your damage. 'Sisters are our first friends and first enemies,' ­writes Tessa Hadley. And when things go wrong between sisters, it's never just about what's happening now; it's about decades of unspoken competition and those roles inherited in childhood that are never quite escaped.
'When you look in the mirror, your difficult sibling always looks back, though the image is distorted. In the shadows lurk parts of yourself and your past that you don't want to notice. Behind the reflection, silently influencing the interaction, stand your parents, your grandparents, and all their siblings,' writes the psychotherapist, Jeanne Safer, in her book Cain's Legacy: Liberating Siblings from a Lifetime of Rage, Shame, Secrecy, and Regret.
How fascinating then, that the crux of our relationship with our sisters is steeped, not just in our own dynamic, but in the lineage of misgivings from the past. Tensions sharpened across generations. Perhaps that's why the emotional pitch of sisterhood can feel so extreme, so polarised, capable of flipping without warning from love to hate.
In fiction, these bonds tilt toxic not because sisterhood is broken, but because it's perceived as unbreakable. Sisters have become the stage on which we can rehearse the ethics of our desire – betrayal, manipulation, cruelty is all made permissible by the assumed resilience of the bond. Only a sister could be trusted to hold our most dangerous fantasies and unimaginable transgressions. It's this unique containment, this charged intimacy, that makes for reckless, potent, unfettered (and ultimately interesting) characters.
These stories don't erode the sanctity of sisterhood; they prove its strength. Afterall, we would forgive our sister that which we would not forgive anyone. In fiction – if not also in real life - when she fakes her own death, steals your identity, or frames you for a crime she committed – that's not betrayal. That's just not-so-sisterly love.
Selfish Girls by Abigail Bergstrom is out on 10 July. Pre-order here.
ELLE Collective is a new community of fashion, beauty and culture lovers. For access to exclusive content, events, inspiring advice from our Editors and industry experts, as well the opportunity to meet designers, thought-leaders and stylists, become a member today HERE.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Jillian Michaels slams 'Biggest Loser' documentary, puts co-star Bob Harper on blast for friendship demise
Jillian Michaels slams 'Biggest Loser' documentary, puts co-star Bob Harper on blast for friendship demise

Fox News

timean hour ago

  • Fox News

Jillian Michaels slams 'Biggest Loser' documentary, puts co-star Bob Harper on blast for friendship demise

Jillian Michaels has a bone to pick with Netflix's latest documentary, "Fit for TV: The Reality of the Biggest Loser." Just days after the explosive docuseries premiered, the fitness trainer - who appeared on the NBC show from 2004 to 2011, but did not participate in the documentary - took to social media to refute a series of claims made by former contestants, co-star Bob Harper, executive producers and the show's in-house doctor at the time, Dr. Huizenga. One controversial topic Michaels took issue with included claims that she and other trainers went against show rules and distributed caffeine pills to contestants. "Here is an email chain with @bobharper - the Biggest Loser's producers - @drhuizenga's guy… who stayed on set with us and distributed the fat burners about which 'fat burners' / caffeine pills to purchase the contestants," she wrote on Instagram, alongside screenshots of alleged emails from 2009. Michaels said this "one email of many" shows that, "Dr. Huizenga did approve caffeine pills on many seasons of Biggest Loser. Bob Harper not only knew about the caffeine pills, the 'stackers fat burner' were actually his suggestion." Additionally, said Michaels, "Caffeine was NEVER banned on The Biggest Loser.""Wild how some folks still lie like it's 1985 before texts and email were a thing," she added. The last image shows an alleged text message she sent to Harper, who claimed in the documentary that Michaels never reached out to him after he had a massive heart attack in 2017. "And, the last image is my second to last text ever to Bob Harper. Take from it what you will," she wrote, alongside a screenshot of an alleged text to Harper in 2014. "I really think it's s---ty of you to not even respond to my texts. It's this kind of thing that always makes me so disappointed my our [SIC] relationship," the text message reads. In the documentary, Harper claimed Michaels seemed to have ghosted him and their friendship. "How do I put this? People were always like 'You and Jillian have been so close', and I was like, 'Well, we were really close on television,'" he said. "After I had my heart attack, she's the one person I never heard from. So, I mean, that to me spoke volumes." "It was one of the hardest things I've ever gone through. I was dead on the gym floor for nine minutes," he added. In a separate Instagram post, Michaels refuted another major claim made in the documentary. "In response to the claim in the documentary that I told a contestant at the show's finale, 'You're going to make me a millionaire,' I want to state unequivocally that this is false," she wrote, alongside more receipts. "The full moment was captured on camera, and both the contestant and I were wearing microphones. If such a comment had been made, it would exist on the audio record." "Furthermore, two of the show's executive producers, Mark Koops and Dave Broome, have each provided written statements in text messages to my business partner confirming that this exchange never occurred," she added. "For clarity, below are their texts verifying that no such comment was ever made." That's not all. Former contestants also alleged that they were encouraged to eat less than 1,000 calories a day to lose more weight, an allegation Michaels vehemently denies. "With respect to the allegation that I restricted contestants from eating enough calories: I have an example of a direct written correspondence with a contestant, while she was home for the holidays during filming, in which I explicitly instructed her to consume 1,600 calories per day," she wrote, alongside a screenshot of an alleged email between her and the contestant. "Additionally, the two other emails posted here are standard communications with the show's producers and medical staff, emphasizing the ongoing priority of ensuring contestants were adequately nourished and the need to provide a steady supply of fresh food in the BL house to guarantee ready access to calories." Regarding former contestant Rachel Frederickson's appearance during the season 15 finale, Michaels - who previously voiced her concerns over Frederickson's controversial and dramatic weight loss at the time - shared an email she allegedly received from the then-Chairman of NBC Entertainment. "Not only did I never once get the opportunity to personally work with Rachel Frederickson in any capacity - I raised serious concerns both publicly and to NBC directly about contestant health and the condition of Rachel in particular at BL's Season 15 finale," she wrote in a caption, alongside an alleged email from the NBC executive at the time. "In that email, he made clear that if I did not publicly condone the appearance of contestant Rachel Frederickson at the show's finale, NBC would pursue legal action against me. I resigned from The Biggest Loser shortly thereafter," she concluded. Representatives for NBC, Netflix, Harper and Michaels did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.

Edward Berger's Conclave follow-up movie at Netflix finally has a teaser trailer
Edward Berger's Conclave follow-up movie at Netflix finally has a teaser trailer

Digital Trends

timean hour ago

  • Digital Trends

Edward Berger's Conclave follow-up movie at Netflix finally has a teaser trailer

Edward Berger's last two films have both been major players at the Oscars, and now, Netflix has debuted the first teaser trailer for Ballad of a Small Player. Colin Farrell stars as Lord Doyle, a man who spends all day and night on casino floors in Macau. As he struggles to manage his debts, Doyle receives a possible chance at salvation from casino employee Dao Ming (Fala Chen). However, a private investigator, played by Tilda Swinton, is hot on his heels and ready to confront him about his past. Recommended Videos The movie is adapted from Lawrence Osborne's 2014 novel of the same name. The teaser trailer doesn't offer much in the way of plot details. It does preview yet another crisply shot film from Berger. The director is coming off the papal thriller Conclave, a massive critical and financial success. For Ballad of a Small Player, Berger reteams with Netflix, the studio behind his Oscar-winning war epic, All Quiet on the Western Front. The movie is set to hit theaters on October 15 before hitting Netflix on October 29. This short window is the typical theatrical run implemented by Netflix to make their films eligible for major awards. The qualifying run might be short, but the streamer has some faith in the movie as an awards season player.

‘Splitsville' Duo Michael Angelo Covino & Kyle Marvin Challenge Conventional Wisdom On Comedy's Global Reach – Comedy Means Business Podcast
‘Splitsville' Duo Michael Angelo Covino & Kyle Marvin Challenge Conventional Wisdom On Comedy's Global Reach – Comedy Means Business Podcast

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

‘Splitsville' Duo Michael Angelo Covino & Kyle Marvin Challenge Conventional Wisdom On Comedy's Global Reach – Comedy Means Business Podcast

As multi-hyphenates who together have premiered a pair of acclaimed indie comedies at Cannes — first The Climb in 2019, and more recently, Splitsville — Michael Angelo Covino and Kyle Marvin have a unique perspective on the old adage that comedies don't travel internationally. 'At the advent of cinema, what were the first blockbusters?' asks Covino in an appearance alongside Marvin on our Comedy Means Business podcast. 'It was like Charlie Chapman and Buster Keaton and a ton of Pre-Code stuff where everyone was naked. But for the most part, it was slapstick. It was silent films where people were falling down or crashing into things or a hose was spraying them in the face, and that is universal and goes worldwide.' More from Deadline From Touring With Vampire Weekend To Helming Tribeca Prize-Winner 'On A String': Isabel Hagen On Forging A Unique Career Synthesizing Music & Comedy – Comedy Means Business Podcast Leanne Morgan & Chuck Lorre Defy Decline Of The Stand-Up-Driven Sitcom With Netflix's 'Leanne' – Comedy Means Business Podcast Joe List & Manager Chris Burns Talk Building Direct-To-Consumer Career & Going Theatrical With 'Small Ball' Special - Comedy Means Business Podcast In the case of 'very specific, topical comedy that is of a place and speaking to zeitgeist only, then sure,' Covino can see a case being made that a comedy might not translate. 'But universal comedy, I think, translates better than any other genre.' Covino and Marvin's films together jointly embody an interest in absurdist comedy elevated by sharp writing and dynamic visuals, which focuses on relationships. While The Climb focuses on a revelation emerging from a long-distance bike ride and the strain that it puts on the relationship between two friends, Splitsville tells the story of two evolving marriages, and another revelation that complicates the relationship between those two couples. When Ashley (Adria Arjona) tells Carey (Marvin), abruptly during a road trip, that she's been repeatedly unfaithful and wants a divorce, Carey turns for solace to married friends Paul (Covino) and Julie (Dakota Johnson), learning that the key to their personal happiness has been to open up their relationship. In a last-ditch attempt to salvage his marriage, Carey pitches Ashley on a similar situation, and chaos ensues. Covino tells me on the podcast that a driving force behind his films with Marvin has been an interest in 'strong point of view' — stories embodying a unique juxtaposition between 'grounded emotions and characters' and 'absurd…and farcical situations.' From Marvin's perspective, the film also highlights their very simple goal of making sure that 'people are entertained' if they take the time to check out their work, in a moment where there are seemingly unlimited options, as far as what people can be consuming or doing with their time. 'I think for us, that means not holding back,' Marvin explains. 'If you can make everything interesting and compelling and believable, why would you hold back on the scenarios or situations that are fun to watch or have things going on that put pressure on character? I think we talk a lot about that entertainment value — what the experience of viewing the movie is going to be, and how we make that experience as fun as possible.' A joke a minute, with some really memorable visual gags, Splitsville is certainly that. It's a film with no clear comp, which while complicating conversations around marketing, affirms to Covino that he and Marvin hit on something good. In their appearance on our podcast, Covino and Marvin discuss the process of creating indie comedies unlike any you'll find elsewhere — one that was helped along, in this case, by Adam Newport-Berra, the cinematographer on the rise who's coming off his first Emmy nomination for his work on The Studio. The pair also discuss test screenings, the idea of cultivating 'future nostalgia' through the theatrical release, their desire to tackle a Christmas movie, and more. Covino directed Splitsville from his script written with Marvin, with the pair also producing. Neon releases the film in limited theaters on August 22 and will go wide with it on September 5. Alongside the podcast, I release a Comedy Means Business newsletter for Deadline — chronicling the latest happenings in the comedy space — twice a month, on Mondays. Sign up to receive that here. View a video clip from the conversation with the Splitsville creatives above and listen to the full cut below. { pmcCnx({ settings: { plugins: { pmcAtlasMG: { iabPlcmt: 1, }, pmcCnx: { singleAutoPlay: 'auto' } } }, playerId: "32fe25c4-79aa-406a-af44-69b41e969e71", mediaId: "1377cfec-ba3f-480a-9612-458b693b51e2", }).render("connatix_player_1377cfec-ba3f-480a-9612-458b693b51e2_3"); }); Best of Deadline Everything We Know About 'The Boys' Prequel Series 'Vought Rising' So Far Everything We Know About 'Gen V' Season 2 So Far 2025-26 Awards Season Calendar: Dates For Emmys, Oscars, Grammys & More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store