logo
Jillian Michaels slams 'Biggest Loser' documentary, puts co-star Bob Harper on blast for friendship demise

Jillian Michaels slams 'Biggest Loser' documentary, puts co-star Bob Harper on blast for friendship demise

Fox News2 days ago
Jillian Michaels has a bone to pick with Netflix's latest documentary, "Fit for TV: The Reality of the Biggest Loser."
Just days after the explosive docuseries premiered, the fitness trainer - who appeared on the NBC show from 2004 to 2011, but did not participate in the documentary - took to social media to refute a series of claims made by former contestants, co-star Bob Harper, executive producers and the show's in-house doctor at the time, Dr. Huizenga.
One controversial topic Michaels took issue with included claims that she and other trainers went against show rules and distributed caffeine pills to contestants.
"Here is an email chain with @bobharper - the Biggest Loser's producers - @drhuizenga's guy… who stayed on set with us and distributed the fat burners about which 'fat burners' / caffeine pills to purchase the contestants," she wrote on Instagram, alongside screenshots of alleged emails from 2009.
Michaels said this "one email of many" shows that, "Dr. Huizenga did approve caffeine pills on many seasons of Biggest Loser. Bob Harper not only knew about the caffeine pills, the 'stackers fat burner' were actually his suggestion."
Additionally, said Michaels, "Caffeine was NEVER banned on The Biggest Loser.""Wild how some folks still lie like it's 1985 before texts and email were a thing," she added. The last image shows an alleged text message she sent to Harper, who claimed in the documentary that Michaels never reached out to him after he had a massive heart attack in 2017.
"And, the last image is my second to last text ever to Bob Harper. Take from it what you will," she wrote, alongside a screenshot of an alleged text to Harper in 2014.
"I really think it's s---ty of you to not even respond to my texts. It's this kind of thing that always makes me so disappointed my our [SIC] relationship," the text message reads.
In the documentary, Harper claimed Michaels seemed to have ghosted him and their friendship.
"How do I put this? People were always like 'You and Jillian have been so close', and I was like, 'Well, we were really close on television,'" he said. "After I had my heart attack, she's the one person I never heard from. So, I mean, that to me spoke volumes."
"It was one of the hardest things I've ever gone through. I was dead on the gym floor for nine minutes," he added.
In a separate Instagram post, Michaels refuted another major claim made in the documentary.
"In response to the claim in the documentary that I told a contestant at the show's finale, 'You're going to make me a millionaire,' I want to state unequivocally that this is false," she wrote, alongside more receipts. "The full moment was captured on camera, and both the contestant and I were wearing microphones. If such a comment had been made, it would exist on the audio record."
"Furthermore, two of the show's executive producers, Mark Koops and Dave Broome, have each provided written statements in text messages to my business partner confirming that this exchange never occurred," she added. "For clarity, below are their texts verifying that no such comment was ever made."
That's not all.
Former contestants also alleged that they were encouraged to eat less than 1,000 calories a day to lose more weight, an allegation Michaels vehemently denies.
"With respect to the allegation that I restricted contestants from eating enough calories: I have an example of a direct written correspondence with a contestant, while she was home for the holidays during filming, in which I explicitly instructed her to consume 1,600 calories per day," she wrote, alongside a screenshot of an alleged email between her and the contestant.
"Additionally, the two other emails posted here are standard communications with the show's producers and medical staff, emphasizing the ongoing priority of ensuring contestants were adequately nourished and the need to provide a steady supply of fresh food in the BL house to guarantee ready access to calories."
Regarding former contestant Rachel Frederickson's appearance during the season 15 finale, Michaels - who previously voiced her concerns over Frederickson's controversial and dramatic weight loss at the time - shared an email she allegedly received from the then-Chairman of NBC Entertainment.
"Not only did I never once get the opportunity to personally work with Rachel Frederickson in any capacity - I raised serious concerns both publicly and to NBC directly about contestant health and the condition of Rachel in particular at BL's Season 15 finale," she wrote in a caption, alongside an alleged email from the NBC executive at the time.
"In that email, he made clear that if I did not publicly condone the appearance of contestant Rachel Frederickson at the show's finale, NBC would pursue legal action against me. I resigned from The Biggest Loser shortly thereafter," she concluded.
Representatives for NBC, Netflix, Harper and Michaels did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Get the new ESPN, Disney+ and Hulu bundle for free with this DirecTV deal
Get the new ESPN, Disney+ and Hulu bundle for free with this DirecTV deal

Yahoo

timea few seconds ago

  • Yahoo

Get the new ESPN, Disney+ and Hulu bundle for free with this DirecTV deal

In case you haven't heard, ESPN is launching a new streaming service (also called ESPN), which combines all of its existing channels and streaming platforms in one place. On top of that, for a limited time, you can bundle it with Disney+ and Hulu for $29.99 per month or $299.99 for a year. But if you want to know a secret, there's actually a way to get this brand new ESPN bundle for nothing. Zero dollars. DirecTV is currently offering subscribers who also use their Gemini device a totally free subscription to the Disney+, Hulu and ESPN bundle. The folks at DirecTV will just go ahead and add it to your plan. That's right, any DirecTV Signature pack subscriber with Gemini will see this bundle added to their subscription starting roughly around September 1. At that point, existing customers will receive the Disney+, Hulu and ESPN bundle, and once it's added, you simply need to activate it. For even more information about what you can expect to see on the new ESPN streaming service, check here and learn more about Disney+ and Hulu's upcoming "unified app" now. And in the meantime, here's what you need to know about how to take advantage of this super streaming deal. Disney+, Hulu and ESPN bundle free deal: Starting on August 21, all DirecTV Signature Pack customers who also use a Gemini device will get Disney+, Hulu and ESPN Unlimited included in their subscription at no additional cost. Without DirecTV, the new Disney+, Hulu, ESPN bundle is currently available for a promotional rate of $29.99/month for a limited time, and will eventually cost $35.99/month after the promotional rate expires. Subscribers will receive an email with activation instructions sometime between August 21 and September 1 to start enjoying their new bundle. What Is Gemini? DirecTV's Gemini streaming device is a device that can be added to any DirecTV plan, and works like a smart TV (or more accurately, like an Amazon Fire Stick) connecting viewers to 4K HD DirecTV programming and streamlining all DirecTV content, including third-party apps like Disney+, ESPN, Hulu, and more, so you can find them all in one place. Gemini devices cost around $10/month on top of your DirecTV Signature package subscription. What is the new ESPN streaming service? ESPN's new streaming service, simply (and yet confusingly?) called ESPN, launched on August 21. The service will be divided into two tiers: the ESPN Unlimited package and the ESPN Select package. ESPN Unlimited – which is part of the DirecTV Disney Bundle – includes access to all of ESPN's linear networks: ESPN, ESPN2, ESPNU, SECN, ACCN, ESPNews and ESPN Deportes, plus access to programming on ABC, ESPN+, ESPN3, SECN+ and ACCNX. The other tier of ESPN's streaming service is ESPN Select, which is essentially the new name for ESPN+. That service provides exclusive access to many events, and will simulcast certain sports that air on other channels, but will not feature the robust programming of Unlimited.

Sydney Sweeney Is Being Called Out For How 'Male Centered' She Is After She Blamed Women For The Negative Reaction To Her Bathwater Soap
Sydney Sweeney Is Being Called Out For How 'Male Centered' She Is After She Blamed Women For The Negative Reaction To Her Bathwater Soap

Yahoo

timea few seconds ago

  • Yahoo

Sydney Sweeney Is Being Called Out For How 'Male Centered' She Is After She Blamed Women For The Negative Reaction To Her Bathwater Soap

Back in May, Sydney Sweeney sparked a huge, collective side-eye from the masses when she announced that she is selling her bathwater to her male fans. In a collaboration with men's soap company Dr. Squatch, the 27-year-old star explained that bars of soap had been infused with 'real' traces of her very own bathwater, 'making every guy's fantasy' come true. If you're wondering, the product is called 'Sydney's Bathwater Bliss,' and in a press release, Sydney said: 'When your fans start asking for your bathwater, you can either ignore it, or turn it into a bar of Dr. Squatch soap… Hopefully, this helps guys wake up to the realities of conventional personal care products and pushes them towards natural.' Another quote from the official release read: 'It channels two of the best places on Earth: the great outdoors and Sydney Sweeney's bathtub.' Related: Needless to say, the vast majority of people were left unimpressed by this venture, with many criticizing Sydney for capitalizing on misogyny. One tweet that summarizes the discourse reads: 'capitalising off of patriarchy by making yourself the product is so dystopian.' At the time, Sydney brushed off the controversy, and suggested that her ultimate end goal with the collab was to get people talking about her. When E! News asked her about the soap at the premiere of her Apple TV+ movie Echo Valley, the star quipped: 'I think it's more fun to see everyone else talk about it.' And when asked how the concept even came about, Sydney confirmed: 'I pitched it.' Since then, public favor toward Sydney has soured even more, with the star taking part in another controversial ad — this time, for American Eagle jeans. The campaign, which was unveiled last month, seemingly focuses on Sydney's blonde hair and blue eyes in tandem with the tagline: 'Sydney Sweeney has great jeans [genes],' which sparked fierce backlash. Almost immediately, the campaign was accused of implicitly glorifying whiteness and promoting eugenics, and American Eagle's decision to double down on the campaign only triggered more criticism. The whole thing came to a head when the White House defended the ad, and President Donald Trump even heaped praise on Sydney after BuzzFeed confirmed that she officially registered as a Republican in 2024. Throughout all of this, Sydney was also being roasted for the video part of the campaign, where she speaks with a vocal fry so intense that she is almost incoherent, with many accusing the star of making this choice to both infantalize and sexualize herself for the male gaze. Related: And while Sydney has not acknowledged the reaction to her American Eagle ad, she did comment on the response to her bathwater soap in a new interview with the Wall Street Journal. 'I think it's important to have a finger on the pulse of what people are saying, because everything is a conversation with the audience,' she began. Referencing the soap directly, Sydney added: 'It was mainly the girls making comments about it, which I thought was really interesting. They all loved the idea of Jacob Elordi's bathwater." Related: Suffice to say, this take has not gone down well. For reference, Sydney's comment about her Euphoria costar Jacob Elordi is in relation to his 2023 movie Saltburn, which includes a very specific — and infamous — bathwater scene. While joke products, namely candles, referencing Jacob's bathwater became available online after the movie's release, Jacob himself was not involved in any of them — nor did he promote them. Needless to say, his actual, real-life bathwater was absolutely not in any of the products either. With all of this in mind, the two instances aren't at all comparable — especially as the general reaction to the Jacob Elordi products at the time was mostly bewilderment and disgust. And people have been quick to react to Sydney's latest comments on X, with many questioning her apparent decision to alienate women. Quote-tweeting a Pop Base tweet about Sydney's response, one viral tweet reads: 'yess girl throw women under the bus that'll really help you beat those allegations.' 'Not her trying to switch this on other women when her whole existence is so male centered, especially maga men,' somebody else wrote. 'Bcoz Jacob Elordi was not selling his bath water in any way shape or form. It was a part of movie, people had fun with it, fans made bathwater candles, but he didn't go out endorsing it, and making money off of being disgusting. This ain't the feminist gotcha you think it is,' another pointed out. One more tweeted: 'alienating your female fanbase and throwing your friend and co worker under the bus over a bath water candle that was being sold without his permission is so funnysjksj.' While somebody else concluded: 'white women love to scream misogyny to avoid facing valid criticism." Related: What do you make of Sydney's response? Let me know in the comments below! More on this Sydney Sweeney's Brother Just Gave Us A Glimpse Into How Her Family Are Handling The American Eagle 'Great Jeans' Scandal, And It Sure Is SomethingStephanie Soteriou · Aug. 7, 2025 Jacob Elordi Wants To Know 'Who's Making The Money' Off Of The Viral 'Jacob Elordi's Bathwater' CandleEllen Durney · Jan. 19, 2024 American Eagle Just Dropped Their Response To The Sydney Sweeney Ad Drama, And I'm Absolutely Screaming At How Messy This Has GottenKrista Torres · Aug. 1, 2025 Also in Celebrity: Also in Celebrity: Also in Celebrity:

Following Made by Google, is it time for companies to retire live smartphone launch events?
Following Made by Google, is it time for companies to retire live smartphone launch events?

Android Authority

time2 minutes ago

  • Android Authority

Following Made by Google, is it time for companies to retire live smartphone launch events?

Ryan Haines / Android Authority 🗣️ This is an open thread. We want to hear from you! Share your thoughts in the comments and vote in the poll below — your take might be featured in a future roundup. So, yesterday, Google launched the Pixel 10 series. While the phones are intriguing if not spectacular, it's the livestreamed event that remained seared into my brain when I woke up this morning. The Made By Google event, which was broadcast live and hosted by talk show host Jimmy Kimmel, featured various sports stars, celebrities, and Googlers. That sounds great, right? Well, it definitely was an experience. To be fair to Google, I've had my qualms with live smartphone launch events for years, whether in attendance or watching a stream. But following Made by Google, I think now's the time to ask an important question: do we still need these live smartphone launch events? Don't want to miss the best from Android Authority? Set us as a preferred source in Google Search to support us and make sure you never miss our latest exclusive reports, expert analysis, and much more. For those in the 'absolutely not' camp, Google's Pixel 10 embargo broke an hour before, so any keen-eyed readers would've been privy to the official news well before. The launch event showcased little we didn't already know (besides the glimpse of what could be a new Google speaker), and what wasn't already covered previously. Some may argue that Google's budget for the event could go towards more practical marketing methods. Alternatively, it could forego the entire thing and publish a prerecorded video series detailing the new features in a more grounded manner. But those in favor could suggest that the event probably wasn't designed to appeal to the majority of us Android 'nerds.' Lando Norris, Alex Cooper, Jonas Brothers, and Steph Curry fans had plenty to cheer about. Google also spent plenty of time courting iPhone users over to the Android side. Ultimately, I'm curious about where you — the consumer — stand on live smartphone events, especially as the target audience for these shindigs. Here are some more questions: Did you watch the Made by Google event? If so, what did you think of it? Do you think Google spent enough time describing and explaining the new Pixel 10 and other product features? Would you prefer it if companies announced products via prerecorded videos, press releases, partnerships with celebrities or creators, hands-on experiences from journalists, or live events with keynotes from company officials? Do you believe Google's event did an effective job of courting iPhone users over to Android? What do you think Google should do with the Pixel 11 launch? Be sure to vote in the poll below, too! What did you think of Made by Google 2025? 1226 votes It was quite good actually! 18 % It was a bit cringe, but at least it was a little different. 31 % What did I just watch?! 51 % 👇 And if you have a specific comment related to your poll choice, or want to answer any of the questions posed above, be sure to have your say in the comments below. Follow

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store