WPP Names Microsoft's Cindy Rose CEO to Lead Make-or-Break Turnaround
Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with WPP.
Rose, who has been on WPP's board since 2019, isn't a stranger to transformation; she led Microsoft's UK business before becoming Chief Operating Officer of Global Enterprise; and now, she's being asked to do what feels almost impossiblesteady a sprawling advertising empire; rekindle growth; and wrestle with AI disruption all at once.
The stakes are enormous; WPP has lost almost half its market value this year; it ceded its crown as the world's largest ad group to Publicis; and clients are pulling back on spending; or simply taking their campaigns in-house, empowered by new tech. Chairman Philip Jansen called Rose's digital track record hugely valuable; investors clearly agreedshares edged up 2% in early trading; a modest rebound after Wednesday's brutal selloff.
Rose won't have much of a honeymoon; she takes over September 1, four months earlier than planned; she inherits a business that's bleeding major accounts and facing relentless macro headwinds; but she sounded undaunted; We have and continue to build market-leading AI capabilities, she said; and while that may be true, her challenge now is to convince Wall Streetand WPP's clientsthat the group can actually use them to grow again.
This article first appeared on GuruFocus.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Donald Trump declares US is going to 'win' AI race as administration unveils action plan
Donald Trump has declared the United States is going to "win" the artificial intelligence race, as his administration unveiled its AI Action Plan. The new blueprint is designed to speed up the building of energy-intensive data centres - which run AI products - by loosening environmental rules, while also vastly expanding the sale of AI technologies overseas. The plan, which includes 90 recommendations, comes as America attempts to maintain its edge over China, with both superpowers investing heavily in the industry to secure economic and military superiority. It calls for the export of US AI software and hardware abroad, as well as urging the removal of "red tape" that could be seen as stopping the industry from flourishing. In a speech in Washington DC, Mr Trump said: "America is the country that started the AI race. And as president of the United States, I'm here today to declare that America is going to win it." He said the technological arms race with China was a fight that will define the 21st century. The president added: "We also have to have a single federal standard, not 50 different states regulating this industry in the future." And he said at the 'Winning the AI Race' summit that "America must once again be a country where innovators are rewarded with a green light, not strangled with red tape". An expansion in exports of AI products could benefit AI chip makers Nvidia and AMD as well as AI model giants Alphabet's Google, Microsoft, OpenAI and Facebook parent company Meta. Read more from Sky News:World court issues landmark ruling in climate court caseGovernment mulls two-hour screen time limit for children During his time in office, former president Joe Biden brought in restrictions on US exports of AI chips to China and other countries which America feared could divert the semiconductors to the Asian superpower. Mr Trump rescinded Mr Biden's executive order aimed at promoting competition, protecting consumers and ensuring AI was not used for misinformation. He also rescinded Mr Biden's so-called AI diffusion rule, which capped the amount of American AI computing capacity some countries were allowed to obtain via US AI chip imports. The Trump plan also aims to block the government from doing business with tech companies unless they "ensure that their systems are objective and free from top-down ideological bias". Mr Trump's AI czar, David Sacks, has been criticising "woke AI" for more than a year. Demand for power in the US is hitting record highs this year after nearly two decades of stagnation as the number of AI and cloud computing data centres expands across the country. The tech industry has been pushing to loosen rules to get its computing facilities connected to power sources. But the AI building boom has also led to more demand for fossil fuel production, which contributes to global warming.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mark Cuban delivers 8-word truth bomb on AI wars
Mark Cuban delivers 8-word truth bomb on AI wars originally appeared on TheStreet. The AI race isn't just a sprint anymore, as it has turned into a full-blown geopolitical-scale arms race. With tech giants putting billions into chips, models, and talent, the pressure is mounting to lock in first place before the dust settles. 💵💰💰💵 What was once open-source and academic is now evolving into something far more aggressive and elusive. Though investors chase the moonshots, the real battlefield may be shifting beneath their feet. That said, billionaire Mark Cuban's latest take on the matter might just change how we view the entire game. AI spending hits overdrive as tech giants chase dominance Big Tech's been relentless with AI this year, having hit the gas and never looked back. Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta have collectively committed north of $320 billion to AI infrastructure this year alone. Most of that cash is reserved for growing data centers and scaling up compute for massive AI models. The logic is straightforward: with more chips and data, your AI becomes more powerful. Moreover, the spending spree reflects that multiyear bet on OpenAI gives it the front-run access to bleeding-edge models from ChatGPT. Google, not to be outdone, showed off its seventh-generation TPU chip, which could handle even larger neural networks. Amazon's AWS launched its own Trainium and Inferentia chips, as it looks to undercut rivals on cost for enterprise AI workloads. Also, behind the silicon, a talent war is raging at a breakneck pace. Record compensation packages, in the region of $1 million upfront, are being offered to researchers. Meta, for example, reportedly dangled $100 million signing bonuses to AI bigwigs, shaking up the tech job market. Then there's the new gold, Big Data. Tech firms are looking to shore up proprietary datasets, while forging exclusive licensing deals to feed their models. From health care to finance, whoever has the best data gets the best results, and the biggest moat. More Tech News: Top economist drops 6-word verdict on Trump tariffs, inflation JPMorgan reveals 9 stocks with major problems Bank of America quietly reboots Microsoft stock price target Investors have taken notice. Nvidia crossed the $4 trillion valuation mark, and AI-focused ETFs have seen historic inflows. However, this rapid progress comes with its fair share of risks. All this spending comes with pressure to deliver revenue quickly, and missed monetization windows could result in today's capex into tomorrow's red ink. IP is king: Mark Cuban sees AI future turning cutthroat Maverick investor Mark Cuban isn't mincing words about where the AI arms race is heading. In a recent post, Cuban declared 'IP is KING in an AI world,' warning that the current AI era will be shaped by hoarding, exclusivity, and high-stakes poaching. With tech giants looking to spend close to $1 trillion on AI dominance, he said the race will become more about walls, moats, and closed no one's looking to shell out over $1 trillion to come in second place, which could be a precursor to a full-scale war for talent, IP, and strategic advantage. Cuban predicts a major wave of poaching and IP lock-ups as tech behemoths look to scramble to secure an edge. Big tech is hiring away talent and advancing their models, with the likes of Meta reportedly having dedicated billions for AI hiring. But Cuban's warning isn't just for Big Tech. He's warning creators, researchers, and engineers to wise up. He advises them to encrypt their work, silo codes, or get paid for it behind a paywall. The era of 'publish or perish,' he argues, is over. Naturally, this shift has massive implications for top AI stocks like Nvidia, Microsoft, Alphabet, Meta, Amazon, Apple, and Tesla, which continue leading the pack in terms of AI spend. Nvidia in particular has reaped the rewards of early GPU IP bets. For investors, Cuban's take is more like a playbook. It's best to hunt for businesses with deep patent portfolios, proprietary data, and elusive partnerships. Also, if you want exposure without picking winners, diversified AI-focused ETFs may be your smartest Cuban delivers 8-word truth bomb on AI wars first appeared on TheStreet on Jul 22, 2025 This story was originally reported by TheStreet on Jul 22, 2025, where it first appeared. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Palantir vs. BigBear.ai: Which Is the Better Artificial Intelligence (AI) Software Stock?
Key Points Palantir and both develop artificial intelligence (AI) software platforms that are deployed across various use cases. Given each has witnessed a sharp rise in share price, investors can use financial and operating metrics to get a sense of which business is healthier. One useful metric when benchmarking software companies is the Rule of 40. 10 stocks we like better than Palantir Technologies › One industry that is transforming in real time thanks to the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) is enterprise software. While cloud computing hyperscalers such as Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet have benefited handsomely from new AI-powered services, two other software companies have emerged as fan favorites in the stock market -- largely thanks to their diversified exposure to various applications, offering investors a deeper playbook compared to more specialized businesses offered through big tech. As of the closing bell on July 17, shares of Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ: PLTR) and (NYSE: BBAI) have risen by 104% and 85%, respectively, so far this year. Despite such monster gains, I'd caution investors from following this momentum blindly. To get a better sense of the investment case between Palantir and I'll compare the two businesses across a number of financial and operating metrics -- particularly the Rule of 40. Let's dig in! What is the rule of 40 in SaaS? Outside of traditional financial figures such as revenue, gross profit, and net income, companies will often rely on industry-specific metrics to help investors better understand the health of the business. For software-as-a-service (SaaS) businesses, non-generally accepted accounting principles (non-GAAP) metrics, such as annual recurring revenue (ARR), or the Rule of 40 are often used to complement traditionally reported financials on the income or cash-flow statements. The Rule of 40 is derived by taking a company's revenue growth rate and adding it to free-cash-flow margin. Generally speaking, SaaS companies strive to achieve combined scores above 40%. While the Rule of 40 can be a useful tool in benchmarking SaaS companies, it does have some nuances. First, some companies will choose other profit-adjacent metrics such as operating income margin or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) margin instead of free cash flow. In addition, companies can also inflate non-GAAP figures such as EBITDA and free cash flow by using adjustments such as stock-based compensation in their calculations. Although the Rule of 40 is not necessarily as bulletproof as traditional valuation benchmarks such as price-to-sales (P/S) or price-to-free cash flow (P/FCF), it can still be a useful tool when screening SaaS businesses against one another more broadly. Comparing Palantir and across the Rule of 40 One thing that is nice about Palantir's reporting is that it provides investors with a view into non-GAAP measures, such as the Rule of 40. At the end of the first quarter, Palantir achieved a Rule of 40 score of 83%. This figure was calculated by taking the company's revenue growth rate of 39% and adding it to adjusted operating income margin of 44%. In the table below, I've outlined the necessary financials from the first quarter to calculate Rule of 40 score. Financial Figure $Amount Revenue ($) $34.8 million Revenue growth rate (%) 5% Free cash flow ($) ($8.3 million) Free cash flow margin (%) (24%) Adjusted EBITDA ($) ($7 million) Adjusted EBITDA (%) (20%) Rule of 40 (free cash flow margin) (19%) Rule of 40 (adjusted EBITDA margin) (15%) Data source: investor relations. What's the verdict? As the analysis above illustrates, even with adjusted (inflated) EBITDA figures, Rule of 40 score remains well below 0%. Meanwhile, Palantir's Rule of 40 score has increased by more than twofold over the last two years. To me, these trends highlight something deeper. I see Palantir's improving Rule of 40 score as a direct translation of the company's enormous success with its AI platforms, Foundry and Gotham. By contrast, foray into the AI realm has not been anywhere near as lucrative -- underscored by rather muted revenue growth and an unproven path to profitability, making its long-run worthiness as an investment questionable. In my eyes, rising stock price can be attributed to more of a bullish macro narrative surrounding some of its end markets -- particularly in defense tech, which is just one area that Palantir is currently dominating. In other words, it's likely that some investors are hoping that Palantir's success means that is destined to follow the same trajectory. Smart investors know that isn't always how things turn out in reality, though. Moreover, hope is not a prudent investment strategy. Palantir is a faster-growing, more profitable enterprise than by a longshot. In my eyes, Palantir is the superior choice between the two budding AI software businesses. Should you invest $1,000 in Palantir Technologies right now? Before you buy stock in Palantir Technologies, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Palantir Technologies wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $641,800!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,023,813!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,034% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 180% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 John Mackey, former CEO of Whole Foods Market, an Amazon subsidiary, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Adam Spatacco has positions in Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, and Palantir Technologies. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Palantir vs. Which Is the Better Artificial Intelligence (AI) Software Stock? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
