First detentions of migrants crossing Channel under UK-France returns deal
The first detentions came as people arrived in Dover on Wednesday, the first day the pilot scheme came into force.
Pictures showed the migrants wearing life jackets disembarking from Border Force boats.
The Home Office said detentions began for those who arrived on Wednesday afternoon and they will be held in immigration removal centres until they are returned to France.
Footage published by the department on Thursday showed some of those who were detained arriving and being medically assessed at Western Jet Foil in Dover.
Video also showed men taken to Manston processing centre, wearing dark grey tracksuit jumpers and bottoms, being screened by Border Force officers.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper said: 'Yesterday, under the terms of this groundbreaking new treaty, the first group of people to cross the Channel were detained after their arrival at Western Jet Foil and will now be held in detention until they can be returned to France.
'That sends a message to every migrant currently thinking of paying organised crime gangs to go to the UK that they will be risking their lives and throwing away their money if they get into a small boat.'
UK officials aim to make referrals for returns to France within three days of a migrant's arrival by small boat while French authorities will respond within 14 days.
This is in exchange for an approved asylum seeker in France to be brought to the UK under a safe route.
This process has now also been launched, with adults and families in France able to express an interest in coming to the UK through an online platform set up by the Home Office.
They will have to meet suitability criteria, standard visa application process and security checks.
If accepted, they would be given three months in the UK to claim asylum or apply for a visa, and would be subject to the same rules for all asylum seekers not allowed to work, study or have access to benefits.
The Home Office is expected to launch a campaign in the coming days to make migrants in northern France and elsewhere aware of the new treaty.
Ms Cooper added: 'Criminal gangs have spent seven years embedding themselves along our border and it will take time to unravel them, but these detentions are an important step towards undermining their business model and unravelling the false promises they make.'
The Home Secretary has previously said the accord is not a 'silver bullet' to stop small boat crossings, but marked a step change as migrants will be sent back across the Channel for the first time.
Ministers have rejected criticism that the returns deal leaves open a loophole for human rights laws to be exploited for migrants to avoid deportation.
Efforts to crack down on illegal working and remove migrants with no right to be in the UK from the country are continuing as ministers grapple to curb the crossings.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Troubling' courts service IT bug ‘extremely serious'
An IT bug causing 'technical issues' within the body running courts in England and Wales is 'unbelievably serious' and could be compared to the Post Office Horizon scandal, a former lord chancellor has said. The BBC has reported that it took HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) several years to react to the bug, which is said to have caused evidence to go missing, be overwritten or appear lost, resulting in judges in civil, family and tribunal courts making rulings on cases when evidence was potentially incomplete. HMCTS said there is no evidence to suggest any case outcomes were affected as a result of the issues. The bug was found in case-management software used by HMCTS and the Social Security and Child Support (SSCS) Tribunal, which handles benefit appeals, is thought to have been most affected, the BBC said. Referred to as Judicial Case Manager, MyHMCTS or CCD, the BBC said the software is used to manage evidence and track cases, and is used by judges, lawyers, case workers and members of the public. Documents seen by the BBC show the bug caused data to be obscured from view, meaning some evidence was sometimes not visible as part of case files used in court. The BBC said a leaked internal report said HMCTS did not know the full extent of the data corruption, including whether or how it had affected cases. Alex Chalk, former lord chancellor and former justice secretary, said what has happened is 'incredibly serious' and could have involved cases which determine whether a child is taken into care. 'So unbelievably serious. And, so the whistle blowers indicate, it could potentially have bled into other tribunals as well, whether it deals with divorce and so on. 'And the thing that is so troubling is that this report evidently got on to the desk of the senior leadership of HMCTS in March 2024 when I was in office, and it was never brought to my attention. 'And I am incredibly troubled by that, because any lord chancellor, of any stripe, if they discover that there's potentially a situation in the courts which is leading to injustice, then you will immediately want to investigate that, and yet in effect that was covered up and I'm afraid I think that is extremely serious,' Mr Chalk told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. The BBC said several sources within HMCTS have likened the situation to the Horizon Post Office scandal. Mr Chalk was asked on the Radio 4 Today programme if what has happened could be compared to the Post Office scandal, and he said: 'It could be.' An HMCTS spokesperson said: 'Our internal investigation found no evidence that any case outcomes were affected as a result of these technical issues. 'The digitisation of our systems is vital to bring courts and tribunals into the modern era and provide quicker, simpler access to justice for all those who use our services. 'We will continue to press ahead with our important modernisation.' It is understood that while the bug resulted in some documents not being accessible to users on the digital platform, they were in fact always present on the system. It is also understood that because of a number of 'fail-safes', parties and judges involved in these cases always had access to the documents they needed.
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
List of Government departures since Labour won general election
Sir Keir Starmer has lost 10 members of his Government since Labour won the general election in July 2024. This is a higher number of departures than those clocked up by his immediate predecessors during the equivalent period of their premiership. Rishi Sunak lost nine Government members in the first 13 months since taking office, Boris Johnson six and Theresa May three. Liz Truss's premiership lasted only a month and a half, during which there were three departures. These totals do not include people who left the government as part of changes made during a planned reshuffle. The figures are based on PA news agency reports and data published by the Institute for Government. The 10 people to leave the Labour Government so far are: 1. Louise Haigh (November 28 2024). Resigned as transport secretary after failing to correct police records in 2013 regarding a stolen mobile phone.2. Tulip Siddiq (January 14 2025). Resigned as economic secretary to the Treasury after an investigation by the independent adviser on ministerial standards.3. Andrew Gwynne (February 8 2025). Sacked from job as under-secretary of state for public health and prevention for comments in a WhatsApp group.4. Lord Cryer (February 14 2025). Resigned as government whip in the House of Lords due to personal reasons.5. Annalise Dodds (February 28 2025). Resigned as international development minister and minister for women over cuts to the international aid budget.6. Lord Hunt (May 22 2025). Retired after holding post of minister of state in Department for Energy Security.7. Baroness Curran (June 6 2025). Resigned as minister of state in Department for Energy Security due to ill health.8. Vicky Foxcroft (June 19 2025). Resigned as government whip in the House of Commons over proposed cuts to disability benefits.9. Lord Moraes (July 22 2025). Resigned as government whip in the House of Lords due to personal reasons.10. Rushanara Ali (August 7 2025). Resigned as homelessness minister in Ministry of Housing, Communities & Local Government after allegations she increased rent on a property she owned.
New York Times
4 minutes ago
- New York Times
The U.S. Says Britain Is Chilling Free Speech. Many Britons Point the Finger Back.
Britain was on a knife edge when Lucy Connolly, a mother and former nanny, tapped out an inflammatory 51-word post on social media a year ago, calling for 'all' hotels that house asylum seekers to be set on fire. 'If that makes me a racist, so be it,' she added, a postscript that did nothing to spare her the wrath of the country's courts. Her post was viewed 310,000 times. Now serving a 31-month prison sentence for inciting racial hatred, Ms. Connolly has become a charged symbol in a debate over whether Britain is suppressing free speech. Last month, an appeals court refused to reduce her sentence, drawing angry protests from her defenders, mainly on the political right. Ms. Connolly's arrest came during a fevered period after the killing of three young girls by a British son of Rwandan migrants, which ignited anti-immigrant riots across the country. She is one of thousands of people arrested in Britain each year for sending or posting offensive messages, which can include those that are 'indecent or grossly offensive' if they are intended to cause distress to the recipient. Critics, including Vice President JD Vance and Elon Musk, accuse Britain of backsliding in the age of social media. They point to a thicket of laws, some old, some new, combined with overly zealous policing, and a perception, on the right and the left, that law enforcement is biased against their points of view. Britain, they say, is restricting speech in ways that affect 'not just the British,' as Mr. Vance put it in February in an Oval Office meeting with Prime Minister Keir Starmer, 'but also affect American technology companies and, by extension, American citizens.' Mr. Starmer gives no ground when asked to respond to Mr. Vance's claim that 'free speech, I fear, is in retreat.' Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
