Malegaon Blast 2008: A Verdict That Closes One Chapter, But Opens Many Others
After 16 years of intense investigation, multiple agencies, and a high-profile trial, the special NIA court in Mumbai has acquitted all seven accused in the 2008 Malegaon bomb blast case. The court's reasoning was clear: there was no credible evidence to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. But even as the verdict brings closure to the ordeal of those accused, it leaves behind a haunting vacuum—who, then, was behind the gruesome act of terror that killed six and injured over a hundred in the communally sensitive town of Malegaon?
The verdict does more than exonerate individuals. It symbolically pulls the curtain on what was widely termed as 'saffron terror"—a phrase that had triggered political storms, institutional conflict, and media debates for over a decade. However, in its attempt to bring legal finality, the judgment also renews a crucial question: Will the real perpetrators of the Malegaon blast ever be found?
The Blast That Changed India's Terror Narrative
On the evening of September 29, 2008, a powerful explosion ripped through the Bhikku Chowk area of Malegaon, a town with a history of communal tension. The blast, caused by a bomb planted on a motorcycle, killed six people and injured 101 others. The timing was crucial — it came just days after the Batla House encounter and amidst growing concern about domestic terrorism. But unlike previous attacks, where the blame often fell on Islamist terror groups, this case took a stunning turn.
In a historic move, the Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) led by then Maharashtra ATS chief Hemant Karkare arrested individuals linked to radical Hindu outfits. Among them were Pragya Singh Thakur (former BJP MP from Bhopal), Lt Col Prasad Purohit, and Swami Dayanand. The arrests were unprecedented—marking the first time the Indian State acknowledged the existence of Hindu extremist terror modules. The phrase 'saffron terror" entered the public discourse, prompting a firestorm of political and ideological debate.
The Trial, Politics & Shifting Narrative
From the outset, the Malegaon case was a complex interplay of legal, political, and ideological battles. The National Investigation Agency (NIA), which took over the case in 2011, eventually diluted many of the charges. By 2016, under the BJP-led NDA government, the NIA chose not to oppose bail pleas of key accused, including Pragya Thakur and Purohit. The charges under the stringent Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA) were dropped. Public prosecutors changed, witnesses turned hostile—over 34 out of 323—and the tone of the investigation began to shift.
Many observers felt the case was being politically softened. This was evident when Pragya Thakur was given a Lok Sabha ticket by the BJP in 2019 and won from Bhopal. Her victory speech included a controversial reference to Hemant Karkare, the officer who had arrested her and later died in the 26/11 Mumbai attacks. That the government made no effort to distance itself from her remarks spoke volumes.
The verdict delivered by a Special NIA Court on Thursday acquitted all seven accused citing lack of evidence. The judgment notes that the prosecution failed to prove that the motorcycle belonged to Pragya or that Purohit supplied the explosives. The court added, 'Suspicion, however strong, cannot take the place of proof."
Legally, it is a clean acquittal. Politically, it's a full stop to the 'saffron terror" narrative. But for victims and civil society, it is a continuation of unanswered pain.
What Happens When a Case Ends, But Justice Remains Elusive?
The Malegaon verdict has created a peculiar judicial outcome: there was a blast, there were deaths, and there was a motorcycle with explosive material — but the court has no one to hold responsible for it. This presents a dangerous vacuum. When a terror case ends without conviction, it not only denies justice to the victims but also weakens public trust in the legal process. The deeper concern is that the country may have given up on finding the real culprits.
It cannot simply be a matter of vindication for ideological purposes. If the state had once arrested innocent people—which the verdict now implies—then someone must be held accountable for falsely implicating them. If the case was botched or manipulated, action must be taken against erring investigators or officials. A judicial inquiry into the investigative lapses may be necessary.
The Victims' Voice: Forgotten in the Noise
Lost in the political and legal discourse are the voices of the actual victims. The families of those who died in the 2008 blast have been largely invisible from public view. Their wait for justice has spanned 16 years, across three governments, two investigative agencies, and now a courtroom verdict that gives no answers. Some of them have said, 'We have not got justice, we have only got a verdict." That statement reflects the helplessness of many ordinary Indians caught in the crossfire of power politics, communal polarisation, and judicial delays. For these families, it was never about which religion the accused belonged to—it was about finding out who killed their loved ones. Their grief remains, now without even the hope of legal closure.
The End of 'Saffron Terror"?
The term 'saffron terror" was always controversial — seen by some as a genuine attempt to describe a new wave of extremism, and by others as a politically motivated label. With the Malegaon acquittals, the narrative, for all practical purposes, stands dismantled.
But does that mean such threats never existed?
Between 2006 and 2008, there were a string of blasts — Malegaon (2006), Ajmer Sharif (2007), Mecca Masjid (2007), and Samjhauta Express (2007). Accused in these cases included individuals with links to radical Hindu groups. The investigations in many of these cases collapsed or ended in acquittals. In the end, whether one calls it 'saffron terror" or not, India's institutions must be honest enough to investigate every ideology of violence with equal seriousness — be it Islamist, Leftist, or Hindutva-inspired. Selective justice weakens democracy.
The Verdict Is Out, But Accountability Is Not
The Malegaon verdict may legally close one of India's most controversial terror cases, but it opens a more profound and long-lasting challenge — the need for accountability. If those who were blamed are not guilty, then the real attackers are still free. A fair, non-partisan reinvestigation — or at the very least, a judicial commission — could help restore some public trust. Because in the end, a terror case without a culprit is not just a legal failure — it's a national tragedy.
About the Author
Mayuresh Ganapatye
Mayuresh Ganapatye, News Editor at News18.com, writes on politics and civic issues, as well as human interests stories. He has been covering Maharashtra and Goa for more than a decade. Follow him at @mayuganapa...Read More
Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
2008 Malegaon Blast BJP malegaon blast case news18 specials NIA pragya thakur the maha picture
view comments
Location :
Malegaon, India, India
First Published:
July 31, 2025, 15:35 IST
News india Malegaon Blast 2008: A Verdict That Closes One Chapter, But Opens Many Others
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
29 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Year after uprising, Bangladesh struggles to find political stability
Abdur Rahman Tarif was talking to his sister Meherunnesa over the phone when the voice on the other end of the call suddenly fell silent. In that moment, Tarif knew something bad had happened. He rushed home, dodging the exchange of fire between security forces and protesters on the streets of Dhaka. When he finally arrived, he discovered his parents tending to his bleeding sister. A stray bullet had hit Meherunnesa's chest while she was standing beside the window of her room, Tarif said. She was taken to a hospital where doctors declared her dead. Meherunnesa, 23, was killed on Aug 5 last year, the same day Bangladesh's former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina was forced to flee the country in a massive student-led uprising, which ended her 15-year rule. For much of Bangladesh, Hasina's ouster was a moment of joy. Three days later, Nobel Peace Prize laureate Muhammad Yunus took over the country as head of an interim government, promising to restore order and hold a new election after necessary reforms. A year on, Bangladesh is still reeling from that violence, and Hasina now faces trial for crimes against humanity, in absentia as she is in exile in India. But despite the bloodshed and lives lost, many say the prospect for a better Bangladesh with a liberal democracy, political tolerance and religious and communal harmony has remained a challenge. The hope of the thousands who braved lethal violence a year ago when they opposed Sheikh Hasina's abusive rule to build a rights-respecting democracy remains unfulfilled, said Meenakshi Ganguly, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch, a New York-based human rights group. Stalled change Bangladesh's anti-government movement exacted a heavy price. Hundreds of people, mostly students, were killed in violent protests. Angry demonstrators torched police stations and government buildings. Political opponents often clashed with each other, sometimes leading to gruesome killings. Like many Bangladeshis, Tarif and his sister took part in the uprising, hoping for a broader political change, particularly after when one of their cousins was shot and killed by security forces. "We could not stay home and wanted Sheikh Hasina to go, 20-year-old Tarif said. Ultimately we wanted a country without any discrimination and injustice. Today, his hopes lie shattered. We wanted a change, but I am frustrated now, he said. After taking the reins, the Yunus-led administration formed 11 reform commissions, including a national consensus commission that is working with major political parties for future governments and the electoral process. Bickering political parties have failed to reach a consensus on a timetable and process for elections. Mob violence, political attacks on rival parties and groups, and hostility to women's rights and vulnerable minority groups by religious hardliners have all surged. Some of the fear and repression that marked Hasina's rule, and abuses such as widespread enforced disappearances, appear to have ended, rights groups say. However, they accuse the new government of using arbitrary detention to target perceived political opponents, especially Hasina's supporters, many of whom have been forced to go into hiding. Hasina's Awami League party, which remains banned, says more than two dozen of its supporters have died in custody over the last one year. Human Rights Watch in a statement on July 30 said the interim government is falling short in implementing its challenging human rights agenda. It said violations against ethnic and other minority groups in some parts of Bangladesh have continued. The interim government appears stuck, juggling an unreformed security sector, sometimes violent religious hardliners, and political groups that seem more focused on extracting vengeance on Hasina's supporters than protecting Bangladeshis' rights, said Ganguly. Yunus' office routinely rejects these allegations. Growing political uncertainty Bangladesh also faces political uncertainty over a return to democratically held elections. Yunus has been at loggerheads with the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, or BNP, now the main contender for power. The party headed by former Prime Minister Khaleda Zia has demanded elections either in December or February next year. Yunus has said they could be held in April. The interim government has also cleared the way for the Islamists, who were under severe pressure during Hasina's regime, to rise, while the student leaders who spearheaded the uprising have formed a new political party. The students' party demands that the constitution be rewritten, if needed entirely, and says it won't allow the election without major reforms. Meanwhile, many hardline Islamists have either fled prison or have been released, and the Jamaat-e-Islami, the country's largest Islamist party, which has a controversial past, is now aspiring to a role in government. It often bitterly criticizes the BNP, equating it with Hasina's Awami League, and recently held a massive rally in Dhaka as a show of power. Critics fear that greater influence of the Islamist forces could fragment Bangladesh's political landscape further. Any rise of Islamists demonstrates a future Bangladesh where radicalization could get a shape where so-called disciplined Islamist forces could work as a catalyst against liberal and moderate forces, political analyst Nazmul Ahsan Kalimullah said. Worries also remain over whether the government is ultimately capable of enacting reforms. People's expectation was (that) Yunus government will be focused and solely geared towards reforming the electoral process. But now it's a missed opportunity for them, Kalimullah said. A frustrated population For some, not much has changed in the last year. Meherunnesa's father, Mosharraf Hossain, said the uprising was not for a mere change in government, but symbolized deeper frustrations. We want a new Bangladesh It's been 54 years since independence, yet freedom was not achieved, he said. Tarif echoed his father's remarks, adding that he was not happy with the current state of the country. I want to see the new Bangladesh as a place where I feel secure, where the law enforcement agencies will perform their duties properly, and no government will resort to enforced disappearances or killings like before. I want to have the right to speak freely, he said. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Amit Shah holds meet with West Bengal MPs, kick-starts poll preparations
The BJP on Monday (August 4, 2025) got down to poll preparations for the coming Assembly elections in West Bengal, with Union Home Minister Amit Shah meeting the party MPs from that State, with the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of voter list and seats reserved for Scheduled Castes and Tribes coming in for special mention. The meeting comes in the background of a drive by various BJP-ruled States to identify, what they term, illegal Bangladeshi migrants, and the controversial circular issued by the Delhi police, about people speaking 'Bangladeshi' language. According to an MP present at the meeting, Mr. Shah emphasised that as and when the SIR takes place in West Bengal, the party needs to be prepared for it. The Election Commission (EC) had last week directed West Bengal's Chief Electoral Officer Manoj Agarwal to immediately begin preparations for a SIR of electoral rolls in the State, which heads to polls next year. 'Apart from this, Amit bhai was clear that the issues of women safety following the RG Kar incident need to be kept front and centre as well as assessment of the BJP's performance in SC/ST reserved seats,' said a source. Present at the meeting were West Bengal BJP president Samik Bhattacharya and BJP general secretary in-charge of the State, Sunil Bansal. Mr. Bhattacharya said general issues with regard to poll preparations were discussed, but declined to elaborate. Mr. Shah also held a meeting via video conference with district-level leaders of West Bengal BJP as well as party MLAs, to speak about poll preparations there. West Bengal, Kerala, Assam and Tamil Nadu go to polls early next year.
Economic Times
an hour ago
- Economic Times
'Trump is speaking nonsense against India & Modi is silently listening': Congress slams govt over US' latest tariff threat
The Congress on Monday criticised the Modi government following U.S. President Donald Trump's tariff announcement against India. Calling out Modi's silence, the party questioned why he was 'afraid of Trump.' Jairam Ramesh mocked past BJP slogans and diplomacy, saying the U.S. actions expose the failure of an image-driven foreign policy. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Trump's latest threat Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads India-US Trade ties Congress on Monday criticised the central government over U.S. President Donald Trump's announcement of slapping more tariffs on India. "Trump is speaking nonsense against India every day, and Narendra Modi is silently listening to everything," said the grand old party in a post on social media platform X."Why is Modi so afraid of Trump?," the party asked in its Secretary in-charge of Communications, Jairam Ramesh echoing a similar sentiment, said, "So much for Howdy Modi. So much for Namaste Trump. So much for Ab ki Baar Trump Sarkar. So much for BJP MPs hailing Narendra Modi as India's trumpcard.""Despite all the hugs, all the handshakes, all the high-decibel bromance — 'My friend Dolaand' has delivered yet another jolt. What has come of the much-vaunted front-row seat for our EAM at his inauguration? Or for the PM being one of the first to land at the White House?""Tariffs are being slapped. Negotiations are going nowhere. But Asim Munir, the man whose invective was the backdrop for the Pahalgam terror attacks, gets lunch at the White House."This is what happens when foreign policy becomes about image-building, not national interest, he a fresh trade threat against India, Trump on Monday said he will "substantially" raise US tariffs on New Delhi, accusing it of buying massive amounts of Russian oil and selling it for big week, the Trump administration slapped a 25 per cent duty on all Indian goods. The US president also announced a penalty for buying "vast majority" of Russian military equipment and crude oil, but no mention was made in the notification."India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits," Trump said in a social media post on Monday."They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA," he its reaction, India said it will take all necessary steps to safeguard and promote national interest and that the implications of the tariffs are being import of crude oil from Russia has risen from 0.2 per cent of total purchases before the Russia-Ukraine war to 35-40 per cent. New Delhi is the largest buyer of Russian oil after August 1, Trump signed an Executive Order titled 'Further Modifying The Reciprocal Tariff Rates', raising tariffs for over five dozen countries, including a steep 25 per cent for executive order, however, did not mention the 'penalty' that Trump had said India will have to pay because of its purchases of Russian military equipment and House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller, in an interview to Fox News Sunday, stated that President Trump has said very clearly that 'it is not acceptable for India to continue financing" the Ukraine war by purchasing oil from week, Trump mounted a sharp attack on India and Russia for their close ties and said the two countries can take their "dead economies down together", a remark which prompted New Delhi to say that India is the world's fastest-growing major that the US has a massive trade deficit with India, Trump had said that while 'India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the world, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any country."Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of energy, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to stop the killing in Ukraine — All things not good!' Trump had announcements are being seen as a pressure tactic to get New Delhi to agree to demands made by the US in the proposed trade agreement with India. The US is seeking duty concessions for its agriculture, dairy and genetically modified (GM) foods. India is against giving any concessions in these sectors as they involve the livelihood of millions of small and marginalised Delhi has said that it is studying the implications of these tariffs and is still hopeful of concluding a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial trade far five rounds of negotiations have been held between the two countries. For the next round of talks, the US team is coming to India on August 25. The talks will go on till August historically bought most of its oil from the Middle East, including Iraq and Saudi Arabia. However, things changed when Russia invaded Ukraine in February the world's third-largest crude importer after China and the US, began snapping up Russian oil that was available at a discount after some in the West shunned it as a means to punish Moscow for its invasion of a market share of just 0.2 per cent in India's import basket before the start of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, Russia overtook Iraq and Saudi Arabia to become India's No.1 supplier, with a share as high as 40 per cent at one point of July, Russia supplied 36 per cent of all crude oil, which is converted into fuels like petrol and diesel, that India 2021-25, the US was India's largest trading partner. The US accounts for about 18 per cent of India's total goods exports, 6.22 per cent in imports, and 10.73 per cent in bilateral America, India had a trade surplus (the difference between imports and exports) of USD 35.32 billion in goods in 2023-24. It was USD 41 billion in 2024-25 and USD 27.7 billion in 2024-25, bilateral trade between India and the US reached USD 186 billion. India exported USD 86.5 billion in goods while importing USD 45.3 services, India exported an estimated USD 28.7 billion and imported USD 25.5 billion, adding a USD 3.2 billion surplus. Altogether, India ran a total trade surplus of about USD 44.4 billion with the 2024, India's main exports to the US included drug formulations and biologicals (USD 8.1 billion), telecom instruments (USD 6.5 billion), precious and semi-precious stones (USD 5.3 billion), petroleum products (USD 4.1 billion), vehicle and auto components (USD 2.8 billion), gold and other precious metal jewellery (USD 3.2 billion), ready-made garments of cotton, including accessories (USD 2.8 billion), and products of iron and steel (USD 2.7 billion).Imports included crude oil (USD 4.5 billion), petroleum products (USD 3.6 billion), coal, coke (USD 3.4 billion), cut and polished diamonds (USD 2.6 billion), electric machinery (USD 1.4 billion), aircraft, spacecraft and parts (USD 1.3 billion), and gold (USD 1.3 billion).
