The student and teacher on R.I. Board of Education can't vote. This bill would empower them.
A student and a working teacher already have seats at the table of the Rhode Island Board of Education. They just can't vote on any matters of importance.
But they could under a bill sponsored by Narragansett Democratic Sen. Alana DiMario heard Wednesday evening before the Senate Committee on Education. DiMario's bill would grant voting privileges to Council on Elementary and Secondary Education's ex officio members, the state's Teacher of the Year and the head of the Student Advisory Council, which is composed of high school sophomores through seniors.
'They could come to the meetings, they could participate, but they weren't truly decision makers,' DiMario said in a phone interview Wednesday afternoon.
Decisions by the commissioner of the Rhode Island Department of Education (RIDE) are still subject to the approval by the eight-member Council on Elementary and Secondary Education. This K-12 council is part of the larger 17-member Board of Education, first established in 2014 to oversee all levels of education from kindergarten to university. Membership across both councils is determined by governor appointees.
The House version of the bill, led by Rep. David Morales, a Providence Democrat, was introduced on Feb. 28 but has yet to be scheduled for a hearing. DiMario's bill was held for further study Wednesday by the Senate committee.
In her testimony, DiMario cited Article 12 of the Rhode Island State Constitution, which allows the General Assembly to 'adopt all means which it may deem necessary and proper to secure to the people the advantages and opportunities of education.'
'I believe that allowing for the Teacher of the Year as well as the chair of the Student Advisory Council, to have full voting seats on that council will be a means to that end,' DiMario told her fellow senators on the committee.
This year's bill layers together two previous legislative efforts. RIDE announces the state's Teacher of the Year from the prior year's batch of District Teachers of the Year, an honor determined by the district's own teachers. The state's top teacher was granted a voteless seat at the table in 2023, although the bill became law sans Gov. Dan McKee's signature.
Sen. Valarie Lawson, an East Providence Democrat who is president of the National Education Association of Rhode Island, led the legislation for the student voting powers in recent years. But Lawson, who began her tenure as majority leader in January, has 'a lot on her plate,' DiMario said. So this year Lawson and DiMario combined their efforts into the current bill, which features both women plus eight other Democrats as sponsors.
An overfull plate was also one of the reasons cited by RIDE in its public opposition to the bill at Wednesday's hearing — a concern relayed from Gabriella Bautista Bolvito, the current chair of the Student Advisory Council and a senior at Classical High School in Providence. In her written testimony, Bolvito wrote about one of the first K-12 council meetings she attended, in which the council members were readying the fiscal 2026 budget.
They could come to the meetings, they could participate, but they weren't truly decision makers.
– Sen. Alana DiMario, a Narragnsett Democrat
'I knew little of what a budget entailed but was happy to be present in the conversation and to have the opportunity to give my input when necessary,' Bolvito wrote. 'As a 17-year-old with only an intro level Macroeconomics course in my back pocket, the prospect of potentially having to vote on a matter as serious as RIDE's budget is daunting. Although I hold several leadership positions. RIDE's area of focus is still foreign to me.'
Bolvito did not attend the hearing, but quoting parts of her testimony in person for the Senate committee was Andy Andrade, special assistant to the commissioner for legislative relations at RIDE, who also argued that, rather than the power to contribute to K-12 council decisions, students would be better served by sitting on their local school boards.
'It seems to me that the best place for a student…would be to be a member of their local school committee, where they have a vested interest, where they know the issues, and they would be, I think, much more effective in that role,' Andrade said. 'A commitment as a voting member would be challenging for any student with many responsibilities in and out of school.'
Sen. Tiara Mack, a Providence Democrat who has previously supported lowering the voting age, disagreed.
'I was a little disappointed to hear that one of our students didn't feel like they were given the tools or empowerment to engage civically within our state at a variety of levels,' Mack said. 'I think our young people are smart, and when given the proper tools, empowerment and resources, I believe they can engage in multimillion dollar decisions … and I think we should be giving our young people more opportunities to authentically engage in civics.'
Two people spoke up on behalf of the bill in person, while a packet of nine written submissions from members of Young Voices, a youth-led Providence nonprofit focused on empowering students of color in the state's urban core, rallied in support of the bill.
'People constantly ask us to be involved civically, but then we lack the opportunity to do so,' Krissia Diaz, a Classical student, wrote in a testimony. 'Give us the opportunity to have a real say as to what happens in our schools. . 'We need to pass this bill, youth deserve to use their voice rather than have decisions made for them by officials who haven't stepped foot in a school for more than fifteen years.'
It's not unheard of for states' boards of education to grant voting rights to student or teacher representatives. Massachusetts gives its student education board member voting rights, making it one of seven states that did so, according to 2022 data from the National Association of State Boards of Education. Some states have guardrails in place, like Maryland, which gives its student representative a say in the boardroom without being able to vote on personnel matters or certain appeals, according to state law.
As for teacher representatives, their governing powers on school councils also vary by state.
DiMario said the bill eliminates the need to identify and appoint new representatives for the student and teacher council seats, as they would be filled by existing office holders. The Teacher of the Year would sit on their council seat the year following their tenure as the state's top teacher. DiMario's bill would use the Senate, rather than the governor, to appoint the two new seats.
'I do expect that there could be some questions about that separation of powers issue,' DiMario said, adding that she's not sure if the governor would support the legislation. A spokesperson for Gov. Dan McKee did not immediately respond to a request for comment Wednesday.
'I think it's a fundamental approach to policy, I believe very strongly in that whole idea of 'Nothing about us, without us,'' DiMario said. 'We can only make our best decisions about what is going to solve a problem when we talk to people that are closest to that problem. To me, this is just a piece of that.'
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘Idiot' Trump Aide Called Out for Failed Jab at Gavin Newsom
Gavin Newsom's press office called out 'idiot' White House Communications Director Steven Cheung for his attempted online attack of the California governor. Cheung, in a profane post on X, claimed the Democrat was 'too chicken s--t to take questions from the press' after his speech Thursday about congressional redistricting to counter similar GOP moves in Texas and other red states. Except that's exactly what Newsom did. Less than 15 minutes after Cheung called Newsom a 'coward' and 'beta cuck,' the governor's press office shot back in the replies. 'Questions are streamed here you idiot,' they wrote, linking to a question-and-answer session in which the governor fielded nine questions from reporters. The Newsom account highlighted Cheung's mistake in another post—this one directed to the public. 'Steven Cheung (incompetent Trump staffer) doesn't know how to use his computer. SAD!' they wrote, adopting Donald Trump's style of posting. The White House did not immediately respond to the Daily Beast asking if Cheung plans on deleting or editing his post. The recent trend by Newsom's press team of imitating Trump's tone was the topic of one of the questions Newsom responded to in the Q-and-A. 'I hope it's a wake-up call—the president of the United States, sort of following his example,' Newsom said. 'If you've got issues with what I'm putting out, you sure as hell should have concerns about what he's putting out as president,' he continued. 'So, to the extent it's got some attention, I'm pleased, but I think the deeper question is: how have we allowed the normalization of his tweets and Truth Social posts over the last several years to go without similar scrutiny and notice.' For days, that account has been aiming to make Trump aware of the purpose of Newsom's speech Thursday: announcing a November special election to vote on proposed new maps to nullify GOP-friendly redistricting in red states. Newsom reiterated to reporters Thursday that if states like Texas, Florida, Missouri, and Indiana call off their 'unprecedented, mid-decade, hyper-partisan gerrymander to rig the upcoming midterm elections,' then California's redistricting effort won't be necessary. But there don't appear to be signs of Republicans backing down. 'Gavin Newsom's latest stunt has nothing to do with Californians and everything to do with consolidating radical Democrat power, silencing California voters, and propping up his pathetic 2028 presidential pipe dream,' National Republican Congressional Committee spokesperson Christian Martinez said.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Mark Hamill gave wife option of two countries they could move to when Trump was re-elected
Star Wars actor Mark Hamill has revealed he planned to leave the United States when Donald Trump was re-elected as president in 2024. The 73-year-old, known for his role as Luke Skywalker in the iconic sci-fi franchise, gave his wife Marilou Tork – whom he married in 1978 – the choice between relocating to 'London or Ireland'. Hamill's wife, who worked as a dental hygienist and met Hamill while cleaning his teeth, ingeniously convinced her husband not to move countries by suggesting Trump was pushing them out of the US. 'She's very clever. She didn't respond right away but a week later she said, 'I'm surprised you would allow him to force you out of your own country,'' Hamill, a lifelong Democrat, told The Times. ''That son of a b****', I thought. I'm not leaving.' When asked about the political landscape in the United States, Hamill expressed exasperation over 'the bullying, the incompetence, the people in place' in the Trump administration. The actor added that the only way he could 'deal' with the his country's politics without becoming suicidal was to look at the situation 'like a thick, sprawling political novel' instead of reality. Despite his horror, Hamill added that he 'still believes' there are 'more honest, decent people' in the country than there are those in a Maga crowd. 'If I didn't, I'd move back to England,' he said. Elsewhere in the interview, Hamill revealed his dislike of US gun culture is such that he almost didn't accept his role in a forthcoming adaptation of Stephen King's horror novel The Long Walk. Hamill will play The Major, a man who runs an annual walking contest in a dystopian version of America that sees 100 young men walk continuously at a pace of four miles an hour – or they'll be shot to death. 'Francis Lawrence, the director, understood what was troubling me,' he said of his initial reluctance to take on the role. 'American society is gun violence and it's hard to get past that, but as I spoke to him I realised this is just the guy. He said he would have been surprised if I wasn't troubled by it.' The actor went on to compare the film to recent ICE [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] arrests in the country, saying agents wearing masks, with no identification, had been 'pulling people out of their cars'. 'They were just brutalising people, kneeling on their necks,' he said. 'When I made the movie I wasn't thinking in terms of it being timely but it's proven to be just that.' Hamill led the three original Star Wars movies – Star Wars (1977), The Empire Strikes Back (1980), and Return of the Jedi (1983) – as Luke Skywalker alongside Carrie Fisher as Princess Leira and Harrison Ford as Han Solo. He reprised the role in all three films of the sequel trilogy: The Force Awakens (2015), The Last Jedi (2017), and The Rise of Skywalker (2019), as well as in numerous TV spin offs, including The Clone Wars and The Mandalorian. Solve the daily Crossword


Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Trump Defends Putin Summit Against Media 'Major Defeat' Claims
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump dismissed criticism of his summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska as "fake news" Sunday night on Truth Social, saying the war in Ukraine could be ended "almost immediately" but critics were making it harder to do so. Trump also appeared to rule out any return of the Russian-occupied Crimea region or NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) membership for Ukraine. Why It Matters Critics have slammed Trump for providing Putin with red-carpet treatment in Alaska on Friday in exchange for seemingly little in the way of concessions. The meeting ended without any agreement on a ceasefire or peace deal, but Trump officials have talked up possible concessions made by the Russians, although details have yet to surface. Trump's comments come as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is due to travel to Washington, D.C. on Monday to discuss with Trump a possible settlement of the war, which Putin launched in February 2022. Several European leaders are due to participate in the meeting. U.S. President Donald Trump (R) walks with Russian President Vladimir Putin as they arrives at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson on August 15, 2025 in Anchorage, Alaska. U.S. President Donald Trump (R) walks with Russian President Vladimir Putin as they arrives at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson on August 15, 2025 in Anchorage, Alaska. Andrew Harnik What To Know Trump rejected any suggestion that holding the summit on U.S. soil represented a defeat. "The Fake News has been saying for 3 days that I suffered a "major defeat" by allowing President Vladimir Putin of Russia to have a major Summit in the United States. Actually, he would have loved doing the meeting anywhere else but the U.S., and the Fake News knows this. It was a major point of contention!" the president said in a post on his Truth Social platform. "If we had the Summit elsewhere, the Democrat run and controlled media would have said what a terrible thing THAT was. These people are sick!" he said. The decision to hold the summit at Anchorage's Joint Base Elmendorf–Richardson surprised many observers as previous suggestions indicated a third country, such as the United Arab Emirates, would host the two leaders' first meeting in six years. Senator Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat, did not hold back on his assessment of the Trump-Putin summit, saying in a Sunday appearance on NBC News' Meet the Press that the meeting was a "disaster" that gave Russian Putin "everything he wanted." "The very unattractive (both inside and out!) Senator from Connecticut, Chris Murphy, said "Putin got everything that he wanted." Actually, "nobody got anything," too soon, but getting close," Trump fired back in another Sunday Truth Social post. "Murphy is a lightweight who thinks it made the Russian President look good in coming to America. Actually, it was very hard for President Putin to do so. This war can be ended, NOW, but stupid people like Chris Murphy, John Bolton, and others, make it much harder to do so." In advance of his talks with Zelensky and his European allies, Trump appeared to rule out any chance that the Ukrainian leader would succeed in his long-held aims of getting back Crimea, which Russian forces occupied in 2014, or of membership of NATO. "No getting back Obama given Crimea (12 years ago, without a shot being fired!), and NO GOING INTO NATO BY UKRAINE. Some things never change!!!" Trump said. Kyiv has repeatedly said it is against the country's constitution to give land away to Moscow. One of Putin's fears is that Ukraine would become a member of NATO, expanding the U.S. and European footprint even more along the border of Russia. U.S. Special Envoy Steve Witkoff on Sunday said the Russians had agreed to a "game-changing" concession, which would allow the U.S. to establish security guarantees modeled after NATO's Article 5 protections, which states that an attack against any member of NATO is an attack against all members of NATO—also known as the collective defense clause. Looking ahead to Monday's talks, Trump said: "Big day at the White House tomorrow. Never had so many European Leaders at one time. My great honor to host them!!!" What People Are Saying In a post on Truth Social, President Donald Trump said: "President Zelenskyy of Ukraine can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight." Senator Chris Murphy told NBC News: "It was a failure. Putin got everything he wanted…He was invited to the United States: War criminals are not normally invited to the United States of America." What Happens Next? Zelensky and several European leaders are due to meet Trump in Washington on Monday.