5 Best Japanese Cars for Budget-Conscious Drivers
Japanese cars have earned a reputation for their reliability, longevity and affordability. Some of the top Japanese car brands are favorites among budget-conscious drivers thanks to their low starting prices, low maintenance costs and gas mileage.
Check Out:
Read Next:
For those who are in the market for a new car, here are the best expert-recommended Japanese cars for those on a budget.
Starting MSRP: $24,250
'The Civic is one of the most reliable vehicles on the market,' Melanie Musson, auto industry expert with AutoInsurance.org, wrote in an email. 'It's an excellent vehicle for someone on a budget because it doesn't require a lot of upkeep.'
Regular oil changes, brake service and fluid flushes will keep it on the road longer and help owners avoid expensive repairs. 'Civics depreciate slower than most other vehicles, so when you buy one, it retains its value,' Musson said.
Alex Black, chief marketing officer of EpicVIN and an auto industry expert with over 15 years of experience, also pointed out that the Civic has excellent gas mileage and it's easy to work on. 'And the older models can easily be purchased for affordable prices when in good condition,' Black explained.
Be Aware:
Starting MSRP: $23,950
The Mazda3, available as both a sedan and a hatchback, has quick acceleration with a turbocharged engine for a low cost. It also uses higher-quality materials than you'd expect.
'[They're] fun to drive, great gas mileage and overall less costly than a Civic or Corolla,' Black said. 'Mazda's Skyactiv engines are durable, and the maintenance is cheap.'
Starting MSRP: $22,325
'The Corolla is dependable. It's not finicky, and it will often serve owners for over 200,000 miles,' Musson explained. 'Insurance premiums are also affordable with the Corolla thanks to the budget-friendly MSRP and loaded safety features.'
Black also highly recommended the Toyota Corolla due to its cheap parts, good gas mileage and durability.
'These cars will run forever if you keep them regularly maintained,' Black said. 'Excellent choice if you need something that will not aggravate you.'
Starting MSRP: $25,810
Another Japanese car that retains its value and rarely has mechanical problems if maintained is the Subaru Crosstrek, an all-wheel drive compact SUV.
'The Crosstrek is perfect for drivers looking for something that has AWD and performs well in adverse road conditions,' Musson said.
Starting MSRP: $17,190
'If you need something extremely affordable, the Versa is one of the cheapest cars you can buy new,' according to Black. 'Great gas mileage and simple to maintain.'
Even the pricier SR trim is only about $22,000. But no matter which trim you choose, automotive resource website Edmunds claims that you can still expect a good amount of features for an affordable price tag.
Editor's note: All starting MSRP figures were sourced from Edmunds.
More From GOBankingRates10 Home Features That Have Decreased the Most in Popularity (And How Much Homes with Them Cost)7 Tax Loopholes the Rich Use To Pay Less and Build More Wealth
This article originally appeared on GOBankingRates.com: 5 Best Japanese Cars for Budget-Conscious Drivers
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Developer: Asian market, food hall at Burnsville Center nearing finish line
Developer: Asian market, food hall at Burnsville Center nearing finish line originally appeared on Bring Me The News. The Asian supermarket and food hall designed to transform Burnsville Center remains in the pipeline, three years after the plans were unveiled. The Windfall Group initially said the the development, known as Pacifica of Burnsville, could open as soon as January 22, 2023, in celebration of Lunar New Year – a date that came and went while the project was beginning to move through the city's formal planning process. In December 2023, the Windfall Group said the destination was on track to open at the end of the first quarter in 2024. A March 2024 press release advertised the food hall would indeed open very soon - before summer. Now, over one year later, the project remains under construction and no opening date is set. "The community is very antsy for this project," Burnsville City Council Member Vince Workman told developers last week. "We're almost to the finish line," Christina Le, one of the project's developers, reassured city officials. The Burnsville City Council voted unanimously June 3 to once again amend the city's $1.1 million grant tied to the redevelopment to allow more time for construction. The extension sets a Jan. 31, 2026 deadline for exterior renovations, with interior work on the project set to wrap up this month. "Yes, we have had our delays and so forth but we did not take any shortcuts," Le told the City Council. "We did not diminish any quality in the work that we've done. We've kept the quality high." The Windfall Group, an international developer, is also behind Pacifica Square in Aurora, Illinois, which is billed as one of the largest "one-stop" Asian lifestyle centers in the country. The development in Burnsville is planned to be anchored by the upscale Asian supermarket chain, Enson Market, and a feature a nine-vendor food hall, called Ate Ate Ate. In a letter to the City Council dated March 5, Eddie Ni, with the Windfall Group, indicated plans to construct a two-story addition to incorporate patio dining and a landscaped plaza have been nixed. "Instead of constructing a 15,000-square-foot addition, we aim to create affordable and inviting spaces for tenants while preserving parking," the letter reads. "The two restaurants originally planned for the addition will now occupy vacant mall units." Ni also noted progress on Enson Market have been impacted by shipment delays from overseas. Ate Ate Ate is designed to emulate Asia's atmospheric street markets, with a stroll through the food hall taking guests from morning cafes, to lunchtime spots and, finally, the evening-inspired segment, which will be complete with vibrant lights and live music. Hospitality HQ, the food hall's operator, will oversee the curation of vendors. The current vendor line-up includes Soga Mochi Donuts, which became Minnesota's first mochi donut business when it brought its Japanese-style treats to St. Paul in 2021. Bulgogi, bibimbap and other Korean favorites will be served at Hang Sang Korean Cuisine and Nepal-style dumplings filled with seasoned meat and veggies will be the focus at Amazing Momo. Other vendors include Asian-inspired ice cream shop ODAY Creamery, Niko Niko Boba, Mason's Famous Lobster Rolls and spots serving ramen, hand-crafted sushi rolls and sashimi and Mediterranean fare, according to Le. A central bar, called Urban Oasis, will offer self-serve beer and wine, she added. "This really means a lot to us that you've been patient and waited this long," she told the City Council. "We're almost there." According to Le, a grand opening is expected before the end of the story was originally reported by Bring Me The News on Jun 10, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Mitsubishi Fuso, Hino finalise deal for new holding company
The integration of Mitsubishi Fuso and Hino Motors is set for completion, with Daimler Truck and Toyota Motor aiming to each hold a 25% stake in the new holding company, which is planned to start operations in April 2026. This strategic move is intended to enhance the competitiveness of Japanese commercial vehicle manufacturers and contribute to a sustainable mobility society. The merger plan was first announced in April this year. The newly formed holding company, which plans to own 100% of both Mitsubishi Fuso and Hino, is expected to be listed on the Prime Market of the Tokyo Stock Exchange. The collaboration is designed to operate on an equal footing, focusing on the development, procurement, and production of commercial vehicles. The companies anticipate announcing further details, including the name of the holding company, in the coming months, contingent upon approval from boards, shareholders, and authorities. Commercial vehicles, considered essential "social infrastructure", are at the heart of this collaboration. The four companies share a vision to "contribute to an affluent society through mobility" and believe that the integration will lead to improved business efficiency and a stronger automotive industry foundation in Japan and Asia. Hino CEO Satoshi Ogiso said: "Cooperation among these 4 companies is truly "once-in-a-lifetime opportunity". In addition to operational synergy, we can expect immeasurable synergy affection from synthesising different culture and climate of us. "Under commonly aimed aspiration, we are confident with building strong and resilient team to empathizing with each other and contributing to society. As a new commercial vehicle company rooted in Japan, we collaboratively create ever better future.' "Mitsubishi Fuso, Hino finalise deal for new holding company" was originally created and published by Just Auto, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site.
Axios
an hour ago
- Axios
Brooklyn Village developers warn county it will forgo affordable housing plan
The Peebles Corporation is warning Mecklenburg County that if it doesn't subsidize affordable housing for Brooklyn Village, the developer will proceed with its original plan to build mostly luxury apartments on the historically significant site. Why it matters: It's looking increasingly less likely that Peebles will actually redevelop Brooklyn, once a thriving Black neighborhood in Charlotte until it was razed in the '60s and '70s. A legal battle could ensue if the county wants to reclaim control of the site it sold to The Peebles Corporation for a discount. Catch up quick: Mecklenburg County sold prime land near Uptown to The Peebles Corporation and its development partner at a discounted rate, expecting they would honor Brooklyn through a mixed-use development that incorporates affordable housing. But the project has stalled for years because of negotiations and construction delays, which have been blamed on market conditions. In February, the development team revised its proposal and said it would build 250 affordable housing units — instead of 550 mixed-income units — in part to restore confidence with county commissioners. The latest: Peebles told the county April 18 it would miss a contractual deadline to demolish a building on the site due to the discovery of asbestos. WFAE reports that the county may use this latest delay as an out from its relationship with Peebles. In an unprompted email to Axios on Tuesday, Peebles emphasized that it now owns the Brooklyn land. "There is no reversion provision for Mecklenburg County to take it back," the email states. Peebles also said it scored among the top applicants for a government subsidy to build affordable housing. However, the email claims the city was "insistent" that the county contributed, and the county refused. Peebles further blamed the county for not disclosing the asbestos. It added that the building is on Phase 2 land for Brooklyn Village, which the developers do not own and, according to the email, do not plan on acquiring within the next decade. "The County wants BK Partners to pay for and perform an environmental clean-up of a building we do not own," the email states. "They are trying to shift the cost of extensive clean up." The other side: A letter Mecklenburg County's outside attorney sent to Peebles Corp. in late April, reported by WFAE, reads, "In reality, this is merely a continuation of BKV's ongoing attempts to avoid performing the demolition and removal work it agreed to perform. Clearly, BKV did not proceed diligently because it has been hoping it could evade its obligations." Mecklenburg County provided Axios with its April 30 response to Peebles but declined to comment further. The bottom line: The latest email effectively warns the county to approve its request for more funding if it's "genuinely committed to providing more affordable housing." "Otherwise, we will wait until market conditions improve in Charlotte and then proceed with our original plan," the email states. What's next: Developers say they expect to meet with the county in the coming weeks to seek a resolution. Read The Peebles Corporation's statement to Axios in full below: 1. The development team of BK Partners, composed of Conformity Corp and The Peebles Corporation, owns the Phase 1 land. 2. There is no reversion provision for Mecklenburg County to take it back. 3. BK Partners has the right to build luxury apartments, a hotel, office and retail. 4. Current market conditions make construction of any of these uses infeasible economically. This is due to the impact of a global pandemic, the tripling of interest rates and an oversupply of apartments in the market. 5. BK Partners has an obligation to build 10% of any apartments on Phase 1 as affordable. 6. To address the County's and City's need and desire for more affordable housing, BK Partners was willing to build 250 units of affordable housing in two buildings. 7. As is the case for all affordable housing in Charlotte and the nation, a government subsidy is required. We applied for it and scored at the top of the applicants. 8. The City was insistent that the County contribute to their subsidy and the County refused. 9. As to the Board of Education building: A. It is on the site of Phase 2 which we do not own and do not plan on acquiring in the next 8-10 years. B. At the County's request two years ago, BK Village agreed to demolish the building under the expectation that there was minimal asbestos. C. Prior to securing a permit for demolition, an additional environmental study was performed, and extensive friable asbestos was discovered. This extended the timeframe to demolish the building significantly as all the asbestos will need to be removed by hand first. Then demolition will follow. D. The extensive asbestos in the building increased the demolition costs fivefold and added 6 to 8 months of time to the demolition process. E. BK Partners was unaware of the extensive environmental contamination of the building prior to this discovery. F. Apparently, the County government knew of the contamination but did not disclose this information to us. 10. The Board of Education Building has nothing to do with the schedule of Phase 1, nor does it impact the construction of affordable housing. It is the County government who is trying to leverage the construction of affordable housing to force us to cover the cost of the environmental clean-up of the Board of Education building in exchange for them to support affordable housing on Brooklyn Village Phase 1. We are surprised and disappointed by their approach. However, this is a complicated issue which will need to be addressed at some point. 11. The County wants BK Partners to pay for and perform an environmental clean-up of a building we do not own. They are trying to shift the cost of extensive clean up to BKV Partners. 12. BK Partners does not understand the urgency of the Board of Education building demolition as our original development agreement contemplated it being demolished before we started on Phase 2, which is 6-8 years away. 13. BK Partners has asked the County to allow us to proceed with the affordable housing buildings now and separately work out the issues involving the environmental clean-up. 14. If the County is genuinely committed to providing more affordable housing, it will approve our request. Otherwise, we will wait until market conditions improve in Charlotte and then proceed with our original plan. 15. BK Partners plans to meet with the county in the coming weeks to try and reach a resolution to move forward with the affordable housing. 16. There have been several reports of how we have delayed the project. Here are the facts: A. The Development Agreement was approved by the county Commission October 2016. B. The County did not control all of the land in Phase 1 because the City had rights to recover a portion of the land in Phase 1. C. The County and City did not reach an agreement on the land until 2021. D. BK Partners acquired the land under Phase 1 for $10 million in 2023. E. BK Partners immediately commenced demolition and site work on the property as required in the agreement with the County.
