logo
Solving the cyber talent gap: Three lessons from Ireland

Solving the cyber talent gap: Three lessons from Ireland

Fast Company18-07-2025
The cybersecurity industry has been plagued by a global talent shortage for years, with companies struggling to fill millions of open positions. While public and private sector initiatives like early career training and skills-based hiring have aimed to boost the cybersecurity workforce, the U.S. still faces a gap of 17%, leaving critical systems vulnerable to costly attacks.
At the same time, we're seeing cyberattacks become more sophisticated in the AI era, as hackers turn to generative AI tools to quickly develop malware, improve phishing attacks, and create convincing deepfakes. Without a more concerted effort to fill the cybersecurity talent gap, companies stand to lose trillions of dollars from cybertheft, service disruptions, and recovery costs in the coming decade.
As the U.S. has struggled to meet the need with local workforces, Ireland has emerged as a bright spot for companies seeking dynamic cybersecurity talent. This is no accident. The Irish government has spent decades investing in homegrown cybersecurity expertise, and now boasts six of the world's 10 largest security software companies, including Cisco, McAfee, and Microsoft.
In my role at IDA Ireland, I've watched the industry grow significantly by prioritizing cross-industry collaboration, continuous education, and regional coordination. Here are three lessons leaders in the U.S. can learn from Ireland's success in developing a world-class cybersecurity talent pipeline:
LESSON #1: A RISING TIDE LIFTS ALL BOATS
Companies often compete for top talent, but in an industry like cybersecurity facing significant labor shortages, everyone benefits when the overall talent pool grows. When more people have the skills to be successful in an in-demand field, entire local economies flourish, creating new opportunities for both companies and employees.
To better align competing priorities within the Irish cybersecurity industry, the Irish government funded Cyber Ireland, a national organization representing over 200 companies and organizations across the sector. Members include both Irish startups and large multinational companies like Dell, Deloitte, and Proofpoint that have set up security operations in Ireland. The organization also includes educational institutions, training providers, research centers, government agencies, NGOs, and investors, representing the entire cybersecurity ecosystem.
Through Cyber Ireland, these entities have worked together to develop industry-aligned university curricula to ensure that Irish college graduates are well prepared for cybersecurity careers. These efforts have resulted in substantial growth in the Irish cybersecurity industry, now employing 8,000 people across more than 500 companies and generating €2.7 billion in 2024. The organization projects growth to 17,000 jobs by 2030—that's out of a national population of just 5 million people.
Though Cyber Ireland began with a focus on training university students, closing a skills gap requires lifelong learning. To reach non-traditional talent and mid-career professionals working in other fields, it's critical to build pathways for skill-building beyond college campuses.
Cyber Ireland has coordinated efforts across multiple universities to develop accredited online microcredential courses for working professionals. This allows more people to develop the right cybersecurity skills to get ahead without needing to commit to an expensive and time-consuming master's degree program.
Other companies with a presence in Ireland have taken this effort a step further by actively targeting talent from underrepresented groups. For example, HP partnered with a local industry body to launch a 'returnship' program for women who previously left the workforce, offering a 10-week cybersecurity bootcamp and work placement assistance. Similar initiatives aimed at recruiting military veterans and neurodiverse people for cybersecurity careers are underway.
Given the ever-increasing speed of technological advancement, it's not enough to focus solely on bringing college-age talent into the fold. Cybersecurity workforce development calls for educating talent at every career stage.
LESSON #3: NATIONAL VISION, REGIONAL ACTIVATION
One of the most important elements of Ireland's national cybersecurity strategy is building community on a regional level. Though the government has outlined a broad vision and provided funding to support the future of the cybersecurity industry in Ireland, execution is often best handled locally.
Cyber Ireland plays a key role in coordinating regional cybersecurity clusters, which run local meetups and activities in cities like Dublin, Cork, and Galway. The organization also brings regional leaders together for an annual conference to facilitate networking, collaboration, and knowledge sharing among members. Other initiatives designed to activate young people on a local level include Irish Capture the Flag competitions, a secondary school outreach initiative called Cyber Future, and a national cybersecurity career fair for college students.
THE BOTTOM LINE
Ireland's strategic focus on cross-industry collaboration, continuous education, and regional engagement has cultivated a thriving cybersecurity ecosystem. These lessons offer a valuable blueprint for other countries and regions seeking to address the global talent shortage and secure their digital futures. This strategy has helped a small nation punch above its weight in a critical industry. If countries with much larger populations follow suit, we all stand to benefit from stronger cyber defenses and growing local economies.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Leaked ChatGPT Conversations Show People Asking the Bot to Do Some Dirty Work
Leaked ChatGPT Conversations Show People Asking the Bot to Do Some Dirty Work

Gizmodo

timea minute ago

  • Gizmodo

Leaked ChatGPT Conversations Show People Asking the Bot to Do Some Dirty Work

This should go without saying, but ChatGPT is not a confidant. That has not stopped people from asking the chatbot deeply personal questions, giving it problematic prompts, and trying to outsource incredibly unethical business practices to it—some of which have been made public thanks to some poor design that resulted in chats being made indexed and searchable by search engines. Digital Digging, a Substack run by investigator Henk van Ess, reported last week that the 'Share' function in ChatGPT, designed to allow people to share part of a conversation with others, created a public page for the chat rather than a private one that is only accessible by those who receive the link. As a result, those public-facing pages got archived by search engines, making those conversations accessible to anyone who finds their way to the link. Obviously, many of those conversations should be private. OpenAI has since removed the ability to make chats publicly accessible (the company's Chief Information Security Officer, Dane Stuckey, said on Twitter that it was a 'short-lived experiment to help people discover useful conversations') and started to get the indexed results removed from search engines. But they are out there—including plenty that have been saved by the near-encyclopedic And they do not show the best that humanity has to offer. In one particularly jarring case that Digital Digging highlighted, an Italian user told the chatbot, 'I am the lawyer for a multinational group active in the energy sector that intends to displace a small Amazonian indigenous community from their territories in order to build a dam and a hydroelectric plant.' The user told the chatbot the indigenous people 'don't know the monetary value of land and have no idea how the market works' and asked 'How can we get the lowest possible price in negotiations with these indigenous people?' That's the type of transparently evil behavior you usually don't get without months' worth of discovery and lots of lawyer fees. One chat showed a person who identified themselves as working at an international think tank and proceeded to use ChatGPT to work through scenarios in which the United States government collapses, seeking preparedness strategies just in case. (Frankly, not a bad idea.) Another showed a lawyer, who was made to take over a coworker's case after a sudden accident, request that ChatGPT formulate their defense for them, before realizing they were representing the other side of the litigation. In many of these cases, the people offered identifiable information in the chats, from names to sensitive financial data. And while it's at least a little amusing if not at least a bit concerning that ostensible experts and professionals are tasking AI with doing their job, there is a much more troubling reality in some of these chats. Digital Digging found examples of domestic violence victims working through plans to escape their situation. Another chat revealed an Arabic-speaking user asking for help in crafting a critique of the Egyptian government, leaving them vulnerable to potential persecution by an authoritarian government that has jailed and killed dissidents in the past. The whole situation is a bit reminiscent of when voice assistants were new and it was revealed that recordings of people's conversations were being used to train voice recognition and transcription products. The difference is that chats feel more intimate and allow people to be much more verbose than short back-and-forths with Siri, leading them to reveal much more information about themselves and their situation—especially when they never expected anyone else to read it.

AI is already impacting the labor market, starting with young tech workers, Goldman economist says
AI is already impacting the labor market, starting with young tech workers, Goldman economist says

CNBC

time2 minutes ago

  • CNBC

AI is already impacting the labor market, starting with young tech workers, Goldman economist says

Changes to the American labor market brought on by the arrival of generative AI are already showing up in employment data, according to a Goldman Sachs economist. Most companies have yet to deploy artificial intelligence in production cases, meaning that the overall job market hasn't yet been significantly impacted by AI, said Joseph Briggs, senior global economist of Goldman's research division, in a podcast episode shared first with CNBC. But there are already signs of a hiring pullback in the technology sector, hitting younger employees there the hardest, Briggs said. "If you look at the tech sector's employment trends, they've been basically growing as a share of overall employment in a remarkably linear manner for the last 20 years," Briggs said on the episode of "Goldman Sachs Exchanges" to be aired Tuesday. "Over the last three years, we've actually seen a pullback in tech hiring that has led it to undershoot its trend." Since its November 2022 release, OpenAI's ChatGPT has fueled the rise of the world's most valuable company, Nvidia, and forced entire industries to contend with its implications. Generative AI models are quickly becoming adept at handling many routine tasks, and some experts say they are already on par with human software engineers, for instance. That has sparked concerns that while automation will make companies more productive and enrich shareholders, swaths of the job market could be impacted in the coming years. Technology executives have recently become more candid about the impact of AI on employees. Companies including Alphabet and Microsoft have said AI is producing roughly 30% of the code on some projects, and Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff said in June that AI handles as much as 50% of the work at his company. Young tech workers, whose jobs are the easiest to automate, are the first concrete signs of displacement, according to Briggs. Unemployment rates among tech workers between 20 and 30 years old jumped by 3 percentage points since the start of this year, he said. Briggs recently co-authored a report titled "Quantifying the Risks of AI-Related Job Displacement" that cites labor market data from IPUMS and Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research. "This is a much larger increase than we've seen in the tech sector more broadly [and] a larger increase than we've seen for other young workers," he said. The approach from technology CEOs has been to hold off on hiring of junior employees as they begin to deploy AI, said George Lee, the former technology banker who co-heads the Goldman Sachs Global Institute. "How do I begin to streamline my enterprise so I can be more flexible and more adaptive... yet without harming our competitive edge?" Lee said in the podcast episode. "Young employees for this period of time are a little bit the casualty of that." Over time, roughly 6% to 7% of all workers could lose their jobs because of automation from AI in a baseline scenario, according to Briggs. The transition could be more painful, both to workers and the broader U.S. economy, if adoption among companies happens faster than the roughly decade-long period he assumes, Briggs said. That could either be because of advances in the technology or an economic slowdown that encourages companies to cut costs, he said. If AI researchers achieve AGI, or artificial general intelligence that equals a person's ability to learn and adapt across domains, instead of being narrowly deployed, the impact on workers would probably be deeper. "Our analysis doesn't factor in the potential for the emergence of AGI," Briggs said. "It's hard to even start thinking about the impact on the labor market, but I would guess there probably and undoubtedly is more room for labor substitution and a more disruptive impact in that world."

What Do Companies Look For In Cloud Services? It's All About Cost
What Do Companies Look For In Cloud Services? It's All About Cost

Forbes

time15 minutes ago

  • Forbes

What Do Companies Look For In Cloud Services? It's All About Cost

Even though cloud solutions promise to help companies innovate more quickly and adopt new strategies, executives ranked innovation and revenue growth as only their fourth most important goals (tie) when migrating to the cloud. Getty Creative By Tom Barkley When companies decide to take their data and apps to the cloud, one goal stands out among the others. Optimizing cost is the No. 1 priority for executives looking to undertake a cloud migration, according to the inaugural Forbes Research Enterprise Technology Purchasing Survey , which was released earlier this year. 'Cost is not just a metric — it's a lens through which every cloud decision is viewed,' says Mayank Bhargava, vice president of consulting services at CGI, which helps companies with cloud transformations. 'Successful organizations treat cost as a continuous design principle, not a one-time negotiation.' With cloud solutions promising to help companies innovate more quickly and adopt new strategies, it may come as a surprise that innovation and revenue growth were cited by only 9% of executives — appearing at the bottom of the same list. Forbes Research Enterprise Technology Purchasing Survey Ahead, explore additional findings from the October-November survey, which polled 1,000 business leaders involved in technology decisions about their demands and opinions of cloud vendors. Looking For Value In The Cloud When shopping for cloud solutions, companies want to ensure they can keep data and storage demand under control, especially with AI requiring heavy amounts of compute. Eighty-six percent of executives said cost-effectiveness is an important factor when considering which cloud solution to acquire. Getting their money's worth was considered more important than other goal choices: getting post-sales support, contract flexibility, scalability and vendor trustworthiness, among them. 'Buyers want assurance that every dollar spent yields business value,' says Bhargava. While executives put vendor reputation further down the list of priorities when shopping for cloud services, that doesn't mean sellers should be complacent. When asked what they liked about their cloud service, executives ranked vendor support last, with just over half expressing satisfaction. This suggests an opportunity for cloud providers that can take steps to differentiate in this area. Forbes Research Enterprise Technology Purchasing Survey Tom Barkley is an editor in the Content & Design Studio at Forbes. The studio is a multidisciplinary team that works on variety of content, event and marketing products.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store