The EU is doing itself no trade favours in pushing China on Russia
China-European Union summit , set to take place in Beijing on July 24, the 27-nation bloc seems determined to adopt a firm stance in its relationship with the world's second-largest economy. While accusing China of aiding Russia's war efforts in Ukraine, the EU also seeks what it sees as fairer economic relations. But can the growing pressure influence Beijing's position on Moscow and the Ukraine conflict?
In a recent speech, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said Brussels 'cannot accept' that China is
'de facto enabling Russia's war economy' . She also said the EU's process of 'de-risking, not decoupling' from the world's second-largest economy must 'speed up'.
This comes just days after Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi
reportedly told top EU diplomat Kaja Kallas that Beijing did not want to see a Russian loss in Ukraine because it feared the United States would then shift its whole focus to Beijing. Von der Leyen's rhetoric suggests the EU has adopted an 'if you're not with us, you're against us' dichotomy in its approach towards China.
But even if Beijing does not wish for Russia to lose the war, it does not necessarily mean it is interested in Moscow accomplishing all of its goals in Ukraine. Similarly, American support for Kyiv does not automatically imply that Washington wants Ukraine to secure a complete victory over Russia. If the US really benefits from the war and China is, as widely seen, the conflict's
'big winner' , then what does either power have to gain from ending the stalemate?
More importantly, from Beijing's perspective, it would be highly problematic if a Russian victory resulted from US President Donald Trump's
betrayal of Kyiv, however unlikely that seems. There is no free lunch in politics and policymakers in Beijing are fully aware the US would expect the Kremlin to make concessions in exchange for any US abandonment of Ukraine. What if those concessions mean Russia's decoupling from China?
There has been growing concern among Russian analysts that Trump aims to sow discord between Moscow and Beijing, eventually using Russia as an instrument against China. But given that Trump, increasingly annoyed with Russian President Vladimir Putin, now says Washington
must continue to send weapons to Ukraine and is
threatening to to impose tariffs on any country doing business with Russia, the chances of Moscow and Washington normalising relations any time soon are rather low. Thus, the scenario of Russia being used by the Americans against China is not on the horizon.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
4 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US farm agency fires 70 foreign researchers after national security review
The US Department of Agriculture said it has fired 70 foreign contract researchers after a national security review intended to secure the US food supply from adversaries including China, Russia, North Korea and Iran. Advertisement 'USDA has completed a thorough review of individuals authorised to work on contracts with the department and identified around 70 individuals from countries of concern,' a spokesperson said. 'The individuals working on these contracts from countries of concern will no longer be able to work on USDA projects.' US Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins on July 8 had announced a farm security plan that included efforts to bar purchases of US farmland by nationals of the four countries, and to terminate any existing research agreements with them. Rollins said the moves were necessary to secure the US food supply. Agriculture Secretary Brooke Rollins on July 8 announced a farm security plan that included efforts to bar purchases of US farmland by nationals of China, Russia, North Korea and Iran. Photo: Reuters The contractors had worked at the Agricultural Research Service, the in-house research arm of the USDA, said Thomas Henderson, president of the American Federation of Government Employees Local 1657, which represents ARS workers in Albany, California. Advertisement Most of those dismissed were Chinese postdoctoral researchers on two-year contracts with the agency, and who were already subject to vetting before being hired, Henderson said.
South China Morning Post
5 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Chinese investors likely to keep USMCA benefits despite China-US rivalry: Mexican envoy
Chinese-funded factories in Mexico are 'very unlikely' to be excluded from preferential treatment under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) despite the free trade deal being up for review next year, a Mexican envoy said on Thursday. 'There is no indication that there are going to be restrictions targeting Chinese companies,' David Trujillo, deputy commercial counsellor at the Mexican Embassy in China, told the Post on the sidelines of the China International Supply Chain Expo. Tariffs imposed during US President Donald Trump's first term prompted many Chinese companies to relocate, with Mexico becoming a popular destination for overseas investment. The USMCA allows imports from the country to enter the US market tax-free as long as a certain share of the goods is produced in North America. But with US-China trade tensions escalating since Trump's return to office, questions have arisen over whether Chinese firms in Mexico will retain these benefits – especially as Washington's recent tariffs on steel and aluminium imports have already been seen as undermining the free trade agreement. Beijing has also warned other countries against reaching trade deals with the US that come at China's expense. However, Trujillo said revisions to the USMCA would likely focus on tightening rules-of-origin requirements – meaning companies would need to make more of their product locally to qualify – rather than introducing restrictions on specific countries. 'For key industries like the automotive industry, the requirement is now 75 per cent,' he added. 'It might be higher.'
South China Morning Post
6 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
Will supply chain troubles delay the debut of America's F-47 fighter jet?
The American sixth-generation fighter jet programme is expected to face development delays stemming from supply chain challenges, according to government documents and media, as the US-China rivalry over advanced aircraft grows. Advertisement Military news site Breaking Defence reported on Thursday that the engine system for the F-47 sixth-generation fighter jet was likely to face a two-year delay and would not be completed before 2030. Citing 2026 budget documents released in June, it said development of the engines was expected to be completed in early 2030. The original timeline estimated it would be finished in the second half of 2027. A US Air Force spokesperson told Breaking Defence that 'the updated schedule in the budget documents reflects supply chain challenges encountered by the programme'. The US Air Force is developing the F-47 under the Next Generation Air Dominance (NGAD) programme, while its initiative to develop engines for sixth-generation fighters is called the Next Generation Adaptive Propulsion (NGAP) programme. Advertisement
