ANCWL in Eastern Cape says justice system enabled Omotoso to disregard the law
The televangelist who was recently cleared of several rape and human trafficking charges, now faces immigration-related charges for being in South Africa illegally.
The league's deputy provincial secretary, Nomakhosazana Nongqayi, said, 'We are here to enforce and appeal to the law that Omotoso must leave South Africa because he is one of the perpetrators of gender-based violence [in the] country.'
Unhappy with the proceedings being heard in camera, Nongqayi said the justice system is failing women.
'By the look of things, our justice system is failing us and again, even today [Tuesday], no one is inside the proceedings of the court, why? Why is it an in-committee thing?'
ALSO READ: NPA to appeal Omotoso acquittal
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
12 hours ago
- The South African
AKA & Tibz murder trial dates revealed amid courtroom drama
Trial dates have been issued in the murder case of Kiernan Jarryd Forbes (AKA) and Tebello Motsoane (Tibz). The five men arrested in connection with the murders appeared in the Durban High Court on Wednesday, 13 August. Award-winning musician AKA and his friend, celebrity chef Tibz, were shot and killed outside a restaurant on Durban's Florida Road in 2023. KwaZulu-Natal National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) spokesperson Natasha Ramkisson-Kara said the matter was postponed to allow the parties to address outstanding pre-trial issues. A trial judge must still be appointed. 'The trial dates are 20 July to 21 August 2026, and 5 October to 6 November 2026,' said Ramkisson-Kara. Proceedings saw some drama earlier in the day when Judge Jacqueline Henriques reprimanded both the state and defence for the slow pace of the pre-trial process. As a result, the case was not certified as trial-ready. Henriques also called out the state for failing to share documents with the defence, including witness statements. Defence counsel Advocate Simphiwe Mlotshwa also indicated he was considering an application to compel the state to disclose witness statements. According to TimesLIVE , the state is expected to call 45 witnesses. The case was postponed to 19 June 2026. The accused – Lindokuhle Thabani Mkhwanazi, Lindani Zenzele Ndimande, Siyanda Eddie Myeza, Mziwethemba Harvey Gwabeni, and Lindokuhle Lindo Ndimande – are aged between 21 and 36. Two other accused remain in custody in Eswatini. They face multiple charges, including conspiracy to commit murder, two counts of murder, attempted murder, and firearm- and ammunition-related offences. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 11. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news
The Citizen
15 hours ago
- The Citizen
Joshlin Smith case: NPA ready to fight appeals in SCA if necessary after latest verdict
The judge also granted key witness Laurentia Lombaard indemnity from prosecution. The National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) said it will oppose any further appeals by the three convicted people in the Joshlin Smith case should they take their case to the Supreme Court of Appeal (SCA). On Wednesday afternoon, the Western Cape High Court in Cape Town delivered its judgment on the leave to appeal applications after hearing submissions from both the state and the defence. Joshlin's mother, Racquel 'Kelly' Smith, together with Jacquen 'Boeta' Appollis and Van Rhyn, had sought to appeal their convictions and sentences. The trio had been sentenced to life imprisonment for human trafficking, along with an additional 10 years for kidnapping, in connection with Joshlin's disappearance. The young girl went missing from her family's home in Saldanha Bay on 19 February 2024. It is alleged that the child was sold for R20 000. Appeal judgment in Joshlin Smith case Judge Nathan Erasmus dismissed the appeal, finding no reasonable prospect of success. 'There is no compelling reason why the appeal should be granted. 'It is rather pegged on whether there is a reasonable prospect of success,' the judge said. He explained that the court had made factual findings, drawn inferences from circumstantial evidence, and had the advantage of observing witnesses directly, which informed credibility assessments. 'It is clear that it can never be said that a sentence of life imprisonment, in particular on count one, on the human trafficking of a child, where life imprisonment is imposed, where persons have shown no remorse, would be shockingly inappropriate. 'We for that reason leave on the sentence should be refused,' Erasmus remarked. ALSO READ: 'Don't twist facts' – Tense proceedings as Joshlin Smith case judge accused of threats, collusion In addition, the judge granted key witness Laurentia Lombaard indemnity from prosecution. Lombaard, initially an accused in the case, later became a Section 204 witness, providing crucial testimony that helped secure the convictions against Smith, Appollis and Van Rhyn. Erasmus emphasised that he could not ignore the witness's personal circumstances such as her drug addiction, as well as the fact that she had no previous convictions. Therefore, her reluctance to be truthful from the outset should not, the judge said, 'carry that much weight'. He further stated that although Lombaard was aware arrangements had been made to sell Joshlin and she remained silent, this was not an offence. 'Over and above that, you played no active role in either the trafficking and kidnapping of Joshlin Smith.' NPA reacts Speaking to the media outside the court, Western Cape NPA spokesperson Eric Ntabazalila said the state was satisfied with the outcome of the proceedings. Ntabazalila indicated that the state had not yet been told whether the defence intended to appeal the latest judgment. 'We will go to the SCA and still oppose their decision to appeal. We believe there is no other court that can come to a different conclusion than what this court has taken. 'So even if they go to the SCA, we will go there and argue the same,' he said on Wednesday. He also confirmed that key witness Laurentia Lombaard remained under witness protection. 'We cannot talk about that programme, but there will be a process which will unfold. 'In this case, she is not going to be prosecuted; she is indemnified. She has got immunity from prosecution, so she's free.' NOW READ: 'Where's Joshlin and what really happened to her?'
The Herald
17 hours ago
- The Herald
No bail for man accused of assaulting wife
In a strong message during Women's Month, a 56-year-old Gqeberha man charged with contravening a protection order after an alleged domestic violence incident in Parsons Hill, has been denied bail. National Prosecuting Authority regional spokesperson Luxolo Tyali said the man had been served on February 11 with a protection order prohibiting any form of abuse against his wife or their children. However, it is alleged that on July 19 he assaulted his wife. The man is not being named to protect the identities of his family. It is alleged that he entered the woman's bedroom, demanded her cellphone and, when she refused, pinned her down, choked her and threatened to kill her. She managed to alert the police and he was arrested. In her affidavit, the complainant said she feared for her life, citing previous alleged assaults in front of their teenage children. She claimed her husband became excessively violent when intoxicated. Prosecutor Asavela Dweba opposed bail in the Gqeberha magistrate's court, arguing that the accused posed a danger to the woman and their children, and he might attempt to intimidate her should he be released from custody. The court agreed, finding that the interests of justice outweighed his request for release. The man has a previous conviction for driving under the influence. Eastern Cape director of public prosecutions Barry Madolo said: 'The denial of bail in this matter sends a clear message that our courts take allegations of domestic violence seriously. 'Protection orders are not mere pieces of paper — they are legal instruments designed to save lives and any violation will be met with the full might of the law.' The case was postponed to October 7 for further investigation. The Herald
