logo
Cardio vs. Strength Training: Which Is Better for Shrinking Middle-Age Belly Fat?

Cardio vs. Strength Training: Which Is Better for Shrinking Middle-Age Belly Fat?

Yahoo19-07-2025
If you're battling a middle-aged belly bulge, you're certainly not alone. Belly fat becomes more common in men over 40, mainly due to hormonal shifts, such as reduced testosterone and a rise in insulin. On top of that, a slowing metabolism makes it easier for fat to accumulate in the abdomen, says Ben LaNeve, CPT, and personal training lead at Life Time Annapolis. To help you shed stubborn fat and reclaim your waistline, we spoke with fitness experts to optimize your workout routine and answer one critical question: What's more effective for melting belly fat—cardio or strength training?
'As we reach midlife…we lose muscle and our hormones change,' LaNeve tells Men's Journal. 'This means we burn fewer calories, even at rest, and it becomes easier to gain weight. To keep metabolism active, workouts should shift to include more strength training to maintain muscle, regular cardio for heart health, and a focus on staying consistent rather than just pushing harder.'
But which workout modality reigns supreme? We learned the pros and cons of each, and ultimately, which is the best option to tame, trim, and tighten your midsection.The Pros and Cons of Cardio
Running comes with a long list of benefits, from improved cardiovascular health to reduced body fat. But like any workout style, it has its drawbacks, too. Below, we break down the pros and cons of this cardio-first approach.
Pros
It Checks a Lot of Boxes
What does this mean, exactly?
'Cardio can touch on some basic strength principles (Hello, quads on the Stairmaster!) as well as general movement longevity (achieving the magical 10,000 step mark). So in short, cardio can provide some serious bang for your buck when there is some thought put into it,' explains Casey Lee, owner and certified personal trainer at Purposeful Strength, LLC.
It Boosts Calorie Expenditure
Engaging in regular cardio is a productive way to burn calories and melt fat.
'Aerobic exercise effectively reduces visceral belly fat (around the organs) by increasing calorie expenditure and improving insulin sensitivity,' explains LaNeve.
Caveats
It's Time-Consuming
'For long-term aerobic gains to happen, we want to start accumulating upwards [of] three hours of moderate intensity cardio,' Lee tells us. 'For some, finding three hours a week in total can be challenging. If you're trying to burn stubborn body fat, time in the gym needs to be a proactive factor.'The Pros and Cons of Strength Training
Unlike cardio, which primarily boosts heart health and burns calories, strength training focuses on building muscle and improving overall body composition. But it's not for everyone. Here, we break down the key benefits and potential drawbacks of this muscle-first approach.
Pros
It Delivers Results With Minimal Equipment
You heard that right! You don't necessarily need a pricey gym membership or at-home machines in order to get into shape.
'A vast majority of my clients utilize adjustable dumbbells and their body weight to achieve strength gains that can help reshape and recompose their bodies,' Lee says.
It Builds and Preserves Lean Muscle
If you want to fast-track muscle growth, strength training is the name of the game. (After all, muscle burns more calories than fat!)
'[This form of exercise] builds and maintains lean muscle mass, which elevates resting metabolic rate and counteracts age-related muscle loss,' LaNeve points out.
It Sets You Up for an All-Day Calorie Burn
Whether lifting weights or training with your body weight, performing strength exercises will set you up for an efficient, all-day calorie burn.
'[Strength training] builds muscle, boosts your metabolism, and helps balance out the hormones that start dropping as you get older—it doesn't burn as many calories on the spot, but it sets you up to burn more all day,' explains Kai Zimmer, lead trainer at Fred Fitness.
Caveats
It's Technical
One downside to strength training, according to Lee? It's 'technical.' In other words, you need to pay attention to your form and the weights you're working with.
'For cardio, you can walk for 60 minutes and check the boxes; however, strength has a few more rules for fat loss,' Lee explains. 'Progressively increasing reps and/or weights and monitoring rest intervals to promote muscle growth becomes a factor when you're trying to burn off those last few areas of stubborn fat.'Cardio vs. Strength Training: Which Is More Effective for Burning Belly Fat?
It's clear that cardio and strength training each promote fat loss in their own way. But when you're deciding which is more effective to focus on, experts agree there's a clear winner.
'Strength training is king when it comes to 'reshaping' your body,' Lee says. 'Cardio can make you look like a smaller version of yourself, so yes, your waistline will shrink. However, when it comes to changing the way your body looks—including a smaller waist—strength training builds the muscle that shapes your body.'
LaNeve advocates for strength training due to its many benefits: increased metabolic rate, sustained lean muscle, and healthy aging.
'When it comes to shrinking the waistline, all forms of strength training have value, but circuit-style resistance training and compound movements—whether using bodyweight, moderate weights, or heavy lifting—are especially effective,' LaNeve tells us. 'Circuit training combines strength and elevated heart rate for greater calorie burn, while heavy lifting builds lean muscle that boosts metabolism. Bodyweight strength is highly accessible and improves core stability. The key is consistency and progressive overload—challenging the muscles over time to stimulate fat loss and reshape the midsection.'
If time is tight and you only have 30 minutes to dedicate to your workout, Zimmer stresses 'intensity is everything.' Circuit-style strength training—which torches fat while building muscle—is key.
'It's like running the gauntlet: five compound moves back-to-back—think dumbbell squats, push-ups, rows, kettlebell swings, and mountain climbers—40 seconds on, 20 seconds off, for four total rounds,' Zimmer says. 'It's efficient, relentless, and insanely effective for carving out the waistline.'
But your routine shouldn't stop there. LaNeve and Lee point out the importance of following a nutritious diet and certain healthy lifestyle habits.
'Exercise alone isn't enough—habits like sleep, stress management, and diet strongly influence whether cardio or strength training actually leads to fat loss,' LaNeve explains. 'Poor sleep and high stress raise cortisol, a hormone linked to belly fat storage. A diet high in protein and whole foods fuels workouts and supports recovery. Without these foundations, even the best training plan can fall short of waistline results.'Cardio vs. Strength Training: Which Is Better for Shrinking Middle-Age Belly Fat? first appeared on Men's Journal on Jul 18, 2025
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Your Pet's Topical Flea Treatments Harm Wildlife
Your Pet's Topical Flea Treatments Harm Wildlife

Forbes

time31 minutes ago

  • Forbes

Your Pet's Topical Flea Treatments Harm Wildlife

If you have any itchy dog or cat, you may reach for familiar topical flea treatments like Frontline, Advantage, or PetArmor. These products promise pets fast, easy protection from fleas and ticks. Unfortunately, this convenience comes at a hidden environmental cost. Two pesticides, fipronil and imidacloprid, are typically the active ingredients in topical treatments. These same compounds were banned from agricultural use in parts of Europe and California because they are so harmful to bees and other pollinators. Yet we're still smearing these pesticides on our pets, and they are showing up in rivers and streams across the country. Flea-Killing Chemicals End Up In Waterways Topical flea treatments are designed to stay on a pet's skin and fur, but that also means they can easily wash off into household drains or outdoor water bodies. Earlier this year, a study from the University of Sussex found that dogs can continue shedding fipronil into the environment for up to 28 days after a single treatment. They further found that a single treated dog swimming in a small pond raised pesticide concentrations above safety thresholds. Pet swimming isn't the only concern. In fact, the primary route of contamination appears to be everyday activities like washing hands after applying the product, bathing pets, and laundering pet bedding. These actions send pesticide-laced water into treatment plants that are not designed to remove such compounds. One study from the California Environmental Protection Agency found fipronil in wash water from dogs treated weeks earlier. Regardless of their filtration technology, conventional wastewater treatment facilities allow these chemicals to pass through, discharging them directly into rivers, bays, and oceans. Wildlife Is Paying the Price For Pets' Fleas Fipronil and imidacloprid are extremely toxic to aquatic invertebrates. In some cases, exposure to even tiny amounts can kill freshwater shrimp and insect larvae or impair their ability to survive and reproduce. A study by the San Francisco Estuary Institute (SFEI) found fipronil in all tested sewage treatment plants at concentrations above the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's recommended limit for aquatic ecosystems. Imidacloprid was also found at levels between 84 and 305 parts per trillion, well above the limit of 10 parts per trillion. Water and sediment samples from San Francisco Bay show pesticide levels near or above toxicity thresholds for invertebrates. According to Dr. Rebecca Sutton of SFEI, 'that's the base of our food web. So, if those critters experience impacts, it could go up and harm our fish and our wildlife.' The contamination doesn't stop with water. Another study led by the University of Sussex found fipronil in every single bird nest examined. Imidacloprid and permethrin were found in 89 percent. Birds often use pet fur to line their nests, exposing their eggs and chicks to these neurotoxins. The researchers linked this exposure to lower hatching success and higher chick mortality rates. Safer Flea Solutions Are Already Available Veterinarians increasingly recommend oral flea and tick medications, which are safer for the environment. These treatments are metabolized internally, meaning there is no pesticide residue left on pet fur to wash off into water systems. Some options include: If you must use topicals, avoid unnecessary treatments and consider seasonal use instead of year-round application. You can ask your vet about the monthly topical Revolution or the quarterly topical Bravecto. You should also keep treated pets out of natural water sources for at least 28 days after topical application. To reduce the risk of fleas in the first place, you can vacuum your home and your pet's bedding often (and empty the bag). See more tips for pet owners and veterinarians about chewable flea and tick medications from San Francisco Bay Area wastewater agencies. Flea Treatment Market Is Ripe For Innovation Though safer options exist, companies should innovate to find more solutions that protect our pets without polluting the planet. The flea and tick treatment market is valued at 9.7 billion dollars globally in 2024 and is projected to grow to 14.8 billion by 2034. For companies willing to act, this presents a strategic advantage. Brands that lead on safety, sustainability, and transparency will be well positioned as consumer awareness catches up with the science. The health of our pets and the health of our planet are linked, and both deserve better.

Modern Flu Vaccines Provide Equal Protection for US Seniors
Modern Flu Vaccines Provide Equal Protection for US Seniors

Medscape

timean hour ago

  • Medscape

Modern Flu Vaccines Provide Equal Protection for US Seniors

TOPLINE: During the 2022-2023 influenza season, an adjuvanted quadrivalent influenza vaccine (aQIV) and high-dose (HD) QIV showed comparable effectiveness at preventing test-confirmed influenza among US adults aged 65 years or older across all hospital settings. METHODOLOGY: Researchers conducted a retrospective study using the test-negative design to evaluate the effectiveness of the aQIV vs HD-QIV in preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza among US adults aged 65 years or older during the 2022-2023 influenza season. They analyzed data of 30,911 patients (mean age, 76.7 years) from a linked administrative claims database who had an acute respiratory or febrile illness, were tested for influenza within 7 days of diagnosis, and received either aQIV or HD-QIV. Patients who tested positive for influenza (n = 2361) were classified as cases, whereas those who tested negative (n = 28,550) were considered control individuals. The analysis was adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates, including insurance type, frailty index, healthcare utilization, comorbidities, and medical conditions associated with an increased risk for influenza complications. TAKEAWAY: Overall, 31.8% and 68.2% received the aQIV and HD-QIV, respectively, with comparable rates of test-positive influenza between groups during the observation period (7.2% and 7.9%, respectively). The relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of aQIV vs HD-QIV showed no significant difference across all settings (adjusted rVE, -2.5%; P = .631) and emergency department/inpatient settings (adjusted rVE, 0.0%; 95% CI, -15.9% to 13.7%). During the peak season (6 November to 24 December 2022), 13.6% of aQIV and 14.4% of HD-QIV recipients tested positive for influenza, and the rVE in the sensitivity analysis was consistent with that in the main analysis. IN PRACTICE: 'These findings align with current recommendations by ACIP [Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices] and other NITAGs [National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups] that support the use of adjuvanted and high-dose influenza vaccines in this age group,' the authors wrote. SOURCE: This study was led by Mahrukh Imran, CSL Seqirus, Kirkland, Quebec, Canada. It was published online on July 11, 2025, in International Journal of Infectious Diseases. LIMITATIONS: The observational study design introduced potential biases due to variability in the use of healthcare resources and heterogeneity inherent in the US healthcare system, which could not be fully accounted for. Vaccination was not randomized, and unmeasured confounding factors might have influenced the results. The limited sample size and data privacy constraints prevented a more detailed geographic analysis. Moreover, influenza testing was performed as part of routine care than according to preset screening criteria. DISCLOSURES: This study was supported by CSL Seqirus. Three authors reported being employees of CSL Seqirus and holding stock in CSL Limited. Three other authors reported being employees of Optum, which received funding from CSL Seqirus to support this work. One author reported receiving direct financial support from the study funders. This article was created using several editorial tools, including AI, as part of the process. Human editors reviewed this content before publication.

Functional medicine expert Jeff Bland's daily routine: tartary buckwheat, intermittent fasting and 6am starts
Functional medicine expert Jeff Bland's daily routine: tartary buckwheat, intermittent fasting and 6am starts

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Functional medicine expert Jeff Bland's daily routine: tartary buckwheat, intermittent fasting and 6am starts

I've spent a lifetime figuring out the formula, and yes, it changes with age. These days, I start early. I'm up around 6am. That way I can catch up with people on the East Coast, where it's already 9am, and I get a head start. I'm fortunate enough to live with my personal fitness trainer — our dog, Bucky. He needs his morning outing, so we go out together for a fast-paced walk-run, around two or three miles. I'm usually back at my desk around 8am, and I follow a time-restricted eating pattern. I don't eat a traditional breakfast. My first meal is generally around 11 or 12, and my last will be 7pm. That's roughly a 16:8 fasting cycle — 16 hours of fasting, eight hours of eating time. I wouldn't necessarily recommend it for younger people or those building muscle, but for people in my age group, it reduces the metabolic load on the body. The key is eating nutrient-dense foods — staying away from processed items, high-fat and high-sugar foods, and obviously avoiding sweetened beverages. I'm a big believer in drinking water throughout the day and always keep a large container at my desk. Six to eight glasses a day is the goal. In the US we're lucky to have access to tartary buckwheat — a crop we've worked on that's over 3,500 years old and naturally high in polyphenols. These compounds are powerful for the immune system. I'm not a chef, but I do a bit of weekend cooking, making flatbreads and crisps with tartary buckwheat flour. I believe eating for our immune systems is really important. It's not just about vitamins or minerals — immune-active foods help repair and regenerate the body. The colour of food is a great guide. Natural colours — orange, red, blue, purple — come from flavonoids, which are very powerful nutrients. Dinner, for me, is a celebratory meal — time for community, relaxation, storytelling. I try to eat slowly, joyfully, never in haste. That improves digestion, nutrient absorption and makes the whole process more enjoyable. I finish eating by 7 or 8pm and get to bed by 11. That gap gives my body time to digest before rest. It's crucial to have a wind-down period. I avoid technical reading in the evening — no science journals. That's my time for fiction. I love nature writing, and one of my favourite authors is Wade Davis, a National Geographic fellow. He writes about wild places and far-flung cultures. It takes me somewhere else before sleep. I aim for seven to eight hours of good-quality sleep each night. It's not just time in bed — it's the quality that matters. Our circadian rhythms shift with age, and sleep becomes something you have to practise. There's even a system in the brain called the glymphatics that cleans up accumulated waste during REM sleep. So I try to give my mind time to slow down before bed, with reading or quiet music. I use a couple of wearable devices —whoo/shopping/esbest/gadgets-tech/fitness/ and an Apple Watch — to track my sleep, heart rate variability, body temperature and steps. It's like having a personal coach. The data keeps me on track. I don't meditate in the traditional sense, but I've trained myself to fall into short meditative states throughout the day, especially on flights. I've travelled over six million miles and I can slip into meditation before take-off and come out of it after we're airborne. I do take supplements. A high-potency multivitamin, omega-3 cod liver oil and a polyphenol blend from tartary buckwheat. Life is a privilege. It's a joyful opportunity. We should each day see an opportunity to do something that expresses our full joy of being present on this planet.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store