Motherhood at 50 Wasn't the Plan—It Was Better.
Having a baby as a 50 year old woman wasn't a life experience I ever thought was in the cards. I'd never allowed myself any sort of fantasy about having a child or a partner. For most of my life, my work as a freelance photographer has been my sole focus. I was raised to support myself, to get things done and, through that, find success.
I was concerned that I wouldn't be able to have a baby and support myself, and so I approached the idea of family pragmatically and simply let it go. Expending energy on imagining a life I didn't even think I wanted felt like squandering time I didn't have to waste. And so, yes, while I dated a bit in my 20s and 30s, I also spent periods of time single. My biggest focus was work, and my career, and I chose that over fantasizing about motherhood.
But then, in life's unpredictable way, things changed. It wasn't so much that I wanted a baby; it was that at 40 I realized I didn't actually have the answers to my life. That it was arrogant and ridiculous to think that I knew exactly what the future would look like, and that I might change my mind one day and want a baby.
And although I felt this way, I was avoidant. It took my best friend to push me. I remember she said to me, "Get your eggs frozen right now." At first it seemed ridiculous. I knew 40 was late to freeze my eggs, and even my gynecologist—whom I've had since I was a teenager—laughed and said, "Danielle, you're not having a kid. You're too busy.' But she gave me the referral for the reproductive people anyway, and I went. And it floored me.
There with the doctor at my first appointment, where we were discussing the procedure, I was suddenly overcome with emotions and began to cry. Because it suddenly hit me that my body was saying to me, 'This thing that you've been so sure you didn't want, maybe you do.' The reality of seeing this doctor made me very concerned that I had made a choice for myself that was irreversible. Maybe I was too late even then to decide for my future, and I would be relegated to the choices of a 40-year-old. I had never second-guessed myself in my 20s and 30s, but here I was at 40 doing just that. I still get emotional thinking about that day.
But even then I couldn't fathom the idea of an actual child. I wasn't looking for a sperm donor. Freezing my eggs was about giving myself the choice, albeit at a large cost financially—$15,000 to be precise, without taking into account annual storage—and emotionally.
As with so much in my life, I went back to working at full throttle, traveling and socializing, as soon as it was done. And then out of the blue, a year later I met Harry, the man who would become my husband.
This is not, however, the point in the story where we both realized the one thing missing from our lives was a child. We fell for each other hard, but he's a lot younger than me and wasn't ready for kids, so it wasn't even a conversation. What we loved most about the life we were building together was how nomadic it was—we truly traveled the world constantly, something that didn't stop even after we got married in 2018.
One time, I think I raised the idea of children with him and said, 'You know, if we're serious, if you want to have a kid, we probably have to start because I'm old,' and in response (while he doesn't remember saying this to me) he was like, 'I don't want to have a kid until I'm like 39.' And I thought (but probably didn't say), 'Well, okay, then. By then I'll be so old, we're never having kids.' I just kind of chucked it away again—and it wasn't hard. I didn't have a great pull to have a baby.
But I guess these things creep up on you. Harry's family has lots of kids—he's one of four, he's a twin. His twin has four kids, his sister has three, his brother has two, and I started to think that maybe if we had kids I would be okay with the shift in my life. I wanted to make sure that I was ready to be everything that a potential child would need. I didn't want to still want to do things and think that being a parent was holding me back. It just took me a lot longer than most people to get there.
I was 49 when Harry and I decided to start . Did age ever come into it? Not for me. Age isn't why we started IVF. I didn't—and don't—feel old. Age 49 was simply the time at which I finally felt ready to become a mother. At the same time, because of my age, I couldn't get attached to the idea of it. My doctor even said to me that they wouldn't do the transfer at 50—it was now or never. If we were going to do it, we knew we didn't have much time. So we decided to go for it. If my doctor had said to me, 'No, we can't do this at your age,' we would have just abandoned the idea. I honestly believe I would have been okay with that too.
Saying that, while I'm usually an all-out-there kind of person, I was very private about the process once we'd decided to move ahead. It wasn't that I held any shame about it. I just didn't want others to make any judgments about me, whether that be my age, no longer being the life of the party, or sidelining me work wise—for nearly 50 years people had known me as a hard-working globetrotter, and my whole life was going to totally shift.
IVF is no easy ride. In our case, while I wasn't having to go through the egg-retrieval process, we still had to thaw my eggs, see how many survived, fertilize them, and then sync my cycle and prepare my body for implantation. It's a very physical process; you're shooting yourself with so many hormones every day and also trying not to get too excited while dealing with enormous hormonal fluctuations.
The first cycle we did didn't work, and I remember feeling as if I'd expended so much energy on something so unmonumental and unrewarding. It sounds stupid in a way, but in the fakery of what I thought was IVF I presumed that everyone gets pregnant—that I could will a baby into existence through the right doctor, through simply the implantation procedure itself. Of course it doesn't work like that—it's so much more than that, and I know that now. But at the time, when it failed, we just moved on. Now that I have the space, there is a part of me that feels sad that I didn't feel compelled to mourn or be sad. Although I also had such a full life that I knew we'd be okay either way.
But there was no doubt we wanted to proceed with a second transfer, which thankfully succeeded. We might have done a third, and maybe even a fourth, if it hadn't worked.
However, by the time I had the second implantation, I was also dealing with uterine fibroids—noncancerous tumors that develop in the muscular wall of the uterus, which can affect the successful implantation of embryos. Because of them, it took nearly two hours and three doctors to insert the embryo. So even though I was finally pregnant, it wasn't straightforward. It really was far from ideal medically, because I was a 50-year-old woman by this stage, and my doctors would have preferred me to have a perfect everything. But these were just the cards I was dealt. This was probably the first time I really started to feel my age—pregnancy is hard enough, without this kind of complication—and the whole way through the pregnancy I was being carefully monitored by multiple doctors and health care professionals.
As a result of all this, the doctors planned to deliver my daughter by vertical C-section—where they would cut me vertically to try and remove my daughter without disturbing the cysts (which were going to need to be removed safely in a second C-section once I'd healed from the birth). During the birth I lost two liters of blood. But birthing our daughter was a life-altering experience, and one that perhaps is even better coming to it at a more grown-up stage of life.
I have nothing to hide about becoming an . It's given me wisdom and patience and a presence with my child that I would not have had when I was younger. I have rethought what's important, how to live my life in a way that is more present, and I do my best to parent her without distractions.
Of course I still care about my career, of course I'd love an invite to the Met Gala, but I just feel so grounded with my daughter that I see my work and the perks of my job as a benefit, not the sole focus.
I'm 52 now, and my daughter is two, and I think so differently about my life now. For so long I wanted to be there at the center of the action—whether that was socially or workwise—but my center is now my family. I still have so much to achieve in my life, but I equally want so much for her. There's no perfect anything. I'm not the perfect everything, but today I'm a better person. I'm a more thoughtful person, and I'm a more patient person. I'm a more learned person as a 50-something-year-old. The inescapable reality is I'm also an older person, and I wish I were a bit younger only because I just want more time with her. But I wasn't going to be ready until I was ready; that is just the truth. And I regret nothing.
Originally Appeared on Glamour
More Parenting
Parents, you might be too emotionally invested in Bluey
Can a $200 Instagram class really make you a better mother?
Inside the (annoying?) rise of Cocomelon
How Fisher-Price's 'Purple Monkey' Mat Became a viral hit
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
SIGA to Host Business Update Call on August 5, 2025 Following Release of Second-Quarter 2025 Results
NEW YORK, July 29, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA) (Nasdaq: SIGA), a commercial-stage pharmaceutical company, today announced that management will host a webcast and conference call to provide a business update at 4:30 P.M. ET on Tuesday, August 5, 2025. Participating in the call will be Diem Nguyen, Chief Executive Officer, and Daniel Luckshire, Chief Financial Officer. A live webcast of the call will also be available on the Company's website at in the Investor Relations section of the site, or by clicking here. Please log in approximately 5-10 minutes prior to the scheduled start time. Participants may access the call by dialing 1-800-717-1738 for domestic callers or 1-646-307-1865 for international callers. A replay of the call will be available for two weeks by dialing 1-844-512-2921 for domestic callers or 1-412-317-6671 for international callers and using Conference ID: 1130215. The archived webcast will be available in the Investor Relations section of the Company's website. About SIGA SIGA is a commercial-stage pharmaceutical company and leader in global health focused on the development of innovative medicines to treat and prevent infectious diseases. With a primary focus on orthopoxviruses, we are dedicated to protecting humanity against the world's most severe infectious diseases, including those that occur naturally, accidentally, or intentionally. Through partnerships with governments and public health agencies, we work to build a healthier and safer world by providing essential countermeasures against these global health threats. Our flagship product, TPOXX® (tecovirimat), is an antiviral medicine approved in the U.S. and Canada for the treatment of smallpox and authorized in Europe, the UK, and Japan for the treatment of smallpox, mpox (monkeypox), cowpox, and vaccinia complications. For more information about SIGA, visit Contacts:Suzanne Harnettsharnett@ and Investors Media Jennifer Drew-Bear, Edison GroupJdrew-bear@ Holly Stevens, CG Lifehstevens@
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sarepta shares rebound after shipments of gene therapy Elevidys resume in US
(Reuters) -Sarepta Therapeutics shares surged more than 30% before the bell on Tuesday, as analysts said the resumption of U.S. shipments for its muscular gene therapy partially removes financial headwinds and decreases the risk of market withdrawal. The company said on Monday it would resume shipments of Elevidys — approved in the U.S. to treat a rare condition called Duchenne muscular dystrophy — to patients who can walk. U.S. shipments to patients who cannot walk independently are still halted, following the death of two teenage boys earlier this year. These incidents brought heightened regulatory scrutiny to Sarepta in recent weeks, while the pause of shipments raised concerns about the future of Elevidys — the company's largest revenue generator. Sarepta's announcement followed the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's recommendation that the voluntary hold on shipments be removed after a probe showed the death of an 8-year-old boy in Brazil was not related to Elevidys. Wall Street analysts said the resumption of shipments would allow Sarepta to fulfill its near-term payments to partner Arrowhead and maintain access to its debt facilities. "The FDA's recommendation and the resumption of commercial treatment in the U.S. virtually eliminate the risk of Elevidys being formally withdrawn from the market," said William Blair analyst Sami Corwin. While the decision allows some patients to regain access to the treatment, analysts warned that patients and doctors could show hesitancy in light of the recent hit to reputation. "It remains to be seen how the news headlines regarding the patient deaths will affect commercial interest in the near term," Corwin said. Sarepta's partner Roche had also stopped Elevidys shipments in certain countries outside the U.S. Shares of Sarepta surged 36% to $18.85 in premarket trading. They have fallen more than 80% since the first Elevidys-related death was reported in March. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


Forbes
5 hours ago
- Forbes
Sweeping Problems Under The Rug By The Feds Doesn't Make Them Go Away
A man walks his dog past a homeless man sleeping under a message painted on a boarded up shop in San ... More Francisco, California on April, 1, 2020, during the novel coronavirus outbreak. - The US death toll from the coronavirus pandemic topped 5,000 late on April 1, according to a running tally from Johns Hopkins University. (Photo by Josh Edelson / AFP) (Photo by JOSH EDELSON/AFP via Getty Images) For decades, every administration, every Congress, put many things off for someone else to deal with. No one can get everything done all the time, that's understandable. But many current economic and social programs aren't a result of juggling what might be possible. Instead, they have become the ultimate attempt to kick every can down the road. That doesn't solve problems. It only hides them and allows them to grow and fester. One of the current examples is homelessness. Here is a statement out of the presidential executive order, Ending Crime And Disorder On America's Streets: 'The overwhelming majority of these individuals are addicted to drugs, have a mental health condition, or both. Nearly two-thirds of homeless individuals report having regularly used hard drugs like methamphetamines, cocaine, or opioids in their lifetimes. An equally large share of homeless individuals reported suffering from mental health conditions.' Homelessness is a problem in many parts of the country. And, yes, people on the streets are often troubled in one way or another. However, the entire executive order is a rhetorical setup, claiming that 'nearly two-thirds' of the individuals reporting having used 'hard drugs like methamphetamines, cocaine, or opioids in their lifetimes.' No source for the statistic that is then delivered to deemphasize that any such use might have been long before. And then a statement that an 'equally large share of homeless individuals reported suffering from mental health conditions.' No source, again, and no explanation of what mental health conditions mean. Broadly defined enough, like any amount of depression, anxiety, discomfort, and so on, it could include everyone in the country. Next, a combination of claiming that spending by the federal government and states has run tens of billions on failed programs 'that address homelessness but not its root causes.' After claiming that homeless people leave 'other citizens vulnerable to public safety threats' comes the statement, 'Shifting homeless individuals into long-term institutional settings for humane treatment through the appropriate use of civil commitment will restore public order.' After stating that previous spending never looked at root causes, presuming that the administration knows the root causes, the proffered solution is to lock people away. The message is to ignore the problem and put it out of sight. The point isn't really for safety, because most dangerous behavior in the country doesn't come from homeless people. It's for comfort and to pretend everything is fine. This has economic and social implications. Institutionalize where? Privately owned prisons where someone makes a lot of money from incarcerations? Hospitals that have been financially struggling but will even more now that Medicaid has been so thoroughly cut? Similar issues come in arguments over diversity, equity, and inclusion, or DEI. The administration wants it purged not only from websites and government discussions, but from corporations, universities, and anywhere else the term might appear. Again, the communication expressed by action is to strike any mention of the topic anywhere, to bury it from consciousness as though that makes issues go away. It never does. Other parts of life are no different. Corporations want to promote the use of the most recent forms of artificial intelligence. Traditionally, the argument executives would use is not that technology was about enabling job cuts, but to free people up to do more useful and interesting work. That mask has finally begun to slip as CEOs and their corporations boast of shrinking their workforces. Ultimately, this will lead to fewer people being employed, greater degrees of consumer financial struggle, and economic weakness. But, again, that all gets brushed under the carpet. No society can long stand with such undermining. So long as problems are ignored, they likely grow worse until there comes a point that they demand more resources than are available.