
Why more Germans can't afford life on their wages – DW – 06/27/2025
Chancellor Friedrich Merz took to the Bundestag lectern this week to deliver — in his characteristically forthright manner — the government's position on what he called of the next major priorities for his government: His plans to reform the unemployment benefit, or Bürgergeld ("citizen's income").
He rang a familiar tune on the subject of work: Work, he argued, needs to be worth it. He wanted "to ensure that people in Germany as a whole can once again see that their efforts are paying off and that the principle of performance-related pay will once again be applied."
But his remark was somewhat undercut by a statistic that emerged a few days earlier: In 2024, some 826,000 working people were dependent on benefits, or Bürgergeld ("citizen's income") as it is called in Germany.
That represents an increase of around 30,000 since 2023 — the first time that the number of employed people receiving a top-up had increased since 2015.
That, perhaps not coincidentally, was also the year that Germany introduced its first basic minimum wage — at the time, over a million workers were still dependent on state benefits, a number that has steadily decreased since. These extra benefits cost the state nearly €7 billion ($8.1 billion) in 2024 — over a billion more than the €5.7 billion the state paid for such cases in 2022.
The government revealed the figures in response to a parliamentary question from Bundestag member Cem Ince of the socialist Left Party, who told DW: "It is unacceptable that hundreds of thousands of people are dependent on state aid despite being in work. This means we are supporting low wages and perpetuating the exploitation of labor."
Ince believes that these figures show that Germany's minimum wage is simply too low. Though it was raised substantially by the last government — to €12 at the start of 2023 — it has only risen minimally since then, to the current €12,82 per hour.
On Friday, the German minimum wage commission — which consists of representatives of employers' associations and trade unions — announced that the minimum wage would increase in two stages: To €13,90 on January 1, 2026, and then €14,60 a year later, falling short of the €15 the center-left Social Democrats (SPD) had been campaigning on.
Helena Steinhaus, founder of the campaign group Sanktionsfrei ("Sanction-Free"), which supports people living on benefits, says the small rises in recent years have not kept up with increases in rent and cost of living in the past couple of years. The average rent in Germany, for example, rose by 4.7% last year alone, and by as much as 8.5% in Berlin. "I'd say that's our answer as to why more people have to top up their earnings, because the minimum wage — even if you work full time — doesn't cover what it is supposed to cover."
But some economists argue that the minimum wage has little to do with the number of working people who need benefits. "You have to recognize that most of these people don't work full-time — most of them are in training or working part-time," said Holger Schäfer, senior economist for labor market economics at the German Economic Institute in Cologne (IW). "The minimum wage won't be any use there, because the reason that people can't earn a living from their income is not down to the low hourly wage, but the low number of hours."
The figures back this up: According to the latest figures from the Federal Employment Agency, of the 826,000 workers who receive benefits, only around 81,000 were working full-time.
But that is no excuse for paying low wages, according to Cem Ince: "The fact is: the current minimum wage is a poverty wage! Employers cannot talk their way out of this," he said. "The number of people receiving supplementary benefits depends to a large extent on low wages. One of my recent inquiries revealed that people earning the minimum wage for full-time work cannot afford adequate housing in half of Germany's major cities and are dependent on financial support."
In any case, as Steinhaus argued, the reason why many people only work part-time is simple: They have children or other dependents who need care, and many cities in Germany lack childcare infrastructure. The IW calculated last year that 306,000 children in Germany under the age of three don't have a kindergarten place — even though they are legally entitled to one.
A 2021 study by the Institute for Employment Research (IAB) found that the more children working people have, the more likely they are to need benefits. If the state invested more in childcare places, Cem Ince argued, "it would enable many people to escape the trap of part-time work."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Nevertheless, Schäfer argues that raising the minimum wage is not the answer, and could be counterproductive: "It could make the situation worse if companies restrict their demand for work because of the higher cost," he told DW.
Steinhaus is not convinced: "The employers' associations have made that argument for the last ten years, but in the last ten years that has not been proven true even once," said Steinhaus. "Of course, there are some companies that struggle when the minimum wage is raised, but a lot of companies profit from the fact that they can employ people cheaply."
Schäfer also believes that the recent rise in the number of people requiring a top-up is relatively small and that the overall downward trend since 2015 remains intact. Last year's rise, he said, probably had more to do with general economic conditions on the labor market than anything else.
Merz, meanwhile, is likely to stick to his plans to reform the unemployment benefit system in an attempt to get more people onto the labor market — even if then some of those workers need state help anyway.
"Unfortunately, Merz's arguments about work are the wrong way round," said Steinhaus. "When he says, 'work needs to be worth it,' he means that unemployment benefits should be reduced. But the minimum you need to live on is independent of what poor workers earn. They should earn more, no question. But simply reducing benefits is counterproductive, and it plays the poorest off against each other."While you're here: Every Tuesday, DW editors round up what is happening in German politics and society. You can sign up here for the weekly email newsletter, Berlin Briefing.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
16 minutes ago
- DW
German top politicians' cars exceed CO2 targets: study – DW – 08/19/2025
If EU emissions targets for the car industry were applied to top German politicians' official vehicles, the fleet would fail, according to a climate body's new study. DUH said it was "emblematic" of German carmakers. More than half of leading German politicians' work vehicles exceed EU targets for average CO2 emissions and the fleet as a whole would run over its carbon budget, a climate group said on Tuesday. The German non-profit environmental and consumer protection association DUH, known as Environmental Action Germany in English, found only modest improvement over 2024's figures in the 19th annual study of its kind. It drew parallels between the political community and Germany's car industry. "The sluggish progress toward environmentally sustainable official vehicles is emblematic of the entire auto sector, which is lagging behind massively in climate protection," DUH's executive director Barbara Metz said in a statement. "Instead of seriously pursuing the switch to futuristic electric power, the federal government is concentrating on pollutant petrol and diesel limousines." In total, DUH estimated that 151 of 238 cars it evaluated exceeded the EU's average emissions target for the car industry of 93.6 grams of CO2 per kilometer driven. That's 63% of the evaluated vehicles, compared to just under 74% a year ago. A green card was awarded to any vehicle at or below the target, a yellow card to any exceeding it by less than 20 grams per kilometer, and a red card for anything above that. Seven of the 11 federal government ministers included in the study used vehicles earning them a red card, compared to seven of nine in 2024. Seven ministries as a whole were given a green card for their fleets; two were yellow, and seven red. "With this, despite the continuing climate crisis, there was no sign of a consequential switch toward more efficient vehicles in the federal Cabinet, even after the change of government" earlier this year, DUH said on Tuesday. Environment ministries, at the state and federal level, did fare slightly better — with 12 of them being given top marks and only four receiving red cards. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The study was based on global figures seeking to calculate so-called "real world emissions," rather than industry numbers from standardized tests. It also sought to incorporate the environmental impact of electric vehicles by using DUH's data for the average CO2 costs of German electricity generation in 2024. The study noted an increase in the number of wholly electric cars in the federal government's fleet — from 50% last year to 57% — but said that their energy consumption varied considerably, and pledged closer scrutiny of their environmental impact in future as well. Perhaps unsurprisingly, almost all the cars studied were German-manufactured, larger, luxury vehicles made by BMW, Audi or Mercedes — cars suited to having the guest of honor sit in the back and not in the front. This meant that even the plug-in hybrids in the fleet tended to weigh in at roughly double the levels of the EU benchmarks, given their hefty size and weight. However, DUH was estimating these vehicles' emissions when being driven without any electric power, saying "these cars are predominantly driven with empty batteries." Bavarian state premier Markus Söder was singled out for having the most thirsty official vehicle, with his car emissions estimated at 292 grams of CO2 per kilometer, more than three times the EU average target. Germany's only Green state premier, Winfried Kretschmann from the neighboring carmaking southern state of Baden Württemberg, was credited with just 70 grams of CO2 per kilometer driven. And perhaps fittingly, Environment Minister Carsten Schneider's vehicle was found to emit the least of any federal minister, at 62 grams per kilometer. But Transport Minister Patrick Schnieder, "who really ought to know better," as DUH put it, was given a red card for his plug-in hybrid's emissions. The city state of Bremen's environment senator, Kathrin Moosdorf, was hailed for her official bicycle, as was Hamburg's traffic senator, Anjes Tjarks, for having no business vehicle of any kind. Both politicians represent the Greens. The DUH said that only the Greens could "demonstrate an acceptable fleet of official vehicles," with average emissions of 85 grams per kilometer. Both the center-left Social Democrats, at 151 grams, and the center-right CDU/CSU, at 160 grams, comfortably exceeded the EU benchmark. If you're wondering how Chancellor Friedrich Merz and other leading lights in national politics fared, DUH's study can't help. The chancellor and deputy chancellor — as well as the ministers for finance, the interior, defense and health — were all excluded from the study. The reason for this is that these vehicles are all armored, meaning that they are sure to be much heavier than standard models and therefore less energy efficient. Given the sensitive nature of the data about exactly how much weight was added and where, DUH elected not to include them. The group also noted that some of its estimates for other politicians in need of armored vehicles could therefore be lower than the real values, with its figures based on a standard-issue model.


DW
3 hours ago
- DW
Serbia rocked by ongoing anti-government clashes – DW – 08/19/2025
Serbian cities have been gripped by days of clashes between anti-government protesters and security forces, as demonstrators accuse authorities of stifling dissent. After nine months of relatively peaceful protests, Serbia's streets are beginning to resemble a state of war, with the offices of the ruling Serbian Progressive Party (SNS) vandalized. Clashes between demonstrators and police with batons, tear gas, smoke bombs and flares, repeat night after night across the country. Neda Vrebac, from the citizens' assemblies in Novi Sad, has been on the streets for months. She says people are furious and that the violence on the streets is merely a reaction to the regime's violence. "We went unarmed against bayonets," Vrebac told DW. "I feel, personally, as do other citizens who regularly attend protests, very upset, insecure, and unsafe, and that is a consequence of living under fascism, with all its manifestations." Protesters on the street often do not know whether they are clashing with police or SNS paramilitaries. Videos circulate on social media showing groups of young men in masks and carrying sticks rushing at demonstrators. Media reports claim that among the SNS supporters were individuals previously convicted of attempted murder, violent behavior, and even a former football hooligan leader convicted for the 2009 murder of a French football fan. "The authorities, with the help of party criminals, have declared a street war on citizens. But there is no turning back, things have come to a head. Citizens have realized that with the mafia, there is no room for parliamentary democracy, no negotiations left except about handing over power," Radivoje Jovovic from the Free Citizens' Movement told DW. He believes the violence on the streets is a result of the government's nervousness and inability to resolve the crisis. "The authorities are the ones who refused to acknowledge the just demands of the protests. SNS didn't believe us when we said 'beware the wrath of a patient man,' and now they have committed crimes that have hastened their own end," Jovovic added. Meanwhile, the police have also started applying violence. Citizens and media have documented numerous instances of police brutality. Belgrade student Nikolina Sindjelic testified that she was "slapped and had her head slammed against the wall" by the commander of the Personal and Property Protection Unit, Marko Kricak, who also called her a "whore." "He said he would strip me and rape me in front of everyone, that everyone would watch. I was visibly angry, and he said, 'You should beg me to stop beating you,'" Nikolina Sindjelic told N1 television. While batons flashed at night, mass arrests occurred during the day. Several pro-regime media outlets published footage showing young men kneeling against a wall with their hands behind their backs, each guarded by a police officer. With these images, many were reminded of images from wartime detention camps. Neda Vrebac says she knows that at least three of them were twenty-year-olds arrested by police even though they weren't at the protests. One of them is Vukacin Kurilic, whose family she knows personally. "They are from my assembly, they support everything but are not active participants in the protests," Neda Vrebac told DW. "He was arrested on his way from a store. He was carrying some bags, and when they approached him, the kid resisted, saying he hadn't done anything. Then they searched him, found his asthma inhaler, thought it was pepper spray, and shoved him into a police van. No prior offenses." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic has promised a harsh state response, but denies that a state of emergency will be imposed. "At one point, you will see the full determination of the Serbian state. We will use everything at our disposal to restore order, peace, and law in our country, and we will do it. We will oppose all external pressures, everyone who threatens us, who tells us what is allowed and what is not, and until now we have seen that they managed to bring chaos into our country. But we will win," Vucic said. At a press conference, he accused students and citizens of trying to destroy the state, comparing them to fascists and Nazis, and said it was only a matter of days before someone would be killed. He is not alone in thinking this. "I fear for human lives. The lives of us citizens, the innocent, children, activists," said Neda Vrebac. She also fears the regime might kill someone from its own ranks to escalate the violence further. "I think he is ready for anything, because there are huge amounts of money and mafia around him. And you know how the mafia operates." Retired political science professor Zoran Stojiljkovic describes the situation as a balance of powerlessness, where both sides struggle to gain the upper hand, and neither has a clear strategy. "I don't think Vucic even desires a state of emergency because he doesn't have the capacity to enforce it when people are unwilling to comply, and they clearly are not," Stojiljkovic noted. "The desirable outcome is certainly some form of dialogue, relatively fair electoral conditions, and elections within a few months, by the end of this year or the beginning of next." He emphasizes that it is crucial for students, who still have credibility, to mobilize citizens around the narrative of a political resolution. "You need to clearly tell people what they will gain when you achieve victory at elections and what you will do in the reasonable time until normal elections in a year or two so that this never happens again," Stojiljkovic added. From open repression to new waves of protests and strikes or even elections and a possible toppling of Vucic, all outcomes appear to be on the table.


Local Germany
3 hours ago
- Local Germany
How much do you need to earn to buy a home in Germany?
Germany is notoriously a nation of renters. With more than half (52.8 percent) of residents living in rental accommodation in 2024, according to Germany's statistical office, it has the highest proportion of renters of all EU nations by a significant margin. But home prices dipped slightly between 2022 and the end of 2024, and while they have begun to rise again recently, there is evidence to suggest that now is a decent time to buy a house in Germany. For example, the Interhyp-IW affordability index – published by the brokerage firm Interhyp and the German Economic Institute (IW) – looking at figures from the German housing market in April 2025 – suggests that home ownership affordability has recovered noticeably. The report points to a period of declining interest rates combined with income growth, as well as stagnating or falling real estate prices in some cases, as having improved the affordability of home ownership. Still, 'improved affordability' metrics on paper and actually being able to buy a home on a regular monthly income are two different things. So how much do you need to earn to buy a home in Germany? How much loan can you afford? Assuming you don't have a few hundred thousand euros just stashed away somewhere, your salary (or your combined salary with your spouse / partner) is the factor that will have the most influence over exactly how much home can afford. The general rule of thumb in Germany is that your monthly payments on a loan (or mortgage) should not exceed 40 percent of your net monthly salary ( netto ), or roughly 30 percent of your gross monthly salary ( brutto ). While this rule of thumb may sound a bit like conservative financial advice rather than a limiting factor, you'd have a hard time finding a bank that would give you a mortgage at an amount that would exceed that salary-based limit. To give an idea, an article in German news outlet Focus gives the following example: with a total monthly salary of €2,000, you can afford to pay back up to €630 monthly, which equates to a total loan of around €139,000. Along similar lines, this article on the Das Finanzen website suggests that with a net monthly salary of €3,000, you could feasibly be eligible for a loan up to around €270,000. Of course these numbers will vary a bit depending on your personal credit history (or your Schufa ), any additional equity you can demonstrate, and any additional expenses you already have. If you want to crunch the numbers for yourself, you can get an idea with this loan-budget calculator , which allows you to factor in kids and any additional equity or expenses you may have. Advertisement Factor in extra costs Before you start looking into the going prices of homes on the market, you should know that it's common to have to pay around 12 percent on top of the listed price in taxes and other fees. These include the land transfer tax, the real-estate agent fee and a notary fee. EXPLAINED: What fees do you have to pay when buying a home in Germany? Property prices So, assuming you're on-board with paying those fees, and you have a rough idea of the value of a housing loan a bank will give you, how much home can you afford? According to information shared by Investropa – which offers financial services in Germany – national average prices for homes are around €4,161 per square metre. A couple view a property. Buying property in Germany comes with a whole lot of extra fees on top of the listed purchase price. Photo: dpa/RTLZWEI, EndemolShine Germany | RTLZWEI This varies significantly between new builds (€5,478 per square metre) and existing apartments (€3,403 per square metre). It also varies immensely between regions: Munich is known for its high property values (€8,476 per square metre on average), Berlin can be a bit cheaper than Munich (€5,451 per square metre), and some rural regions can be significantly cheaper (in the €1-2,000 range). Advertisement Currently, the average size of a home in Germany is around 46 square metres. So an average-sized, averagely-priced German home would be expected to cost about €191,406. To give an idea: a similar apartment in Munich would be expected to cost around €389,897, and in Berlin it would be around €250,746. Keep in the mind that these figures are based on a rather compact apartment size – if you're thinking of a larger flat suitable for a family, or for a standalone house with more floor space, you can expect the numbers to be much larger. It's not uncommon to see high-end 100-square-metre apartments listed for over a million euros. As The Local previously reported, a couple looking to buy a home worth one million euros would likely need around €150,000 in the bank, as well as a combined net income of around €13,000 monthly. READ ALSO: How much do you need to earn in Germany to buy a million euro home? If those numbers sound out of reach, that's because very few people in Germany earn anything near to that. A couple with two slightly-above average income earners could feasibly finance a €500,000 home, however. According to the article by Das Finanzen linked above, a house at this price could be financed on a gross income of €8,204 per month, or €4,100 per person per month. As we've touched on, the highest property prices are consistently found in Germany's biggest cities including Munich, Frankfurt, Hamburg and Berlin. Dortmund is among the most affordable of the country's major cities, and smaller cities in the east such as Chemnitz or Magdeburg have some of the lowest real estate prices. Leipzig's Plagwitz district, Hamburg's HafenCity, Bremen's Überseestadt and Erfurt are all highlighted by Investropa as areas with strong price growth potential. Advertisement The bottom line The immense cost of property in Germany's more populous regions, along with significant additional costs, means that the prospect of buying a house or apartment remains just out of reach for many. But if you have a high-paying job, significant equity, or are willing to invest in property outside of the big cities, you just may be able to buy a home of your own.