Government officials announce $10 billion high-speed rail project — here's how it could revolutionize transportation for millions
Morocco's push to overhaul its train system with better coverage and expanded high-speed rail could be steaming ahead with an announced $9.6 billion investment plan.
The plan, described in Newsweek, would be a crucial step in Morocco's broader vision to revolutionize rail travel by 2040. Government leaders of the North African country hope to nearly double the number of cities served by rail and increase train coverage from today's 51% of the population to 87%.
The $9.6 billion investment would be a key part of that expansion.
Would you support a tax increase to pay for high-speed rail in your state?
Absolutely
Probably
I don't know
No way
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Abdessamad Kayouh, Moroccan minister of transport and logistics, said the plan includes a high-speed railway from coastal Kenitra to inland Marrakech. This would link to the existing Al Boraq high-speed line that already connects Tangier to Casablanca, the country's largest city and its commercial capital. Beyond high-speed rail, the initiative also includes purchasing new trains and upgrading 40 rail stations nationwide.
Morocco is already a leader in African rail development thanks to Al Boraq, which was inaugurated in 2018 and is the continent's only high-speed train. Morocco is now racing to upgrade its trains further as part of a wider logistics overhaul intended to boost its economy and improve access for when the kingdom co-hosts the 2030 FIFA World Cup with Spain and Portugal.
"Morocco is pursuing plans to pump heavy investments into the rail infrastructure to accommodate the rapid increase in passengers," Kayouh said in December, per AGBI.
As governments around the world eye ambitious infrastructure development plans, high-speed rail projects are typically high on the wishlist. Upgrading train lines is an effective way to move people and heavy freight — both of which are vital for sustainable economic growth.
Even better, trains can improve a country's carbon impact by reducing transit by more wasteful cars and trucks. High-speed trains also run on electricity, not diesel or other carbon fuels, and can be powered by renewable sources of energy.
Last year, Vietnam announced its intention to build a high-speed line connecting Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City by 2035. That project, part of a larger upgrade of Vietnam's north-south connections, would cost an estimated $67.34 billion.
Parts of the U.S. could also see new high-speed rail access in years to come. There are at least five railways suggested today, and with a growing number of international projects in the works, one of these could be next.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
Top 10 African countries with the weakest currencies in June 2025
For some African countries, the unpleasant reality of currency devaluation remains a challenge even as the year passes its mid-point. Business Insider Africa presents the top 10 African countries with the weakest currencies in June 2025. This list is courtesy of the Forbes currency calculator. São Tomé & Príncipe ranks number 1 on the list. Many currencies, including the Egyptian pound and the Nigerian naira, have seen sharp declines in value in the previous year as a result of policy blunders, inflationary pressures, and a strong reliance on imports. But for some of these countries, early indications of currency recovery are beginning to show up, whether as a result of stronger exports, stricter monetary policy, or outside funding. Even small gains in weak currencies might yield significant benefits and lessen the strain on faltering economies if this trend keeps up. Right off the bat, a weak currency often drives inflation, particularly in countries that rely on international imports. As these currencies show signs of recovery, inflation rates may begin to ease. Lower inflation not only enhances consumer confidence but also allows central banks to explore lowering interest rates, which may encourage domestic borrowing and investment. Weak currencies significantly increase the cost of imported goods, fuel, medication, food, and industrial machinery, exacerbating the cost-of-living issue for ordinary individuals. A stronger local currency contributes to the reversal of this tendency. For example, if the Nigerian naira or Ethiopian birr begins to appreciate, the cost of basics may eventually stabilize or perhaps fall. This would bring immediate help to millions of consumers facing exorbitant prices. Furthermore, a currency weakening typically deters investors owing to concerns about capital loss and economic mismanagement. When a traditionally weak currency begins to show indications of resilience, market sentiment can improve. With that said, here are the 10 African countries with the weakest currencies, presently, according to the Forbes currency converter, last updated on the 23rd of June. Save for Rwanda, the currency value for Nigeria, Malawi, Burundi, Tanzania, DRC, Uganda, Guinea, all increased this month compared to the top 10 list last month. While the currency values for São Tomé & Príncipe and Sierra Leone remained the same. Top 10 African countries with the weakest currencies in June 2025 Rank Country Currency value per US$ Currency 1. São Tomé & Príncipe 22,281.80 São Tomé & Príncipe Dobra 2. Sierra Leone 20,969.50 Sierra Leonean Leone 3. Guinea 8,657.48 Guinean Franc 4. Uganda 3,605.57 Ugandan Shillings 5. Burundi 2,975.85 Burundian Franc 6. Democratic Republic of the Congo 2,905.28 Congolese Franc 7. Tanzania 2,653.06 Tanzanian Shilling 8. Malawi 1,732.71 Malawian Kwacha 9. Nigeria 1,553.68 Nigerian Naira 10. Rwanda 1,448.29 Rwandan Franc
New York Post
9 hours ago
- New York Post
Standing up to bullying, unscientific transgender activist mob
Almost no one does wicked things in the knowledge that what they are doing is wicked. It is a truth that should be universally acknowledged that in order to do something truly evil, a person needs to believe that what they are doing is good. Until somebody steps in and says 'no.' This week there was an extraordinary development in one of the great medical and social scandals of our time. Advertisement Alex Byrne is a professor of philosophy at MIT. This week he outed himself as one of the authors of the review published last month by the Department of Health and Human Services. Or rather he outed himself after being hounded and exposed by demonic maniacs online. The review goes over treatments of so-called 'gender dysphoria' in minors. Advertisement The fact that the authors of the DHHS review even tried to remain anonymous tells us a lot about the toxicity of this whole debate. The review itself is considerate and moderate. It weighs up the actual evidence and simply suggests that American authorities should align with the emerging consensus among experts and politicians in Europe. Which is that things have been done in the name of treating 'gender dysphoria' are a medical and ethical nightmare. For over a decade now, the 'be kind' brigade has been insisting that 'trans' should be the next civil rights issue of our age. No less a graveyard of thought than Time magazine had a cover in 2014 saying that transgender issues should be 'America's next civil rights frontier.' Advertisement That is a very loaded way to present a complex issue. After all, talk about 'civil rights' brings two particular struggles to mind. The first is the struggle to ensure that ethnic minorities — in particular African-Americans — have equal rights to everyone else in the United States. That issue was addressed and answered by force of moral argument six decades ago. The second issue that it brings up is the fight for gay rights, which also started some six decades ago. Since that time, the moral argument of the gay rights movement has also been accepted. Advertisement Nobody today wants to be a bigot who removes rights from black Americans or gay people. But by presenting the complex issue of trans as the inevitable next step in a campaign for ever more rights, our societies in the West took a mad turn. After all, the acceptance of other arguments were based on the idea that the people getting their rights were equals — and that society would not need to change itself or alter its fundamentals in order to grant these rights. The moral force of both movements were founded on the basis of 'Just like us.' And that is how they succeeded. The 'trans-rights' movement, by contrast, turned everything completely on its heads. They insisted not just that some people feel that they have been born in the wrong body, but that nobody is born with any discernible biological sex. Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters They insisted that because some people feel a confusion about their sexual identity nobody has a fixed biological identity. That — as some of us said from the start — was madness. It would be like the gay rights movement saying 'We're here, we're queer — and as a result there is no difference between men and women.' I doubt the gay rights cause would have succeeded if that was the track that campaigners chose. Advertisement But that was where the trans movement went. And of course the landmine which they trod on — and which was gone along with for far too long — was the explosive issue of children. As the DHHS review notes, the whole idea of 'gender affirming care' (note how manipulative that phrase is) was based on unbelievably weak evidence. Even before you get to issues of life-changing surgery, there was the imposition of 'puberty blockers.' These could be handed out after minimal consultation to any child who simply felt concern about the onset of puberty and worried about the changes to their body. They were handed out with no long-term studies of their effects. Advertisement Too few professionals warned that these medications could cause lifelong sexual disfunction, infertility and much more. The ones that did raise alarms or even questions were hounded by the dementors of our age — both online and off. But how did anyone think a child could make an informed decision about such a measure? Studies from Sweden, the Netherlands, Britain and other countries have confirmed what many of us said, which is that young people — including those who might grow up to just be gay — would be 'trans-ed' by the health industry. And live to deeply regret it. 'Gay conversion therapy' may have become a taboo. But converting gay people into approximations of the opposite sex became deemed 'progressive.' Advertisement We were told that if a child who had 'gender dysphoria' was not medicated with cross-sex hormones, or did not have a double-mastectomy then a range of things would happen. We were told that 'trans children' (another fallacious category) would 'kill themselves.' Or that any criticism of such procedures was 'disappearing' or even 'genociding' trans people. I have lost count of the number of American parents I have spoken to who were told by doctors that they had to 'trans' their child and were given the slogan if, say, the child was a biological male, 'Would you rather have a trans daughter or a dead son?' Parents were literally bulldozed into agreeing to life-altering surgeries and medical experiments being run on their children. Advertisement Now a smidgen of sanity has been brought to the debate. Future generations will look back at this period and marvel at what we allowed. They will coo with amazement that we gave life-altering drugs and performed life-altering operations on young people not old enough to vote, drive or drink alcohol. But we can already tell why it happened. It happened because pseudo-science was waved by crazed progressives bullies, who in the name of 'kindness' did things that were wicked beyond words.
Time Magazine
9 hours ago
- Time Magazine
TIME100 Most Influential Companies 2025: Janngo Capital
Sub-Saharan Africa has the world's highest rate of female entrepreneurship—from venture capitalists to the roadside tomato seller. Yet African women entrepreneurs face a $42 billion funding gap. In a market where, according to the World Bank, $25 is invested in startups led by men for every $1 invested in those led by women, Janngo Capital has consistently defied the odds. Founded by Senegalese-born Fatoumata Ba, Janngo is an African venture capital firm that commits to putting 50% of its investments in companies founded, co-founded, or significantly benefiting women. Ba, who founded Janngo in 2018 after more than four years in leadership roles at the e-commerce company Jumia, began raising its second investment fund in 2020 after securing $10 million for its first fund. Last year, Ba and her team secured another $78 million for Janngo's second investment fund—one of the largest ever raised by an investment firm led by an Africa-born woman—despite a broader funding crunch in African venture capital. (In 2024, African venture capital firms raised $3.2 billion—a 7% decline from the previous year—according to Partech Partners.) Fundraising for an African tech VC as a thirty-something francophone African female 'is not for the faint of heart' Ba says. Last year also saw a continued decline in deal activity, but Janngo completed its second successful 'exit,' as purchases and IPOs are known, following the cash sale of Tunisian startup Expensya in 2023. 'We have actually executed three exits and are closing our fourth one,' Ba says. With its second fund, the company plans to invest up to $5 million per startup in multiple installments, focusing on West Africa and key sectors such as healthcare, logistics, and financial services. Janngo's current 21 portfolio companies are 56% female-founded and led. With the new fund, Janngo's goal is to back 25 to 30 companies, primarily at the seed and Series A stages.
