'Make No Sense': US Economist Slams Trump's Tariffs On India As ‘Stupid, Delusional'
US economist Jeffrey Sachs criticized Donald Trump's tariffs on India, calling them 'stupid' and damaging to the US economy.
Prominent US economist Jeffrey Sachs sharply criticized US President Donald Trump's decision to impose steep tariffs on India, calling the move 'stupid" and saying it 'serves no purpose." In an interview with news agency ANI, Jeffrey Sachs accused Donald Trump of acting out of hostility toward the BRICS bloc, which includes India, China, Russia, Brazil and South Africa.
'This makes no sense. It's not true. It's failing. Putting the surcharge on India was as stupid as it could be from any norm. It serves no purpose," he said.
Jeffrey Sachs described Donald Trump as 'delusional," arguing that Washington has grown accustomed to exercising global dominance.
'The US has exercised its dominant power for so long, they think they can boss every other part of the world around," he added.
The economist warned that the tariffs, imposed at 50% on imports from India over New Delhi's purchase of Russian oil, are damaging for the US economy and in violation of international law.
'Everything about the tariffs is wrong. It's destructive for the US economy. It violates international law. It's a breakdown of our political system. Trump's policies are doomed to fail," he said.
Jeffrey Sachs urged India not to rely on the US for long-term strategic security or trade benefits, cautioning that Washington's interests do not align with New Delhi's.
'US politicians don't care at all about India. Please understand this. India is not going to reap long-term security by siding with the United States in the Quad against China. India is a great power that has an independent standing in the world," he said.
Instead, Jeffrey Sachs called China, Russia and Brazil India's 'real partners" and warned against believing New Delhi could simply replace China in the global value chain. He stressed that India should not expect a 'great trade relationship" with Washington, even if it helps diversify US supply chains. Jeffrey Sachs had previously labeled Donald Trump's tariffs 'unconstitutional" and argued they reflect a broader failure in US foreign and economic policy.
view comments
First Published:
Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Which European leaders are set to meet Trump alongside Zelenskyy in Washington?
European leaders will travel with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to Washington on Monday for talks with US President Donald Trump, Reuters reported. The meeting comes two days after Trump's summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska, where proposals for a possible peace deal were discussed. Those attending the White House talks include German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer. Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and Finnish President Alexander Stubb will also take part. The leaders aim to support Ukraine as Trump presses for an agreement with Russia. According to the German government, the talks will focus on 'security guarantees, territorial issues, and continued support for Ukraine in its defence against Russian aggression. This includes maintaining pressure on sanctions.' European powers are also pushing for a trilateral meeting between Trump, Putin and Zelenskyy to ensure Ukraine has a direct role in shaping its future. Trump and Putin spoke in Alaska about Russia giving up smaller areas of occupied land in exchange for keeping larger parts of eastern Ukraine, as reported by Reuters. A source familiar with the talks said Trump later told Zelenskyy by phone that Putin had offered to 'freeze most front lines if Kyiv ceded all of Donetsk.' The source added that Zelenskyy rejected the proposal. Russia currently controls about one-fifth of Ukraine, including most of Donetsk province. After his Alaska meeting with Putin, Trump said: 'Ukraine should make a deal to end the war with Russia because Russia is a very big power, and they're not.' He also suggested that talks could proceed without a ceasefire, shifting from his earlier stance that fighting should stop first. European leaders want to avoid a repeat of Zelenskyy's last visit to the White House in February, when Trump and Vice President JD Vance publicly urged him to strike a quick settlement. Ahead of Monday's meeting, Merz, Macron and Starmer hosted a virtual session of the 'coalition of the willing', a grouping of more than 30 countries backing Kyiv. Von der Leyen and Zelenskyy joined from Brussels. Ukraine has stressed that a peace deal cannot move forward without halting the fighting. 'Stopping the killing is a key element of stopping the war,' Zelenskyy posted on X. Today, following a conversation with President Trump, we further coordinated positions with European leaders. The positions are clear. A real peace must be achieved, one that will be lasting, not just another pause between Russian invasions. Killings must stop as soon as… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 16, 2025 Putin, meanwhile, warned Europe not to 'attempt to disrupt the emerging progress through provocation or behind-the-scenes intrigue,' Reuters reported.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
10 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Putin agreed to Ukraine security protections in Trump summit: US envoy
Special US envoy Steve Witkoff said Sunday that Russian leader Vladimir Putin agreed at his summit with President Donald Trump to allow the US and European allies to offer Ukraine a security guarantee resembling NATO's collective defence mandate as part of an eventual deal to end the 3 1/2-year war. We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in NATO," he said on CNN's State of the Union. Witkoff said it was the first time he had heard Putin agree to that. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, speaking at a news conference in Brussels with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, said that "we welcome President Trump's willingness to contribute to Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine. and the Coalition of the willing' -- including the European Union -- is ready to do its share. Witkoff, offering some of the first details of what was discussed at Friday's summit in Alaska, said the two sides agreeing to robust security guarantees that I would describe as game-changing." He added that Russia said that it would make a legislative commitment not to go after any additional territory in Ukraine. Zelenskyy thanked the United States for recent signals that Washington is willing to support security guarantees for Ukraine, but said the details remained unclear. It is important that America agrees to work with Europe to provide security guarantees for Ukraine, he said, But there are no details how it will work, and what America's role will be, Europe's role will be and what the EU can do, and this is our main task, we need security to work in practice like Article 5 of NATO, and we consider EU accession to be part of the security guarantees. Witkoff defended Trump's decision to abandon his push for Russian to agree to an immediate ceasefire, saying the president had pivoted toward a peace deal because so much progress was made. We covered almost all the other issues necessary for a peace deal, Witkoff said, without elaborating. We began to see some moderation in the way they're thinking about getting to a final peace deal, he said. Secretary of State Marco Rubio insisted there would be additional consequences as Trump warned before meeting with Putin, if they failed to reach a ceasefire. But Rubio noted that there wasn't going to be any sort of deal on a truce reached when Ukraine wasn't at the talks. Now, ultimately, if there isn't a peace agreement, if there isn't an end of this war, the president's been clear, there are going to be consequences, Rubio said on ABC's This Week. But we're trying to avoid that. And the way we're trying to avoid those consequences is with an even better consequence, which is peace, the end of hostilities. He also said we're not at the precipice of a peace agreement and that getting there would not be easy and would take a lot of work. We made progress in the sense that we identified potential areas of agreement, but there remains some big areas of disagreement. So we're still a long ways off, Rubio said. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Mint
12 minutes ago
- Mint
Fatal explosion at U.S. Steels plant raises questions about its future, despite heavy investment
HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — The fatal explosion last week at U.S. Steel's Pittsburgh-area coal-processing plant has revived debate about its future just as the iconic American company was emerging from a long period of uncertainty. The fortunes of steelmaking in the U.S. — along with profits, share prices and steel prices — have been buoyed by years of friendly administrations in Washington that slapped tariffs on foreign imports and bolstered the industry's anti-competitive trade cases against China. Most recently, President Donald Trump's administration postponed new hazardous air pollution requirements for the nation's roughly dozen coke plants, like Clairton, and he approved U.S. Steel's nearly $15 billion acquisition by Japanese steelmaker Nippon Steel. Nippon Steel's promised infusion of cash has brought vows that steelmaking will continue in the Mon Valley, a river valley south of Pittsburgh long synonymous with steelmaking. 'We're investing money here. And we wouldn't have done the deal with Nippon Steel if we weren't absolutely sure that we were going to have an enduring future here in the Mon Valley," David Burritt, U.S. Steel's CEO, told a news conference the day after the explosion. 'You can count on this facility to be around for a long, long time.' The explosion killed two workers and hospitalized 10 with a blast so powerful that it took hours to find two missing workers beneath charred wreckage and rubble. The cause is under investigation. The plant is considered the largest coking operation in North America and, along with a blast furnace and finishing mill up the Monongahela River, is one of a handful of integrated steelmaking operations left in the U.S. The explosion now could test Nippon Steel's resolve in propping up the nearly 110-year-old Clairton plant, or at least force it to spend more than it had anticipated. Nippon Steel didn't respond to a question as to whether the explosion will change its approach to the plant. Rather, a spokesperson for the company said its 'commitment to the Mon Valley remains strong' and that it sent 'technical experts to work with the local teams in the Clairton Plant, and to provide our full support.' Meanwhile, Burritt said he had talked to top Nippon Steel officials after the explosion and that 'this facility and the Mon Valley are here to stay.' U.S. Steel officials maintain that safety is their top priority and that they spend $100 million a year on environmental compliance at Clairton alone. However, repairing Clairton could be expensive, an investigation into the explosion could turn up more problems, and an official from the United Steelworkers union said it's a constant struggle to get U.S. Steel to invest in its plants. Besides that, production at the facility could be affected for some time. The plant has six batteries of ovens and two — where the explosion occurred — were damaged. Two others are on a reduced production schedule because of the explosion. There is no timeline to get the damaged batteries running again, U.S. Steel said. Accidents are nothing new at Clairton, which heats coal to high temperatures to make coke, a key component in steelmaking, and produces combustible gases as byproducts. An explosion in February injured two workers. Even as Nippon Steel was closing the deal in June, a breakdown at the plant dealt three days of a rotten egg odor into the air around it from elevated hydrogen sulfide emissions, the environmental group GASP reported. The Breathe Project, a public health organization, said U.S. Steel has been forced to pay $57 million in fines and settlements since Jan. 1, 2020, for problems at the Clairton plant. A lawsuit over a Christmas Eve fire at the Clairton plant in 2018 that saturated the area's air for weeks with sulfur dioxide produced a withering assessment of conditions there. An engineer for the environmental groups that sued wrote that he 'found no indication that U.S. Steel has an effective, comprehensive maintenance program for the Clairton plant.' The Clairton plant, he wrote, is "inherently dangerous because of the combination of its deficient maintenance and its defective design." U.S. Steel settled, agreeing to spend millions on upgrades. Matthew Mehalik, executive director of the Breathe Project, said U.S. Steel has shown more willingness to spend money on fines, lobbying the government and buying back shares to reward shareholders than making its plants safe. It's not clear whether Nippon Steel will change Clairton. Central to Trump's approval of the acquisition was Nippon Steel's promises to invest $11 billion into U.S. Steel's aging plants and to give the federal government a say in decisions involving domestic steel production, including plant closings. But much of the $2.2 billion that Nippon Steel has earmarked for the Mon Valley plants is expected to go toward upgrading the finishing mill, or building a new one. For years before the acquisition, U.S. Steel had signaled that the Mon Valley was on the chopping block. That left workers there uncertain whether they'd have jobs in a couple years and whispering that U.S. Steel couldn't fill openings because nobody believed the jobs would exist much longer. In many ways, U.S. Steel's Mon Valley plants are relics of steelmaking's past. In the early 1970s, U.S. steel production led the world and was at an all-time high, thanks to 62 coke plants that fed 141 blast furnaces. Nobody in the U.S. has built a blast furnace since then, as foreign competition devastated the American steel industry and coal fell out of favor. Now, China is dominant in steel and heavily invested in coal-based steelmaking. In the U.S., there are barely a dozen coke plants and blast furnaces left, as the country's steelmaking has shifted to cheaper electric arc furnaces that use electricity, not coal. Blast furnaces won't entirely go away, analysts say, since they produce metals that are preferred by automakers, appliance makers and oil and gas exploration firms. Still, Christopher Briem, an economist at the University of Pittsburgh's Center for Social and Urban Research, questioned whether the Clairton plant really will survive much longer, given its age and condition. It could be particularly vulnerable if the economy slides into recession or the fundamentals of the American steel market shift, he said. 'I'm not quite sure it's all set in stone as people believe,' Briem said. 'If the market does not bode well for U.S. Steel, for American steel, is Nippon Steel really going to keep these things?'
