Angela Rayner accused of waging 'class war' over her plans to cut funding for wealthier Southern areas so more can be spent in the North
Under Angela Rayner 's shake-up, wealthier southern households face a raft of raids to help pay for the giveaway in Labour's traditional working-class areas.
These include hikes in council tax bills and fees, such as parking, planning and licensing charges.
Town halls in the South also face having to cut existing services because of the raid on their coffers.
Under the plans, unveiled yesterday, town halls with 'stronger council tax bases', which tend to be in wealthier parts of London and the Home Counties, will get less Government cash.
Those with 'weaker bases', often in the North, will get more under the 'progressive' redistribution model.
The Deputy Prime Minister Ms Rayner, who is also the local government secretary, has long argued that an overhaul of council funding is needed.
Ms Rayner, the MP for Ashton-under-Lyne, has pointed to people living in the North who pay hundreds of pounds more in council tax than those in wealthier southern areas, calling it 'unfair'.
But the plans, which affect councils in England and would begin for three years from next April, sparked a furious backlash.
Greg Smith, the Tory MP for Mid Buckinghamshire, said: 'We're already massively over-taxed and council tax has already blown out of all proportion across the country.
'Anything that takes from the South to pay for the North is class war.'
And Kevin Hollinrake, the Tories' local government spokesman, said: 'In reality, Labour's appetite for tax hikes knows no bounds. These new backdoor rises in fees and charges are nothing more than stealth taxes – punishing the very councils that have kept taxes low and responsible.'
The new proposed formula for allocating money would take into account local needs, based on population, poverty and age data.
This will lead to more cash going to deprived areas. And Government grants, which account for about half of councils' income, will now be based on calculations of what local authorities could raise if all areas charged the same rates of council tax based on their housing mix.
This will mean steep falls in grant income for wealthier councils. Vikki Slade, the Lib Dems' local government spokesman, said: 'It would be a big mistake for the Government to force councils into unfair council tax rises.
'At a time when councils desperately need support, it beggars belief that Angela Rayner is considering reducing funding entitlements for many, including councils which already receive very little grant funding.'
But ministers insist councils won't go bust as it would be phased in over three years, removing a potential 'cliff edge' if the redistribution happened in one go.
They also say it will not lead to huge council tax hikes because these are already capped at 5 per cent, and most councils already raise it by this amount every year.
However, they could apply to Ms Rayner, who is from Stockport, for special permission to raise it by more than this given the unprecedented pressure their finances could come under.
They are also likely to look at cutting back on existing services and hiking other fees to help balance the books.
It raises the prospect of councils being handed more powers to raise revenues by hiking such fees.
Yesterday's new consultation, which will run until August 15, said ministers will now 'review all fees previously identified and consider where there is the strongest case for reform'.
Kate Ogden, a senior research economist at the Institute for Fiscal Studies, said councils in 'leafier suburban and rural areas' in the South will be among the biggest losers.
Local government minister Jim McMahon said: 'There's broad agreement across council leaders, experts, and parliamentarians that the current funding model is broken and unfair.
'This Government is stepping up to deliver the fairer system promised in the 2017 Fair Funding Review but never delivered.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer has now reached Sunak-levels of unpopularity: how long can he last?
Loyalty, it used to be said, was the Conservative Party's secret weapon. It was loyalty to the leader, as well as the party, that got them through a series of crises and scandals that less disciplined parties could not withstand. Even when that loyalty was fractured in an unprecedented and dramatic fashion – in the removal of Mrs Thatcher as leader in 1990 – the party quickly united behind the new leadership and pulled off an unlikely general election triumph in 1992 as a result. But that mantle of loyalty, so fruitlessly squandered and devalued by a generation of Tory MPs in the last three decades, has now been handed to the Labour Party. And as this Government's approval ratings plumb the depths of popularity that sealed Rishi Sunak's fate just before the electorate kicked him out of office, Keir Starmer is going to have to rely on party loyalty more than ever. Consider this: until Jeremy Corbyn's arrival as Labour leader in 2015, no Labour leader had been formally challenged since 1988, when Tony Benn took a tilt at Neil Kinnock, who saw off the Left-wing upstart by securing nearly 90 per cent of the party's support. The 2016 challenge to Corbyn occurred in unique circumstances and was the lesser of the radical solutions Labour MPs had considered in response to the hard Left's unforeseen takeover of the party. For the three decades between those two events, Labour leaders were considered untouchable. And despite Starmer's many difficulties, that remains the case today. There are certainly plenty of MPs who would rather he resigned before the next election, allowing a more convincing successor to try to hold on to the party's governing majority; this would also allow the Prime Minister a chance to seize his place in history as only the second Labour Prime Minister to retire undefeated. But there is zero chance of a formal challenge to his leadership. It's just not the done thing in the Labour Party, especially not to a man who has just won a three-figure majority from a position of near electoral extinction at the previous election. But that doesn't mean that there will be no briefing against him by malcontents, and also by apparently loyal ministers whose grievance is hidden behind a mask of loyalty. The Parliamentary Labour Party is nervous. Well, of course it is. It would be weird if it were not. Languishing nearly ten points behind Reform in almost every poll is not the ideal place for any Government elected barely a year ago, albeit on a wave of apathy rather than enthusiasm. And so journalists eager for salacious gossip will listen attentively as unhappy backbenchers relate dreadful anecdotes about how unpopular the Government is on the doorsteps of their constituencies, and of how the antidote could be for Starmer to be replaced. Much of this briefing will be done anonymously, some of it won't. The Liverpool MP Ian Byrne is not the shrinking violet that many of his colleagues are, and has been outspoken in his criticism of the Government. What is less predictable is the end result of all this unhappiness. In the absence of a formal challenge to Starmer at this year's (or next year's) party conference, his detractors will be hoping that the polls will simply pile up too much bad news to withstand. This is the Labour way, to cross one's fingers and hope for the best, rather than to plot any specific course of action. It's what happened under Gordon Brown, who never once looked in danger of winning the next general election, and who was constantly briefed against by MPs and cabinet colleagues in the forlorn hope he would stand aside and give the Government a fighting chance of re-election. Will this summer's discontent produce a more substantial, not to say more electorally beneficial result? There are certainly plenty of Labour backbenchers who maintain a belief that Starmer can yet turn things around in time for the next election, though what this faith is based on remains unspecified. But the eye-watering levels of disapproval revealed by the latest polling makes Starmer's position all the more vulnerable. Not only is he facing the public perception that he has no concrete principles of his own, and that he is too willing to reverse direction in the face of parliamentary rebellions from his own side. He is also facing unprecedented rival challenges to his party's position as the country's chief recipient of Left-wing support. Aside from the imminent launch (or relaunch) of Jeremy Corbyn's new party, Starmer faces an erosion of his party's support from the Greens and even the Liberal Democrats. All of this is in the context of an insurgent Right-wing party led by Nigel Farage that looks set to displace the Conservatives and present a real populist challenge to the political establishment. Is Starmer up to the challenge? It is the key question that will be asked by Labour backbenchers and activists as the year draws to a close and the next set of local and devolved elections hove into view. Much of their judgment will await those results in May. Unless Starmer has plans to unveil a whole new side to his personality, one that reveals a previously hidden talent for strategic policy and communications, that judgment will be damning.
The Sun
11 minutes ago
- The Sun
All the new tax raids Rachel Reeves is planning on YOUR cash to fill £50bn blackhole – how to protect yourself
RACHEL Reeves is under pressure to fill a £50billion blackhole with an all-new tax raid in the Autumn Budget. Experts have suggested a raft of tax changes could be announced in the speech - but how could they affect you? And what can YOU do now to protect your finances. We explain. 2 The Chancellor is under increasing pressure after slow economic growth, U-turns on spending and a weak jobs market have all pushed the government finances further into the red, the National Institute for Economic and Social Research has warned. Among the ideas on the table are changes to stamp duty, capital gains tax and council tax. Labour has already pledged not to raise income tax, national insurance or VAT in its manifesto, which means it is considering other options. Of course, the full details of the Budget will remain under wraps until the day it is unveiled. But here we explain what could be on the cards and what it might mean for you. Inheritance tax Reeves is said to be eyeing up inheritance tax changes as part of plans to fix the nation's finances. Some of the options on the table are stopping parents from making unlimited tax-free gifts to kids by capping the value of gifts that someone can pass on to loved ones. Currently, you can give away unlimited amounts of money and assets to friends or family members without paying inheritance tax, as long as you do so seven years before you die. If you give money away and then die within seven years then the amount of tax you pay is charged at a tapered rate. Capping the amount relatives can give to their loved ones could raise millions of pounds for the Treasury. 2 The tax raised a record £8.2billion last year alone. Experts have warned that if the measure was brought in it could cause 'a fundamental change to the way families pass on wealth". Rachael Griffin, tax and financial planning expert at Quilter warned the change 'could capture not just large transfers designed to reduce tax bills but also modest, routine support between family members." Stamp duty It has also been suggested this week that the Chancellor is considering plans to replace the current stamp duty thresholds with a new property tax. Earlier this week The Guardian published a story about how the Chancellor Rachel Reeves is considering a new levy on houses over £500,000. It said the Treasury has been considering suggestions from a report by thinktank Onward. In it, Onward recommended that if a property is worth more than £500,000 it would incur an annual tax of 0.54%. Meanwhile, any home worth more than £1million would pay 0.81% on the proportion of its value over the threshold. This would replace the current stamp duty thresholds, which are tiered depending on the value of your home. Currently there is no stamp duty to pay on a home worth less than £125,000. On homes worth between £125,001 and £250,000 stamp duty is charged at a rate of 2%. But this rises to 5% for homes worth between £250,001 and £925,000. The Government has not yet confirmed how the proposals would work but did not rule them out. It is understood that only homeowners who buy a property after the tax is brought in could be affected by the change, so the tax would not be applied to properties retrospectively. This means homeowners who already paid stamp duty when they bought their home would not be charged again. The extra stamp duty for homeowners with more than one property would remain in place and this group would not have to pay the new tax. Experts have described the change as 'designed to radically overhaul stamp duty'. David Hollingworth, of L&C Mortgages, said: 'Many have called for a rethink of stamp duty which can act as a barrier to buying, moving and downsizing. 'Buyers won't shed any tears for stamp duty but may have to rethink the likely annual cost of owning their own home. 'If that sees a big increase it will have a knock on impact for affordability.' Meanwhile, property expert Kirstie Allsopp said the Chancellor's plans to reform stamp duty would have a 'destabilising' effect and added it's 'not the place to fly kites.' Speaking on Times Radio she warned: "It's not Rachel's to go after because it's their homes. "It's the roof over their head. And this Government seems to want to punish people for making the sacrifices they've made to buy their own homes." Council tax Officials are also said to be considering whether to replace council tax with a local property tax. This would mean a total overhaul of the current council tax system, which came into effect in 1993. Currently council tax is an annual fee that is paid to the local council to fund services such as road upkeep and state schools. People pay more or less depending on where they live and the size of their home. There have been fears that council tax will be reformed after several councils declared themselves bankrupt and others warned they have just months left before they run out of funds. But a total reform of the council tax system could take years, so it is unlikely to happen in this parliament. Capital gains tax Homeowners with expensive properties could be hit with capital gains tax when they decide to move house, recent reports suggest. Rachel Reeves is said to be considering ending private residence relief, which stops people from having to pay capital gains tax when they sell their main home. The change would mean that properties worth over a certain amount would be subject to the tax. Higher rate taxpayers would pay 24% of the value of any gains they make, while basic rate taxpayers would have to pay 18%, The Times has reported. If the levy was brought in with a threshold of £1.5million then it would affect around 120,000. These wealthy homeowners would be hit with a bill of £200,000 if they tried to move house. It is not clear from when this change could be introduced or if it would be phased in. Pensions Another option that could come under the microscope is tax relief on pensions. The Chancellor has previously shied away from this option but is said to be reconsidering it as an easy option to raise cash. Currently you get tax relief on any money you pay into your pension. This is done through rebates from the Government and the exact amount you get depends on your income tax rate. For example, basic rate taxpayers get 20% tax relief on any money they pay into their retirement pot. However, for higher rate taxpayers the relief rises to 40%, or 45% for additional rate taxpayers. As a result, the system is currently tilted in favour of more wealthy people as they pay more tax. But reports have suggested that the Chancellor could introduce a flat rate of tax relief. This would cut the amount of cash higher and additional taxpayers get back from the Government. However, it could also hit hardworking teachers, nurses and public sector workers who are on modest incomes. This move could raise billions of pounds for the Chancellor each year. Official figures show the total cost of providing pension tax relief was £52.5billion in 2023/24, up from £50.1billion the year before, official figures reveal. Most of this money went to higher and additional rate taxpayers. Former pensions minister Baroness Ros Altmann thinks the measure is likely to appear in the Budget. She said: "With a desperate need for more money to be invested in this country, it is inevitable that the Chancellor will be looking at whether this money could be better used in Britain directly, and I do think she will find ways to reduce its generosity." But overhauling the pension system would be a major reform, so it cannot be brought in overnight. This means the Government is unlikely to be able to use it to raise the cash it needs in the short term. What should YOU do now None of the potential changes being tabled have been confirmed yet. The Government has not yet ruled them out but any measures it introduces will not happen until after the autumn Budget at the earliest - and a date has not been set yet. Don't make any rash decisions based on the current Budget speculation. If and when the changes are announced you can decide to act to stop your finances from being hit. For example, if the changes to stamp duty are brought in from a certain date then you cold move house before this deadline to avoid being hit. Or if the Government decides to charge Capital Gains tax on high value properties then you could downsize to a smaller house before the change is implemented. Most of the suggestions on the table will only affect the very wealthy, so you may not even be hit by the tax changes. There are some things you can do if you're worried. Get financial advice If you are worried about your finances then you should speak to a financial adviser. They will be able to offer you advice about your situation and explain if any of the measures will affect you. You can find one using - but remember, you will pay a fee. Make a will First, you should ensure your money gets to the right place by making a will, according to Ms Young. 'If you die without a will, your estate will fall under the rules of intestacy, which could mean a higher IHT bill. 'This is especially key for couples who aren't married, as unmarried partners will not automatically inherit from one another, even if they have lived together for many years.' Check how to make one in our guide. Give your finances a makeover It's good practice to sit down and take stock of your finances every six months and work out a plan. Work out all your bills and outgoings and what income you have and factor in any changes, such as bills going up or new income streams. Think about what you need to do to make the most of your money. For example, do you need to prioritise paying off debts or saving for a house deposit. Our guide to paying less tax legally could help you avoid giving away more cash to the tax man than necessary. Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@
Reuters
11 minutes ago
- Reuters
UK's FTSE 100 steady as consumer stocks rise; homebuilders slump on hot inflation data
Aug 20 (Reuters) - Britain's FTSE 100 held steady on Wednesday as gains in consumer and healthcare sectors offset losses in energy and mining stocks, while investors assessed a hotter-than-expected inflation report. As of 0945 GMT, the blue-chip index FTSE 100 (.FTSE), opens new tab was largely flat. Meanwhile, the FTSE midcap index (.FTMC), opens new tab dropped 0.4%, on pace to mark its steepest fall in over two weeks. The UK's consumer price inflation hit its highest in 18 months in July when it increased to 3.8% from 3.6%, once again leaving the country with the fastest rate of price increases among the world's largest rich economies. "Inflation was always likely to rise today, but this report is definitely on the hotter side," said Luke Bartholomew, deputy chief economist at Aberdeen. "In particular, services inflation, which the Bank of England watches very closely as a measure of underlying inflation pressure, popping higher will be a source of concern among policymakers." The data led to a shift in market expectations on BoE's monetary policy, with traders now betting on a quarter-point reduction in March next year. Earlier this month, markets had anticipated a cut before the end of 2025. Sterling also strengthened slightly following the data release. The inflation report's interest rate implications led to a 1.3% fall in homebuilders (.FTNMX402020), opens new tab on concerns about mortgage affordability. Energy sector (.FTNMX601010), opens new tab declined 0.7% as heavy-weight BP (BP.L), opens new tab dropped 1.3% after the oil major said operations at its refinery at Whiting, Indiana, were affected due to flooding. Metal mining stocks (.FTNMX551020), opens new tab dropped 0.8%. Aerospace and defence (.FTNMX502010), opens new tab index came under pressure for a second consecutive day, dipping 1.2%, after marking its largest single-day decline since early April in the previous session. On the flip side, consumer stocks (.FTNMX452010), opens new tab and healthcare companies (.FTNMX201030), opens new tab supported gains on the blue-chip index, rising 0.7% and 0.5% respectively. Among individual movers, Ithaca Energy (ITH.L), opens new tab jumped 8% after the oil and gas company lifted its 2025 production forecast. Medical equipment maker Convatec (CTEC.L), opens new tab rose 5.5% after it announced $300 million share buyback programme.
