Pakistan upgrading nukes with Chinese support, US warns
Pakistan is upgrading its nuclear arsenal with Chinese support and sees India as an 'existential threat', a US report has said.
In its worldwide threat assessment report for 2025, the US Defence Intelligence Agency predicted that nuclear modernisation would be a top priority for Pakistan's military during the next year.
The report said: 'Pakistan regards India as an existential threat and will continue to pursue its military modernisation effort, including the development of battlefield nuclear weapons, to offset India's conventional military advantage.'
It suggested Islamabad was not only upgrading and securing its arsenal but also 'almost certainly' procuring weapons of mass destruction (WMD).
'Pakistan is modernising its nuclear arsenal and maintaining the security of its nuclear materials and nuclear command and control. Pakistan almost certainly procures WMD-applicable goods from foreign suppliers and intermediaries,' it said.
Pakistan is a recipient of China's economic and military largesse, and the two nations carry out joint military exercises, including an air exercise in November last year.
'Foreign materials and technology supporting Pakistan's WMD programmes are very likely acquired primarily from suppliers in China, and sometimes are trans-shipped through Hong Kong, Singapore, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates,' said the report.
India considers China its 'primary adversary,' and Pakistan, its neighbour, more of an 'ancillary security problem', the report said.
It added that India had modernised its military last year, testing the nuclear-capable developmental Agni-I Prime MRBM (medium-range ballistic missile) and the Agni-V multiple independently targetable re-entry vehicle.
India also commissioned a second nuclear-powered submarine to strengthen its nuclear triad and bolster its ability to deter adversaries.
Last week, the Indian government claimed China had helped move satellites and recalibrate air defence systems before Pakistan shot down Indian fighter jets during their recent military clashes.
According to Ashok Kumar, the director general of the New Delhi-based Centre For Joint Warfare Studies, China worked with Pakistan to reorganise its radar and air defence systems to track troop deployments and aerial movements by India.
Mr Kumar, whose research group operates under the Indian Ministry of Defence, said Chinese military advisers helped Pakistan realign its satellite coverage over India as the two neighbouring state clashed after the April 22 terror attack.
On that day, 26 tourists were killed at Pahalgam in Indian-administered Kashmir. India blamed Pakistan and accused it of backing cross-border terrorism. Pakistan denied any involvement and called for an international investigation.
Between May 7 and 10, the neighbouring states launched attacks involving supersonic missiles and drones on each other's territory.
Pakistan said it shot down six Indian warplanes, including three French-made Rafales. India has not commented on the specific losses. Dozens of civilians were killed in the attacks, mostly in Kashmir, which is divided between the two nations.
Hours after the initial Indian military strikes on May 7, Ishaq Dar, Pakistan's foreign minister, told parliament that Islamabad had used Chinese jets, including J-10C, against India. Mr Dar said the Chinese ambassador had been called to his office to discuss the deployment.
Pakistan also used a Chinese-made PL-15 missile, which has never been used in combat before. Its use raised concerns among Beijing's rivals, including Taiwan. China's government has not commented on the use of its equipment.
Donald Trump, the US president, surprised many by announcing a 'full and immediate ceasefire' on May 10, which appears to be holding.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
13 minutes ago
- Newsweek
'Russia's Pearl Harbor' Fuels Fears Over Chinese Cargo Ships at US Ports
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Sunday's Ukrainian drone ambush on a Russian airbase more than 3,000 miles from the front lines has intensified a growing debate among U.S. military analysts over the plausibility of a similar attack launched from Chinese merchant vessels docked at American ports. The scenario has drawn scrutiny from lawmakers and security analysts alike following confirmation that COSCO Shipping—China's state-owned shipping giant—operates across key U.S. ports, despite being designated by the Department of Defense as a Chinese military company. At issue is whether drones or cruise missiles could be hidden in shipping containers aboard these vessels, activated remotely or after offloading, and used in a preemptive strike. "This is a very plausible form of attack in the U.S.," said Bryan Clark, senior fellow at the Hudson Institute and a former U.S. Navy officer. "But the attack would need to overcome several challenges," he told Newsweek. "The drones need to get out of the container, and that's hard to control aboard a ship. A more feasible approach would be to deploy the drones from a container once it's offloaded and moved on a truck." In this image taken from video released June 1, 2025, by a source in the Ukrainian Security Service shows a Ukrainian drone striking Russian planes deep in Russia's territory. In this image taken from video released June 1, 2025, by a source in the Ukrainian Security Service shows a Ukrainian drone striking Russian planes deep in Russia's territory. AP Retired Navy commander Thomas Shugart, now a fellow at the Center for a New American Security, has voiced a more urgent warning. "It is becoming borderline-insane that we routinely allow ships owned and operated by DoD-designated Chinese military companies to sit in our ports with thousands of containers onboard and under their control," Shugart said in a conversation with Newsweek. Shugart said the concept isn't speculative—it mirrors Chinese military writings. "Their Science of Campaigns is full of references to 'sudden' and 'surprise' strikes," he said, referring to a core text that Chinese military officers are expected to study. "They explicitly discuss hitting first, especially against what they call the 'powerful entity,' which is clearly a reference to the United States." The concerns are not just theoretical. In January, members of the House Committee on Homeland Security asked the U.S. Coast Guard for a classified briefing, citing COSCO's access to "major U.S. ports" and warning of risks including "espionage, cyber intrusions, sabotage, and supply chain disruptions," according to a letter sent in January. Vulnerabilities Can Be Exploited Zak Kallenborn, a researcher of drone and asymmetric warfare, acknowledged the technical possibility but questioned the timing. "A similar Chinese drone attack is definitely plausible and worth worrying about," he told Newsweek. "However, a Chinese attack is unlikely to come completely out of the blue. If China were to do this, we'd likely already be at war." Shipping containers, including those from COSCO, a Chinese state-owned shipping and logistics company await transportation on a rail line at the Port of Long Beach on July 12, 2018 in Long Beach, California. Shipping containers, including those from COSCO, a Chinese state-owned shipping and logistics company await transportation on a rail line at the Port of Long Beach on July 12, 2018 in Long Beach, California. FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images Still, the lessons from Ukraine's recent drone strike on Russian airfields linger heavily in the minds of U.S. analysts and war planners grappling with the warp-speed progress of battlefield technological advancements like drone warfare. The operation on Sunday exposed how even hardened military targets can be neutralized by low-cost drones—deep inside a nuclear-armed adversary's territory where an enemy's conventional air power would be difficult to penetrate. For some of these experts, it raised uncomfortable parallels to U.S. vulnerabilities. Shugart said the U.S. shouldn't assume distance offers safety. "We've hardened some overseas air bases," he said. "But we still park billion-dollar aircraft in the open on our own soil. That's a risk." According to a March report from the Atlantic Council, China has developed and demonstrated containerized missile and drone platforms that can be covertly transported aboard commercial vessels. The report warned these systems could enable Beijing to establish "a covert way to establish anti-access/area denial nodes near major maritime choke points." A Regulatory Blindspot Ukraine's Operation Spiderweb demonstrated how swarms of inexpensive, off-the-shelf drones—slightly modified to carry explosives and smuggled in wooden containers to be deployed remotely—can inflict billions of dollars in damage on strategic military assets, including long-range bombers. The contrast has fueled criticism of more traditional defense approaches, such as President Donald Trump's proposed "Golden Dome" missile shield, which analysts say may be poorly matched to emerging low-cost threats. What if I told you that as I type this there was a vessel, associated with the Chinese PLA, that *could* be equipped with many dozens of anti-ship cruise missiles—and was parked less than 4 miles from the bulk of the U.S. Atlantic Fleet. Well guess what: it's happening—for real. — Tom Shugart (@tshugart3) August 22, 2024 The regulatory environment surrounding drones is also a major factor in the growing risk, experts say. "We don't have a drone transportation and logistics system," military theorist John Robb wrote on X. "The FAA strangled it in the crib a decade ago. If the FCC had regulated the internet the way we've handled drones, we'd still be using AOL." Robb advocates for a national drone framework with built-in security measures: "Monitoring, kill switches, no-fly zones, hardware and software rules, maintenance requirements, and corporate certification." In Congress, lawmakers continue to press the Coast Guard to ensure more stringent vetting of foreign vessels, crew members and cargo. "The vetting process must be consistent and comprehensive across all U.S. ports," the Homeland Security Committee wrote in its January request. The committee also raised concerns about Chinese political officers allegedly embedded aboard COSCO vessels, which it argued underscores direct Chinese Communist Party influence over ostensibly commercial operations. For analysts like Clark, the technology is only part of the equation. The more pressing concern is readiness. "If China believes it can use relatively small drones to cause major damage, and we've done nothing to detect or deter it, that's a vulnerability we can't afford to ignore," he said.
Business of Fashion
14 minutes ago
- Business of Fashion
Fashion's New PR Playbook for India
Please log in to ensure you can read our agenda-setting intelligence, analysis and advice. Or get in touch at support@ if you experience difficulties. Last month, L52 Communications entered India with a six-member office in Mumbai, expansion plans for New Delhi and dedicated 'India teams' at the company's New York and London headquarters. The timing of the move was down to the dynamism and global relevance of the Indian fashion scene, says Adam Shapiro, founder of the PR firm that represents Fendi, Jacquemus and Loro Piana among others.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - End US tax breaks that enrich Chinese companies
Republicans and Democrats have rung alarm bells for years about Beijing's efforts to infiltrate America's industrial base, warning not just about the threats of espionage and sabotage that follow their investment, but also of the human rights abuses linked to Chinese companies. Just last month, Reuters reported that rogue cellular radios and communications devices were found in Chinese batteries, electric vehicle chargers and solar panels that are already in the U.S. Despite those warnings, China, with help from the Biden administration, Democratic governors and members of Congress, has established footholds in America's emerging electric vehicle battery sector. Gotion, a company with deep ties to the Chinese Communist Party, has begun building plants in Michigan and Illinois despite strong local pushback. Last year, President Trump wrote on Truth Social that the Gotion plants 'would put Michiganders under the thumb of the Chinese Communist Party in Beijing.' CATL — a company designated by the Pentagon as a 'Chinese military company' — is working with Ford in Michigan, and also has footprints in several other states. Secretary of State and acting National Security Advisor Marco Rubio previously sought to block CATL's Michigan plant, writing that the facility will 'only deepen U.S. reliance on the Chinese Communist Party for battery tech.' He also highlighted the company's 'ties to forced labor and to Xinjiang' and urged the Department of Homeland Security to add CATL to the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act Entity List which would blacklist its products in the United States. President Trump and Secretary Rubio are right, but even with Republicans in control of Washington, these malicious actors continue to operate in the U.S. Troublingly, the reconciliation legislation, deemed The One, Big, and Beautiful Bill, which recently passed in the House, fails to fix loopholes created by the Biden administration's Inflation Reduction Act. This legislation, which the Senate is now considering, leaves the window open for Chinese companies to benefit from U.S. tax credits, specifically the 45x Advanced Manufacturing Production Credit, an uncapped incentive program for certain manufacturing projects. Unless the Senate fixes this legislation, American taxpayers will be on the hook for funding our foremost adversary. For although Chinese companies cannot receive tax credits on their own, they can easily bypass this restriction by establishing joint ventures or taking advantage of projects that license Chinese technology to receive tax credits for at least two more years. Right now, the highest-profile project that would benefit from these credits is Ford's BlueOval Battery Park Michigan, which relies on CATL's battery technology. Under this arrangement, Ford will pay CATL to license its technology and operational services for the plant. Under the House bill, U.S. companies that receive 'material assistance' from prohibited foreign entities like CATL will remain eligible to receive 45X tax credits for at least two years. That is two years of uncapped tax credits for this plant. Any federal financial benefits Ford receives from this tax credit will indirectly flow to CATL. Ford has yet to disclose the details of this arrangement, despite threats of congressional subpoena, so the American people still have no idea of how much of their dollars will flow to Beijing. Ford has committed itself to this project, despite the clear economic and national security threats. The U.S. House, unfortunately, greenlit this arrangement. The Department of Defense, meanwhile, had already outlawed battery procurement from CATL, Gotion and four other Chinese companies. It is now up to the Senate to protect America from China's malicious efforts to dominate America's critical technologies. The Senate should align its legislation with existing policy. As a first step, the Senate must ensure that any and all U.S. manufacturing projects that rely on China-affiliated companies are wholly ineligible, directly or indirectly, for U.S. tax credits. Moving further, they should stop Chinese companies from further infiltrating America's industrial base and block U.S. companies from working domestically with any company listed by the Department of Defense as a Chinese military company or that is considered a foreign entity of concern. In his first term, President Trump elevated the threat that China poses to the United States. In his second term, he must use all tools of American power to confront it head-on. An integral part of that effort will require the Senate to ensure that the landmark legislation of his first term — the One, Big, Beautiful Bill Act — delivers zero benefit to Beijing. Gabriel Noronha is the president of POLARIS National Security. He previously served as the special advisor for Iran at the Department of State in the first Trump administration and as the special assistant for the Senate Armed Services Committee under the late Chairmen John McCain (R-Ariz.) and James Inhofe (R-Okla.). Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
