logo
Developer tees up appeal, fights ruling that preserves Florida golf course until 2030

Developer tees up appeal, fights ruling that preserves Florida golf course until 2030

USA Today13-06-2025
Developer tees up appeal, fights ruling that preserves Florida golf course until 2030
A legal battle involving the former Riviera Golf Course has taken another turn.
In February, a circuit court judge ruled the property in East Naples must remain a golf course until 2030.
The ruling handed a partial victory to the Riviera Golf Estates Homeowners Association, which sued the property's owners for declaratory and injunctive relief in 2022, in hopes of blocking their attempts to build homes on the land.
The victory, however, could be short-lived, with an appeal filed.
La Minnesota, the owner of the golf course property, is challenging the lower court's decision in Florida's Sixth District Court of Appeal.
In an initial brief filed June 6, the property owners argue the judgment "must be reversed because itfundamentally rewrote Florida's Marketable Record Title Act," known for short as MRTA, by allowing an affidavit "to preserve ancient deed restrictions."
In its civil suit, the homeowners association claimed the recording of the affidavit, prior to a deed conveyance in 1990, constituted an exception to MRTA, preserving a restrictive covenant placed on the land in 1973.
In her ruling, Collier Circuit Judge Lauren Brodie agreed, finding the restrictive covenant continues to run with the land, based on a chain of deeds.
MRTA allows most recorded documents to be ignored after 30 years, to simplify the purchase and sale of property. Generally, it doesn't automatically extinguish a mortgage.
The protective covenant for the golf course property was included as an exhibit to the affidavit, or sworn statement, that's central to the appeal. The covenant required the land to be used solely as a golf course, and for "no other purpose."
In its appeal, La Minnesota contends the affidavit was only recorded to confirm the authority needed to transfer ownership of the golf course, and to provide a legal description of the property, not to affirm the restrictive covenant, nor to convey title.
The affidavit at issue was signed by Myron Gifford, whose family once owned and operated the Riviera Golf Club, and its golf course.
La Minnesota argues nothing in the document "mentions, references, or seeks to preserve" the protective covenant.
Judge Brodie determined the covenant remains valid and enforceable – until August 18, 2030, based on the affidavit.
Her expiration date for the covenant is based on what she determined to be the "root of title," or root deed for the property, established in 2000. A title transfer that year did not reference the official record books and page numbers for the 1973 or 1990 deeds, or the affidavit.
Brodie's ruling on Feb. 6 followed a one-day bench trial in December.
More about the developer's appeal
In its appeal, La Minnesota contends Judge Brodie's ruling is flawed because it redefines and misinterprets state statute, and essentially "defeats MRTA's purpose" to 'extinguish claims" that are at least 30 years old.
"Allowing any affidavit to circumvent MRTA's requirements would swallow the rule and perpetuate the very 'stale claims' that MRTA was designed to eliminate," the appeal states.
La Minnesota asserts the lower court used the wrong root of title, and the wrong document, to uphold an exception to MRTA. It points to a corrected deed recorded in August 1990 that did not include the affidavit, claiming that it should be considered as the last transaction "affecting title to the property recorded more than 30 years ago."
If that deed became the starting point, the covenant would have been extinguished in 2020, "as a matter of law," the appeal states, allowing development to move forward.
La Minnesota characterizes the legal fight with homeowners as "more than a dispute between private parties," but one that "threatens MRTA's effectiveness throughout Florida."
If the lower court's ruling is allowed to stand, La Minnesota argues the consequences will be significant.
"If this court affirms the lower court's errors, no property owner in Florida can rely on MRTA's 30-year limitation period. Title examiners will be forced to search every document ever recorded, no matter how tangentially related to a deed. The statutory scheme the Legislature carefully crafted to bring certainty to real estate transactions will collapse," the appeal states.
An attorney for La Minnesota could not immediately be reached for comment on the appeal.
Homeowners prepared to fight appeal
In an email, Peter Osinski, a board director for Riviera Golf Estates, and a chairman of its Golf Course Working Group, said the homeowners association sees the initial brief by La Minnesota in its appeal as "a repackaging of the unsuccessful arguments they presented in the trial."
He shared: "Our attorneys are well into working on the rebuttal, which will be filed in early July."
La Minnesota, based in Lilydale, Minnesota, purchased the public golf course for $4.8 million in 2005, with redevelopment in mind.
Located off Rattlesnake Hammock Road, just west of County Barn Road, the course has been closed since April 2022.
Riviera Golf Estates, a 55-plus gated community, built between 1967 and 2003, has nearly 700 homes. It's intertwined with the 18-hole golf course.
Residents are worried about the impact of the new development on their property values and their way of life.
They're concerned about the potential for more flooding, noise and traffic in what's described as a peaceful and friendly neighborhood, offering a relaxed lifestyle, to seniors, including retirees.
A petition to stop development of the golf course on change.org, started more than five years ago, garnered more than 1,500 signatures by county residents.
Multiple attempts by homeowners in Riviera Golf Estates to purchase the property have failed, including one that involved the county.
Lawsuit against the county still on hold
In November 2021, La Minnesota filed an intent to convert application with Collier County's Planning & Zoning Department, initiating the process needed to change the golf course zoning to residential. It faced an uphill battle, triggering a lawsuit against the county, brought under Florida's Bert Harris property rights act.
In that suit, La Minnesota claimed they'd been "inordinately burdened" by the county's new rules for rezoning a golf course.
They alleged golf course conversion rules adopted in 2017 had burdened "the reasonably foreseeable residential use of the property with new cumbersome processes and new development standards."
La Minnesota asserted the county's requirement for a larger greenway, instead of a traditional buffer to shield its development from the surrounding community would slice the number of single-family homes it could build on its property from 346 to 104.
The developers valued their property losses – equating to 242 homes – at $14.52 million.
The county asked for a "stay," or pause, in that legal spat, until the lawsuit filed by the Riviera Golf Estates Homeowners Association in the same court played out. La Minnesota agreed to the county's request.
If the court sided with the association, the county's attorneys reasoned the Bert Harris claims would then become "moot," as La Minnesota wouldn't be able to build homes on the site anyway, or at least not right away.
Court records show that case as inactive, not disposed, with a status conference scheduled for December.
It's Collier County's policy not to comment on pending litigation.
If La Minnesota's Bert Harris lawsuit is revived, the Riviera homeowners association intends to intervene, in support of the county, and its golf course conversion rules, Osinski said.
The association, he said, has unearthed information that could cast doubt on the viability of that case.
"It is our intention to keep fighting and advocating, and we're not giving up," Osinski said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Half of Americans don't have any life insurance. Here's why that's a mistake
Half of Americans don't have any life insurance. Here's why that's a mistake

CNBC

time01-07-2025

  • CNBC

Half of Americans don't have any life insurance. Here's why that's a mistake

Nearly half of Americans don't have a life insurance policy, according to a new study, with wide disparities based on age, gender, income and race. A report from Western & Southern Financial Group found that just 51% of U.S. adults had any kind of life insurance. Term, whole, universal, indexed/fixed indexed universal, key person No Along with term policies, Western and Southern offers a dividend-paying whole life plan, a survivorship indexed universal life policy and a key person policy that can protect small businesses. Of those who are covered, about a quarter (26%) only have a group life policy from their employer. While inexpensive and easy to get, group policies have low coverage limits, little room for customization and expire when you leave your job. Perhaps not surprisingly, the odds of coverage increase with age: Just 36% of Gen Z had life insurance, according to the report, the lowest of any generation. That's compared to 50% of Millennials, 55% of Gen X and 57% of Baby Boomers. "That number for Gen Z should be a wake-up call," Troy Brodie, senior vice president with Western & Southern Life, told CNBC Select. "Too many Americans still view life insurance as something you don't need until later in life. But that frame of mind leaves millions vulnerable financially." Offers in this section are from affiliate partners and selected based on a combination of engagement, product relevance, compensation, and consistent offers a level term life insurance and whole life insurance policies payable for 20 years or until ages 65 or 100. Both include a terminal illness rider at no extra charge. Terms ApplyPacific Life offers term, permanent and no-exam life insurance, with an accelerated death benefit included at no charge. Terms Apply One of the key functions of life insurance is to protect your loved ones if they count on your income for major expenses, like a mortgage or a child's college education. Despite this, many Americans don't think about life insurance until they're older — when the house is paid off, kids are grown and the need for coverage may actually be less critical. The cost of a life insurance policy increases as you get older, too, so waiting to enroll can add thousands of dollars to your premiums. "There is a widening gap between how younger Americans think about financial protection and how it actually works to solve long-term risk," Brodie said. "Life insurance is not just about planning for the end of life — it's about building financial security through all phases of life." The likelihood of having a policy rises with income, researchers found: Only 31% of Americans earning less than $50,000 a year have coverage, compared to 55% of those earning between $50,000 and $150,000. Of Americans making $150,000 or more, nearly three-quarters (71%) have some kind of life insurance. "Lower income earners are more financially vulnerable," said Steve Wood, consumer markets research director for LIMRA, the insurance industry trade association. "Nearly half of households with incomes $50,000 or lower say they would experience financial hardship within a month of losing a primary earner." The gender gap was fairly pronounced, with men 24% more likely to be covered than women. The study also pointed to a racial divide: African-Americans had the highest rates of coverage, 58%, compared to just 52% of whites and 42% of Hispanics. "Covid-19 saw an even greater awareness for the need for life insurance in the Black community, likely due to the racial disparities in health outcomes," said Wood. "Final expense policies were an affordable way to ensure a loved one was buried how the family wanted."But life insurance can provide much more, he added. "The challenge is communicating to all Americans how affordable a more comprehensive life insurance policy can be." While younger Americans may put off life insurance, there are many reasons to get a policy now. If you were to die while your family was still dependent on your income, a life insurance policy can ensure they maintain their standard of living. That includes money for daily expenses, mortgage payments, education and other major expenditures. Permanent life insurance policies, like whole or universal life, build cash value over time that grows tax-deferred. You can tap into that value while you're still alive to pay premiums, borrow against or make cash withdrawals. Some policies earn dividends, a portion of the insurer's profits that is returned to shareholders. Dividends are not guaranteed, but they can increase the value of your policy, reduce premiums or provide cash payments. Northwestern Mutual, one of our top picks for whole life insurance, announced a $8.2 billion dividend dispersal for 2025. That's the industry's largest ever and a result of the company's strong performance and astute financial management. The best way to estimate your costs is to request a quote No Yes Northwestern Mutual offers five term, whole life and universal life policies. Dividends, while not guaranteed, have been paid to eligible policyholders annually since our review of Northwest Mutual Life Insurance. Life insurance can be an effective way to pass on wealth, either to your family or community. Unlike other assets, the death benefit is typically untaxed and goes directly to your beneficiary without getting tied up in the probate process or used to settle the policyholder's outstanding debts first. The average cost of a funeral ranges from $6,280 to $8,300, according to 2023 data from the National Funeral Directors Association. If you add viewings, upkeep and other options, it can easily rise about $10,000. Burial insurance, also known as final expense insurance, is a whole life policy that covers burial, funeral and cremation, as well as outstanding medical and legal bills, estate fees and other end-of-life expenditures. Applicants are typically guaranteed approval and payouts usually range from $10,000 to $30,000 The best way to estimate your costs is to request a quote Yes Transamerica offers term life insurance, as well as whole, indexed universal and final expense policies. Term products offer coverage for those ages 18 to 80 for up to $10 million, with the option to skip the medical exam for policies under $2 million. The Transamerica FE Express Solution, however, pays out up to $50,000 with no medical exam required. Approval can take as little as 10 minutes and the plan's concierge service comes with free estate planning and assistance in filing legal documents and finding a funeral home. According to the study from Western & Southern, men are 24% more likely than women to have life insurance. While there are many permutations, there are five basic types of life insurance: Term life is fairly cheap but expires according to a preset timeline, while group policies are usually bought for employees or other larger groups and have limited benefits. Whole life remains active as long as you keep paying premiums and may earn a cash value, as can a universal life policy, which is tied to the market. Lastly, a final expenses policy may be automatically approved with a death benefit big enough to pay for a funeral and other end-of-life costs. Life insurance costs vary based on your age, gender, health status, and the type of coverage you're considering. A 20-year term life insurance policy for a healthy 30-year-old male with a $250,000 death benefit could cost less than $200 per year. Money matters — so make the most of it. Get expert tips, strategies, news and everything else you need to maximize your money, right to your inbox. Sign up here. At CNBC Select, our mission is to provide our readers with high-quality service journalism and comprehensive consumer advice so they can make informed decisions with their money. Every mortgage review is based on rigorous reporting by our team of expert writers and editors with extensive knowledge of financial products. While CNBC Select earns a commission from affiliate partners on many offers and links, we create all our content without input from our commercial team or any outside third parties and we pride ourselves on our journalistic standards and ethics.

Developer tees up appeal, fights ruling that preserves Florida golf course until 2030
Developer tees up appeal, fights ruling that preserves Florida golf course until 2030

USA Today

time13-06-2025

  • USA Today

Developer tees up appeal, fights ruling that preserves Florida golf course until 2030

Developer tees up appeal, fights ruling that preserves Florida golf course until 2030 A legal battle involving the former Riviera Golf Course has taken another turn. In February, a circuit court judge ruled the property in East Naples must remain a golf course until 2030. The ruling handed a partial victory to the Riviera Golf Estates Homeowners Association, which sued the property's owners for declaratory and injunctive relief in 2022, in hopes of blocking their attempts to build homes on the land. The victory, however, could be short-lived, with an appeal filed. La Minnesota, the owner of the golf course property, is challenging the lower court's decision in Florida's Sixth District Court of Appeal. In an initial brief filed June 6, the property owners argue the judgment "must be reversed because itfundamentally rewrote Florida's Marketable Record Title Act," known for short as MRTA, by allowing an affidavit "to preserve ancient deed restrictions." In its civil suit, the homeowners association claimed the recording of the affidavit, prior to a deed conveyance in 1990, constituted an exception to MRTA, preserving a restrictive covenant placed on the land in 1973. In her ruling, Collier Circuit Judge Lauren Brodie agreed, finding the restrictive covenant continues to run with the land, based on a chain of deeds. MRTA allows most recorded documents to be ignored after 30 years, to simplify the purchase and sale of property. Generally, it doesn't automatically extinguish a mortgage. The protective covenant for the golf course property was included as an exhibit to the affidavit, or sworn statement, that's central to the appeal. The covenant required the land to be used solely as a golf course, and for "no other purpose." In its appeal, La Minnesota contends the affidavit was only recorded to confirm the authority needed to transfer ownership of the golf course, and to provide a legal description of the property, not to affirm the restrictive covenant, nor to convey title. The affidavit at issue was signed by Myron Gifford, whose family once owned and operated the Riviera Golf Club, and its golf course. La Minnesota argues nothing in the document "mentions, references, or seeks to preserve" the protective covenant. Judge Brodie determined the covenant remains valid and enforceable – until August 18, 2030, based on the affidavit. Her expiration date for the covenant is based on what she determined to be the "root of title," or root deed for the property, established in 2000. A title transfer that year did not reference the official record books and page numbers for the 1973 or 1990 deeds, or the affidavit. Brodie's ruling on Feb. 6 followed a one-day bench trial in December. More about the developer's appeal In its appeal, La Minnesota contends Judge Brodie's ruling is flawed because it redefines and misinterprets state statute, and essentially "defeats MRTA's purpose" to 'extinguish claims" that are at least 30 years old. "Allowing any affidavit to circumvent MRTA's requirements would swallow the rule and perpetuate the very 'stale claims' that MRTA was designed to eliminate," the appeal states. La Minnesota asserts the lower court used the wrong root of title, and the wrong document, to uphold an exception to MRTA. It points to a corrected deed recorded in August 1990 that did not include the affidavit, claiming that it should be considered as the last transaction "affecting title to the property recorded more than 30 years ago." If that deed became the starting point, the covenant would have been extinguished in 2020, "as a matter of law," the appeal states, allowing development to move forward. La Minnesota characterizes the legal fight with homeowners as "more than a dispute between private parties," but one that "threatens MRTA's effectiveness throughout Florida." If the lower court's ruling is allowed to stand, La Minnesota argues the consequences will be significant. "If this court affirms the lower court's errors, no property owner in Florida can rely on MRTA's 30-year limitation period. Title examiners will be forced to search every document ever recorded, no matter how tangentially related to a deed. The statutory scheme the Legislature carefully crafted to bring certainty to real estate transactions will collapse," the appeal states. An attorney for La Minnesota could not immediately be reached for comment on the appeal. Homeowners prepared to fight appeal In an email, Peter Osinski, a board director for Riviera Golf Estates, and a chairman of its Golf Course Working Group, said the homeowners association sees the initial brief by La Minnesota in its appeal as "a repackaging of the unsuccessful arguments they presented in the trial." He shared: "Our attorneys are well into working on the rebuttal, which will be filed in early July." La Minnesota, based in Lilydale, Minnesota, purchased the public golf course for $4.8 million in 2005, with redevelopment in mind. Located off Rattlesnake Hammock Road, just west of County Barn Road, the course has been closed since April 2022. Riviera Golf Estates, a 55-plus gated community, built between 1967 and 2003, has nearly 700 homes. It's intertwined with the 18-hole golf course. Residents are worried about the impact of the new development on their property values and their way of life. They're concerned about the potential for more flooding, noise and traffic in what's described as a peaceful and friendly neighborhood, offering a relaxed lifestyle, to seniors, including retirees. A petition to stop development of the golf course on started more than five years ago, garnered more than 1,500 signatures by county residents. Multiple attempts by homeowners in Riviera Golf Estates to purchase the property have failed, including one that involved the county. Lawsuit against the county still on hold In November 2021, La Minnesota filed an intent to convert application with Collier County's Planning & Zoning Department, initiating the process needed to change the golf course zoning to residential. It faced an uphill battle, triggering a lawsuit against the county, brought under Florida's Bert Harris property rights act. In that suit, La Minnesota claimed they'd been "inordinately burdened" by the county's new rules for rezoning a golf course. They alleged golf course conversion rules adopted in 2017 had burdened "the reasonably foreseeable residential use of the property with new cumbersome processes and new development standards." La Minnesota asserted the county's requirement for a larger greenway, instead of a traditional buffer to shield its development from the surrounding community would slice the number of single-family homes it could build on its property from 346 to 104. The developers valued their property losses – equating to 242 homes – at $14.52 million. The county asked for a "stay," or pause, in that legal spat, until the lawsuit filed by the Riviera Golf Estates Homeowners Association in the same court played out. La Minnesota agreed to the county's request. If the court sided with the association, the county's attorneys reasoned the Bert Harris claims would then become "moot," as La Minnesota wouldn't be able to build homes on the site anyway, or at least not right away. Court records show that case as inactive, not disposed, with a status conference scheduled for December. It's Collier County's policy not to comment on pending litigation. If La Minnesota's Bert Harris lawsuit is revived, the Riviera homeowners association intends to intervene, in support of the county, and its golf course conversion rules, Osinski said. The association, he said, has unearthed information that could cast doubt on the viability of that case. "It is our intention to keep fighting and advocating, and we're not giving up," Osinski said.

New West Public Affairs Welcomes Dr. Ian Brodie as Senior Advisor
New West Public Affairs Welcomes Dr. Ian Brodie as Senior Advisor

Hamilton Spectator

time14-05-2025

  • Hamilton Spectator

New West Public Affairs Welcomes Dr. Ian Brodie as Senior Advisor

CALGARY, Alberta, May 14, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — New West Public Affairs announced today that Dr. Ian Brodie has joined the firm as a Senior Advisor, further strengthening New West as a leader in public affairs, government relations, and strategic advisory services. Brodie brings to New West a remarkable depth of experience at the highest levels of politics, academia, and public policy. A former Chief of Staff to Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Brodie has advised on some of the most significant policy, political, and governance decisions of the past two decades. He also spent four years working with the InterAmerican Development Bank based in Washington, DC. His understanding of Canadian political institutions, legislative strategy, and strategic communications will be a tremendous asset to New West clients. 'Ian's strategic insight, academic pedigree, and public service experience are unique,' said Monte Solberg, CEO of New West Public Affairs. 'He combines experience as a researcher and academic expert with decades of expertise as a political adviser at the highest levels in Canada.' Currently a professor of political science at the University of Calgary, a fellow at the Centre for Military, Security and Strategic Studies, and program Director at the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, Brodie's work focuses on public administration, political leadership, and institutional reform. His bestselling 2019 book At the Centre of Government offers one of the most compelling insider accounts of Canadian federal politics in recent years. 'New West is a firm I've long respected and I'm excited to contribute to the team and support their clients,' said Brodie. 'At a time when Canada needs to find real pathways to nation-build, Ian brings the kind of national perspective and strategic clarity our clients need,' added Solberg. About Dr. Ian Brodie Ian Brodie is Professor in the Department of Political Science and a Fellow at the Centre for Military, Security and Strategic Studies. He is also Program Director at the Canadian Global Affairs Institute, a Fellow of the Halifax International Security Forum, and Chair of the Research Committee at the Institute for Research on Public Policy. His newsletter, The Thursday Question , is closely read by political insiders in Ottawa and he appears regularly on The CGAI Podcast Network , and 'The Chiefs' through The Herle Burly Podcast . A double alumnus, Brodie finished his PhD in the Department of Political Science under the supervision of Dr. F.L. Morton. Brodie then taught for six years at the University of Western Ontario before heading to Ottawa. In 2009, Brodie was Visiting Fellow at the McGill Institute for the Study of Canada. About New West Public Affairs New West Public Affairs is one of Canada's leading public affairs firms with deep experience in government relations, strategic communications, and public policy. With a team of seasoned political experts across the country, New West helps clients navigate complex political environments and achieve their goals with clarity, confidence, and impact. To learn more about how New West Public Affairs is expanding its capabilities to better serve clients across Canada, visit here . A photo accompanying this announcement is available at

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store