
Half of Americans don't have any life insurance. Here's why that's a mistake
A report from Western & Southern Financial Group found that just 51% of U.S. adults had any kind of life insurance.
Term, whole, universal, indexed/fixed indexed universal, key person
No
Along with term policies, Western and Southern offers a dividend-paying whole life plan, a survivorship indexed universal life policy and a key person policy that can protect small businesses.
Of those who are covered, about a quarter (26%) only have a group life policy from their employer. While inexpensive and easy to get, group policies have low coverage limits, little room for customization and expire when you leave your job.
Perhaps not surprisingly, the odds of coverage increase with age: Just 36% of Gen Z had life insurance, according to the report, the lowest of any generation. That's compared to 50% of Millennials, 55% of Gen X and 57% of Baby Boomers.
"That number for Gen Z should be a wake-up call," Troy Brodie, senior vice president with Western & Southern Life, told CNBC Select. "Too many Americans still view life insurance as something you don't need until later in life. But that frame of mind leaves millions vulnerable financially."
Offers in this section are from affiliate partners and selected based on a combination of engagement, product relevance, compensation, and consistent availability.Amica offers a level term life insurance and whole life insurance policies payable for 20 years or until ages 65 or 100. Both include a terminal illness rider at no extra charge.
Terms ApplyPacific Life offers term, permanent and no-exam life insurance, with an accelerated death benefit included at no charge.
Terms Apply
One of the key functions of life insurance is to protect your loved ones if they count on your income for major expenses, like a mortgage or a child's college education.
Despite this, many Americans don't think about life insurance until they're older — when the house is paid off, kids are grown and the need for coverage may actually be less critical.
The cost of a life insurance policy increases as you get older, too, so waiting to enroll can add thousands of dollars to your premiums.
"There is a widening gap between how younger Americans think about financial protection and how it actually works to solve long-term risk," Brodie said. "Life insurance is not just about planning for the end of life — it's about building financial security through all phases of life."
The likelihood of having a policy rises with income, researchers found: Only 31% of Americans earning less than $50,000 a year have coverage, compared to 55% of those earning between $50,000 and $150,000.
Of Americans making $150,000 or more, nearly three-quarters (71%) have some kind of life insurance.
"Lower income earners are more financially vulnerable," said Steve Wood, consumer markets research director for LIMRA, the insurance industry trade association. "Nearly half of households with incomes $50,000 or lower say they would experience financial hardship within a month of losing a primary earner."
The gender gap was fairly pronounced, with men 24% more likely to be covered than women.
The study also pointed to a racial divide: African-Americans had the highest rates of coverage, 58%, compared to just 52% of whites and 42% of Hispanics.
"Covid-19 saw an even greater awareness for the need for life insurance in the Black community, likely due to the racial disparities in health outcomes," said Wood. "Final expense policies were an affordable way to ensure a loved one was buried how the family wanted."But life insurance can provide much more, he added.
"The challenge is communicating to all Americans how affordable a more comprehensive life insurance policy can be."
While younger Americans may put off life insurance, there are many reasons to get a policy now.
If you were to die while your family was still dependent on your income, a life insurance policy can ensure they maintain their standard of living. That includes money for daily expenses, mortgage payments, education and other major expenditures.
Permanent life insurance policies, like whole or universal life, build cash value over time that grows tax-deferred. You can tap into that value while you're still alive to pay premiums, borrow against or make cash withdrawals.
Some policies earn dividends, a portion of the insurer's profits that is returned to shareholders. Dividends are not guaranteed, but they can increase the value of your policy, reduce premiums or provide cash payments.
Northwestern Mutual, one of our top picks for whole life insurance, announced a $8.2 billion dividend dispersal for 2025. That's the industry's largest ever and a result of the company's strong performance and astute financial management.
The best way to estimate your costs is to request a quote
No
Yes
Northwestern Mutual offers five term, whole life and universal life policies. Dividends, while not guaranteed, have been paid to eligible policyholders annually since 1872.Read our review of Northwest Mutual Life Insurance.
Life insurance can be an effective way to pass on wealth, either to your family or community. Unlike other assets, the death benefit is typically untaxed and goes directly to your beneficiary without getting tied up in the probate process or used to settle the policyholder's outstanding debts first.
The average cost of a funeral ranges from $6,280 to $8,300, according to 2023 data from the National Funeral Directors Association. If you add viewings, upkeep and other options, it can easily rise about $10,000.
Burial insurance, also known as final expense insurance, is a whole life policy that covers burial, funeral and cremation, as well as outstanding medical and legal bills, estate fees and other end-of-life expenditures.
Applicants are typically guaranteed approval and payouts usually range from $10,000 to $30,000
The best way to estimate your costs is to request a quote
Yes
Transamerica offers term life insurance, as well as whole, indexed universal and final expense policies. Term products offer coverage for those ages 18 to 80 for up to $10 million, with the option to skip the medical exam for policies under $2 million.
The Transamerica FE Express Solution, however, pays out up to $50,000 with no medical exam required. Approval can take as little as 10 minutes and the plan's concierge service comes with free estate planning and assistance in filing legal documents and finding a funeral home.
According to the study from Western & Southern, men are 24% more likely than women to have life insurance.
While there are many permutations, there are five basic types of life insurance: Term life is fairly cheap but expires according to a preset timeline, while group policies are usually bought for employees or other larger groups and have limited benefits. Whole life remains active as long as you keep paying premiums and may earn a cash value, as can a universal life policy, which is tied to the market.
Lastly, a final expenses policy may be automatically approved with a death benefit big enough to pay for a funeral and other end-of-life costs.
Life insurance costs vary based on your age, gender, health status, and the type of coverage you're considering. A 20-year term life insurance policy for a healthy 30-year-old male with a $250,000 death benefit could cost less than $200 per year.
Money matters — so make the most of it. Get expert tips, strategies, news and everything else you need to maximize your money, right to your inbox. Sign up here.
At CNBC Select, our mission is to provide our readers with high-quality service journalism and comprehensive consumer advice so they can make informed decisions with their money. Every mortgage review is based on rigorous reporting by our team of expert writers and editors with extensive knowledge of financial products. While CNBC Select earns a commission from affiliate partners on many offers and links, we create all our content without input from our commercial team or any outside third parties and we pride ourselves on our journalistic standards and ethics.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Los Angeles Times
12 minutes ago
- Los Angeles Times
Stakes rise in the Russia-Ukraine war as Trump's deadline for the Kremlin approaches
The coming week could bring an important moment in the war between Russia and Ukraine, as President Trump's deadline for the Kremlin to reach a peace deal approaches — or it could simply melt away. Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff was expected in Moscow in the middle of this week, just before Trump's Friday deadline for the Kremlin to stop the killing or face potentially severe economic penalties from Washington. Previous Trump promises, threats and cajoling have failed to yield results., and the stubborn diplomatic stalemate will be hard to clear away. Meanwhile, Ukraine is losing more territory on the front line, although there is no sign of a looming collapse of its defenses. Witkoff was expected to land in the Russian capital on Wednesday or Thursday, according to Trump, following his trip to Israel and Gaza. 'They would like to see (Witkoff),' Trump said Sunday of the Russians. 'They've asked that he meet so we'll see what happens.' Trump, exasperated that Russian President Vladimir Putin hasn't heeded his calls to stop bombing Ukrainian cities, a week ago moved up his ultimatum to impose additional sanctions on Russia as well as introduce secondary tariffs targeting countries that buy Russian oil, including China and India. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Monday that officials are happy to meet with Trump's envoy. 'We are always glad to see Mr. Witkoff in Moscow,' he said. 'We consider (talks with Witkoff) important, substantive and very useful.' Trump said Sunday that Russia has proved to be 'pretty good at avoiding sanctions.' 'They're wily characters,' he said of the Russians. The Kremlin has insisted that international sanctions imposed since its February 2022 invasion of its neighbor have had a limited impact. Ukraine insists the sanctions are taking their toll on Moscow's war machine and wants Western allies to ramp them up. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Monday urged the United States, Europe and other nations to impose stronger secondary sanctions on Moscow's energy, trade and banking sectors. Trump's comments appeared to signal he doesn't have much hope that sanctions will force Putin's hand. The secondary sanctions also complicate Washington's relations with China and India, who stand accused of helping finance Russia's war effort by buying its oil. Since taking office in January, Trump has found that stopping the war is harder than he perhaps imagined. Senior American officials have warned that the U.S. could walk away from the conflict if peace efforts make no progress. The diplomatic atmosphere has become more heated as Trump's deadline approaches. Putin announced last Friday that Russia's new hypersonic missile, the Oreshnik, has entered service. The Russian leader has hailed its capabilities, saying its multiple warheads that plunge to a target at speeds of up to Mach 10 cannot be intercepted. They are so powerful, he said, that the use of several of them in one conventional strike could be as devastating as a nuclear attack. Also, one of Putin's top lieutenants warned that the Ukraine war could nudge Russia and the U.S. into armed conflict. Trump responded to what he called the 'highly provocative statements' by former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev by ordering the repositioning of two U.S. nuclear submarines. Putin has repeated the same message throughout the war: He will only accept a settlement on his terms and will keep fighting until they're met. Russia's relentless pounding of urban areas behind the front line have killed more than 12,000 Ukrainian civilians, according to the United Nations. It has pushed on with that tactic despite Trump's public calls for it to stop over the past three months. On the 1,000-kilometer (620-mile) front line, Russia's bigger army has made slow and costly progress. It is carrying out a sustained operation to take the eastern city of Pokrovsk, a key logistical hub whose fall could open the way for a deeper drive into Ukraine. Ukraine has developed technology that has allowed it to launch long-range drone attacks deep inside Russia. In its latest strike it hit an oil depot near Russia's Black Sea resort of Sochi, starting a major fire.


Newsweek
13 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Doubles Down on Mathematically Impossible Drug Price Cuts
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump has doubled down on his claim of reducing drug prices by amounts that are mathematically impossible. Trump told reporters on Sunday that his administration had cut the price of some prescription drugs by as much as 1,500 percent. "Well, one of the things they're going to be talking about pretty soon are the tremendous drop in drug prices. You know, we've cut drug prices by 1,200, 1,300, 1,400, 1,500 percent. I don't mean 50 percent. I mean 14-, 1,500 percent," the president said. When asked to clarify the president's remarks, White House spokesperson Kush Desai told Newsweek, "It's an objective fact that Americans are paying exponentially more for the same exact drugs as people in other developed countries pay, and it's an objective fact that no other Administration has done more to rectify this unfair burden for the American people." Why It Matters Trump's remarks signal a misunderstanding of how pricing and percentages work, which could undermine public confidence in his ability to tackle problems such as drug pricing. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters near Air Force One at the Lehigh Valley International Airport in Allentown, Pennsylvania, on August 3. President Donald Trump speaks with reporters near Air Force One at the Lehigh Valley International Airport in Allentown, Pennsylvania, on August To Know Reducing the price of a drug by 100 percent would make it free, and a reduction greater than 100 percent suggests pharmaceutical companies would pay their customers to take their prescription drugs. Commenting on Trump's claims, Jeffrey Frankel, a professor of capital formation and growth at Harvard University, told Newsweek that the numbers were "indeed mathematically impossible." On Friday, the president made similar claims of bringing drug prices down by "1,000 percent, 1,200 percent" in an interview with Newsmax's Rob Finnerty. That came a day after the White House said Trump had written to the heads of 17 pharmaceutical companies outlining steps they needed to take to bring down the prices of drugs sold in the U.S. to match the lowest price paid by a group of other economically advanced countries. According to a fact sheet the White House released on Thursday, Trump's letters said the pharmaceutical manufacturers' proposals for implementing his May executive order—which seeks to achieve "most favored nation" pricing in the United States—had "fallen short." However, it did not mention the percentage reductions the president has discussed in recent days. What People Are Saying Jeffrey Frankel, a professor of capital formation and growth at Harvard University, told Newsweek: "They are indeed mathematically impossible. If he cut prices 90 percent, the drugs would cost 1/10 as much as before. If 100 percent, then they would cost zero. If cutting 1,000 percent means a thing, then it means that the drug company pays you (a lot) to take the drug." He added: "It's almost as if Trump is making fun of his supporters, seeing what increasingly absurd statements he can get away with." Justin Wolfers, a professor of economics and public policy at the University of Michigan, told Newsweek: "This is not a question for an economist, but rather a sixth grader. After all, the Common Core curriculum standard states that students should know how to 'find a percent of a quantity as a rate per 100 (e.g., 30 percent of a quantity means 30/100 times the quantity).'" Wolfers added: "I just checked with my sixth grader (Oliver Wolfers), and he confirmed that he has studied percentages and that the president's math does not make sense 'because then the prices would be negative.' He added, 'Is he an idiot?' before returning to watching YouTube. Oliver's father agrees with Oliver's mathematical analysis and encourages him to use more positive language when engaging with fellow kids." Pau Pujolas, a professor of economics at McMaster University, told Newsweek: "If your grocery bill is $100 and you get a 50 percent reduction in price, you pay $50. If you get a 75 percent reduction, you pay $25. If you get a 99 percent reduction, you pay $1. If you get a 100 percent reduction, you pay $0. You can't get a reduction larger than that ... so 1,200 percent doesn't make sense. "Talking about bad math: Firing Erika McEntarfer, the director of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), is way worse than a POTUS not knowing how to operate with basic percentages. Let's not miss the forest for the trees." President Donald Trump said at a Republican dinner in July: "This is something that nobody else can do. We're gonna get the drug prices down—not 30 or 40 percent, which would be great, not 50 or 60 percent. No, we're gonna get them down 1,000 percent, 600 percent, 500 percent, 1,500 percent. Numbers that are not even thought to be achievable." The White House fact sheet said: "From this point forward, President Trump will only accept from drug manufacturers a commitment that provides American families immediate relief from vastly inflated drug prices and an end to the freeriding by European and other developed nations on American innovations." Journalist James Surowiecki wrote on X in response to Trump's comments on Sunday: "It's not just that the math here is nonsensical. It's that Trump hasn't actually cut drug prices yet at all. He's literally just sent letters to drugmakers telling them to cut prices. Does he know that and is lying? Or is he deluded? We have no idea." What Happens Next Trump and the White House have not clarified what he means when he says drug prices will come down by as much as 1,500 percent. The president's letters to pharmaceutical companies give them a 60-day window to present a viable plan to reduce U.S. drug prices.
Yahoo
41 minutes ago
- Yahoo
41 States Where Retirees Are Expected To Run Out of Money in Retirement
A retirement crisis is quietly unfolding across America. According to a new analysis from Northwestern Mutual and Seniorly, retirees in 41 states plus Washington D.C. are projected to outlive their savings, facing an average shortfall of $115,000 during their golden years. Find Out: Read Next: The findings paint a sobering picture of retirement readiness in the United States, where rising costs of living, healthcare expenses, questionable policy choices and longer lifespans are colliding with inadequate savings to create financial stress for millions of older Americans. Only nine states provide seniors with enough financial cushion to fully cover their retirement costs. For everyone else, the math simply doesn't work. The $115,000 Retirement Gap Facing Most Americans The study examined the financial outlook for retirees by comparing projected retirement income (think: Social Security, savings and investments) against expected living expenses over typical retirement lifespans in each state. The results are eye-opening: Most American retirees will face significant financial shortfalls that could force difficult choices about housing, healthcare and quality of life in their later years. This retirement funding crisis comes as more than half of Generation X and 40% of baby boomers already expect to outlive their savings. The 'magic number' Americans think they need for retirement has now reached $1.26 million, yet even that amount may not provide security in many high-cost states. Be Aware: The States Where Retirement Dreams Become Financial Nightmares New York leads the nation in retirement financial stress, with seniors facing a devastating $448,000 gap between their needs and resources. Despite the state's higher incomes, retirees require approximately $1.12 million to cover 19.4 years of expected retirement expenses but can only expect to collect around $670,000 from all income sources. Hawaii ranks as the second-worst state for retirement security, with seniors facing a $417,000 shortfall. The state's astronomical living costs — requiring $1.74 million for a typical retirement — far exceed what most retirees can accumulate, even with Hawaii having the highest average retirement income in the nation at $1.32 million. Washington D.C. completes the top three worst, where retirees face a $407,000 gap between retirement needs and available resources. The nation's capital combines high living costs with extended life expectancy to create particularly challenging financial conditions for older residents. Other states where retirees face significant financial challenges include Alaska and California, both struggling with expensive housing markets and elevated healthcare costs that drain retirement savings faster than anticipated. Here's the full list in ranked order: New York Hawaii Washington, DC Alaska California Massachusetts Rhode Island Vermont Louisiana Connecticut Arkansas Mississippi Arizona New Hampshire Florida Alabama West Virginig Nevada Ohio Wisconsin South Dakota New Meixco Kentucky Texas Oregon Delaware Oklahoma Pennsylvania Missouri Idaho Tennessee Illinois Wyoming Virginia New Jersey North Dakota Georgia North Carolina Michigan Nebraksa Maine Indiana The 9 States Where Retirees Can Actually Retire Comfortably It's not all doom and gloom, though. In fact, there are nine states where financial security during your golden years is more feasible. Washington state tops the list for retirement financial security, providing seniors with an average $146,000 cushion above their expected needs. This success stems from combining high retirement incomes (approximately $1.13 million) with living costs that remain manageable compared to other high-earning states. Utah ranks second, offering retirees a $121,000 financial buffer through strong incomes around $994,000 paired with moderate living expenses of $873,000. This combination means Utah retirees can live comfortably without constant financial stress. Montana, Colorado and Iowa round out the top five states for retirement security, each providing smaller but meaningful financial surpluses ranging from $32,000 to $43,000. Once again, it's all about a moderate cost of living to make those retirement dollars stretch. Here's the full list in ranked order: Washington Utah Montana Colorado Iowa Minnesota Maryland Kansas South Carolina Why High-Income States Often Have the Worst Retirement Outcomes Some of the wealthiest states create the most challenging retirement conditions. It all comes down to, you guessed it, cost of living. Massachusetts, despite providing retirees with over $1 million in average retirement income, still has cost of living expenses exceeding $1.31 million. California presents similar challenges, with retirement costs around $1.26 million straining even well-funded retirement accounts. The lesson is: A million-dollar retirement fund can mean very different things based on location. The Longevity Factor: Living Longer Means Needing More Money Living longer actually makes retirement harder to afford. In Hawaii, people typically live 20.6 years after retiring at 65, which is wonderful but also means an almost five extra years of expenses compared to other states. Compare that to West Virginia and Mississippi, where people only live about 16.1 years in retirement on average. The shorter timespan means retirement money doesn't have to stretch as far, so the financial math works out better. Sadly, many of the people in those states aren't living shorter retirements by choice. They're dealing with serious health problems and economic issues that cut their lives short. This creates a strange situation where staying healthy and living longer (which is obviously good) actually makes retirement planning more expensive and complicated. The Hidden Retirement Costs Driving Financial Shortfalls Healthcare expenses represent a major factor driving retirement shortfalls across states. Medical costs have risen faster than inflation, creating unexpected drains on retirement savings even for well-prepared seniors. Housing costs also play an important role, particularly in states like California, New York and Hawaii where property values and rental costs consume disproportionate shares of retirement incomes. Transportation, food and other essential expenses have similarly outpaced the growth of typical retirement incomes, which of course puts pressure on budgets. Strategies for Overcoming Retirement Shortfalls If you're worried about running out of money in retirement, financial experts have some game plans that actually work: Time your Social Security right. When you claim Social Security matters way more than most people realize. Claiming later versus early can literally mean hundreds of thousands of extra dollars over your lifetime. Move somewhere cheaper. This might sound obvious but relocating from an expensive state to an affordable one can add years to how long your money lasts. Prepare for medical bills. Healthcare costs in retirement can be brutal and unpredictable. Setting up health savings accounts now, buying long-term care insurance and understanding Medicare supplements can prevent medical expenses from wiping out your savings later. Work a few extra years if you can. Every additional year you work does double duty. You're earning more money while not spending your retirement savings. It's like getting paid twice for the same time period. Be smart about taxes. Where you keep your retirement money and how you withdraw it can save or cost you thousands in taxes. Working with a financial expert can help to ensure you've got these basics covered. More From GOBankingRates 3 Reasons Retired Boomers Shouldn't Give Their Kids a Living Inheritance (And 2 Reasons They Should) This article originally appeared on 41 States Where Retirees Are Expected To Run Out of Money in Retirement